• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Official Next Smash - Speculation & Discussion Thread

ForsakenM

Smash Lord
Joined
Sep 14, 2018
Messages
1,984
Got a big post I'm working on but before that...

It seems tensions are still high in the community, at least among speculators. I wonder if anything can truly be done to settle this by the time the next game comes around?

I have my own thoughts on this all (as anyone who saw my FP2 video can attest), but would I just be fanning the flames by talking about them at length here?
Hey, aren't you that YT guy? Like, there are a lot to be fair, but I feel like I've watched your videos before. Have you done moveset breakdowns for future characters before? If you are who I think you are, you freakin rock dude!

They aren't. It was a desperate attempt to insult other characters they didn't like.

Like and dislike what you want but... at least be honest about it.
This is actually a joke in my friend group, but it was only about a month or so ago I learned Pyra and Mythra are actually adult in age. I think they look VERY much like teens and I think that was intentional because Japan be Japan yo, but if they are adults they are adults. Still wondering if that choice was made so that people didn't feel like degenerates...speaking of which.

SSGuy SSGuy , for the love of Star Road, how many times do we have to go over not attacking the characters that other people want? Remember what you make the Geno fanbase look like when you do that. It's one thing to do it in jest or as a joke, but actively slandering the characters and the people who want them is NOT COOL.

Remember that this website and some sites outside of this have a stigma about us Geno fans being crazy and toxic, and before we let ourselves fit that narrative (which admittedly, it was a self-fulfilling prophecy that people actively engaged with us to make us like that) there was a stigma against us. We have an image to try and clean up if we want others to support us even if they don't want Geno, and acting like this ain't it chief.

Yes, we took a big blow. Yes, a lot of people gave up on Geno. Yes, his support is smaller than it was.

However, consider that SmashBoards is a very small fraction of actual support. Consider that people congregate on multiple different websites and support their most wanted there. Consider that us having an active support Discord is a very good thing. Consider the bigger names on social media that support Geno.

It's not as bad as you think, and most of the fans who gave up only gave up for THIS Smash. they may say otherwise, but they will come flocking back at another chance for the boy to get his dues.
 
Last edited:

Delzethin

Character Concept Creator
Joined
Mar 23, 2012
Messages
3,972
Location
St. Louis, MO
NNID
Delzethin
Speaking as someone who's been a fan of Geno ever since I first played Super Mario RPG way back in 1998...I don't know what to think of his chances for next game. Ultimate went out of its way to pick up several long running fan requests, yet he wasn't one of 'em.

I have a tinfoil hat theory that Sakurai wanted to get him for Fighter #8 after he/Nintendo/etc. decided to set that spot aside for someone from Square-Enix, only for SE to turn the idea down and leave both sides to go with Sephiroth instead...but with no evidence to support it, it's little more than mad ramblings that'd probably get mocked if someone who didn't already have clout said them.

Honestly, I think the best thing that could happen for Geno is if Nintendo somehow acquired the rights to him from Square-Enix and incorporated him into Mario canon for real. But is that even realistically possible? What would compel Nintendo to bend over backward for an old character like that? I'd like to think he'd appeal to newer or younger fans nowadays (I mean he's a star inhabiting a child's toy to fight for the good guys; that's still pretty damn interesting), but who's to say an original character couldn't do just as well?

Difficult situation, this.

Hey, aren't you that YT guy? Like, there are a lot to be fair, but I feel like I've watched your videos before. Have you done moveset breakdowns for future characters before? If you are who I think you are, you freakin rock dude!
One and the same. I do what I can.
 
Last edited:

Shroob

Sup?
Joined
Sep 26, 2013
Messages
41,833
Location
Washington
Got a big post I'm working on but before that...



Hey, aren't you that YT guy? Like, there are a lot to be fair, but I feel like I've watched your videos before. Have you done moveset breakdowns for future characters before? If you are who I think you are, you freakin rock dude!



This is actually a joke in my friend group, but it was only about a month or so ago I learned Pyra and Mythra are actually adult in age. I think they look VERY much like teens and I think that was intentional because Japan be Japan yo, but if they are adults they are adults. Still wondering if that choice was made so that people didn't feel like degenerates...speaking of which.

SSGuy SSGuy , for the love of Star Road, how many times do we have to go over not attacking the characters that other people want? Remember what you make the Geno fanbase look like when you do that. It's one thing to do it in jest or as a joke, but actively slandering the characters and the people who want them is NOT COOL.

Remember that this website and some sites outside of this have a stigma about us Geno fans being crazy and toxic, and before we let ourselves fit that narrative (which admittedly, it was a self-fulfilling prophecy that people actively engaged with us to make us like that) there was a stigma against us. We have an image to try and clean up if we want others to support us even if they don't want Geno, and acting like this ain't it chief.

Yes, we took a big blow. Yes, a lot of people gave up on Geno. Yes, his support is smaller than it was.

However, consider that SmashBoards is a very small fraction of actual support. Consider that people congregate on multiple different websites and support their most wanted there. Consider that us having an active support Discord is a very good thing. Consider the bigger names on social media that support Geno.

It's not as bad as you think, and most of the fans who gave up only gave up for THIS Smash. they may say otherwise, but they will come flocking back at another chance for the boy to get his dues.
I mean, they're anime girls.


Anime girls look like anime girls.
 

ForsakenM

Smash Lord
Joined
Sep 14, 2018
Messages
1,984
I mean, they're anime girls.


Anime girls look like anime girls.
As someone who really enjoys anime, it is very easy in design to make it clear who is a young adult and who is an adult, even when the age difference isn't that much. I haven't touched XBC2, but from what little I've heard of Pyra she may not LOOK like an adult as much as she sounds and in some ways acts like one.

I can't speak for Mythra or the spoiler, though Mythra seems very much like a immature teen from what I got from Smash.

Like, I get you my dude, but I also have to disagree. Not all anime girls plunge into the stereotype. These two very much do though.

Just kinda feels like this is the kinda of comment someone would have made about anime before it became a popular medium outside of nerd culture is all.
 

SSGuy

Smash Champion
Joined
Oct 7, 2008
Messages
2,684
Location
Dallas, TX/FGCU
3DS FC
4871-4520-9643
Speaking as someone who's been a fan of Geno ever since I first played Super Mario RPG way back in 1998...I don't know what to think of his chances for next game. Ultimate went out of its way to pick up several long running fan requests, yet he wasn't one of 'em.

I have a tinfoil hat theory that Sakurai wanted to get him for Fighter #8 after he/Nintendo/etc. decided to set that spot aside for someone from Square-Enix, only for SE to turn the idea down and leave both sides to go with Sephiroth instead...but with no evidence to support it, it's little more than mad ramblings that'd probably get mocked if someone who didn't already have clout said them.

Honestly, I think the best thing that could happen for Geno is if Nintendo somehow acquired the rights to him from Square-Enix and incorporated him into Mario canon for real. But is that even realistically possible? What would compel Nintendo to bend over backward for an old character like that? I'd like to think he'd appeal to newer or younger fans nowadays (I mean he's a star inhabiting a child's toy to fight for the good guys; that's still pretty damn interesting), but who's to say an original character couldn't do just as well?

Difficult situation, this.


One and the same. I do what I can.
Oh hey! Really cool to know. Your videos were really great watches!

I think for me it's really just this. I accept the fact that getting Geno into this kind of game is not an easy endeavor. I'm just really bitter about how it went down and how often someone who would want Geno would be met with such unjustified scorn. It kind of brings out the worst in me but it's at least something I'm willing to admit and not beat around the bush about. I think at the very least I don't make this kind of thing personal with the actual player or user.

Nintendo is kind of their own worst enemy when it comes to the idea of acquiring Geno because they seem so adamant on making the Mario and the Mario Universe so disgustingly homogenized at this point that anything showing a beat of originality is just destined to be casted aside for the next wave of generic Toads or Koopa npcs. And even if they do decide to make some original characters I'm just have this burning disappointment that it's not Geno or Mallow. So it's a lose-lose for me.

But I'd like to at least hope there is something that will result in the long standing support.
 

Shroob

Sup?
Joined
Sep 26, 2013
Messages
41,833
Location
Washington
As someone who really enjoys anime, it is very easy in design to make it clear who is a young adult and who is an adult, even when the age difference isn't that much. I haven't touched XBC2, but from what little I've heard of Pyra she may not LOOK like an adult as much as she sounds and in some ways acts like one.

I can't speak for Mythra or the spoiler, though Mythra seems very much like a immature teen from what I got from Smash.

Like, I get you my dude, but I also have to disagree. Not all anime girls plunge into the stereotype. These two very much do though.

Just kinda feels like this is the kinda of comment someone would have made about anime before it became a popular medium outside of nerd culture is all.
I mean

They don't look any younger than Lucina, and Lucina's old enough to both get married and push out a baby in her game.
 

Yamat08

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Oct 11, 2021
Messages
312
I mean

They don't look any younger than Lucina, and Lucina's old enough to both get married and push out a baby in her game.
In before someone brings up the standards of a medieval-style setting.

Really, though, so far as I'm concerned, age is quite literally just a number when discussing fictional characters. As long as they look mature enough to reproduce, I say it flies.
 

Dinoman96

Smash Master
Joined
Sep 22, 2013
Messages
3,340
Nintendo nowadays forbids their contractors from making unique toads/goombas/koopas/etc in Mario spinoffs anymore, the eff would they want Geno for lol
 
Last edited:

Ivander

Smash Legend
Joined
Dec 1, 2014
Messages
10,971
They don't look any younger than Lucina, and Lucina's old enough to both get married and push out a baby in her game.
I mean, she can get married, but the baby doesn't get pushed yet. Only Lucina is ever shown born as a baby before her appearance. The others aren't other than that the babies apparently come after the game, despite time-travel shenanigans. Female Robin would fit this more, both due to being able to be Lucina's mother and because of the young, more child-like version of Robin you can choose.

What you're thinking of may actually be Fates, since that is literally marry, push the baby and then send baby to different dimension where time speeds up immensely for child to be an adult in record time. So in other words, female Corrin rather than Lucina.
 
Last edited:

ForsakenM

Smash Lord
Joined
Sep 14, 2018
Messages
1,984
Speaking as someone who's been a fan of Geno ever since I first played Super Mario RPG way back in 1998...I don't know what to think of his chances for next game. Ultimate went out of its way to pick up several long running fan requests, yet he wasn't one of 'em.

I have a tinfoil hat theory that Sakurai wanted to get him for Fighter #8 after he/Nintendo/etc. decided to set that spot aside for someone from Square-Enix, only for SE to turn the idea down and leave both sides to go with Sephiroth instead...but with no evidence to support it, it's little more than mad ramblings that'd probably get mocked if someone who didn't already have clout said them.

Honestly, I think the best thing that could happen for Geno is if Nintendo somehow acquired the rights to him from Square-Enix and incorporated him into Mario canon for real. But is that even realistically possible? What would compel Nintendo to bend over backward for an old character like that? I'd like to think he'd appeal to newer or younger fans nowadays (I mean he's a star inhabiting a child's toy to fight for the good guys; that's still pretty damn interesting), but who's to say an original character couldn't do just as well?

Difficult situation, this.


One and the same. I do what I can.
Hell yeah, thanks for the cool content.

Actually, I've done the math already, and Ultimate really only dipped their toes into the pool of fan requests in comparison to all the characters added...and to clarify, I'm clearly speaking about long-running requests.

Characters like Geno, Dixie, Isaac, Krystal, Bandanna Dee and such have actually been around a lot longer than some people realize. Sure, it may not have always been the biggest amount of support or the loudest for the whole duration, but they were still being asked for.

Ultimate gave us Ridley, K. Rool and Castlevania from that long list at launch, they tossed in the bear and bird in Pass 1. Out of all of Pass 2, even names like Sephiroth and Steve, Sora is the only one that fits the description of long-running request because the real support movement for Steve isn't nearly as long and Sephiroth really dropped off from the Brawl mod days and people were all talking about Geno, Neku, Sora, 2B and Crono.

So, what does this mean? Well, it means that out of 23 new characters in Ultimate, only 5 of them were from that long-running list, with some wiggle-room depending on how you view Isabelle. That's not even a quarter, and it's why long-term fandom felt rather disgruntled throughout the DLC. Not sure if you've seen me bring it up, but had Furakawa been in charge earlier, Ultimate may have gotten a delay to help with crunch time and that could have put at minimum 3 of the DLC characters into the base roster. I'm not saying each of those would have been fan picks, but just that alone for options would have made things better overall with a huge chunk of the community.

We know Sakurai wants Geno and we know HE KNOWS that we want Geno. The issue here is priority. When you walk up to a company like Square who has many iconic characters and games, do you really pick the puppet over Mr. Final Fantasy? What about THE JRPG? Major contender for the most iconic video game villain? And you can't tell me that you would pick Geno over Sora when Disney comes back to you and says 'Umm, actually, we are cool with it if you follow all the rules we have in this 100-page document.'

Imagine you have a game and you are guest-starring Nintendo characters in said game. You meet up with Nintendo, and your team and your fans have talked about how cool it would be to get Foreman Spike in your build-a-kart racing game. So originally you have that in mind, but then you find out Nintendo is okay with letting you put Mario Jumpman Mario in your game as long as you do your respectful duties. If you picked Foreman Spike over Mario, I would classify you as insane.

As for Nintendo getting the rights permanently for SMRPG-Original characters, it's entirely possible. They have enough money that I don't think it would be them bending over backwards for them (richest Japanese company btw), but whether or not they would want to is whether or not they see profit in Mario as an RPG series...and that is where we come in. The more we talk about how much we love Geno and Mallow and SMRPG and miss them, how we want the series revitalized and that we want Geno in Smash not only to play as him but to show the love for SMRPG and what it started as well as it being a better chance for the return of SMRPG, the more likely they may see a chance to make profit off of a good game.

Fun fact, but a brand-new Mario RPG hasn't happened since 2015 with Mario & Luigi: Paper Jam and I'm not sure how much of an RPG that game is, though I know earlier M&L titles definitely are. Paper Mario has evolved into whatever it is now, which most fans complain about and have complained about it over multiple installments, and the last two M&L games before AlphaDream went under were just remakes with a bit of extra side stuff. Just to do a bit of debunking here SSGuy SSGuy and Dinoman96 Dinoman96 it's not really a Nintendo-wide mandate: originally this was a Miyamoto thing, but I believe the director of Origami King had the same beliefs and enforcement and Miyamoto was almost totally removed from Origami King's development. In other words, it's not like every higher up at Nintendo thinks this way and pushes it, but only those involved with Paper Mario have been. These are things that can easily change with Furakawa in charge who values the SNES-Gamecube as the glory days of Nintendo, which part of that is the SMRPG and Paper Mario of old everyone loves the most.

You also have to consider that, since it's been so long since we've had a true Mario RPG and Origami King still had the same complaints, there is an entirely new audience for a new SMRPG or even a remake to appeal too. Remember that SMRPG is actually very easy for the most part, yet features all the RPG elements require to fit within the genre, so it could easily appeal to kids now like it did to us when we were kids. You also have a massive audience in older players, so this would appeal to them as well. As long as it seems profitable, Nintendo would definitely pursue it.
 
Last edited:

PeridotGX

Smash Hero
Joined
Jun 8, 2017
Messages
9,024
Location
That Distant Shore
NNID
Denoma5280
Would people be intrested in a moveset/smash game creation contest? Basically, every round i would give a prompt like "make a moveset for a 3ds character" or "overhaul a veteran" or something, sumbmissions would be open for like two weeks, and then i would get judges to decide a winner for the round. These things are pretty popular and fun over on gamefaqs, and i would like to bring them over to a good this site. And don't worry - i wouldn't require movesets to be near as lengthy as your average MYM moveset.
The thread exists noew!
 

PeridotGX

Smash Hero
Joined
Jun 8, 2017
Messages
9,024
Location
That Distant Shore
NNID
Denoma5280
Would people be intrested in a moveset/smash game creation contest? Basically, every round i would give a prompt like "make a moveset for a 3ds character" or "overhaul a veteran" or something, sumbmissions would be open for like two weeks, and then i would get judges to decide a winner for the round. These things are pretty popular and fun over on gamefaqs, and i would like to bring them over to a good this site. And don't worry - i wouldn't require movesets to be near as lengthy as your average MYM moveset.
The thread exists now!
 

SSGuy

Smash Champion
Joined
Oct 7, 2008
Messages
2,684
Location
Dallas, TX/FGCU
3DS FC
4871-4520-9643
We can talk about how attractive Geno's concept is for kids all day but it's going to be hard to sell him to people who never played his game when you have an ongoing vendetta against characters who still appear in games.
From experience it usually stems from the 'literal who?' commentary from those who have a cynical view about people wanting a character who hasn't been in a new game in quite some time. This often creates an endless loop of negative comments towards each other.

The solution to this is simple. Let Geno fans and other niche fandoms exist without the need to include snobby responses.

This isn't directed at you. Just more or less a generated statement.
 

DarthEnderX

Smash Hero
Joined
Nov 10, 2014
Messages
8,412
One of the reasons Sora got in was because he was #1 on the ballot, which means Sakurai is admitting a third-party will cater to people who've already bought the game.
How do you figure? You didn't need to own Smash to vote in the ballot.

For all we know, Sora's votes could have come from a ton of non-Smash owning KH fans, who basically wanted to convey "THIS is what will get me to buy Smash."

So, I know a lot of people talk about how Third Party companies have to be cut from the next game - but for a little change of pace, what series do you think might get a new character in the next game?
Another Sonic or Street Fighter character is definitely possible. And I think Zero, Alucard and Raiden all have a shot.

Odds go up if we're counting echoes.

tbh it would probably be better if we could already start support threads

less need for first vs. third party discussion if you could make a thread to build support for your favorite first/third party
Agreed. Also NOW is the time to show character support for the next Smash. After the next Smash is announced, it's too late, the characters have already been decided.

Next Smash should be an entire subforum. And when the next Smash does get announced, you can just rename the subforum.

It's not literally forcing discussion of older, niche characters out, but it is discouraging.
**** 'em. I don't care how unlikely people tell me Kunio is. Imma let my retro flag fly!

I have a tinfoil hat theory that Sakurai wanted to get him for Fighter #8 after he/Nintendo/etc. decided to set that spot aside for someone from Square-Enix, only for SE to turn the idea down and leave both sides to go with Sephiroth instead...but with no evidence to support it, it's little more than mad ramblings that'd probably get mocked if someone who didn't already have clout said them.
I have video evidence:
 

osby

Smash Obsessed
Joined
Apr 25, 2018
Messages
24,014
From experience it usually stems from the 'literal who?' commentary from those who have a cynical view about people wanting a character who hasn't been in a new game in quite some time. This often creates an endless loop of negative comments towards each other.

The solution to this is simple. Let Geno fans and other niche fandoms exist without the need to include snobby responses.

This isn't directed at you. Just more or less a generated statement.
The thing is Geno fanbase is surprisingly hostile towards other niche support groups with a rather ironic lack of self-awareness.

During the course of the Ultimate DLC cycle, they had multiple opportunities to show solidarity and good will for characters like Terry and Hero who also had to deal with "literal who" snides. From what I saw, a lot of Geno fans (at least the vocal ones) preferred throwing them under the bus to elevate themselves above those nobodies nobody wanted.

People's patience towards Geno was waning even before his Mii costume reveal and it was at least partially due to this attitude even towards fandoms that weren't the popular kids.
 

SSGuy

Smash Champion
Joined
Oct 7, 2008
Messages
2,684
Location
Dallas, TX/FGCU
3DS FC
4871-4520-9643
The thing is Geno fanbase is surprisingly hostile towards other niche support groups with a rather ironic lack of self-awareness.

During the course of the Ultimate DLC cycle, they had multiple opportunities to show solidarity and good will for characters like Terry and Hero who also had to deal with "literal who" snides. From what I saw, a lot of Geno fans (at least the vocal ones) preferred throwing them under the bus to elevate themselves above those nobodies nobody wanted.

People's patience towards Geno was waning even before his Mii costume reveal and it was at least partially due to this attitude even towards fandoms that weren't the popular kids.
I can understand the disheartening reactions towards Hero mainly based on how weaponized he was towards anyone who wanted Geno or any other Square Enix character. Terry was probably my favorite DLC character that came out but I can recall how negative his reaction was towards those who might not be as knowledgeable of other fighting games.

I definitely understand that aspect being concerning. I definitively react more poorly towards specific characters than others do but I don't really pin this on Geno fans as a whole. It's like taking a poll of 100 random Smash Bros fans and claiming only Geno supporters were negative towards the outcome when reality is there could have been maybe 3-4 in that total sample.

It's just generalizing at this point and you can see how damaging this kind of generalization can be. Who is to say Kingdom Hearts fans weren't also vile towards Hero or another Final Fantasy character? The idea of grouping fandoms like this has screwed a lot of people over and my advice would be to stop.
 
Last edited:

7NATOR

Smash Master
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
4,089
Seeing people constantly mention Mickey more recently even before Sora's reveal is weird to me... Is it just a thing because of how bizarre it is or...? Like Mickey is definitely never getting into smash for the record. If they weren't even gonna try and work with Disney to add Sora if it weren't for both a high level of demand and a chance meeting at an awards show then the chances of Mickey are like next to none. I'd say Goku has higher odds and this is of course not bearing in mind the whole shtick on non video game characters.

As a refresher, non video game characters aren't included cos of licensing complexities... And can you imagine how much of that would be the case with Mickey... Representing the character in a way that does them justice would require pulling from tons of different places that would likely have tons of legal red tape all around. Mickey could be argued to be the foundation of this entire idea lmao. Nintendo seem to be just fine sticking with video games for now so Mickey is probably like... the least likely character period TBH. This is where a characters iconic status ultimately don't help them as much as it harms them. I know there's a bunch of stuff about Mickey going into the public domain next year even if it's specifically the steamboat willie interpretation IIRC, but that would kinda defeat the point of getting Mickey into a crossover. So at that point the idea would lose a lot of it's potential shine. I don't know the ins and outs of it but Disney should just make their own smash game TBH. If WB can, then they could and it would probably cater to a much larger audience.
To be honest, a Part of the reason people were talking about Mickey was either they were going with the Bonus Character idea and the idea that having to Make Mickey was why Sora was taking so long, or they heard the rumors that Sora was denied intially in part due to Disney wanting Mickey to also be in the game, and well with all the time that needs to be invested into that, might have been too hard

Now here's the thing. Getting Sora has now made Disney involved with Smash, and if they want to keep bringing Sora back, Disney would need to be Involved again.

To My Knowledge, Disney owns the Complete Rights to Mickey Mouse. Compare this to someone like Goku where there are like 7 Different Companies that have hands in the Licensing, and even with Marvel and Star Wars which Disney Owns, there might actually be a Stipulation that would require some of the Ogrinal Creators or Head honchos of Lucasarts or Marvel to get involved, like it's theorized that Nomura and Square have to be involved with Sora in spite of Disney owning the rights. Since Disney is on board with Smash, and I'm sure they already know that having Mickey Mouse going against Mario would be a HUGE Deal, I actually don't think it's an Implausible idea to go for Mickey

It might cost a great deal in Licensing fees, but I could actually see Disney easing up on that. What I can't see them easing up on is their Nitpickiness in how their character is Represented, and I'm sure the LARGE Amount of time it would take to make every aspect of even a Mickey, Donald, Goofy Cameo was probably why all sources of Disney Content was Scrubbed, besides the Mickey Chain.

However that's why I say it's only a matter of time personally. I think Both Nintendo and Disney would want this Crossover to happen, and I think Sakurai might be apprehensive since it's gonna be the Tallest order he's ever Accomplished in terms of Directing a Character Inclusion, but I think at the end of the day, he would go for it if the Opportunity arose. Thought I think it would have to be DLC for whatever is next.
 

osby

Smash Obsessed
Joined
Apr 25, 2018
Messages
24,014
To be honest, a Part of the reason people were talking about Mickey was either they were going with the Bonus Character idea and the idea that having to Make Mickey was why Sora was taking so long, or they heard the rumors that Sora was denied intially in part due to Disney wanting Mickey to also be in the game, and well with all the time that needs to be invested into that, might have been too hard

Now here's the thing. Getting Sora has now made Disney involved with Smash, and if they want to keep bringing Sora back, Disney would need to be Involved again.

To My Knowledge, Disney owns the Complete Rights to Mickey Mouse. Compare this to someone like Goku where there are like 7 Different Companies that have hands in the Licensing, and even with Marvel and Star Wars which Disney Owns, there might actually be a Stipulation that would require some of the Ogrinal Creators or Head honchos of Lucasarts or Marvel to get involved, like it's theorized that Nomura and Square have to be involved with Sora in spite of Disney owning the rights. Since Disney is on board with Smash, and I'm sure they already know that having Mickey Mouse going against Mario would be a HUGE Deal, I actually don't think it's an Implausible idea to go for Mickey

It might cost a great deal in Licensing fees, but I could actually see Disney easing up on that. What I can't see them easing up on is their Nitpickiness in how their character is Represented, and I'm sure the LARGE Amount of time it would take to make every aspect of even a Mickey, Donald, Goofy Cameo was probably why all sources of Disney Content was Scrubbed, besides the Mickey Chain.

However that's why I say it's only a matter of time personally. I think Both Nintendo and Disney would want this Crossover to happen, and I think Sakurai might be apprehensive since it's gonna be the Tallest order he's ever Accomplished in terms of Directing a Character Inclusion, but I think at the end of the day, he would go for it if the Opportunity arose. Thought I think it would have to be DLC for whatever is next.
I honestly don't see what makes Mickey inevitable other than "it would be a big crossover".

Smash doesn't even try to license the biggest video game franchises for the sake of licensing them. It's even less likely for them to try and go beyond the video games for the sake of... what, really?

You're appealing to the new video game fans and creating cross-promotion opportunities by adding third-party characters. By adding Mickey, you would appeal to people who know who he is, which is about everyone. If someone is passionate about him and plays games, chances are that Sora already attracts them. Nintendo doesn't really have much to gain from putting Mickey in Smash, especially when you consider just how controlling Disney would be in terms of his implementation.

If the next Smash adds playable characters from GTA, FIFA, and CoD just because they make big numbers, I may be convinced that Nintendo cares about huge-ness above all else. Until then, I think Mickey is just a meme some people take too seriously like Goku.
 
Last edited:

ForsakenM

Smash Lord
Joined
Sep 14, 2018
Messages
1,984
The thing is Geno fanbase is surprisingly hostile towards other niche support groups with a rather ironic lack of self-awareness.

During the course of the Ultimate DLC cycle, they had multiple opportunities to show solidarity and good will for characters like Terry and Hero who also had to deal with "literal who" snides. From what I saw, a lot of Geno fans (at least the vocal ones) preferred throwing them under the bus to elevate themselves above those nobodies nobody wanted.

People's patience towards Geno was waning even before his Mii costume reveal and it was at least partially due to this attitude even towards fandoms that weren't the popular kids.
Every single character that has even a single person supporting them has someone who will be an asshat about it. Doesn't matter who the character is.

Same can be said for any collection of people who like anything. It's not about any one group or what they love: it's that there are people who are willing and very ready to be nasty when the result isn't what they wanted.

The OG Geno Thread had like, I dunno, maybe ten of these kinds of people? The majority were just like 'Damn, again? ****ing rough, mate.' when Sephiroth showed up and the Mii Costume returned. Then you have folks like me who lost their **** over the OG gaming edgelord and has been excited for every reveal save for Hero (never touched DQ, but his breakdown got me hype) and Byleth (who I excepted the day of the reveal and never hated on while this whole site was filled with toxic waste dumps of people and also thought they were cool in their breakdown)...and Geno is my #1 request and has been for years.

I hate talking about the old Geno thread because it's clear people are gonna remember it for only the bad, which was never really a thing on it's own without people stirring the pot weekly and often to the point of daily. No one talks about the art being shared, the ideas, us talking about content creators, sharing new remixes, Operation Starfall, hand in hand with Isaac fans supporting them and showing moral support for others characters that were more niche. Nope, just talk about how they got tired of people coming into the thread just to screw with us and knowing that half of GameFAQs was in the thread during each reveal just to mock us, so we became super defensive of anyone who didn't come in clearly supporting him.
 

Diddy Kong

Smash Obsessed
Joined
Dec 8, 2004
Messages
26,320
Switch FC
SW-1597-979602774
So, to change conversation, why do you all think we haven't had a new Zelda character since Brawl? There have been lots of popular characters and tons of landmark titles since then.
As you know, I feel Impa should have been in. I think if Ultimate took the approach of newcomers Smash 4 had, a Champion would be included too. Not sure which one though. But Impa should definitely get in, especially if they want to revamp the Zelda roster. Which they should.

Speaking of revamps, which characters you feel are the most likely to get moveset overhauls next game ? Personally I think we'll see a change in quite a few characters.
 
Last edited:

osby

Smash Obsessed
Joined
Apr 25, 2018
Messages
24,014
As you know, I feel Impa should have been in. I think if Ultimate took the approach of newcomers Smash 4 had, a Champion would be included too. Not sure which one though. But Impa should definitely get in, especially if they want to revamp the Zelda roster. Which they should.

Speaking of revamps, which characters you feel are the most likely to get moveset overhauls next game ? Personally I think we'll see a change in quite a few characters.
It depends on which characters will get big releases between now and then and what you mean by "overhaul". Nobody could predict the moveset revamp Pit got before Uprising was announced. Samus can get one depending on whether Prime 4 actually comes out.

I don't expect any third-party character to have a moveset overhaul since I feel like it would require too many negotiations, unless it's something like say, changing Steve's blocks to work in the new game's engine.
 

JOJONumber691

Smash Lord
Joined
Sep 28, 2020
Messages
1,791
Geno is the type of character who I feel is quite literally never gonna make it in. Simply because of what Sakurai Said in regards to Geno. He said, and I quote, “I think he could be interesting. He has a Gun for a Hand, and that could be incredibly unique.” This makes me suspect that Sakurai likely reused several of his ideas for Geno into Mii Gunner, since Mii Gunner was added after Geno was considered for Brawl. Just a theory, but I do think it does make sense considering Square would likely never give Nintendo the rights to use Geno as a Fighter.
 

Dinoman96

Smash Master
Joined
Sep 22, 2013
Messages
3,340
I honestly don't think anyone's gonna get a super drastic overhaul. The ceiling to me is like, Link being turned into his BOTW version.

So in Samus' case I can see them moving away from the Other M look and giving her the Samus Returns/Dread suit instead, and maybe some new moves like the Melee counter, but that's pretty much it.
 

JOJONumber691

Smash Lord
Joined
Sep 28, 2020
Messages
1,791
Samus is the one character who needs something super drastic imo. Her Kit just… doesn’t work for how she feels in her Source Material. It’s that bad. At least give her a Stat Overhaul and her Energy Blasts like Mega Man. Also a ****ing Crawl! Seriously, Samus should’ve had one since Brawl or hell, even ****ing Melee my god!
 
Last edited:

Dinoman96

Smash Master
Joined
Sep 22, 2013
Messages
3,340
Dark Samus is honestly lucky to have what she already has in Smash.

It's been almost 15 years since she last appeared in Metroid and will more than likely not return in Prime 4 and onward, going by how Corruption ended and Kensuke Tanabe's comments in the past.

It's pretty clear that the only choices for her were to remain an assist trophy like in Smash 4, or just become a glorified alt skin for Samus as a mere echo fighter. At least she's got some neat animations.
 
Last edited:

Garteam

Smash Master
Joined
Jul 17, 2014
Messages
3,290
Location
Canada, eh?
NNID
Garteam
So, I know a lot of people talk about how Third Party companies have to be cut from the next game - but for a little change of pace, what series do you think might get a new character in the next game? Personally, my money's on Sonic - though another classic Namco character (maybe Blinky as another Pac-Man rep, or some other character like Dig Dug or Mappy?) is also pretty plausible, and a new SF character could be cool too.
Obligatory X and Zero appreciation post.
 
Last edited:

ForsakenM

Smash Lord
Joined
Sep 14, 2018
Messages
1,984
Geno is the type of character who I feel is quite literally never gonna make it in. Simply because of what Sakurai Said in regards to Geno. He said, and I quote, “I think he could be interesting. He has a Gun for a Hand, and that could be incredibly unique.” This makes me suspect that Sakurai likely reused several of his ideas for Geno into Mii Gunner, since Mii Gunner was added after Geno was considered for Brawl. Just a theory, but I do think it does make sense considering Square would likely never give Nintendo the rights to use Geno as a Fighter.
Man, I guess Megaman will never be a fighter in Smash because he has a gun for a hand. He'd be too similar to Samus in that regard.

Also, you kinda skipped and messed up a bit of that quote there friendo. Let me grab the whole thing for you.

"Geno was actually a character I wanted to include as a fighter. He has a gun for an arm, and just seems like he'd fit absolutely perfectly into Smash.

I was hoping I'd be able to put him in as far back as Super Smash Bros. Brawl, but unfortunately that never ended up materializing."

So, he didn't say he was interesting, he said he 'seems like he'd fit perfectly into Smash' and one reason for that is 'he has a gun for an arm.' You also missed the part where he was 'hoping to get him as far back as Brawl' which is an incredible statement alone as it shows Sakurai has been interested in the character being in his game over a decade.

Before it gets brought up, this is where people like to say 'Well, if he really still wanted him in his game, he would have done it by now. Clearly, he doesn't want him anymore' to which my response is simple: since when has someone wanting something meant it went exactly their way? Just because Sakurai wants it doesn't mean it's going to happen as he wishes it, and his desires and priorities can and will change. Again with the example I gave with Delzethin Delzethin if you were making a game of your own and your community wanted Foreman Spike and you actually approached Nintendo for guest characters in your game, would you still pursue Foreman Spike if it became clear Nintendo was willing to have Mario or Link show up in your game?

To break it down further, in this scenario, Foreman Spike is what your community is asking for, but Mario or Link is a much more popular choice that would please and attract more people than Foreman Spike would please within your community. Do you sacrifice that amazing opportunity? Not if you have any sort of business sense. In reality, Geno is Foreman Spike and Cloud, Hero, Sephiroth and Sora were Mario and Link...except that's not even true entirely, because the community actually wanted Sora. Thus, and even better example would be your community heavily wanting Mario and Foreman Spike, but Mario seems impossible to get, only to work out later on.

Geno and SMRPG are niche, although it turns out many a child played this game back in the day and it has a rising cult following. He just does not compare to all these big names and franchises, and Sakurai would be a fool to turn them down to get Geno, no matter how much Sephiroth being chosen partially to patch FF7 content in Ultimate irritates me. The funny thing is, people even in this thread right now think that Lara Croft, Neku or Crono are on this same level but don't wish to recognize the major faults that these characters have that make them fall behind in competition with Geno. Nobody wants to talk about how The World Ends With You is incredibly niche and got it's biggest boost when it was in Kingdom Hearts, or how Chrono Trigger is a once-in-a-lifetime-longshot that didn't recreate the magic and is a dead franchise as much as SMRPG, or how Lara Croft is no where near as popular as she used to be and has been very much changed from her nostalgic design that many would consider offensive in some form or that aside from the reboot the sales for the series plummeted. The only one I can agree with is that 2B is a big deal and has gotten very popular within the past few years, but I'm not sure whether or not that recent success after a massive failure that canned the series for years will be enough for Sakurai to value the character over the massive demand Geno has.

Not only do people not want to talk about these factors, but no one is bringing up how fan mock polls both during the time of the ballot and afterwards seem to have a very small picture of what actually took place in the real Smash Ballot, as Sakurai mentioned Sora was #1 and Banjo was #2, something that was very consistent fan polls as well with these two placing incredibly high...which one could assume and thus make the argument that other characters who consistently placed high in multiple mock polls likely did well and placed in relatively similar numbers in the actual Smash Ballot. Geno was very consistent in Top Tens and Top Twenties in many of these while often placing Top 5 or Top 3. Hell, Sakurai's own words in that same interview suggest Geno did very well.

"Yes. He's incredibly popular. Even though he's an old character, we keep getting loads of votes and requests for us to put him in the game. Even though he still isn't in as a playable fighter, I made sure he'd be in as a Mii costume so his fans would at least feel that they got something."

He didn't say he did well or he did okay: he said 'we keep getting loads of votes and requests for us to put him in the game' and 'He's incredibly popular' which is not something you would say if a character didn't get very many votes. Additionally, we got a Mii Costume for the character at a time when Geno fans were relatively quiet, and it's for a character that everyone thought Nintendo just forgot about or didn't care about up until that point in time. What would be the point in making a Mii Costume for a character that wasn't popular enough to make money off of it and, even more so, what would be the point of making sure Geno fans 'feel like they at least got something' if the demand for the character was super low? Wouldn't you just ignore that and get a different costume?

Also, you have no backing for your assumption about Square working with Nintendo around Geno. In fact, all the evidence is against that idea that they wouldn't cooperate. For starters, we never would have gotten the original Mii Costume in Smash 4 if Square didn't cooperate, nor Beware The Forest's Mushrooms to play for both trailers. We also got Spirits of both Geno and Mallow in base Ultimate as well as an icon well before the return of the costume, and Piranha Plant's Palutena's Guidance refers to both Chewies and Smilax/Megasmilax which are both variations of Piranha Plant unique to SMRPG. if working with Geno or what Square owns from SMRPG was a problem, none of this would have been able to happen.

You also have no backing for saying that Sakurai basically took elements from Geno and put them into Mii Gunner and became satisfied with that result. This isn't a weird situation where a lot of moves look very similar to an actual characters like Lloyd, and if you were right, Sakurai would have done a terrible job in this regard. Where does Mii Gunner fire off their fists, shoot their fingers like bullets, retract their hands to fire weapons or shoot stars at anyone? I don't remember Geno having a reflector or an absorption field, and the only bombs he used were from the party's general item inventory. None of Mii Gunner's side or up specials correlate with Geno at all, and all the neutral specials reflect other characters in the game rather than Geno who fires beams instead of balls or energy or grenades. Can Mii Gunner boost their attack and defense? Where is Geno Whirl? Does Mii Gunner have Timed Hits? Can Mii Gunner rain beams of rainbow energy from the heavens? Can they turn themselves into a cannon and fire out their soul in a giant explosion?

It's clear to me that you've never played SMRPG nor have you done extensive research into the character and what they can do, and that's fine, but you can't say things in confidence the way you did when you lack such critical information. Everything about Mii Gunner screams accomplishing these feats through modern and future technology. They share more traits with Samus and Snake than anyone else, and even then they are rather unique. This is in complete contrast to Geno, who does everything through magic and star power while utilizing an action figure body that is modifiable but also a wooden doll and not something more modern.

Man, feels good to talk about ma boi again. Just kinda came flooding outta me there.
 
Last edited:

ForsakenM

Smash Lord
Joined
Sep 14, 2018
Messages
1,984
Yeah. Thanks for the correction, even if he’s still never getting in lol.
I feel like people said this a lot about some other characters. A space dragon? A reptile king? A hunter of undead? Two chummy animals? A man made of blocks? A kid and his key?

Silly me, I must have imagined them getting in after all the flack.
 

Trevenant

Smash Lord
Joined
Feb 24, 2020
Messages
1,166
To be honest, a Part of the reason people were talking about Mickey was either they were going with the Bonus Character idea and the idea that having to Make Mickey was why Sora was taking so long, or they heard the rumors that Sora was denied intially in part due to Disney wanting Mickey to also be in the game, and well with all the time that needs to be invested into that, might have been too hard

Now here's the thing. Getting Sora has now made Disney involved with Smash, and if they want to keep bringing Sora back, Disney would need to be Involved again.

To My Knowledge, Disney owns the Complete Rights to Mickey Mouse. Compare this to someone like Goku where there are like 7 Different Companies that have hands in the Licensing, and even with Marvel and Star Wars which Disney Owns, there might actually be a Stipulation that would require some of the Ogrinal Creators or Head honchos of Lucasarts or Marvel to get involved, like it's theorized that Nomura and Square have to be involved with Sora in spite of Disney owning the rights. Since Disney is on board with Smash, and I'm sure they already know that having Mickey Mouse going against Mario would be a HUGE Deal, I actually don't think it's an Implausible idea to go for Mickey

It might cost a great deal in Licensing fees, but I could actually see Disney easing up on that. What I can't see them easing up on is their Nitpickiness in how their character is Represented, and I'm sure the LARGE Amount of time it would take to make every aspect of even a Mickey, Donald, Goofy Cameo was probably why all sources of Disney Content was Scrubbed, besides the Mickey Chain.

However that's why I say it's only a matter of time personally. I think Both Nintendo and Disney would want this Crossover to happen, and I think Sakurai might be apprehensive since it's gonna be the Tallest order he's ever Accomplished in terms of Directing a Character Inclusion, but I think at the end of the day, he would go for it if the Opportunity arose. Thought I think it would have to be DLC for whatever is next.
Eh, if they were being stingy on whether Mario wielded a keyblade or not and were likely super hard to work with to a point where Sakurai made a sarcastic remark about how many model alterations Sora had to undergo due to criticism from Disney, then I imagine they'd be 10x stingier on Mickey, who is their mascot. Then factor in all the people who likely own different parts of stuff from history or at least have a say what's done with it, and then that ultimately stirs it up to a point where it's kinda implausible unless Nintendo just start acting really shortsighted business wise. It seems like that's a character that they'd spend way too much money and time adding and not get the payoff from potential sales. The public domain stuff only entangles the situation more as that could theoretically mean they could just get Mickey as long as it only pulls from his first appearance, but that would require them not getting any consultation from Disney, and as said, is likely the same reason you don't see people requesting Bram Stoker's Dracula etc. Public domain isn't exactly as appealing but they'd likely only be be able to incorporate stuff that they have to pay for.
 

DarthEnderX

Smash Hero
Joined
Nov 10, 2014
Messages
8,412
I feel like people said this a lot about some other characters. A space dragon? A reptile king? A hunter of undead? Two chummy animals? A man made of blocks? A kid and his key?
I, like, literally never heard anyone say ANY of those.

It might cost a great deal in Licensing fees, but I could actually see Disney easing up on that. What I can't see them easing up on is their Nitpickiness in how their character is Represented, and I'm sure the LARGE Amount of time it would take to make every aspect of even a Mickey, Donald, Goofy Cameo was probably why all sources of Disney Content was Scrubbed, besides the Mickey Chain.
All of this though is really ignoring the simple fact that:
Sora didn't get added without Mickey because Mickey is too hard negotiate for. Micky is not in Smash because Mickey is not a video game character. Sakurai doesn't WANT Mickey in Smash.
 
Last edited:

Geno Boost

Smash Master
Joined
Jul 25, 2014
Messages
4,398
Location
Star Hill. Why do you ask?
I think Athena would be a great 2nd rep for SNK as she is important to SNK history
And by Athena I mean the original one she has a very interesting playstyle consist of using Animals and Sword and Transformations and weapons
However I think the issue might be getting her censored which is fine by me if they give her the Golden Armor as default instead of wearing only underwear
 
Last edited:

Diddy Kong

Smash Obsessed
Joined
Dec 8, 2004
Messages
26,320
Switch FC
SW-1597-979602774
Speaking as someone who's been a fan of Geno ever since I first played Super Mario RPG way back in 1998...I don't know what to think of his chances for next game. Ultimate went out of its way to pick up several long running fan requests, yet he wasn't one of 'em.

I have a tinfoil hat theory that Sakurai wanted to get him for Fighter #8 after he/Nintendo/etc. decided to set that spot aside for someone from Square-Enix, only for SE to turn the idea down and leave both sides to go with Sephiroth instead...but with no evidence to support it, it's little more than mad ramblings that'd probably get mocked if someone who didn't already have clout said them.

Honestly, I think the best thing that could happen for Geno is if Nintendo somehow acquired the rights to him from Square-Enix and incorporated him into Mario canon for real. But is that even realistically possible? What would compel Nintendo to bend over backward for an old character like that? I'd like to think he'd appeal to newer or younger fans nowadays (I mean he's a star inhabiting a child's toy to fight for the good guys; that's still pretty damn interesting), but who's to say an original character couldn't do just as well?

Difficult situation, this.


One and the same. I do what I can.
Your tinfoil hat theory makes a lot of sense. However, to be fair and frank, both Sephiroth and Sora are way more popular and bigger names than Geno is, or was, and unfortunately ever will be. That's just a harsh reality.

Anyway, as I spoke of moveset overhauls, I do think Samus is one that's gonna change a bit. Mechanically then. She will probably get things as the Melee counter yeah, a different dash attack, an actual Morph Ball mode, and I hope they can incorporate the Storm Missiles, and fast firing of both her Charge Shot and Missile attacks.

I also think Diddy Kong might be coupled with Dixie Kong next time. That's if Sakurai is director again of course, as he was quite positive about the idea before, and by now he has the experience with dual characters you'd think. Dixie is also highly requested, or at least, reasonably, and Diddy was voted as the very least popular character in Ultimate. Could be due to the Hoo Hah stigma of Smash 4, Diddy was one of the most popular requests for both Melee and Brawl back in the day.

I also think a couple of Smash 64 veterans will have some differences in their Specials. Mario could do without FLUDD, Kirby and Yoshi could have their Neutral B improved to how they work in their respective games (same with Samus honestly).

Melee veterans I feel could be changed are Zelda (BotW 2 serving as main inspiration), Ganon could replace Ganondorf too, Sheik could be revamped into a new character with Impa. Not too sure what to do with both Young and Toon Link, they could leave, and give Link some aerial combat and speed improvement to mesh all versions of Link into one?

Outside of the Zelda cast, I'd change Mewtwo around a bit too. Keep him a glass canon, but give him attacks to work around that. Psychic replacing Confusion as a powered up version, keep the reflective properties but change the grab part of it into a ranged command grab with high KO potential and damage. Disable becomes Barrier, giving Mewtwo super armor for some while with decreased damage, or make it Recover, which allows Mewtwo to heal. Throws also should be N64 level strong.
 

Megadoomer

Moderator
Moderator
Writing Team
Joined
Jun 28, 2013
Messages
10,391
Switch FC
SW-0351-1523-9047
I, like, literally never heard anyone say ANY of those.
Plenty of people said that Ridley would never get in because he's too big (after all, it's outright impossible to scale a character down), K. Rool would never get in because he's irrelevant (he hadn't been in a game since a Mario Baseball spin-off from 2008), Sora would never get in because he's owned by Disney (I know I figured the character was extremely unlikely for that reason), Steve would never get in because he's owned by Microsoft (a competing console maker), and Banjo and Kazooie would never get in for a mix of why Steve and K. Rool wouldn't.

There might have been other reasons that were thrown around, like Steve being too new or Metroid's focus on isolation meant that Samus was the only character who made sense to be made playable, but plenty of characters who made it into Ultimate were dismissed as being "impossible" for the developers to include, or at least dismissed as standing little to no chance of making it in, for one reason or another.

Not sure why people would say that Simon Belmont would never make it in (I assume that's what's meant by the hunter of the undead) - maybe it's because of Konami? (if it's meant to be Bayonetta, I know that many people said that it was "impossible" to tone the character down, on top of the series being obscure compared to the likes of Sonic or Mega Man, so she'd never be included in Smash)
 
Last edited:

DarthEnderX

Smash Hero
Joined
Nov 10, 2014
Messages
8,412
I think Athena would be a great 2nd rep for SNK as she is important to SNK history
And by Athena I mean the original one she has a very interesting playstyle consist of using Animals and Sword and Transformations and weapons
However I think the issue might be getting her censored which is fine by me if they give her the Golden Armor as default instead of wearing only underwear
Realtalk: I owned that game, dude. That game is ****ing TRASH. It is not something to be celebrated.

That game and Hydlide are the two games that taught me not to buy games based on their box art.

Plenty of people said that Ridley would never get in because he's too big (after all, it's outright impossible to scale a character down), K. Rool would never get in because he's irrelevant (he hadn't been in a game since a Mario Baseball spin-off from 2008), Sora would never get in because he's owned by Disney, Steve would never get in because he's owned by Microsoft (a competing console maker), and Banjo and Kazooie would never get in for a mix of why Steve and K. Rool wouldn't.
Yes. But nobody was ever like "You can't have an undead hunter in Smash!" or "You can't have boy with a key in Smash."

My point was, all the examples he used were things he made up that nobody ever said.
 
Last edited:

PeridotGX

Smash Hero
Joined
Jun 8, 2017
Messages
9,024
Location
That Distant Shore
NNID
Denoma5280
I think Athena would be a great 2nd rep for SNK as she is important to SNK history
And by Athena I mean the original one she has a very interesting playstyle consist of using Animals and Sword and Transformations and weapons
However I think the issue might be getting her censored which is fine by me if they give her the Golden Armor as default instead of wearing only underwear
I think Iori has a 100% chance of getting something in the next game, be it an AT or a playable slot. He's really popular and is Sakurai's favorite SNK character.
Iori Basketball GIF - Iori Basketball Dunk - Discover & Share GIFs
 
Last edited:

Geno Boost

Smash Master
Joined
Jul 25, 2014
Messages
4,398
Location
Star Hill. Why do you ask?
Realtalk: I owned that game, dude. That game is ****ing TRASH. It is not something to be celebrated.

That game and Hydlide are the two games that taught me not to buy games based on their box art.

Yes. But nobody was ever like "You can't have an undead hunter in Smash!" or "You can't have boy with a key in Smash."

My point was, all the examples he used were things he made up that nobody ever said.
We are not celebrating that game but we could borrow something
Athena has been around way back during the 80s
 

Garteam

Smash Master
Joined
Jul 17, 2014
Messages
3,290
Location
Canada, eh?
NNID
Garteam
I have mixed opinions on Geno's chances, but the fact he's a star inhabiting a doll is certainly not something in his way.
 
Top Bottom