The uk is four countriesThere's nothing against the law about it. If your merger is denied by a single country you can simply decide to...proceed with your merger, and just not do business in that country
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
The uk is four countriesThere's nothing against the law about it. If your merger is denied by a single country you can simply decide to...proceed with your merger, and just not do business in that country
Microsoft as a whole would need to leave the UK. No Windows, no Office 365, no Edge, no Azure. Any British website which is hosted by Microsoft, which I hear includes several Government ones, would be taken down. All for a relatively insignificant part of the company, in one of the only countries that even humors them when compared to PlayStationEnjoy not having those games in the UK then. That market is small enough that MS would rather just not do business there then give up on a merger this size.
Japan already approved the merger.If they don't, then other foreign trade officials in other markets such as the US and Japan will have precedent to also say no, forcing Microsoft to the bidding table to work out deals.
That sounds like a bigger problem for the UK than it is for MS. It wouldn't be MS's responsibility to pull all that stuff. The UK would be the ones that would have to redo their entire system.Microsoft as a whole would need to leave the UK. No Windows, no Office 365, no Edge, no Azure. Any British website which is hosted by Microsoft, which I hear includes several Government ones, would be taken down.
Honestly, we might have to wait and see how the appeal goea first. Lots of people were expecting the merger to go through, so this threw everything for a loop...I posted the CMA and Microsoft thing more as an attempt to talk about how that affects some characters joining a new Smash Bros game more than anything.
What I means is (and while I would hate be the one to say this); could we get back on topic, and try to talk about how this thing can affect future newcomers in a Smash game?
I’m not really sure if this would help the chances of an Activision/Blizzard character getting into Smash but I think it’s possible. Nintendo already has a good relationship with Microsoft and they already have two characters in Smash so that could make negotiations easier. My biggest hope is that Microsoft can force them to address their toxic work environment. Most importantly, I just want people to be treated with respect but I also want to be able to be excited about their characters without all the baggage that comes with them.I posted the CMA and Microsoft thing more as an attempt to talk about how that affects some characters joining a new Smash Bros game more than anything.
What I means is (and while I would hate be the one to say this); could we get back on topic, and try to talk about how this thing can affect future newcomers in a Smash game?
Agreed.Xenoblade 3 story DLC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> x 888 Fire Emblem Engage story DLC, and it's not even funny.
Also yeah the Switch 2 coming out so soon kills all dreams of having DK and Golden Sun on the Switch. So ouch.
You say that as if there was a debate...Xenoblade 3 story DLC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> x 888 Fire Emblem Engage story DLC, and it's not even funny.
Also yeah the Switch 2 coming out so soon kills all dreams of having DK and Golden Sun on the Switch. So ouch.
I think their latest known game project is Pikmin 4, and Gamescom is after that. This doesn’t necessarily mean a Switch successor, but the fact that Gamescom is taking place after Pikmin 4 comes out is pretty interesting.You say that as if there was a debate...
Also, how does Nintendo going to Gamescom confirm a Switch successor?
I want to try the DLC at some point. That’s great to hear that you think it’s worth it.Xenoblade 3 story DLC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> x 888 Fire Emblem Engage story DLC, and it's not even funny.
Also yeah the Switch 2 coming out so soon kills all dreams of having DK and Golden Sun on the Switch. So ouch.
This is officially coming next week.
There was a problem fetching the tweet
what does this mean ??Xenoblade 3 story DLC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> x 888 Fire Emblem Engage story DLC, and it's not even funny.
thanksI think their latest known game project is Pikmin 4, and Gamescom is after that. This doesn’t necessarily mean a Switch successor, but the fact that Gamescom is taking place after Pikmin 4 comes out is pretty interesting.
Diddy likes one game more than the other game.what does this mean ??
why ? What does it benefit Nintendo to wait until next year ?As someone leaning towards a successor console not coming until the latter half of 2024, I think the most we'll get out of Gamescom is announcement of when the next system is coming out, if that. Heck If Nintendo holds any sort of Direct, (or even a partner showcase) that could fill out the rest of year before August, the event could simply easily be a showcase for whatever games revealed in June/July, no console announcement required.
exactly why Nintendo will market their next console as the Switch ProThey've established a massive install base on the Switch and they're gonna want to milk that for all that it's worth. Eventually new hardware will be deemed necessary, but they have already stated their desire to make the Switch's success last as long as possible, and expressed optimism that it could last beyond most external estimates.
The CMA is Microsoft's problem, not Nintendo's. The CoD deal represents a miniscule portion of Nintendo's overall business strategy that they could easily survive without. I can pretty much guarantee you that getting CoD ports on par with the versions of CoD on XBox and PS is NOT going to majorly dictate when Nintendo decides to go to new hardware.Looks like if Nintendo wants access to the UK ; they have to come out with a better system. preferably this year.
think of it more as a minor part of the decision, not the major one. still trending in the Switch Pro 2023 directionThe CMA is Microsoft's problem, not Nintendo's. The CoD deal represents a miniscule portion of Nintendo's overall business strategy that they could easily survive without. I can pretty much guarantee you that getting CoD ports on par with the versions of CoD on XBox and PS is NOT going to majorly dictate when Nintendo decides to go to new hardware.
Particularly the DLC. Xenoblade 3 and Fire Emblem Engage are both great entries in their respective series, but the XBC3 DLC just triumphs FEE in terms of story content. XBC3 DLC is a great additional story line that adds a lot of debt and perspective so far, Engage story DLC is just... there. Doesn't do much for me at all.Diddy likes one game more than the other game.
SUPER...NINTENDO...SWITCH!!exactly why Nintendo will market their next console as the Switch Pro
hey leave us out of itLooks like if Nintendo wants access to the UK ; they have to come out with a better system. preferably this year.
good name choice.SUPER...NINTENDO...SWITCH!!
Putting CoD on Nintendo systems is owing to MS, not Nintendo. It's a strategic move to invalidate Sony's claims of withholding the franchise. Nintendo is just a lucky benefactor here. Having CoD on the platform would be a plus, obviously they wouldn't turn it down, but Switch never got it, and look at how that turned out. They don't need the franchise to succeed, and aren't going to schedule their console release around an unrelated potential deal which has yet to not be in indefinite flux.think of it more as a minor part of the decision, not the major one. still trending in the Switch Pro 2023 direction
Wanna make a pfp bet?exactly why Nintendo will market their next console as the Switch Pro
Now that I think about it, the merger not going through probably hurts ActiBlizz more than it hurts Microsoft. Not only would the harmful behavior continue (which I would not be surprised if it eventually led ActiBlizz going under, as unlikely as that sounds), but if certain rumors are to be believed ABK wasn't even MS's first choice for their next acquisition. If the appeal fails, what's stopping MS from just cutting their loses and looking elsewhere? ABK would lose both a potential lifesaver should the worst-case scenario happen...I really don’t care who owns Call of Duty, or Crash, or Spyro, or Tony Hawk, or whatever else honestly. Usually a company doesn’t make a character any less or more likely when it comes to smash.
Now that I got the relevant part to the thread out of the way, this is a huge L for the industry. Golden Parachute or not, the Microsoft Merger was going to be the ONE thing that could bring real change to the absolute 3-ring circus of abuse that is Activision-Blizzard-King. But the lack of a merger and real consequences to the Managers at the company that ruined people’s lives doesn’t set a good precedent for the industry at large.
As much as I don’t care about the companies themselves, the fact that any and all creative talent at ABK will not only continued to be stifled but also continued to be laughed at, degraded, and abused for as long as Bobby Kotick remains at the top is heartbreaking. Love or hate Microsoft and their business practices, I’m heartbroken for employees who have poured their heart and soul into a company that will never treat them like human beings.
There were rumors there was supposed to a Pro sku, but the pandemic ****ed things up and by the time a release was feasible (which I think, though don't quote me on it, was allegedly last year) it was close enough to the actual next thing that they were like forget it.I feel like it’s too late for any kind of Switch Pro. It would have made sense a couple years ago but it’s getting close to the time that a console is nearing the end of its life. We don’t have any major games announced after Tears of the Kingdom so I think they are likely holding announcements for the reveal of the next generation. I not sure but I wouldn’t be surprised to hear an announcement about the Switch’s successor by the end of this year and be released some time in 2024.
Technically the lifecycle of the system ends when the support stops, not when the successor arrives. Most successful systems do still continue to get support after the next thing shows up, albeit reduced. And Switch would certainly constitute a success. The 3DS was supported into 2019.I recall earlier in 2022 the president of Nintendo reiterated that the Switch was "mid lifecycle" meaning a new console wouldn't be out until 2027! To me that's way too late for the next console. This year is TotK, Pikmin 4, and some random stuff like Etrian Odyssey, Diablo IV, etc. I think it's definitely a safe bet to expect a new console next year.
well they still count as first party series but they're not the only twoI can't believe there's gonna be a new console for Nintendo before a new DKC game on Switch. If it turns out to be so, the next console release of DK is gonna have to make up for this major loss! Like, literally all Nintendo first party series thrived on the Switch, except DK! And I guess Star Fox and maybe F Zero if they still count.
Fwiw I do believe the claims that Nintendo has big plans for DK. Movie, increasing merch, Nintendo World expansion. It wouldn't surprise me if they're just holding on to the DK game (and all other unannounced high-profile games) for the next thing at this point, and made that decision a while back.I can't believe there's gonna be a new console for Nintendo before a new DKC game on Switch. If it turns out to be so, the next console release of DK is gonna have to make up for this major loss! Like, literally all Nintendo first party series thrived on the Switch, except DK! And I guess Star Fox and maybe F Zero if they still count.
**** this is depressing.
On the other hand, I wouldn't want to sacrifice either the quantity of DLC or the earlier release of the successor system (assuming its ready and not rushed) for the sake of breathing room after DLC, especially since getting the next system doesn't mean getting the next Smash.To be honest, I prefer to let the latest Smash game to last about three years as a complete game before moving on to the next console that the sequel is going to be released on. While it's always hype to see which character is going to be in Smash, I don't want it overshadow everything else about the game. I just want to enjoy it as a complete game now, with no news or DLC. Just what the game is. Ultimate has enough in it that I think could last a long time before the next game is revealed.