Repiteo
Smash Apprentice
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2014
- Messages
- 120
- NNID
- Repiteo
I certainly believe that one inconsistency is not enough to disprove a leak, at least a leak that is lain out in this manner. Due to the fact there are several different leakers, some of which are making bold claims (DLC) and some of which are allegedly attempting sabotage (disablad), I don't follow the logic that one inconsistency disproves everything.While Smashchu may be wrong about some of the things in his post, I agree with his philosophical message which is that it only takes one logical inconsistency to disprove something. If we prove that one of the images is just from somewhere else the whole leak is disproven. However, because of the day and age we live in, we might not be able get that anymore. Photoshop allows somebody to easily adjust an image so that it can't be recognized on full with its original source. So we should not only accept a definitive, objective disproving.
edit: We should consider if something is close enough to a source to have been photoshopped from it.
That said, I do think the mindset is something to strive for. Remaining skeptical is the ideal way to approach this leak, neither disproving it outright (because nothing has) nor believing it without question (because nothing's confirmed). Close-mindedness is what we need to avoid at all costs, and I'm glad to see that most people are looking at this debacle with a clear head.
...Well, for the most part I suppose.
Last edited: