Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Well, on the DDD boards, we've gone over the MU. We looked at the supertheory. It supported Fox winning. We looked at the applicable theory (what matters). It supported an even MU. We looked at the available high/top-level evidence at various points in time. It supported DDD winning.
That +1 better not be for Snake, 'cause If the MU ever shifts due to stage, it's going in DDD's favor. Please, please, PLEASE don't be dumb (unless you're trolling). What stage features could possibly give Snake the advantage? Smaller stage? That just means less room for you to run and you offstage a lot easier for edgeguarding. Delfino? Pleeaase, walls and walk-offs all over the place. Anything else is standard for a zero.
Sorry, im pretty bad at explaining things XD. Even the oli advice was pretty bad rofl. You and TC are usually the best ones explaining those kind of things. Im just the guy that goes to tourneys and prolly can give better advice thru analyzation of my videos =lWell, on the DDD boards, we've gone over the MU. We looked at the supertheory. It supported Fox winning. We looked at the applicable theory (what matters). It supported an even MU. We looked at the available high/top-level evidence at various points in time. It supported DDD winning.
This reasoning was infinitely more sound than Dew's reasoning, but it came to the same conclusion. Fox doesn't beat DDD +2. He doesn't even beat him +1. Where did this notion come from?
This logic is mostly true when it comes to high tiers facing off against each other. Below that, no, it does not.
You don't have to ban Quest I'm still going to MMM5 lol. I'll try to get a carpool going but no one here ever likes to travel.
Sorry I only take people who have absolutely no chance of beating or outplacing me.
Yeah I can get there. Can you at least get me from the nearest train station that's there or if that too out of the way? It's on Jamaica-179 Street / Hillside Avenue's train stationSorry I only take people who have absolutely no chance of beating or outplacing me.
Nah but, if you can get to the Impact venue I can definitely pick you up from there.
Hype!!!!
I want in on this, whats up.
rip ;__;7
Do it, House of 3000 invades NE. Best thing to ever happen to the region
When I talk about match ups and what my character can do in them, I am not just pulling stuff off of my mind. This is stuff I have tested myself in tournaments. I also put myself in risky situations on purpose and try to figure out ways of dealing with them. An example of this would be me being near the ledge against Marth. And I tell my friend to try his best to keep me from getting past him. And my job would be to obviously try to get behind him or just get him off me. I test stuff before I say anything. Therocrafting would be doing stuff and not testing it to see if it works. I don't do that.@Dark peach: Mind if I contribute here? I don't usually take a stance but I think what's the point of MU information if it's not accurate? Sure you can go to a character and analyse his/her opportunities but the fact is that sometimes it's just not practical/too risky, etc etc. Basically it's possible to have your method but only if everyone revamped how they play Brawl. Otherwise your MU chart would be based on 'on-paper' theoretics rather than what usually happens. I personally think that at the moment we should be looking at what currently happens and drawing off that because sometimes the theory just doesn't work.
An example would be Ness vs. MK. This is a MU that says Ness is just plain bad against MK but in reality he doesn't do so badly and many people argue this to be a -1 or call him to be one of the top 10 chars against MK, non-ness mains included. Player error means that this MU isn't as bad as it should be.
You could even say this applies to Marth in many MUs: He's an incredible character in theory but there's just so much to him practically that a player will mess up one way or another. It's possible that this is your problem with peach (this is only a possibility, i'm not presuming!): That you're so in to what she can theoretically do that you sometimes just can't execute, you know? The only reason I say this is because i recall you used to say that you thought how you played her was the way to go, you just couldn't pull it off.
Correct me if i'm wrong there. But anyway, on to my point.
Basically, i'm saying that your method isn't 'wrong', just it would require a total revamp of how Brawl is played (basing how we do MUs on what the theory says we can do, which we do to some extent but not all), which I dunno.... I think it might just be a bit too much for the community atm. But hey, who am i to judge?
Also, why did you say 'why does everyone mis-read/not read my posts' and then attack SPF for telling you what he thinks the reason is? Personally I usually read your posts but I why someone wouldn't. You can't have it both ways though; either you feel fine with your posting and keep it that way or say 'I can make this better/here's what i'm doing wrong' and change it. Either way is fine (going your own way is a good thing sometimes!) but I think you're tryign to have your cake and eat it too.
is it just me?
Sorry dark peach, I don't mean to be offensive or anything... I do respect you and i'm a nobody, this is just kinda what I see... I guess...
Also, Iota is a talented player. I wish online wasn't so bad between countries, I enjoyed versing him when we did play.
GL Dark.Pch, I believe in you bro. I'm glad you're finding your bad habits and making a new metagame for yourself & your character.
Found it.
