Wrath`
Smash Master
Firce oni cant admit my list was good,so he undermines me and calls it bad instead.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Debate about what? The only pokemon he seems to "support" is one of the ones I have been supportting for the pass (I think almost ) year or so.Wrath doesn't seem to be taking you declaring yourself an enemy seriously, Blacklight. Perhaps you should start debating him?
Actually, since there hasn't been a Smash bros. game made in ages, they haven't introduced 3rd or 4th generations of PK yet. Although I have to agree with you, that dumb Hoenn region almost turned me completely off of pokemon altogether. However, the Shinnoh region is trying to bring me back since the 4th generation is chalk full of tight new legendary pokemon! 4th generation ftw!The 3rd gen was sucessfull, but should it have priority over the 4th gen? Almost anyone is already pretty familair with the 3rd gen Pokémon now so they don't need introduction. And since the 3rd gen isn't old enough, they aren't "classics". However, Deoxys would be an acceptable replacement for Mewtwo, and sure would be an intressting character.
No problem.Ill come up with some stuff for blazeIf we did, all arguments based off how Cool it is will be disalawed.
Rofl, this'll be good.No problem.Ill come up with some stuff for blaze
lol... well sorry for countering BS reasons from a noob.and I want F-O to STFU because he isn't making a good argument (making points I have countered countless times but, if unchecked by logical argument, could actually convurt some people to be Blaze haters).
Oh, how I long for a pokemon to use the different types of martial arts, especially Blaziken! Your batting 1000 Black/Light!@ F-O
*Points at the Blaziken thread*
New move-set.
And new fighting style you say?
Tae kwon Do/ Capoeira/ Wushu kick style/ Kupighana Ngumi and ect are all great/ unique and (for the most part) leg based fighting styles that arnt in this game that Blaze could use.
Zelda, Ness and Mewtwo dont cancel out each others uniqueness because their fighting styles arent based around the same things at all even if they dont use their bodys with their styles. there is a difference between psychic, magic and... whatever ness uses (i guess it is kind of psychic, but it is much different from mewtwo's psychic that only includes telekinisis, 1 psychokinisis based move and pure energy attacks while ness's psychci doesnt include those types of moves). if a character can use a move that another character cant use, it makes neither of them less unique. do you think pikachu can shoot out a ball of electricity and control it with its mind? anyway, when i said bring some sort of new fighting style, i wasnt just talking about the types of moves they use.But in actually I can't see your point. A unique character is just that. . . a unique character. Does Ness make Pika less unique by having PK Thunder? No, because it's not used as much as Pika uses his lighting and it doesn't work the same way. Do Zelda/ Ness cancel out M2's uniqueness? Their attacks are in the same general area as in they us some force other than their bodies. . . but they all work very differently.
one of the main reasons i support Lucario is because of its significance and recognisability which aucually lets you support it without any annoying objections. of course, i wouldnt support any character no matter how significant they are if they dont seem very unique. when i think lucario, i dont see a mix between fox and sheik at all. i dont see it with swift flexible ninja attacks or constant unescapable kicks. i see a fighting style that isnt present in the game. i dont think it would be based around swift constant martial arts but single powerful physical attacks that could be compared to ganondorfs attacks at best, and an arsenal of ranged pulse attacks that could only really be compared with Samus's B, and would still be very different. its classified as a pulse pokemon, as in it wouldnt be using its fighting attacks more than its pulse attacks, and it has even exhibited this type of style in its movie. the best mix that could classify Lucario would be Ganondorf and Mewtwo, and even then it wouldnt be anything like them. after the attacks, it could still have unique traits such as its speed, knockback resistance and falling speed being modified because of added weight from its steel typing, its original height and its ingame abilities that seem to signify some sort of resistance against being stopped by attacks.If you REALLY want to show me that you want only completely unique characters that have a type thats never been in SSB and couldn't attack like other characters than explain why you want Lucario. Sure, he is 2nd typed steel (so he meets THAT lev of uniqueness to your logic) but he could still END UP attacking like other fighters in SSB. . .take Fox and Sheik and mix them together. Not to say that this will happen but with his body type it wouldn't be hard to do. Sure, he has the PB but that COULD work like Zelda's B/ B> (forgot which).
you seem to base Lucario's uniqueness in its appearence while its uniqueness doesnt come from what it looks like it does, but more from what it does. its a pulse type pokemon, and it relies more on balls of energy than kicking and punching.I rank pokemon like Mawile (Has a huge mouth made from it's horns on the back of its head), Scizor (Bug wings AND big claws that no other character has) and Aggron ( The huge heavy monster with Browser lev attacks) above him in uniqueness of body type and thats only in the type steel group that makes him unique.
some characters cant just be given unique traits. they have to at least show them to have them. when i say traits, im not talking about attacks. what im trying to point out isnt about attacks they use, but about other traits. other things that make a big difference in characters. things like weight, height, movement styles unique abilities (peach's floating for example) and so on. could Blaziken be given any unique traits? it has the possibility of being given unique moves even though its most recognisable moves arent unique, but after that factor that every character has, does it have anything else that could make it unique? height? weight? structure? unique abilities? movement style? it practicly resembles a fighting wire frame with its near perfect humanoid structure. if you can get a fighting wire frame, replace its model with a character's and not see any problems with that character, i think there is a problem there.Really, I just see unique characters and not how "different" they HAVE to be to every other character but more in the range of how unique they CAN be made (every character can be unique, from the newest Pika rip to Falco and Fox to Link and Young Link).
you have a point, but as im trying to point out, attacks arent what calculate a characters uniqueness completely. do you think there wouldnt be a uniqueness decrease if they took away Peach's floating and kirbys height, structure and jumping?If you strip alot of the Melee characters down you would find that the thing that makes them unique isn't just what they attack with but much more in HOW they attack and how the effects of their attacks work/ differ.
dont talk to me about logic. even you can agree that you have the logic of an inanimate object. im not allowed to state my opinion against blaziken because i have a supportive opinion on Lucario while you and other people have a supportive opinion on blaziken? now, how does that work exactly?F o.You were saying lucario is uniqu to you.So you cant diss blaze or call him boring because he's unique to some of us.
whats your point? as i said before, i dont support Lucario only because its unique. it seems to be the only really significant good option for a character, so its a good option to support.That is not what I said.I was saying:You suporrt lucario because he's unique to you,yet diss other chocies because then seem normal to you.
what would the point of that be? im not making the game. just providing ideas.Oh I checked your move set.Get it down to one atacke per apot(so many alternitives
He lacks the in-game and in-movie importance of Lucario. Rioru would simply me a slightly more interesting Machop.Go rioriu the baby form of lucario.
Yeah, but Jiggly is one of the strongest melee characters. XD I agree that Pichu has to go though.Yeah I agree with Stryks, now more pre-evolutionary pokemon, period. I wanna see fully evolutionary pokemon or pokemon that would be very unique to the game without an evolution. It's sad that other than Mewtwo, that Pichu, Pikachu, & Jigglypuff represented Game Freak. How obsurd!
I will say pikachu is in brawl, for one reason he's in the brawl videos, and has beenI agree, i think pikachu's a shoe in for brawl. Mewtwo just needs a few changes hear and there, but pichu has no chance at all. That leaves room for another pokemon.
WAS popular. Now apparently the Ralts evo and the 4th gen bunny seem to have taken it's place.Jigglypuff got in because she's popular in Japan. That's a very important reason. The rest of the world's likes are also important, but naturally Sakurai will be leaning slightly towards his home country when he considers characters. I'd actually give Jiggly a 75% chance at staying in, as she seems ever so slightly unnecessary.
Yes, there IS a difference between Magic and Pys. . . but in a game where they both have the same basic princable it doesn't matter. Their using forces out-side of themselves that COULD ALL act alike. Im sure Z magic can do what Pys M2/ Ness does and Pys M2/ Ness what Z magic does. Like I said. . . "Do Zelda/ Ness cancel out M2's uniqueness? Their attacks are in the same general area as in they us some force other than their bodies. . . but they all work very differently."Zelda, Ness and Mewtwo dont cancel out each others uniqueness because their fighting styles arent based around the same things at all even if they dont use their bodys with their styles. there is a difference between psychic, magic and... whatever ness uses (i guess it is kind of psychic, but it is much different from mewtwo's psychic that only includes telekinisis, 1 psychokinisis based move and pure energy attacks while ness's psychci doesnt include those types of moves). if a character can use a move that another character cant use, it makes neither of them less unique. do you think pikachu can shoot out a ball of electricity and control it with its mind? anyway, when i said bring some sort of new fighting style, i wasnt just talking about the types of moves they use.
To the first bolded point, Lucario actually isn't very important.one of the main reasons i support Lucario is because of its significance and recognisability which aucually lets you support it without any annoying objections. of course, i wouldnt support any character no matter how significant they are if they dont seem very unique. when i think lucario, i dont see a mix between fox and sheik at all. i dont see it with swift flexible ninja attacks or constant unescapable kicks. i see a fighting style that isnt present in the game. i dont think it would be based around swift constant martial arts but single powerful physical attacks that could be compared to ganondorfs attacks at best, and an arsenal of ranged pulse attacks that could only really be compared with Samus's B, and would still be very different. its classified as a pulse pokemon, as in it wouldnt be using its fighting attacks more than its pulse attacks, and it has even exhibited this type of style in its movie. the best mix that could classify Lucario would be Ganondorf and Mewtwo, and even then it wouldnt be anything like them. after the attacks, it could still have unique traits such as its speed, knockback resistance and falling speed being modified because of added weight from its steel typing, its original height and its ingame abilities that seem to signify some sort of resistance against being stopped by attacks.
No, I don't base his uniqueness on his body shape. Sorry if it went over your head but I was refering about how YOU see characters based on other, past arguments. YOU said things like " boring human shape" before. YOU count P/M uniques out because they "look like a character already in the game". And part of your reasons for dragonite is BECAUSE of it's body shape. I was just pointing out that, according to alot of the statments I have heard from you in the past, that Lucario doesn't have a very unique look.you seem to base Lucario's uniqueness in its appearence while its uniqueness doesnt come from what it looks like it does, but more from what it does. its a pulse type pokemon, and it relies more on balls of energy than kicking and punching.
*sigh again. . . deeply*some characters cant just be given unique traits. they have to at least show them to have them. when i say traits, im not talking about attacks. what im trying to point out isnt about attacks they use, but about other traits. other things that make a big difference in characters. things like weight, height, movement styles unique abilities (peach's floating for example) and so on. could Blaziken be given any unique traits? it has the possibility of being given unique moves even though its most recognisable moves arent unique, but after that factor that every character has, does it have anything else that could make it unique? height? weight? structure? unique abilities? movement style? it practicly resembles a fighting wire frame with its near perfect humanoid structure. if you can get a fighting wire frame, replace its model with a character's and not see any problems with that character, i think there is a problem there.
*Points to above*you have a point, but as im trying to point out, attacks arent what calculate a characters uniqueness completely. do you think there wouldnt be a uniqueness decrease if they took away Peach's floating and kirbys height, structure and jumping?