Maven89
Smash Master
So far I'm liking Rajam and Kary. Soup is null, Xatres I'm uneasy with, Frozen is inactive, Hando cleared.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I feel we've reached an impasse. I didn't directly question you but I was hoping #72 was clear enough that I was signaling a response from you.So far I'm liking Rajam and Kary. Soup is null, Xatres I'm uneasy with, Frozen is inactive, Hando cleared.
Because I don't think there's much I can do to change his mind, considering multiple people have me on their hit list for basically no reason. Plus it means I'm put in the drivers seat, rather than dying. Not the worst fate that can befall a person.Why are you so ok with being given the gun?
this is a pretty non-responsive answer to the question "who would you shoot"Not sure. I was trying to think about who would give a slot like Handorin the chance to be clear given that his playstyle has always been questionable/somewhat hard to read, which could've made for an easy misshoot.
feeling this as stated aboveWho you would shoot, and who gave Hando the gun, seemed like different questions to me, so your answer seemed kind of squeezed in.
This is a very strange question. Why do two questions need to be "different enough" to warrant asking someone to actually be responsive to the question asked when the answer provided was in fact non-responsive? Sure, the answers are obviously related insofar as the answer to "who gave hando the gun" obviously provides a clear answer to the question "who would you shoot" by virtue of the fact that the gun giver is scum, but still, the responding to "who would you shoot" with "I'm not sure because I'm wondering who gave hando the gun" is non responsive. It's like answering "who would you lynch" with "I don't know because I'm still wondering who's scum."Why do you feel those questions are different enough to make a note about it?
Ah ok, Kary's one step ahead of me lolThey are different?
"I'm surprised Hando got the gun" doesn't answer the question "Who would you shoot?"
Not true.They're basically the same question because they're both asking who scum is, so I'm not sure why you think Soup wondering who would give Hando a gun is a strange response to asking him who he'd shoot
So you're not going to bother trying to argue?Because I don't think there's much I can do to change his mind, considering multiple people have me on their hit list for basically no reason. Plus it means I'm put in the drivers seat, rather than dying. Not the worst fate that can befall a person.
Surely you have no way of knowing who Maven is going to shoot if he gets the gun. You can't use that as a rationale for him being shot now. What did you mean by this because it doesn't make any sense right now.Frankly though I'm a bit biased and know that if Maven is town and decides to go gung ho and shoot at me I can at least stop the bleeding by holding the gun and slowing the game down.
soup what's your opinion on Xatres being shot?quoting you because tagging you is a pain in the ass.
I don't see why people keep going for Soup about this. Saying "I don't know" is not being unresponsive, it's early game, nothing had been posted, saying "I don't know but this is what I'm wondering about" is the only correct answer, Rajam was obviously trying to get conversation going, not figure out who Soup would kill with zero posts in the game. Soup responded perfectly normal, you even acknowledge this hereThis is a very strange question. Why do two questions need to be "different enough" to warrant asking someone to actually be responsive to the question asked when the answer provided was in fact non-responsive? Sure, the answers are obviously related insofar as the answer to "who gave hando the gun" obviously provides a clear answer to the question "who would you shoot" by virtue of the fact that the gun giver is scum, but still, the responding to "who would you shoot" with "I'm not sure because I'm wondering who gave hando the gun" is non responsive.
but then you claim he wasn't being upfront about being undecided even though the first words of Soup's posts were "I don't know". I assume, based on you having him as scum, these are points you believe, and you're not just trying to argue what Kary thought.It's early in the game so obviously not being sure who the play is is natural, and saying as much isn't necessarily scummy. But not being upfront about the fact that you're undecided, and cloaking it (whether consciously or subconsciously) in a non-responsive answer just comes off shady.
This is a good point I didn't consider. Is this just an "fyi" or does it tie into your Soup suspicion?Not true.
Deciding who to shoot is informed first and foremost by who you think scum is. It is however also informed by hedging analysis due to the fact that you can hedge your bets by putting a player who, if town you trust to make good plays going forward, into the drivers seat. Basically you may choose to shoot one player over another as long as you have atleast some reason to believe that player might be scum, if that player you'd prefer to have the gun as town to your alternative scum suspect (if they were town.)
I just finished a long *** monday so I may not be explaining this very clearly, but basically the questions we're comparing here aren't quite as similar as you're making them out to be. It's a bit reductive, what you're doing Maven.
This is not a good point.Frankly though I'm a bit biased and know that if Maven is town and decides to go gung ho and shoot at me I can atleast stop the bleeding by holding the gun and slowing the game down. Hando your rationale for Xatres/Maven makes plenty of sense to me and I find either target pretty unobjectionable though I do lean toward shooting Maven for what its worth.
UhhhhhhhhhhSurely you have no way of knowing who Maven is going to shoot if he gets the gun. You can't use that as a rationale for him being shot now. What did you mean by this because it doesn't make any sense right now.
/in gonna shoot frozen flame day 1
Pick me to get the gun so I can shoot you already
I mean maybe Maven is just memeing here but he's repeated the sentiment enough to make me think he's at least somewhat serious about wanting to shoot me if given then chanceI said I'd shoot frozenflame. I wasn't given the gun, therefore frozenflame must be scum. GG guys games over
So far I'm liking Rajam's content the best, and I'm liking Kary's the least. I don't see how her questions could lead to anything valuable. Rajam's baiting seems more genuine. That's where I'm sitting at now
Maven can you explain your 180 on Kary?So far I'm liking Rajam and Kary. Soup is null, Xatres I'm uneasy with, Frozen is inactive, Hando cleared.
It's not the fact that he said "I don't know" that comes off shady, it's the way he did it. The way his response was phrased, he seemed to be trying to "hide" his "I don't know" behind his musings re: who gave Hando the gun. It just comes off as deflective. You're right that it is perfectly fine to respond to the question of "who would you shoot right now" that early in the game with "I don't know/I'm unsure" but there are more direct ways to phrase it that don't attempt to unnecessarily excuse the uncertainty and deflect the question posed. Basically, I'd have felt better had he said something along the lines of "I don't know, not nearly enough info yet" as opposed to "I don't know, BUT HERE'S WHAT I'M CURRENTLY WONDERING THINK ABOUT THIS AND NOT MY ANSWER." That's the intent my gut is gleaning from the form of his answer. It's not the answer of "I don't know" just by itself.I don't see why people keep going for Soup about this. Saying "I don't know" is not being unresponsive, it's early game, nothing had been posted, saying "I don't know but this is what I'm wondering about" is the only correct answer, Rajam was obviously trying to get conversation going, not figure out who Soup would kill with zero posts in the game. Soup responded perfectly normal, you even acknowledge this here
He seems to want the gun, so by all means he can have it. I really don't get where you two are townreading Rajam for, but I also don't think giving him the gun is a good idea. I'd entrust Xatres to work with people and keep conversation flowing than Rajam who plays to more his own ideals and keeps to himself. In the event of him flipping scum and Hando keeping the gun, he's done his job of keeping his partner under wraps because I'd have no idea where to look in regards of tells.soup what's your opinion on Xatres being shot?
We were not even a page in and I'm not gonna make a call based on absolutely nothing. I touched on this in #61, so I'm not sure why you missed my explanation.FrozenFlame said:this is a pretty non-responsive answer to the question "who would you shoot"
This is not my argument but I want to step because it is made about me. I don't really follow your mindset nor do I really like it, because you seem to be mincing words. I don't believe that merely saying "I don't know/not enough info yet" is all too useful, so I considered a thought about the intention of giving Hando the gun. Of course, this is something that is not provable, therefore that's all I could do is ponder. I don't really understand why you believe that is dodgy or the conclusion you're making, unless you want me to make a shot in the dark (heh) about who I think is scum based on something that could devolve into endless circular logic. Hando offered a point about Maven/Xatres which I thought was decent, which is why I have no qualms with the shot.It's not the fact that he said "I don't know" that comes off shady, it's the way he did it. The way his response was phrased, he seemed to be trying to "hide" his "I don't know" behind his musings re: who gave Hando the gun. It just comes off as deflective. You're right that it is perfectly fine to respond to the question of "who would you shoot right now" that early in the game with "I don't know/I'm unsure" but there are more direct ways to phrase it that don't attempt to unnecessarily excuse the uncertainty and deflect the question posed. Basically, I'd have felt better had he said something along the lines of "I don't know, not nearly enough info yet" as opposed to "I don't know, BUT HERE'S WHAT I'M CURRENTLY WONDERING THINK ABOUT THIS AND NOT MY ANSWER." That's the intent my gut is gleaning from the form of his answer. It's not the answer of "I don't know" just by itself.
Re: my hedging analysis point, that was partly just mean to be illustrative as to why the two questions being compared were actually different. It doesn't inform my opinion that soup seems dodgy. It actually more informs my opinion that you're muddling the waters by being reductive/conflating points.
If what you take away from those posts is that Maven is actually considering shooting you, you must have a pretty nervous disposition right about now.I mean maybe Maven is just memeing here but he's repeated the sentiment enough to make me think he's at least somewhat serious about wanting to shoot me if given then chance
I'm not.I really don't get where you two are townreading Rajam for,
No you haven't.I've seen both Maven/Kary say he's tried to get the game going
The only issue there is that BOTH of us would have to be scum for that logic to pan out. All it takes is one player who knows you to tell his partner that you're not a good choice for the shot.So I mainly have two people in mind that could possibly give me the gun: Xatres and Maven. The simple reason is that neither of these guys have played a game with me. They even joined Smashboards -after- I went to live in Germany and basically left Smashboards and the community. I didn't come back until 2012, but I still didn't join any games. Every other player is veteran enough to know I'm generally very reserved and scummy (and openly don't care about that). Basically I'm an easy target to be shot at.
I'll try and get another list out by tonight.
Had to work, and technically tonight is my date night with my wife, although she's comforting our screaming baby right now. I will be peaking in thread most of the night, though.This lack of activity on a deadline is crazy
This shouldn't be an excuse to not do anything / do little. Common soup, you have plenty of experience on Mafia, and if you're town you should be concerned about moving things on. This is my main issue with you atm: I see a lack of town motivationI can't read anything going on right now because the thread seems to be having growing pains, and what I mean by this is that we're all waiting for something greater to happen.
I don't think Maven was serious, but I played along with it to get things moving. You seem more concerned about resetting stuff to null status instead of generating pressure. Question is: why didn't you go along with it, or take the chance to pressure frozen somehow at leastNo idea. Do you think Maven was serious about Frozen, or had intention to egg it on even after pre-game? I won't attempt to decipher such behavior, unless you think it's worth deciphering.
see, this is inconsistent seeing how you did nothing regarding pressuring frozen. Also I don't like the last sentence in what's quoted here, because you throw mud to Maven's intentions when it was an obvious starting point to get things moving. Again, it scummier that you did nothing at the beginning other than commenting how things were null: of course many things are null at the very beginning, but it worthless to mention them. Seems like fake contribution to meMy gut feeling about people is that I'm alright with Kary, hesitant on Maven, and keeping my eye on Frozen. Of course, Frozen has no reason to entertain the idea that Maven is serious, but I did note that he did respond to it. It didn't go anywhere however so that just furthers leads to what Maven wanted out of it, if anything.
I'm gonna deflect this question to soup and frozen. I have my own opinion but I want to hear from these two firstWhat do you think of Xatres' reaction to his waggon?
I voted you, because splitting votes wasn't gonna help in creating pressure on a slot (you in this case). Also, same thing I said to soup: you're doing nothing in terms of trying to advance the game further; you're also inherently saying how many things are null and there's no stance on anything. There's lack of town effort/motivation to try to find stuff, scumhunt or generate pressureWell, that's evasive.
I wouldn't shoot anyone right now. Not enough data.
Who's the scum mate?
Who's the scum mate?