Here, let me replace all those "it"
Please, find something to do other than a policy lynch (Rule #1). you are only hiding the policy lynch because it's "easy" to throw words at me and I just laugh inside. your hurt just makes me stronger.
It's easy to throw words at me, because I obviously don't care. Every time someone like you first plays a game with me, it always comes up. It just boils down to you not liking what I do. Deal with it. I'm just going to laugh at you.
There was also nothing to discuss. I said that the miller can't claim. You seem to forget I did. Why do I think that? It's pointless to discuss it. It's a miller. It looks scummy. Mafia also look scummy.
By "throw words at you" do you mean actually argue and play the game? Because yes, that's what I'm doing.
By "someone like you" do you mean someone who actually picks out what they find to be scummy and pursues it? Or instead do you mean someone who votes or puts their opinions down on paper? Or as a third option do you mean someone who is actually interested in contributing to the day's discussion as opposed to just watching it slide by and then determining whether or not "something happened?" Because all three of those apply to me and don't apply to you in this game. So maybe you can enlighten me.
I didn't forget that you said the miller can't claim. You seem to have forgotten that I said that often they can claim and I made the fact that they know they're a miller (which does happen, as you seem to have forgotten that I cited per mafiascum experience and not your Epic Mafia experience (one of which is forum mafia and one of which is an excuse to call mafia based on a system of popularity and point farming where performance in the individual game has absolutely no importance and all you need to do is massclaim instead of scumhunt)) a qualifier for the question. It is also discussion that can lead directly into the MAFIA, as millers look like MAFIA to cops, and MAFIA might be tempted to claim miller, while CULT doesn't have jack all to do with MAFIA.
And you are right. I am content. I like sitting around, but I like to lynch sometimes. Town obviously couldn't come to a conclusion though. No one (other than you, I suppose) has put forth a lot of suspicion arguments. It has only been pointed out that Marshy is pushing for my policy lynch.
That's a pretty gross simplification of the game so far. It has been slow, but to say that the only thing thats happened is that Marshy voted you because of a policy joke is ignoring (simplified):
-Macman's vote on you because you brought up cults unnecessarily and that is unhelpful
-discussion about a No Lynch and its merits
-discussion about whether or not PGO should claim (with differing opinions)
-discussion about thinking there is more than one PGO
-junglefever asking Riddle how he can find Macman scummy for play that looks like his town play
and I'm sure other things that I have forgotten without looking back.
You're just simplifying what little but valuable things that
have happened this game day into "if you vote for me its a policy lynch." I distinctly remember reading Marshy re-affirm his stance that you are scum after you made more posts, and I haven't based jack all of what I've said vs. you on anything he's said, so what you say about his case cannot and does not apply to mine.
I am surprised you aren't dead and I really don't know what it will take.
