Sonicguy726
Smash Lord
No way they are already really different and both incredibly posterI saw Lucario yesterday and I thought to myself "well there goes Mewtwo". Hope I'm wrong about that too.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
No way they are already really different and both incredibly posterI saw Lucario yesterday and I thought to myself "well there goes Mewtwo". Hope I'm wrong about that too.
Rosalina's confirmation would say otherwise about this matter.I saw Lucario yesterday and I thought to myself "well there goes Mewtwo". Hope I'm wrong about that too.
It's really unfair to just give the spot to charizard the pokemon trainer represents the series better than any single pokemon does cause he's the guy you play as and I don't think Jiggs is gonna get cut, she's popular enough and would be a fairy type rep which makes it relevant again, so why replace it?Falco- I personally think an antagonist/rival is more important representation than the sidekick.
Jigglypuff- Smash has acted as a kind of life support for jigglypuff for a good while, time to pull the plug and aknowledge the other five generations of pokemon.
Ivysaur, and Squirtle- while charizard has the fame (and mega evolution) to go solo, the other two sadly don't and again it would be nice to see less focus on gen 1 in smash. Charizard, Pikachu and Mewtwo cover the essentials from gen 1 anyway
Why get rid of meta knight, he is pretty popular and is important to the kirby series which can have 3 reps if star fox can, Ike is the second most important fire emblem character, he is unique, popular and is one of the 2 to have more than one game, while chrom and lucina are marths descendants that use the same sword as him and are just perfect clone material. Pokemon trainer represents the series better than any single pokemon can, they are popular, iconic and unique plus people would be pissed off if they got rid of charizard he is one of the most popular pokemon ever. At this point I don't think there will be any cutsI can say these two things for sure:
- It's not going to be any character of the original 12 (and it won't feel like Smash if that happens [inb4 who cares]).
- It's probably less cuts, and most of them are from the Brawl roster.
With that in mind (and opinion is opinion), here are my insane and wacky choices:
Meta Knight - No offense, but I don't think we need 3 Kirby characters when two of them are most potent to the series, which is Kirby and D3 respectfully.
Ike - Although much less of a clone that Roy was to Marth in Melee, more than likely he'll be replaced with one of the newer FE characters (especially in Awakening).
PKMN Trainer - A great idea, but fall very short thanks to the fatigue mechanic. Unless fixed in the upcoming Smash, I can see other Pokemon reps fairing better than him.
I would say Lucas, but I would weirdly say get rid of Ness since Mother 3 was the latest game in the series, which isn't happening.
This is why I said opinion is opinion. The rate this is going, the roster is almost an obvious guessing game with most of the remaining characters in silhouettes poses.Why get rid of meta knight, he is pretty popular and is important to the kirby series which can have 3 reps if star fox can, Ike is the second most important fire emblem character, he is unique, popular and is one of the 2 to have more than one game, while chrom and lucina are marths descendants that use the same sword as him and are just perfect clone material. Pokemon trainer represents the series better than any single pokemon can, they are popular, iconic and unique plus people would be pissed off if they got rid of charizard he is one of the most popular pokemon ever. At this point I don't think there will be any cuts
Just because Ike uses a sword doesn't mean he's like Marth. His moveset is very different and his playstyle as well. I say Ike should return.Marth 2 can **** off.
- Ike is the second most important fire emblem character, he is unique, popular and is one of the 2 to have more than one game, while chrom and lucina are marths descendants that use the same sword as him and are just perfect clone material.- Ike
- Wolf
- Lucas
- R.O.B.
These four are doomed.
well wolf is a villain and we do need more of those and I love how people complain that there aren't enough and then remove wolf.Lucas MIGHT be. I know he is the star of the most recent, but still.
Wolf I'm leaning on yes. He's similar to Fox, and has no reason to stay unlike Lucas.
Snake, probably. He just seems Brawl exclusive.
How are the two connected?Rosalina's confirmation would say otherwise about this matter.
They're not gonna do 6 Pokemon characters, Pikachu and Jigglypuff aren't going anywhere and someone from the new gen will probably come in.No way they are already really different and both incredibly poster
There is no pokemon to add from the new gen, the only ones that are up played are the starters (which are outshined by the kanto starters and their megas) and the legendariesHow are the two connected?
They're not gonna do 6 Pokemon characters, Pikachu and Jigglypuff aren't going anywhere and someone from the new gen will probably come in.
I hope you're right I really do but I don't think you will be.There is no pokemon to add from the new gen, the only ones that are up played are the starters (which are outshined by the kanto starters and their megas) and the legendaries
I think adding lucario was just proof of that, the obvious choice was mewtwo who will most likely be in it aswell as jiggs and poke trainerI hope you're right I really do but I don't think you will be.
If the Mario franchise can have five reps, so can the Pokemon franchise. Of course, the Pokemon Trainer does make things quite complicated with the Pokemon representation.How are the two connected?
PikachuIf the Mario franchise can have five reps, so can the Pokemon franchise. Of course, the Pokemon Trainer does make things quite complicated with the Pokemon representation.
The new pokemon character won't be in it cause you know there aren't any to addPikachu
Jigglypuff
Lucario
Pokemon Trainer
Mewtwo
New Pokemon
It's basically a game of choose which of the last 3 aren't in.
Pokemon Trainer is one character officially so I'm keeping it that way.
I think his reveal gave a bigger chance for Ike, wolf and lucas to come backLucario's reveal put me in a new perspective.
Possible Cuts:,
,
,
,
,
,
,
&
![]()
>Zero suit SamusLucario's reveal put me in a new perspective.
Possible Cuts:,
,
,
,
,
,
,
&
![]()
It hurt Pokemon reps a little.I think his reveal gave a bigger chance for Ike, wolf and lucas to come back
Not really all of them can return and then they have the same amount of slots as marioIt hurt Pokemon reps a little.
Well that all depends on what Kojima wants to do, I'd think he'd want him back in especially since he wasn't in playstation all-starsI think in the end, the only cut character will be Snake.
He doesn't dislike the wiiu, when asked he only said if he were to make a game for it they would have to make good use of the wiiu pad. One of the reasons the current games aren't on there is that they had started development on them way before wiiu dev kits were out there, so it's obviously not something they had planned out. Konami likes money so they would if they could and mgs5 or a collection could still be possible. I doubt Kojima would be opposed to snake getting exposure once again, especially if sakurai asked him.Sakurai has made it clear that he hates cutting characters. But if anyone had to go it would bebecause Sakurai doesn't have a lot of say in if he goes or not, so that is Kojima's decision and since Kojima seems to dislike the Wii U the solid solider may not see the light of day
.
Not really, it just changed our perception of the issue. Although I have never personally thought that Ike, Wolf, or Lucario were likely cuts in the slightest. Neither did I assume that Toon Link was a feasible cut. My cut list has always been Pokemon Trainer, Snake, and Lucas. However, recently I have decided to remove Lucas from that list. He was mostly there for a 3rd character in the list. I do not actually believe he will be cut though, he is just next-in-line (IMO).I think his reveal gave a bigger chance for Ike, wolf and lucas to come back
I am not sure, I believe that Ice Climbers caused the most overt lag; so if he manages gets them to work, I have no doubt that Pokemon Trainer will work. However, I also advocate Pokemon Trainer's cut (I am probably his loudest opposition). Not only does Charizard represent everything Pokemon Trainer does (minus the Trainer aspect), but he is the character that got the other characters considered as it was. I interpret it like this, if two veterans are cut, like Wolf and Ike, I am going to blame Pokemon Trainer. You alienate 2 fan-bases, 2 characters that play completely differently, for the sake of keeping one that no one wants to return (without major revisions to his mechanics). That isn't logical.Really, not saying that I want him to be cut, but besides Snake, Pokemon Trainer is most likely to go. Don't think that the 3DS can handle it, I mean, didn't he lag a lot when switching pokemon in brawl's online? ...I mean, yeah, Brawl's online lagged horribley in general, but wasn't Pokemon Trainer's switch one of the more nastier things from it?
Plus, it'd be easier to remove a 3-in-1 character than just 3 characters.
If Jiggly is cut, I think Sylveon should replace her.This is why I think Jigglypuff is the most likely character to be cut, if there are cuts. She is seen as a joke character, (not just by fans, but by Sakurai too) she was low priority in Brawl, the other Pokemon characters are probably higher priority than Jigglypuff, The Pokemon Company/Game Freak probably aren't going to be pushing for her to be in, unlike the other veterans, (they chose Pokemon based on who's hot right now, the other veterans and Mewtwo are, Jigglypuff isn't) she probably only got in over Mewtwo because she takes less time/is easier to make, she doesn't have any notable significance to the Pokemon series, she has a very bland moveset, she isn't nearly as popular as she used to be, she isn't all that relevant anymore, and she is disliked by many people. The bad points outweigh the good points, I mean if Sakurai could only chose between Jigglypuff and Wario do you really think Jigglypuff would be added over him just for the sake of tradition? There are more important characters to bring back then Jigglypuff, she's never been cut before, but there's a first time for everything, things change.
Whoa sorry but I'm going to have to respectively disagree with this. The first issue is assuming that Wolf and Ike's attendance is based solely on the appearance of the Pokemon trainer. The problem with this is the three could easily all be removed or that they could all three appear. Sakurai could remove both Wolf and Ike not because of lack of time but because he is more interested in a couple potential newcomers. He could remove them because of some unforeseen technical issue. There are a whole variety of variables that goes into characters joining or getting cut. Granted time may be the biggest factor; however it is not the only one. Anyways it's not just these select few that will be in the roster but rather the complete 35+ so the decision is based on the comparison of these characters with every other character revealed so far.I am not sure, I believe that Ice Climbers caused the most overt lag; so if he manages gets them to work, I have no doubt that Pokemon Trainer will work. However, I also advocate Pokemon Trainer's cut (I am probably his loudest opposition). Not only does Charizard represent everything Pokemon Trainer does (minus the Trainer aspect), but he is the character that got the other characters considered as it was. I interpret it like this, if two veterans are cut, like Wolf and Ike, I am going to blame Pokemon Trainer. You alienate 2 fan-bases, 2 characters that play completely differently, for the sake of keeping one that no one wants to return (without major revisions to his mechanics). That isn't logical.
So should LucarioWario should be cut because his name rhymes with Mario.