Wario Wario Wario
Smash Legend
When did I ever say these picks are jokes?So the joke here is just "Lol, random garbage picks!"
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
When did I ever say these picks are jokes?So the joke here is just "Lol, random garbage picks!"
WoL needs a map expansion so all the DLC characters can be located on it and give space for a bunch of new Spirits.Honestly, my pipe dream for SSBU in 2024 is a DLC expansion pack with not just new fighters, but new single-player content and QOL improvements as well.
You don't need to say it. It's self-evident.When did I ever say these picks are jokes?
id certainly like to see more of itFor garbage pick I select...
View attachment 381935
Nightmare from Metroid. Sickly looking boss and a pretty tough battle. Would love to see him as a boss in Smash.
It is not Smash's obligation to be a history lesson. It's Smash's obligation to add fun and engaging characters from a variety of beloved video games. Ignoring the fact that Geno is not remotely comparable to Banjo's iconography and significance within his genre - I think it's extremely reductive to put them in this same category - adding lesser known characters is not confusing. Its not promoting misconceptions, because most people do not view Smash as this exchange of historical relevance. Most people like discovering new characters through Smash Bros. When you force this role and limitation onto Smash, you're the one making it boring. Not the fans who request characters that personally don't excite you.I'd very much prefer to avoid grey area characters like Banjo and Geno, they just feel like wastes to me, and could contribute to misconceptions about gaming history, even if that isn't the intent
This is untrue, but it's a conversation we've retread here multiple times so I don't want to rope us back into it. Just consider that Fox, Falco and Wolf all bring something original to the table even if they are cut from the same cloth. It seems unlikely to me that Tom Nook would be fighting with the all the same tools Villager and Isabelle have and I feel like dismissing him as a clone is kind of lazy.Animal Crossing doesn’t have a lot to go off from for a new fighter. They would likely end up as an echo of Villager and/or Isabelle.
Octolings could be a skin, sure. But people don't bring up the color thing because it is not an issue. There are more than eight colors.For Octolings, something I don’t see brought up is ink colour issues, as both Inklings and Octolings will have to have different enough ink colours (not good for the colour blind). It might be a better method to simply make Octoling just a skin for Inkling, like how Alph is to Olimar.
It'd be a joke to think most of those characters had a chance to make it in, especially if Smash banned characters like Banjo and Geno because they're owned by the owners of Master Chief and Sephiroth. Because most of your most wanteds are in fact equivalent to adding Banjo before MC, it doesn't matter how much demand they have in comparison.When did I ever say these picks are jokes?
My list is being imagined in a "best case scenario" and part of that would include adding Kratos before PaRappa, Adventurer before Bubsy, and Chief before Clippy (for example) - the only real exception to this is Bad Piggies, which I'd be fine with, if not prefer, over the birds (though the birds are awesome picks too), and is still representing the Angry Birds franchise either way. Additionally, I don't think any of these characters barring Waluigi have a serious chance, and do not care either.It'd be a joke to think most of those characters had a chance to make it in, especially if Smash banned characters like Banjo and Geno because they're owned by the owners of Master Chief and Sephiroth. Because most of your most wanteds are in fact equivalent to adding Banjo before MC, it doesn't matter how much demand they have in comparison.
Well, if there's a joke here, can you explain it? Because I sure as hell did not intend for there to be any.You don't need to say it. It's self-evident.
He’d be killer, I like this idea.For garbage pick I select...
View attachment 381935
Nightmare from Metroid. Sickly looking boss and a pretty tough battle. Would love to see him as a boss in Smash.
I know this was somewhat addressed above, but you can already fight with 8 Inklings at the same time.For Octolings, something I don’t see brought up is ink colour issues, as both Inklings and Octolings will have to have different enough ink colours (not good for the colour blind).
I don’t think that accounts for if two players choose the same colour Inkling and Octoling if they are different characters on the select screen. It’s not like every player is forced to be the specific colour. Players can choose what alt colours they want.I know this was somewhat addressed above, but you can already fight with 8 Inklings at the same time.
At that point you don't have to be color blind to have trouble telling what's going on. Safe to say they don't have a problem with it; it's part of the chaos of multi-player Smash.
Adding Octoling might enlarge the pool of available colors, but the number of colors used at once would still be capped at the number of players, presumably 8 at a time.
I'd take any evolution of them and treat it as an AoE but the reaction... There's already a sleep one and a time slowdown one what about crumple effect on a timer like togepi's meteor bursts?If I made a garbage pick it’d be trubbish
I was going off the premise that they would give Octoling 8 new colors not used by the Inklings.I don’t think that accounts for if two players choose the same colour Inkling and Octoling if they are different characters on the select screen. It’s not like every player is forced to be the specific colour. Players can choose what alt colours they want.
This can still be solved by adding a few additional accessibility options. One possibility for example could be labeling the ink with the P1, P2, etc. icons as is already done for the actual fighters. The player icon would hover over spots covered in their ink.I don’t think that accounts for if two players choose the same colour Inkling and Octoling if they are different characters on the select screen. It’s not like every player is forced to be the specific colour. Players can choose what alt colours they want.
Definitely me. If I'm covered in ink and blend in with the background I sometimes can't see well enough to time buttons, actually some of the visuals in Ultimate can be really insane like a Greninja on one of those omega versions it had grass and flowers and crap all up in the foreground and the "floor" was black lolI don't play as Inkling that much, but given the attacks that actually leave ink, and the duration for which it lasts, you'd probably just be able to remember which is yours and which isn't. And if you're not playing as Inkling (or Octoling) you'd just... try to avoid all of it.
It’s officially a glitch, so MissingNo isn’t debatable— there’s no chance.If I had to choose a garbage pick it would be MissingNo although it’s debatable if this a possible pick
It’s the most iconic glitch character but the real question comes down the whole idea of creating a character that’s intentionally is a design mess
How about Ashura from Sonic 2?It’s the most iconic glitch character but the real question comes down the whole idea of creating a character that’s intentionally is a design mess
It would be unlike anything seen in a fighting game as it’s a manifestation of glitch as a character
...because why would Nintendo want to represent a product they sued a company over?and not getting an actual explanation as to why they feel that way,
I'm sorry if I'm rude, but you can't want Smash to evolve into a celebration of gaming without dealing with the fact that it means pretty much every single pick has to be "hype". Including but not limited to Master Chief.I don't always 100% agree w/Wario Wario Wario on certain opinions on Smash, but I don't know why they have to be so questioned for wanting odd/unconventional picks, or why people often act pretty rude to them in general?
I think if a genie gets in it'd be not that cause that's just an illustration but maybe the accessory could work Ive read ppl talk about a SNES scope lol so yeah ... But then yeah the legal thing but it's be like hey the shark from GameShark to which I say no bc it's Jaws and this is the first movie chr not original vgc in Smash called.At the risk of getting told I'm memeing and not getting an actual explanation as to why they feel that way, I've always thought the genie from the box of Game Genie would be a cool Smash pick. Maybe he could give his opponents crappy cheats to slow them down, I've always liked the idea of a status-infliction-centric character
I agree with this and I've noticed sometimes the dogpiling gets to be a bit overdone for certain unpopular opinions. I don't think we have to tell them that the characters they like are bad and "garbage", people can like what they want. I forget the reason but sometime a week or so ago we just got a slew of posts insulting another person, calling them stupid for their disagreeable opinion. I'm surprised more people didn't get warnings for that.I don't always 100% agree w/Wario Wario Wario on certain opinions on Smash, but I don't know why they have to be so questioned for wanting odd/unconventional picks, or why people often act pretty rude to them in general?
Yeah, this is probably a better way to state my issue with the whole thing, on top of the whole "Banjo should be MC" thing just asking for it to be a million times harder to ask "wouldn't it be cool if Bubsy was in the game?".You do, however, open yourself up to criticism when you insult other popular characters. And that scrutiny can easily be extended onto your own values to highlight hypocrisy. Calling characters that other people enjoy a "waste" and calling the community's taste "lame" and then asking for Bubsy and Clippy is bound to be a magnet for frustration and well, confusion more than anything. So you have to be ready for people to question that when you're suggesting it would be confusing for audiences to have Banjo and Kazooie in the game, and then suggesting it would be cool to represent the Game Genie.
Given the upcoming Spirit Events and Sora's amiibo, I have to say; I AM curious as to what next year will entail...Honestly, my pipe dream for SSBU in 2024 is a DLC expansion pack with not just new fighters, but new single-player content and QOL improvements as well. I know it’s probably way too late for anything other than the Spirit Events that we know for sure are coming BUT LET ME DREAM DAMNIT.
I mean, Surge is basically Ashura if Ashura was an actual character. And she was added to the games...How about Ashura from Sonic 2?
As much as I think SSBU Deluxe is unlikely and once clowned on the idea that FP3 could be a thing because of the Booster Course Pass, citing that Smash doesn't have a mobile game to take assets from, a mobile Smash isn't the only way they could cobble together a late expansion out of reused assets...Given the upcoming Spirit Events and Sora's amiibo, I have to say; I AM curious as to what next year will entail...
Given Nintendo's recent comments about not wanting to be "bound by the traditional concepts of the platform lifecycle" in their latest financial briefing, I could see a world where Nintendo continues to sell Ultimate and give it DLC support in lieu of releasing a new Smash. It simultaneously solves both the issues of no one being able to figure out how to top Ultimate and "Ultimate Deluxe" being unpracticable from a licensing perspective. Granted, this release scheme does rely on either (a) the Switch's Successor being backwards compatible or (b) Nintendo being able to reacquire the licenses for both the base game characters to stay base game characters and for the DLC characters to stay DLC. It would also be the only realistic way for Nintendo to get new, substantive Smash content out the door for the franchise's 25th anniversary (unless development on the next Smash started right after Sora).Given the upcoming Spirit Events and Sora's amiibo, I have to say; I AM curious as to what next year will entail...
Man, it is one thing to want an Ultimate Deluxe, but imagine the amount of work they'd have to if they had to make DLC in the way like how Mario Kart 8 Deluxe's DLC was made, with all those tracks from the latter and all. I mean, I can't see more stages than characters made as DLC for an Ultimate Deluxe, but to match Mario Kart 8 Deluxe's DLC, if they ever were to do it, that would be a lot of work.Given Nintendo's recent comments about not wanting to be "bound by the traditional concepts of the platform lifecycle" in their latest financial briefing, I could see a world where Nintendo continues to sell Ultimate and give it DLC support in lieu of releasing a new Smash. It simultaneously solves the issues of no one can figure out how to top Ultimate and "Ultimate Deluxe" being unpracticable from a licensing perspective. Granted, this release scheme does rely on either (a) the Switch's Successor being backwards compatible or (b) Nintendo being able to reacquire the licenses for both the base game characters to stay base game characters and for the DLC characters to stay DLC. It would also be the only realistic way for Nintendo to get new, substantive Smash content out the door for the franchise's 25th anniversary (unless development on the next Smash started right after Sora).
In a world where GTA V can be a late 7th gen game, a game available throughout the entire 8th gen, and the newest GTA game for what will likely be the lion's share of the 9th generation, I could see Nintendo saying "**** it, just release Ultimate again".
I don't think people using the BCP as an argument for more SSBU DLC literally mean they expect the roster to become twice as big, they're just using it as proof that a late DLC pass can be a thing.Man, it is one thing to want an Ultimate Deluxe, but imagine the amount of work they'd have to if they had to make DLC in the way like how Mario Kart 8 Deluxe's DLC was made, with all those tracks from the latter and all. I mean, I can't see more stages than characters made as DLC for an Ultimate Deluxe, but to match Mario Kart 8 Deluxe's DLC, if they ever were to do it, that would be a lot of work.
I was just saying just in case. As in, I just wanted to say something here, my thoughts, even if that wasn't what people were going for in this discussion. Okay?I don't think people using the BCP as an argument for more SSBU DLC literally mean they expect the roster to become twice as big, they're just using it as proof that a late DLC pass can be a thing.