CableCho57
Smash Lord
tebow > everybody
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82c3b/82c3b8cb192efe58ded4435b7dd6d8ccdc05b186" alt="Troll :troll: :troll:"
but man RG3 looked like pro out there in his first game
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82c3b/82c3b8cb192efe58ded4435b7dd6d8ccdc05b186" alt="Troll :troll: :troll:"
but man RG3 looked like pro out there in his first game
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I don't even get the intent and thought process behind this.RG3 > Sanchez > Peyton > Smith > > Tebow > Rogers
Don't lose hopeMy fantasy team sucks cause someone else drafted for me. FML.
...Man, I want to give Nicks another chance . . . but he's walking off a groin injury. He didn't get enough exposure last week, either.
But he's projected 19 points . . . That's all a big if. I'd rather go with someone more reliable in earning points . . .
because it's a bush league move, it's never worked, and all is does is cause injuryI don't get the big deal about the Bucs playing football... The game wasn't over. You shouldn't care if Eli is going to kneel, still try to get the ball. They didn't have this grand plan to dogpile Eli after he kneeled or anything @.@
Okay... so they should stop playing football because of a risk of injury? This was not a score of 36-7, like last night. What you're saying would make sense if it was so. No sense in exposing yourself when you're bound to lose. But if there's even a slight chance of causing that fumble again (he said in like 5 years of doing that, he caused 4 fumbles), then hey, take the option. Injuries happen all the time, it's unfortunate, but it's not something that should paralyze you from trying to win.because it's a bush league move, it's never worked, and all is does is cause injury
after doing some research, you can see that he tried it in 3 college football games, and not a single one of those games did he get the recovery and now this is the NFL, he can't go under the radar with this type of move
the kneel down is a move that ensures victory, it has never been messed up and the only way for it to mess up is a bad snap, while it isn't an illegal move, it's still a stupid move to use as the risk of injury is high as it's basically a cheap shot to get to the QB
Because you physically can't get to the QB on a kneel down fast enough. The Bucs never got close to Eli even when the o-line wasn't doing anything. On a blind side blitz, it's up to the QB to feel the pressure and get a good pre-snap read also with his left tackle being able to block the blitz. If the defense gets the sack, then those 3 things all messed up and it's a win for the defense. On a kneel down, the only way to force a fumble is to go for the ball, which is always low, so attack the o-line at the knees. The most common injuries in sports are knee injuries. See where I'm getting at? This type of move has no benefit. There has never, NEVER, been a case where QB fumbled the snap on the kneel down, so what are trying to prove? That you're a n arrogant coach who has no respect for the health of players? That's basically all it proves.What I'm failing to understand is what's "cheap" about it. Why is it different from staging a blitz to the blind side of a QB the first play of the game? Your objective is the same: get the ball (and win). Both involve risking injury because hey, you're being tackled by (usually) large people running at high speeds. Time, score, and situation should not matter until that clock hits :00. Technically, they probably wouldn't do it at the end of the first half because they would be thinking they've got 2 quarters to fill this gap. But that's not true near the end of the fourth quarter.
Again, different situation. It's up to Desean Jackson to determine whether he should fair catch the ball or not. He saw an opportunity to run it back for good yardage and he took that chance. It was up to the Giants to stop him and that clearly didn't happen. Going for the ball on a kneel down isn't even a high risk-high reward when the reward has never happened at the NFL level. Heck, even at the College level it didn't work. The kneel down is the sportsman thing to do, as you're telling your opponents: "yes we have the ball but we're not going to run up the score". It's still a bush league move that has no benefit but to cause injury to the other team. What happened to Avant was just an unfortunate occurance. It could've been avoided but again, the game would have gone into overtime if the block never occured in the matter that it did.Essentially, you'd be telling me that the Miracle at the New Meadowlands should have never happened because Desean Jackson should have just fair caught the punt, and take the game to overtime. Instead, he took the punt and returned it for a win (and while the chance of a punt returned for a TD is much higher than getting a fumble out of a kneeling formation, they both run high risk-high reward probabilities). Think he wanted to change his mind when he saw Avant shaken up from pretty much delivering the game-winning block?
Maybe from some points of view. All I see it as is "here's another way to waste time without our running back screwing us over" in a close game like this.The kneel down is the sportsman thing to do, as you're telling your opponents: "yes we have the ball but we're not going to run up the score".