Hadokeyblade
Smash Legend
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2018
- Messages
- 10,821
I sometimes forget Robin is in the game
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I like Robin, but it can be a pain to switch between the regular and Levin sword on command. The faithful durability mechanic can also be your doom. Using the wrong jab attack can affect your recovery.I sometimes forget Robin is in the game
Better yet, Nintendo should just make the entire roster Cereal Box Mascots by releasing cereals for all their major franchises.Cereal Box Mascots?
It's admittedly hard to gauge, but it's not that he's controversial or unpopular, it's more that it doesn't feel like everyone and their mother plays him, unlike Marth (more Lucina nowadays), Ike or Byleth. That's all I was trying to say.Robin is my favorite Fire Emblem character. And their reception was super positive.
How did he get lost in the swaths of Fire Emblem characters? It's not like Robin isn't popular.
I think part of the reason his reception was super positive was becauseRobin is my favorite Fire Emblem character. And their reception was super positive.
How did he get lost in the swaths of Fire Emblem characters? It's not like Robin isn't popular.
Consider the following:Is there any working mascot costumes for certain characters? I say because how would a Pac-Man costume be right without black arms or legs.
i forget little mac and snake are in the gameI sometimes forget Robin is in the game
At the time of Smash 4, Robin's status as a base game character that wasn't a clone greatly helped them avoid rancor among the more cynical non-FE crowd to a degree. They weren't seen a character taking up a valuable DLC slot or (to such a pessimistic audience) viewed as an unoriginal addition seemingly existing to pad out the FE representation even further.I think part of the reason his reception was super positive was because
- it "killed" Gematsu (at least at that point it seemed to), which gave hope to outcomes other than those it claimed
- it wasn't Chrom, who was a very divisive pick due to being seen as very derivative
- it was a FE character who did something more than swords
So I think a lot of the popularity was from what Robin wasn't, as much as it was what Robin was
I think Robin has just suffered from what happens when there are so many characters, the ones people are kinda "yeah, they're cool but whatever" end up getting lost in the crowd. Robin also lacks being particularly longstanding, recently added, or the sole series representative, which can help in notability.
I also think avatar characters don't always strike the same chord with people as super defined characters. If you look at the most requested characters throughout Smash, very few of them have been avatars.
Well at the time Robin was revealed there was no thought of valuable DLC slots or the FE roster being padded. This was before it was known there would even be DLC (it was thought sensible and entirely possible, but people weren't focusing on it, and it hadn't been confirmed), and prior to Robin's reveal it was only Marth and Ike. So yes, Robin avoided that rancor, but that rancor didn't exist yet anyway.At the time of Smash 4, Robin's status as a base game character that wasn't a clone greatly helped them avoid rancor among the more cynical non-FE crowd to a degree. They weren't seen a character taking up a valuable DLC slot or (to such a pessimistic audience) viewed as an unoriginal addition seemingly existing to pad out the FE representation even further.
Spitting facts there! For real, it's THOSE types of characters that I stick around for myself. Just like you said, I don't know if I'd be THAT invested in Smash if all they did was Nintendo's usual song-and-dance of characters.The big name characters are what gets eyes on Smash, but the weirdos are what makes it special. I can't imagine Smash without Jigglypuff, the Ice Climbers, Mr. G&W or the Duck Hunt dog at this point.
It's also the only (or one of the very few) places where you get to play as characters like Ridley, Ganondorf, King K. Rool, a Piranha Plant, or even Falco and Zelda. And the 3rd party characters are all popular but you wouldn't expect to see them in the same game.
Bah, if Smash was only about Nintendo's usual faces it would be a way worse series.
Remember when niche Nintendo franchises seemed like they had a shot?
sighRemember whennicheNintendo franchises seemed like they had a shot?
I'd be lying if I said I didn't feel the same way at the time...Something I'll always remember is when Shulk was announced for Smash 4 on the old Miiverse site...
"not the type of character that would usually appear in the Smash Bros. series" to me, always felt like a kinda sorta middle finger to IPs and characters like Golden Sun, Sin & Punishment, etc
I know I'm late to the party here, but...
"Mr. G&W slander"
Mr. Game & Watch is a really cool addition, and we need at least some Game & Watch representation seeing as it was one of Nintendo's first video game franchises. Would Assist Trophies work? Sure. However, the creativity of a concept like Mr. Game & Watch is something I really admire, and I like seeing retro characters be playable in general. Give me Sukapon, dammit.
Ngl, after remembering Ms. Mokujin from Tekken 3, I've been wondering about a "Mrs. Game & Watch" joining Smash. I know there's no way in heck that's happening, but it makes one think...Indefatigably based
I really hope the chances of him getting in one day aren't completely dead, even if - realistically - the misplacing of JMF's documentation until 2007, coupled with Smash's shifting priorities, means it grows less and less likely with the day.
I just want my funny comedy fighting robot man
You and me both... I mean, there IS that Tomato Adventure concept art that was all the buzz a couple of years ago...With all the obscure franchises getting some kind of revival, it makes me hopeful that Nintendo will one day bring back Tomato Adventure even without AlphaDream.
You mean Marvelous? You know, I actually made a Dion, Max, and Jack support thread when Ultimate was set to come out...I’m still hopeful for Another Treasure Island to get a modern remake, myself
If the next game brings in another character from a forgotten franchise I'd really like to finally see Mach Rider. His Melee trophy was randomly super hype, and he has a motorbike and machines guns and he can split into particles and regenerate himself and he'd have a Mad Max style stage. That's like super cool.
Sukapon, Muddy or the Sable Prince would also be great. I've missed a character of this kind in Ultimate, one of those old relics that get a strong reimagining and bring something truly unique to the table.
It's why I support so many retro/obscure/niche series, primarily from Nintendo! Heaven knows Nintendo has more than what they know what to do with. That said, I think that's partially why I still strongly support characters like Lark, Ray from Custom Robo, Barbara the Bat, and so many others. Seeing such characters get thrust into the modern day, interacting with characters who have had far more 'presence' is something that'll never get old for me, ESPECIALLY in regards to Smash Bros.Lip from Panel de Pon and Saki from Sin and Punishment would also be good choices in this regard.
Happy 25th anniversary to my first video game ever, and the most fun I've ever had with a fighting game! :DHappy 25th Anniversary to Super Smash Bros 64 and the Smash Bros series as a whole!
View attachment 383258
I don't know if EA would ever get a rep in Smash, considering how little EA has supported the Switch this past decade. Plus, it would be weird if Apex Legends got in before the likes of Halo, Doom, or even Wolfenstein.I think that a western pick nobody recogizes its too likely for a future smash bros it's an apex legends hero due to his popularity in japan:https://www.pocketgamer.biz/asia/special-report/79719/how-did-apex-legends-top-the-charts-in-japan/#:~:text=Japanese gamers can be seen,across iOS and Google Play.
Welp, if disney can be in smash bros, then Nintendo can negotiate with EA.I don't know if EA would ever get a rep in Smash, considering how little EA has supported the Switch this past decade. Plus, it would be weird if Apex Legends got in before the likes of Halo, Doom, or even Wolfenstein.
And thats a good thing!And when it comes to third party characters, they tend to prioritize legacy characters. The newest third party IP that has a character in Smash right now is Minecraft, which depending on one's interpretation debuted in either 2009 or 2011. The only third party character in Smash that's newer than that is Joker, who debuted in 2016, but Persona is a much older franchise than that.
Pretty much. This is the reason why I'm not expecting live service games to ever have a rep in Smash. They'll just be shut down sooner or later and they won't have much staying power after that.And thats a good thing!
Do you really think we need stuff from the millions of bad fad games!
Like there are sooo many games that are pretty bad and/or only popular cause of youtube!
Granted there are good games in that category but you usually only know they are good/ have stying power years after!
I'm sure they can, but whether they actually would is another question.Welp, if disney can be in smash bros, then Nintendo can negotiate with EA.
Yeah, but Nintendo prioritizes japanese gaming for smash bros, the only exception, Banjo kazooie was more for his legacy on Nintendo consoles and being in the top 5 of the ballot.I'm sure they can, but whether they actually would is another question.
There are still plenty of popular IPs in both regions, I don't see this being the one they land on, frankly.
Welp, i never said the next smash bros, rather a future smash bros game.Nintendo could also see some sort of Mii Costume from Apex as taking advantage of its popularity while still keeping outright fighter focus elsewhere.
If you can stay popular as long and at the levels some of these live service games have, ala LoL or Fortnite, that's an accomplish just as impactful and meaningful as some of the third-parties we get. I mean League has been going strong for over a decade, has a TV show and multiple spin-off games.Pretty much. This is the reason why I'm not expecting live service games to ever have a rep in Smash. They'll just be shut down sooner or later and they won't have much staying power after that.
Yeah but the part it would be added for isn't Titanfall. They're tied to each other but separate enough that they're not really going to help each other's Smash chances.I mean...even if, hypothetically, Apex shut down, the property is still directly tied to the Titanfall series. So like...the series would still be there.
This seems more likely to me.Nintendo could also see some sort of Mii Costume from Apex as taking advantage of its popularity while still keeping outright fighter focus elsewhere.
Well no, Nintendo prioritizes global gaming for Smash Bros, and the main exception has been Dragon Quest, which is heavily lopsided towards Japan.Yeah, but Nintendo prioritizes japanese gaming for smash bros, the only exception, Banjo kazooie was more for his legacy on Nintendo consoles and being in the top 5 of the ballot.
You know Splatoon is an online shooter right?Pretty much. This is the reason why I'm not expecting live service games to ever have a rep in Smash. They'll just be shut down sooner or later and they won't have much staying power after that.
It's not a live service game like Apex Legends or Fortnite.You know Splatoon is an online shooter right?
I do agree that not every fps is the same, and Master chief, Doom slayer and any Apex character would have vastly different moveset. But the thing is, at the end of the day all 3 are the same archetype of "dude shooting with futuristic guns in sci-fi settings". I feel like there's a much bigger overlap between those franchise than say, Persona and Dragon quest in fighter pass 1 despite also both coming from the same genre (turn based jrpg). In that way, I do feel that if we're going to get a fps characters, they're going to start with only one character, and then if there's more content in future update they could open the door for the others.But also I don't really think the whole "x should get in first because of the legacy" applies here. It's a very different set of circumstances. Not all FPS games are the same. Apex is a battle royale, Halo is a more traditional modern FPS, and Doom falls into the "boomer shooter" sect. But Apex also wouldn't get in because of legacy, but rather insane popularity. You can't really overstate how popular Apex Legends is, so it's at the very least a viable contender for consideration.
well now I’m really curiousIgnore this.
Misread the post
I did't saw the Live on Live Service Games, and I thought you we're talking abou Sega.well now I’m really curious