I didn't have to fight Falco with Pit. That's exactly why. Showdown had AMAZING players at it that are as good as our top players.
You weren't there. Results in other Texas tournaments support what I say about Mr. 3000, T-Rex, and PozerWolf. SRK's online tournaments support what I say about RaphStryker. Final Round and Justin Wong's reputation as one of the best fighting game players in the world supports what I say about him. You're just saying "Texas is bad" because I lost matches I had no idea how to play using Pit when I came back.
Stop discarding the tournament just because you weren't there and have absolutely no idea how good the players were and a few people beat my Pit due to me not knowing match-ups at all. You'd be right in saying I got lucky in fighting matches I knew how to do, but that's it.
The RU weeklies had a lot less on the line. Lower entrance fees, less money to win, and a more laid back atmosphere. Texas Showdown was hosted by a major tournament director, was way larger, took place at the same location as a Guilty Gear SBO qualifier and other fighting games, and actually had good players there contrary to what you may think. Unless you think players like Justin Wong are noobs.
You think about it. The atmosphere at Showdown was extremely competitive.
I honestly don't think Showdown should count a lot myself. But based on entirely different reasoning. It shouldn't count a lot because it was during the first month of the game's existence in America. Much like your win at RU and my second place at RU. More recent stuff reflects skill a lot more accurately, since over time, "new game" and "having no idea how to play a match" johns start to fade.
Edit: I am not allowing teams performance to be any part of a singles ranking decision as they never have been.
This is solely your decision...how?
How would you seperate ties when it comes to skill opinions and results? Coin tosses?