Nah, Kat's first real post already includes stuff against me. Parrot was surely a stretch - I just like the word.
I asked you prior to his post whether you see a connection between you and kevin, and whether it was scummy to you or not.
I just found that part especially noteworthy because it shows clearly that you try to misconstrue what I did to paint me in a bad light. This is the part that proves my point the best so I tried to emphasise it.
There's this thing that we do in mafia, it's called speculating. I was speculating about whether or not this was the reasoning for your pushing riddle at that particular time. You are not being misconstrued, i pointed this out as a possibility.
What do you think of the other points I brought up? WHere is the "misconstruing"
Here you misconstrue me again. I have not shed suspicion on other players at all. I merely used counterexamples to substantiate the fact that connections don't automatically lead to scum but I have never said "X / Y have no interactions so they are scummy because of Z". That's not what I have said.
What does this have anything to do with my argument. I never said you were scum. Your point about connections not leading to scum is moot because all I was arguing was that there is a clear strongly defined connection between you to. It is also interesting to note that the examples you brought up have nowhere near as strong as a connection between you and Kevin. You might argue that Swords/Sinz and I rival yours, but even that would be short sighted, because all I've been doing was defending them. Where as not only have you been defending kevin, you have been parroting things he says, and sharing the same stances as he.
And no wtf, you did shed suspicion.
"Same for Riddlekat who has done nothing except scapegoating Swords and Cacti (conveniently two of the easier targets) and coasting. How convenient to play for a scumbag."
The previous two responses to your points (in this same post) is already an example of how you do it.
false. I'm not misconstruing you. I linked to those posts you made, and gave people what my impression on these posts were and how they linked you to kevin.
Kat did. My post also was a response to him.
well, just wanna say I think you are scummy because I think Kevin is scum.
I'm not guilty of being alone in "defending" somebody or have strong connections to somebody. I mentioned other examples and'd like to hear your thoughts on you / marshy; riddle / pierre; mentos / rockin. Those connections are there too but you have yet to make your input on them.
Marshy/I:
I've agreed with him on somethings, and I think he is town. Strong connection, I don't believe so, atleast not as strong as Kevin and you.
Riddle/Pierre and Mentos/Rockin:
No clue, I haven't really seen/noticed evidence of this.
Kevin/Cacti:
I agree, same as you to a lesser extent. I think cacti is scummy too.
But we agree on one thing, there does seem to be a strong connection between you and Kevin. Do you think that if Kevin was ever revealed as scum, that it should implicate you as scum as well?