Moving on from all the controversial stuff, how about a brand new topic.
Typically Smash has been Nintendo oriented, but Ultimate in particular added a ton of third party characters and franchises.
Do you think future Smash games will be more Nintendo oriented or do you think the series will become more third party oriented as it continues?
I think future Smash games will be more third party oriented compared to Brawl, but probably nowhere near as oriented as Ultimate, since part of Ultimate's focus on third parties was trying to get in choices from the Ballot that people wanted, like Sora, Banjo-Kazooie and Castlevania, you have another part where Nintendo(and Iwata) wanted Minecraft and Dragon Quest and Terry was probably wanted by Sakurai since Fatal Fury was a big deal for Sakurai and a huge influence for Smash Bros.
Kazuya is a bit of an outlier, but has some situations on why he could've been added:
- Could've been a favor and thank-you for Namco who was developing the game.
- Sakurai's love for fighting games, which is quite possible when you remember Akira Yuki is an Assist Trophy and one of the very few 3rd Party Assist Trophies from a 3rd Party series not in Smash with a playable character.
- Possibly a request by Harada, much like Nintendo and Iwata with Minecraft and Dragon Quest.
- Sakurai did consider Heihachi for a player character for Smash 4/5 alongside Pac-Man. So maybe either that was the next Namco series Sakurai wanted or maybe he wanted to try again on making a Tekken character playable.
- Maybe a mix of all of the above.
So, I think future Smash Bros. games will be more 3rd Party oriented on the scale of Smash 4/5. More than Brawl, less than Ultimate. Some I think will stay without much issue, like Capcom, Namco, SNK and Sega. Which leaves Konami, Square Enix, Microsoft and Disney.
- If Microsoft keeps a good relationship with Nintendo, I could see Banjo-Kazooie and Steve staying with little issues.
- Square's in the case where it looks like they want to be part of Smash, but even they have issues with their IPs' copyrights. Because if you read Sakurai's comments regarding their stuff, Square appears quite supportive with Sakurai, like how they helped him with getting Eight and Solo alongside Erdrick and Luminary and helped get him more music for DQ. The big issue just seems to be those copyright issues that even Square seems to have trouble with.
- Konami appears supportive, but we don't exactly know why they passed on Smash 4/5. Castlevania looks like it could stay without much issue. Don't know about Metal Gear.
- Disney is basically a case of, "If Sora comes back, great! If Sora doesn't, it's kinda understandable why."
So it's going to be a tough day when we need to learn which ones come back and which ones don't. But I'm not all too bothered. Not only will I still have Ultimate, but there are still plenty of notable 3rd Parties yet to join Smash, like Monster Hunter, Nier, Phantasy Star, Tales of, Dark Souls/Elden Ring, Undertale, Shantae, etc.
---
It's not a bad thing if the next Smash isn't as 3rd Party oriented as Ultimate. Besides some pretty cool recent Nintendo characters, as well as some older ones still being greatly requested like Isaac, Waluigi, Bandana Dee, etc, I honestly hope they remain open to adding in new Nintendo IPs for characters and stages, as not only do I love learning about them, but also seeing how they are remade and done in Smash Bros.
And Nintendo has a remarkable and colorful cast of characters capable of fitting any visual role and archetype, both from their big IPs and small IPs. But it's so fascinating watching an older and/or unique character get remade for Smash Bros. And I'm still hoping that some like Takamaru, Mach Rider, Dillon, Golden Sun, Astral Chain, Custom Robo, Rhythm Heaven, etc, will one day be able to interact with the cast of Smash Bros. we have now.