jimmysilverrims
Smash Ace
Well ,for your information the accurate term is he/she/it/potato.-_- Could someone explain to me why I get PO'd when people refer to Sheik as male?
Cause she isn't.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Well ,for your information the accurate term is he/she/it/potato.-_- Could someone explain to me why I get PO'd when people refer to Sheik as male?
Cause she isn't.
What the hell does that meanWell ,for your information the accurate term is he/she/it/potato.
Ugh, no one get's in-jokes anymore.
Yeah, Sheik is Zelda in disguise, it's just the fact that I want something fresh, a new face instead of the heavily masked one of Sheik. I mean, who would you rather see in Brawl? Sheik or Ridley? You, of course will say "Ridley, hands down". Now before you say: "But we can have both" just hear me out. It makes perfect sense. It's impossible for the game to have over 40 good, individual, well rounded characters, right? Well, we can't have Ridley, Sonic, Megaman, Olimar, Krystal, Midna, Wolf, Lucario, and Sheik with out them being crappy and I think I speak for everyone when I say that no one wants that. Now the next thing you might say is "But they still have Sheik's frame from Melee!" You may think that makes perfect sense, and to the untrained eye, yes, you'd be right. But in Brawl everything's diffrent. A new physics engine means moves interact diffrently then in Melee. A new graphics program means that the old graphics will be useless. New moves men that they'll interact difrently then in Melee, meaning that Sheik needs an overhaul, she'd take just as much work as any other new character.
'Nuff said.
P.S: Zelda may be in disguise, but it's hinted at that she magically changes her identity. her whole identity if you know what I mean.
me change in red.Ugh, no one get's in-jokes anymore.
Yeah, Sheik is Zelda in disguise, it's just the fact that I want something fresh, a new face instead of the heavily masked one of Sheik. I mean, who would you rather see in Brawl? Sheik or Ridley? You, of course will say "Ridley, hands down". Now before you say: "But we can have both" just hear me out. It makes perfect sense. It's impossible for the game to have over 40 good, individual, well rounded characters, right? (wrong, we can't have more than 50 good characters. thats from sakurai. besides, it seems that all original characters are returning. *points to ice climbers*) Well, we can't have Ridley, Sonic, Megaman, Olimar, Krystal, Midna, Wolf, Lucario, and Sheik with out them being crappy and I think I speak for everyone when I say that no one wants that. Now the next thing you might say is "But they still have Sheik's frame from Melee!" You may think that makes perfect sense, and to the untrained eye, yes, you'd be right. But in Brawl everything's diffrent. A new physics engine means moves interact diffrently then in Melee. A new graphics program means that the old graphics will be useless.wrong again, look at kirby. almost exactly the same. look at pikachu. very similar. New moves men that they'll interact difrently then in Melee, meaning that Sheik needs an overhaul, she'd take just as much work as any other new character.well, gigabowser had an overhall, are you counting him separate?
'Nuff said.
P.S: Zelda may be in disguise, but it's hinted at that she magically changes her identity. her whole identity if you know what I mean.
I would if my roomies xbox's lens wasn't a PoS. PM me for my gamertag if you'd like it. Once the system starts working/is replaced/at my buddies house sunday, I'm always up for a game. ^ ^Edit: By the way, Odin, I just realized that your profile says you're on leave for Halo 3. Do you play online?
Ah yes. Deh potato... >_>Well ,for your information the accurate term is he/she/it/potato.
The problem with his logic (and a lot of other's, for that matter) is that this assumes that the team behind Brawl will fail to balance the game if there are 50 characters verse a roster of 40. With a large development team like Brawl's along with the increased development time, I see no reason why this is unrealistic. The game has been in playable form for quite a while, and it's relatively common for game studios to begin testing and balancing early in the process.This guy's a genius!
seriously i agree with him. Having sheik in the game i think would be a waste. they should be focusing on the newer characters and making them better. like he said with the 40 well rounded characters, we want all of them to be good instead of having an over abundance of characters that suck. Im still going fo rjiggly puff and Ridley. but still we want the characters to be the masters of ownage and not the masters of being owned.
And of course, returning characters take significantly less time to upgrade for Brawl than it does to add a newcomer to Brawl.On top of that, consider that the Melee engine was given as a foundation for the game. That alone has to have saved a load of time.
I'm not so sure about that. Maybe on the designing end, but as far as programming is concerned, I would guess that any returning character would take almost as long as a newcomer to put in.And of course, returning characters take significantly less time to upgrade for Brawl than it does to add a newcomer to Brawl.
Yeah, like I said, when making a sequel on a new console most of the stuff has to be remade. Normally they'd import most stuff from the old game but Brawl has a new physics engine, meaning that they won't be able to do that and still have them inteact correctly with other characters.
To the Kirby/Pikachu analogy: Kirby is a pink blob and Pikachu is a yellow mouse, not much you can graphically update. Sheik on the othe hand has hair, clothes, and several bandages around the face. That's A LOT of updates that need to be made. It would be much easier to have a simpler character like Olimar.
Melee has given a base for the game and I'm sure that Melee's old engine may have been a base, but It's like trying to build a skyscraper out of parts for a house. You need A LOT more parts that may or may not fit perfectally with all of the old parts. I think that Melee may haver been the foundation for the game, but I doubt that it's a 50% old 50% new deal here.
Bottom line- Sheik isn't worth the effort. Sheik wasn't popular (at least for the right purposes) in Melee and putting him/her/it/potato in Brawl would degrade from the individuality that is Zelda. Sheik is the wilting flower on the Brawl Tree. You can go through all of the trouble of trying to get it to re-bloom, or you can prune it and let a better flower grow in it's place.
Hey, any alternative to having Sheik in Brawl is swell by me. (After years of playing against my Sheik maining buds, my hatred of the character is beyond healing...)You know, this may be really random and off topic (who hasn't been on this thread?), but I just had an interesting idea. Don't know if it's a good idea, but interesting nonetheless.
I have a proposed solution to the Sheik conundrum.
So, if I am not mistaken, most Sheik haters (good 'ol Wisey included) are opposed to Sheik's return for two reasons. One, Sheik's moveset is broken and needs fixing to be a fair fighter in Brawl. Two, Sheik is the OoT Zelda, not TP Zelda as has already been revealed for Brawl. Points both driven into our skulls so far. However, the Sheik fanatics argue that not only are no moveset changes necessary, but it doesn't matter which Zelda may turn into Sheik, Brawl is OOC with the Zelda timeline.
I think the best possible compromise for both sides of the argument would be to include OoT's Impa as a separate playable character. No, I'm not crazy, hear me out.
First of all, this would remove the nigh-used Zelda/Sheik transformation. Hardly anyone in Melee actually used both Zelda and Sheik, and it would open up Down B specials for both Zelda and Impa.
Storywise, she could accommodate Sheik's moveset just fine. After all, in OoT it's implied that Impa passed on her teachings to Zelda while Ganondorf was taking over Hyrule. And when it comes to the game mechanics, well, if she's exactly the same as Melee's Sheik, then she would please the Melee Sheik lovers (and must've been a very good teacher ). But if she uses a more balanced Sheik moveset, this would please those who loathe Sheik's brokenness and play on the fact that master and student will have slight differences in fighting style.
On top of that, Brawl's Zelda representation would be represented by arguably the best interpretation of a long-running Zelda character (hmm...decrepit nursemaid or shadowy desert ninja?). Plus, we know Impa's gender
So, am I crazy or does this actually intrigue anybody? Feedback welcome!
Check out my runnersup list. He's there, and I think I give a decent explanation for why he might not make the cut.lucario?
Fixed. Thanks raphtmarqui.BTW,Wiseguy, that animal crossing "interview" was confirmed 100% fake.
I totally would. Miis are a zillion times cooler than the cabbage patch dolls we play as in Animal Crossing. Unfortunately, I can't imagine why Sakurai would have revealed Miis as non-playable avitars last week if he had a Mii moveset in the works.You'd rather have an Avatar over an actual character?
Smashkid would actually be cool as well as unique. Mii would just be odd.
Mii's have nothing on the AC Human, and look 10x worse.Miis just have the zest that the AC character lacks. Actual customisation. And reletive newness. Miis are brand new and are the Wii personified. I really want Miis in, but sadly it's either Sakurai's mindgaming (once again) or he didn't touch upon Miis playability as a way to let it down gently. I hope for the former.
nuff' saidMii's have nothing on the AC Human, and look 10x worse.
Ahem? Did you not hear me when I said that Miis have actual customisability? That they are the personification for the Wii? That they've become a part of the Nintendo "Touch Generation" just as much as Nintendogs (Who are in Brawl) and Dr. K from Brain Age. What makes the AC's so better than Miis?Mii's have nothing on the AC Human, and look 10x worse.
True 'dat. Miis are symbolic, they are you, they are me. They are everybody and everyone. They are the world. And if you hate Miis you hate the world.AC human = Random face + discrimination... No black people in Animal crossing.
But seriously I would prefer Mii's over AC humans anyday.
Actually, smashkid as all you people are calling him for some reason has been in both animal crossing games and is correct me if I'm wrong in the ANIMAL CROSSING MOVIE.Smashkid was in one game. Wow
The only two of those you can really count are Wii sports and Wii play. The others are just pointless cameo appearencess.and Miis have been in, let's count! Wii Sports, Wii Play, Madden 08, WarioWare: Smooth Moves, and METROID PRIME 3. Wow, I guess you really got me beat there with your lame Smashedkid /sarcasm
Mii's are overrated crap. I like Mii's just as much as the next guy but they don't deserve to be playable. That is the biggest flaw in most peoples logic is that they always assume their favorite character HAS to be playable, they don't realize that the playable spots will only go to the most deserving characters and other popular choices for playable that don't deserve it will get the AT treatment.Bottom line: Miis rock more then AC people. Ask anyone (With more than 1/6th of a brain) and they'll tell you the same.