• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Official Next Smash - Speculation & Discussion Thread

dream1ng

Smash Champion
Joined
Jul 24, 2016
Messages
2,169
Well there's no way _ Doom Slayer / Tracer _ would beat out _ Master Chief.
As far as Crash goes Sony has not been eager or interested to get its characters into Smash with the exception of Bayonetta because Nintendo funded it.
And for Rayman i just don't see a meaningful enough reason to put him on. He would not be worth the technical coding effort. Not to mention he wouled probably break the game by falling out of everyone's combos.

As for _ Ahri _ & _ Jinx _ i just don't think it is on people's radar. if it was i think there would be a lot more interest
Crash isn't owned by Sony, he's owned by Activision, who will likely soon be owned by Microsoft, putting him, Tracer, Slayer and Chief all under the same roof. Also Bayo has always been a Sega character, so I have no clue what you're talking about. Just having a game on Playstation doesn't make you a Sony character...

Going back to the others, I'm not sure who is more popular within the fanbase between Chief and Slayer. They're both pretty popular, but overall, yes, Chief is the bigger character. It may not always boil down to fanbase popularity or who is generally bigger, but now that they're both Microsoft, I would be surprised to get Slayer over Chief.

Plus they have multi-character characters, Steve, Kazuya, Hero and Kirby. I don't think Rayman is going to be the one to stymie or overwork the technical side because his limbs float. Being inexact with hurtboxes isn't going to stand out in the midst of battle.

It is funny how the only characters you have anything positive to say things about are the ones you want.
 

MasterCheef

Smash Ace
Joined
Jul 7, 2021
Messages
724
Crash isn't owned by Sony, he's owned by Activision, who will likely soon be owned by Microsoft, putting him, Tracer, Slayer and Chief all under the same roof. Also Bayo has always been a Sega character, so I have no clue what you're talking about. Just having a game on Playstation doesn't make you a Sony character...

Going back to the others, I'm not sure who is more popular within the fanbase between Chief and Slayer. They're both pretty popular, but overall, yes, Chief is the bigger character. It may not always boil down to fanbase popularity or who is generally bigger, but now that they're both Microsoft, I would be surprised to get Slayer over Chief.

Plus they have multi-character characters, Steve, Kazuya, Hero and Kirby. I don't think Rayman is going to be the one to stymie or overwork the technical side because his limbs float. Being inexact with hurtboxes isn't going to stand out in the midst of battle.

It is funny how the only characters you have anything positive to say things about are the ones you want.
1 What is a multi-character character ?

2 clearly -popularity within the fan-base is not the only reason for picking a character.

3 just because i mis-typed does not invalidate my point. i don't think Nintendo nor Activision is interested in Crash in Smash. and we have no evidence to suggest they are interested.

4 As far as _ Rayman _ goes , have you not seen the interview / video where Sakurai explains in no uncertain terms, Ridley was super hard to program for because of his hurt-boxes ? Now imagine how much harder Rayman would be.

My most important two missing characters i love are the most likely newcomers. you just don't like my reasoning for why Nintendo would likely not be including specific characters. i could def go for some other characters. However most everyone on here does not seem to enjoy my other choices. my primary goal is to give people better reasoning skills. not more pie in the sky skills. there are several characters i would love, however they are more pie in the sky type characters, such as _ Viewtiful Joe.
 

Swamp Sensei

Today is always the most enjoyable day!
BRoomer
Joined
Jan 4, 2013
Messages
38,832
Location
Um....Lost?
NNID
Swampasaur
3DS FC
4141-2776-0914
Switch FC
SW-6476-1588-8392
4 As far as _ Rayman _ goes , have you not seen the interview / video where Sakurai explains in no uncertain terms, Ridley was super hard to program for because of his hurt-boxes ? Now imagine how much harder Rayman would be.
No I haven't. Please provide it.
 

dream1ng

Smash Champion
Joined
Jul 24, 2016
Messages
2,169
1 What is a multi-character character ?
Well anything from a transformation character like PKMN Trainer or Pyra/Mythra to a tag-team like ICs and Rosalina to a summoning character like Joker. Those are all on the more complex or time-consuming end to realize.

2 clearly -popularity within the fan-base is not the only reason for picking a character.
Right, I agree. But just because a character is bigger doesn't mean they're inherently the one that will get chosen if the alternative is also qualified.

3 just because i mis-typed does not invalidate my point. i don't think Nintendo nor Activision is interested in Crash in Smash. and we have no evidence to suggest they are interested.
Someone going on about a LoL character in Smash doesn't have much room to use arguments like "Nintendo/third-party doesn't seem interested".

And if you're going to invoke how Nintendo and Tencent have collaborated, keep in mind the level of collaboration between Nintendo and Activision's future parent, Microsoft. Both in and out of Smash.

4 As far as _ Rayman _ goes , have you not seen the interview / video where Sakurai explains in no uncertain terms, Ridley was super hard to program for because of his hurt-boxes ? Now imagine how much harder Rayman would be.
You're conflating how Ridley was difficult to realize because his size with being difficult to program for. Rayman, being an average sized character, wouldn't have that problem. Plus, he made Ridley work, didn't he.

Smash wouldn't even be Rayman's first platform fighter.

My most important two missing characters i love are the most likely newcomers. you just don't like my reasoning for why Nintendo would likely not be including specific characters. i could def go for some other characters. However most everyone on here does not seem to enjoy my other choices. my primary goal is to give people better reasoning skills. not more pie in the sky skills. there are several characters i would love, however they are more pie in the sky type characters, such as _ Viewtiful Joe.
Actually, the characters I want are the most likely characters.

Your reasoning entailed not even knowing who owned them, false equivalencies like Rayman and Ridley, and making total guesses that hinder your own choices were it applied to them like "I don't think [third-party] is interested". Are these your "better reasoning skills"?

Unless you're Sony, you're probably not turning down a Smash invitation anyway. Even Disney didn't.
 
Last edited:

Luke Starkiller

Smash Cadet
Joined
Jun 20, 2020
Messages
27
Location
United Kingdom
For those wondering why I mentioned EA for third party reps earlier, I feel like EA would be interested in getting a character in Smash Bros Six at some point. I think this is mainly down to more Western content appearing in Ultimate which other gaming companies took notice off. They all want a slice of the golden goose to have a character in Smash Bros Six.
 

fogbadge

Smash Obsessed
Joined
Jun 29, 2012
Messages
22,592
Location
Scotland
It's so weird because the hyper-fantastical dex entries basically never manifest themselves in gameplay.
Maybe it's because they're so inconsequential gameplay-wise that the team just lets themselves go bonkers with them.
well if you're gonna expand the lore of your fictional world you might as well have fun with it

For those wondering why I mentioned EA for third party reps earlier, I feel like EA would be interested in getting a character in Smash Bros Six at some point. I think this is mainly down to more Western content appearing in Ultimate which other gaming companies took notice off. They all want a slice of the golden goose to have a character in Smash Bros Six.
what you have to remember is that no one likes EA so they almost never come up in discussion
 

StrangeKitten

Smash Lord
Joined
Mar 25, 2020
Messages
1,956
Location
Battle Royal Dome
I see. Still, the Geno fanbase was seemingly unwilling to listen to reason, and they thought incorrectly that Geno had a lot going for him. Even if Sakurai did want in in Brawl, which I am not sure of, things do change from 2008 and 2013 and 2018-2021, between Brawl, Smash 4 and Ultimate respectively. Whatever the case, I have doubts that they will be tempered next time. They may be a little, but I do not see much improvement happening. And don't even get me started on that one guy who said he would be in.

What did Geno have going for him, anyway?
For one, there was the ballot. With big fan faves such as Ridley, K Rool, and Banjo getting in, it stood to reason that Geno also had a strong chance of getting in. Both K Rool and Geno got costumes in Smash 4 as a gift to their fans once the dev team realized they were popular among the Smash fanbase. K Rool later became playable, which raised hopes for Geno. There were some small things as well, such as a reference to Megasmilax in Viridi's dialogue when you do Piranha Plant's Palutena's Guidance. Nintendo would have had to negotiate with Square-Enix for that one, because that's a species of Piranha Plant only found in SMRPG. The mention of Megasmilax could have very easily not been there. See, Viridi gets really excited about Piranha Plant and starts listing the many, many species of them that have existed across the Mario franchise (there are a ton). Megasmilax could have been omitted and nothing would have been lost. Yet, it was there. If nothing else, this showed that the dev team was keeping SMRPG in mind. And then, there was Geno's Mii costume being absent for so long. Which, in hindsight, really sucked. At least rip off that bandaid early instead of keeping everyone in the dark for so long, y'know?

Is this the strongest evidence ever? No, far from it. But it's more than most characters get. With the benefit of hindsight, what I think happened was: S-E simply prioritized other characters. Hero and Sephiroth are far bigger icons than Geno. But of course, we had no way of knowing that at the time.

Honestly I'd take just a deluxe Mii Costume of Geno at this point. A Mii head that actually looked like his face, and Beware of Forest Mushrooms as a bonus song would go a long way.
Same. I was super disappointed when we got that cheap knockoff-looking head returning; so much so that I didn't bother to buy Geno's Mii costume. It doesn't seem like it would have been hard to get the head looking a lot better.
 

Opossum

Thread Title Changer
BRoomer
Joined
Aug 10, 2011
Messages
33,992
Location
This Thread
NNID
OpossumGuy
3DS FC
4742-4911-3431
Switch FC
SW 2859 6322 5208
I was already in a horrible mood due to personal events that happened today. Thank you for making it even worse with your smug post.

I indicated that the poll was decent supportive evidence that Waluigi was a hyper polarizing character that probably was not outright the most popular first party. Just because he has a vocal fanbase does not mean that he automatically is the most popular first party. Its easy to just claim that there is this massive ground swell of support for Waluigi, when honestly he is also a polarizing pick.

Just because you get trending on Twitter does not mean much at the end of the day. By the nature of the twitter algorithm, it was easy to get Waluigi trending when people were already talking about Smash and Nintendo that day. All it took was a couple dozen funny posts to get him trending.

Also I mentioned earlier that this poll is not representative of the entire community. In the first ****ing line of the post you quoted.


You do not have to read into it super hard when as I highlighted, it is just one poll. You could build up the argument that Waluigi was and still is a polarizing character, like I have, to support the findings of the poll even if it might not be a representative sample. As I highlighted, multiple other polls have shown that Waluigi, while having a vocal fanbase, does not have the stranglehold over fan demand that you claim. If anything, it helps show that his popularity is not overwhelming as you claim it is.
???

I'm not sure where you got smugness out of that post. There wasn't any there.

Also, I think the big thing here is that you believe being polarizing and being the most popular are mutually exclusive things. All being polarizing effectively means is that more people have an opinion on the subject, one way or the other. One such example I can give is from Fire Emblem, and that's Edelgard. She is easily one of the most polarizing characters in the entire franchise, if not the most polarizing, and the definition of a "love her or hate her" character. And yet when she became eligible for Choose Your Legends, she blew the vote count of every other character in her poll and all previous polls out of the water, showing that she is without a doubt one of the most popular characters in the series in addition to being among the most polarizing.

But going further, Choose Your Legends also shows how different things will be without an "anti-vote" option. It's a ballot; you pick who you want. You don't give votes against those you don't want. With a "rate 1-5" system, rating something a 1 is, effectively, an anti-vote, and that's what makes that sort of system inherently biased against polarizing characters. That was my point. That's not smugness; that's just how polling works.

And yes, you mentioned it wasn't indicative of the wider fanbase. But at that point...why even bring it up? Why respond to a point with a sarcastic "Does He Know?"-style meme implying that the poll result does matter? All it serves to do is send a mixed message, that the poll simultaneously proves nothing, but also proves everything?

Because at the end of the day, pretty much everything points to Waluigi being the most popular first party pick among the potential remaining newcomers. He's incredibly popular among the casual Nintendo and general online fanbases, the more casual online Smash fanbase, and the more hardcore Smash speculators. His popularity is consistent across borders and hemispheres by virtue of the series he hails from and his notoriety within said series.

And to that end...who would even compare? Most of the more fervent support bases left are for third party inclusions. Among first parties, the top requests simply can't match the pull Waluigi has. Isaac, by virtue of his series being dormant, mostly has pull from the more hardcore fans, and not the casuals. Bandana Waddle Dee has the same polarization as Waluigi, where many either fervently love or utterly despise the idea of him being playable...but on a much smaller scale due to the smaller install base. The Octolings are very popular, but the greater Splatoon fanbase both on the Smash side and the Splatoon side have a more minor version of the "Zelda issue" where there are many different support groups for different characters (Octoling, any of the now seven idols, DJ Octavio, or the final boss of Splatoon 3 that I won't spoil). Dixie Kong has a stable base, but it's no doubt smaller than Waluigi's, again by virtue of his prominence. Choices like Officer Howard, Raven Beak, and Noah or Mio come from more niche genres and franchises, so they lack a lot of the evergreen appeal Waluigi has. Spring Man has a decent following, especially after getting Smash 4 Chrom'd in Ultimate, but the fervor is comparatively dormant due to the perceived necessity of an ARMS sequel to bolster his appeal. Tom Nook is a very popular character, but the Smash side of the fanbase tends to be lukewarm on the idea of more Animal Crossing characters.

So like, genuinely. If Waluigi isn't the most popular first party pick, then who is? What was the point of the post if you couldn't offer a conceivable option for who would be?
 
Last edited:

Wonder Smash

Smash Champion
Joined
Oct 8, 2013
Messages
2,188
I think some people are kind of underestimating possibility of Doom Slayer making it in over Master Chief. Doom is represented in Smash already. A series that important could very well be upgraded to playable status in the next Smash game.

...I mean, when you bring something up, many are often are under the impression you can help answer it, since it was your hypothetical. A lot of times the start of development is quite well known. And listed. So yes, in most cases the question is highly easy to answer.
All I was talking about was if the game was released earlier along with the other Switch titles that got represented in Smash Ultimate. I don't recall bringing up when they started developing the game. Like I said, that's info that only the company can give out. Even if people can easily look it up, that's only possible if the company mentions it, either way.

The Halo Pack in Minecraft is a very huge thing and most definitely means the franchise has actually appeared on Nintendo, so, that has nothing to do with it. It looks more like, realistically, Sakurai just wasn't interested is licensing for it. Nintendo nor Microsoft would have any real reason to say no at that point, anyway. It'd amount to even less of a cameo than Minecraft itself got(which is worth noting that it never appear on the Playstation releases of Minecraft, so it's pretty evident that Microsoft is willing to easily let anyone license Halo, it's just only one rival company was willing to do so. That was literally done with BK too, so Nintendo is clearly not against specifically advertising Microsoft-owned works, too. And not just owned, but specifically noted as "play it on the Xbox consoles", further showing a lot of trust. Yeah, I highly doubt this had anything to do with not getting a straight release on the Nintendo system in any way. The relations say quite the opposite, and Sakurai is the one who is actually going for these other kinds of DLC(we know he does ask the other companies), and it's also been noted that Nintendo only is selecting the playable fighters, so while it's not hard stated, it's highly likely they aren't the ones who are choosing things like costumes and spirits in the first place for DLC.
The Halo Pack in Minecraft is significantly less than anything represented in Smash so far. It's not even part of its own series. It's just skins. I honestly don't think don't think Sakurai would just straight up pass up an opportunity add another significantly popular series like Halo to Smash Bros just because he's not interested. There's definitely other reasons why.
 
Last edited:

TCT~Phantom

Smash Master
Writing Team
Joined
Dec 10, 2013
Messages
3,965
NNID
TCT~Phantom
???

I'm not sure where you got smugness out of that post. There wasn't any there.

Also, I think the big thing here is that you believe being polarizing and being the most popular are mutually exclusive things. All being polarizing effectively means is that more people have an opinion on the subject, one way or the other. One such example I can give is from Fire Emblem, and that's Edelgard. She is easily one of the most polarizing characters in the entire franchise, if not the most polarizing, and the definition of a "love her or hate her" character. And yet when she became eligible for Choose Your Legends, she blew the vote count of every other character in her poll and all previous polls out of the water, showing that she is without a doubt one of the most popular characters in the series in addition to being among the most polarizing.

But going further, Choose Your Legends also shows how different things will be without an "anti-vote" option. It's a ballot; you pick who you want. You don't give votes against those you don't want. With a "rate 1-5" system, rating something a 1 is, effectively, an anti-vote, and that's what makes that sort of system inherently biased against polarizing characters. That was my point. That's not smugness; that's just how polling works.

And yes, you mentioned it wasn't indicative of the wider fanbase. But at that point...why even bring it up? Why respond to a point with a sarcastic "Does He Know?"-style meme implying that the poll result does matter? All it serves to do is send a mixed message, that the poll simultaneously proves nothing, but also proves everything?

Because at the end of the day, pretty much everything points to Waluigi being the most popular first party pick among the potential remaining newcomers. He's incredibly popular among the casual Nintendo and general online fanbases, the more casual online Smash fanbase, and the more hardcore Smash speculators. His popularity is consistent across borders and hemispheres by virtue of the series he hails from and his notoriety within said series.

And to that end...who would even compare? Most of the more fervent support bases left are for third party inclusions. Among first parties, the top requests simply can't match the pull Waluigi has. Isaac, by virtue of his series being dormant, mostly has pull from the more hardcore fans, and not the casuals. Bandana Waddle Dee has the same polarization as Waluigi, where many either fervently love or utterly despise the idea of him being playable...but on a much smaller scale due to the smaller install base. The Octolings are very popular, but the greater Splatoon fanbase both on the Smash side and the Splatoon side have a more minor version of the "Zelda issue" where there are many different support groups for different characters (Octoling, any of the now seven idols, DJ Octavio, or the final boss of Splatoon 3 that I won't spoil). Dixie Kong has a stable base, but it's no doubt smaller than Waluigi's, again by virtue of his prominence. Choices like Officer Howard, Raven Beak, and Noah or Mio come from more niche genres and franchises, so they lack a lot of the evergreen appeal Waluigi has. Spring Man has a decent following, especially after getting Smash 4 Chrom'd in Ultimate, but the fervor is comparatively dormant due to the perceived necessity of an ARMS sequel to bolster his appeal. Tom Nook is a very popular character, but the Smash side of the fanbase tends to be lukewarm on the idea of more Animal Crossing characters.

So like, genuinely. If Waluigi isn't the most popular first party pick, then who is? What was the point of the post if you couldn't offer a conceivable option for who would be?
This is my last post dealing with you.

If you bothered to click any of the polls I generously provided you, you would see that there are alternative options for a most demanded character. Bandana Dee for instance out performed Waluigi on all three of those polls. Plenty of other first parties have performed will in the polls as well, such as Isaac, Dixie Kong, Skull Kid, or even Porky on one. You also are just assuming that naturally, Waluigi's fan demand is going to rise. You can't predict the future like that. Waluigi could easily be a Brawl Geno or Krystal, or a Smash 4 Professor Layton where their demand peaks at a certain time and does not explore further. Already, if you even bothered to read any of the polls or any post I made, you would have seen that yes, there is evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that Waluigi is not the most popular first party. But it must be so much easier to make blanket statements like Waluigi is the most popular first party character right? He trended on twitter, even though I explained to you with a helpful link that trending on twitter does not mean as much at the end of the day. He got a caged PR response from Reggie. He even does... decently well but not overwhelmingly well on multiple fan polls. Surely, he must be the most popular first party?

Or instead of just making blanket statements that have no binding, you could actually make a coherent argument that yes, he might indeed not be the most popular first party. But it is so much easier to say I did not offer you reasonable alternatives, when I did so with multiple fan polls.

Even putting aside the ample evidence I provided you that does cast a reasonable doubt that Waluigi is outright the most popular first party, that does not remove the fact that he is a polarizing character. Yes, some people like Waluigi. Some people detest him. Compared to previous fan favorite picks like Ridley, K Rool, Palutena, or Little Mac, Waluigi is far more polarizing. He would more likely compare to Geno than any of them.

I originally was going to make a reply to someone else when they brought up the casual nintendo fanbase silent majority like you did, but this is a good time to stake that right through the heart. Using the ballot and polls from that era (ballot to Smash Ultimate E3) before the twitter fiasco, we can say that Waluigi was not an S tier request prior to the twitter fiasco. But even moreso, let's put to bed that there is this silent majority that would be ecstatic if Waluigi was somehow added to the game. You can just as easily claim any character from a popular Nintendo series would make the casual audience happy. What is stopping me from saying the silent majority demands Octolings, Tom Nook, and King Boo? What is stopping me from saying that Pauline would please this silent majority just as much as Waluigi? You can't claim to speak for a silent majority because they are silent. Maybe the silent majority loves Wii Fit Trainer. Maybe their favorite character is King K Rool. It is easy to just assume that this widespread, casual nintendo monolith that you claim is 100% behind Waluigi is firmly in his corner. Would they be happy with Waluigi? Sure. You know who else they would be happy with? Most other reasonably popular Nintendo characters that they know.

It's funny you say Waluigi's popularity crosses hemispheres, when its also clear he is more of a Western request. Compared to the US, demand for Waluigi is notably lower in Japan. But it is easy to just assume that Waluigi is this popular monolith. Just because he is a Mario character does not mean his popularity will automatically be what it was on NA twitter June 2018 everywhere else. What is stopping me from using your own backwards logic to claim that Tom Nook is the true pick of the silent majority, globally popular since Animal Crossing New Horizons was huge?

And yes, there is logic that perhaps, god forbid, the character you have latched onto, might not be the pick that speaks for everyone. Bandana Dee and Isaac both are competitive with Waluigi already, but both are far less polarizing than he is. Dee in particular outperformed Waluigi in each of the polls I spoonfed as an example, but I am going to take a shot in the dark that you did not read them. After all, why read them instead of saying I offered you no reasonable alternative take? Dixie Kong is another reasonable take, espeically now that she does not have a big green crocodilian obstacle in her way. If you want to go outside of the hardcore speculation scene, you can easily claim other characters could be a more desired first party. Spaltoon and Animal Crossing have had huge rises. Contrary to what you have suggested, I do think that support and demand has started to unify for both of those series. Octolings are the easy consensus pick for Splatoon, and they seem to be the most popular Splatoon pick by far. Tom Nook meanwhile is easily the Animal Crossing pick. But you want to have your cake and eat it to, so Tom Nook clearly can not ride the support of casual fans like Waluigi does by your own logic.

You also ignore the issue that, much like the issues you claim with Zelda and Splatoon, there are alternative Mario options that people would not be opposed to. Is Waluigi the most popular and polarizing of them? Sure. But there is fan demand out there for Geno, Pauline, King Boo, Paper Mario, and Captain Toad. All of those have at least somewhat of a fanbase, Geno's of which is actually comparable in size to Waluigi's (he even out performed him on some of the polls I generously provided you). Competition exists for a lot of franchises in Smash, even for the Mario fanbase. You could claim that the fandom could coalesce around Waluigi. Sure, that could happen. Or it could not. Maybe it only splinters further. There was a large growing wave of support for King Boo for instance at the end of Smash Ultimate's DLC lifespan, maybe that grows. Or maybe Pauline becomes a stronger fan request now that she is basically a mainstay addition to the Mario Spin Off crowd. There right now is no real evidence that the Mario fanbase is going to just band together and overwhelmingly support Waluigi the way for example Metroid fans did with Ridley. Maybe that will happen, but you can not just assume that it will like you conveniently do.

Unlike you, I think there is evidence that at least to a reasonable doubt, Waluigi is not the most popular first party character? Is he popular? Sure. But you can't just assume he is far and away the most popular first party on a whim. You can't casually dismiss any other option just because Waluigi trended on Twitter one time in 2018. There is evidence that the hardcore speculation audience does not have him as their first party of choice. The casual monolith you claim is behind evergreen Waluigi also is not an airtight piece of evidence: the silent majority could just as easily be behind something like a Tom Nook or an Octoling. It is easy to just latch onto a popular character, like Chrom in Smash 4. But it is important to critically think instead of just making a blanket statement about a character. The easy route is to use a leak like Gematsu like a cudgel and smash out any other speculation that threatens your "objective" choice. Needless to say, the "objective" choice did not win out in Smash 4. Despite Chrom being reasonably popular (albeit polarizing), he did not make it into Smash 4's roster as a unique character. Just because you hitch your bandwagon to a popular and/or likely character does not automatically mean they are the objective choice. There is plenty of evidence that Waluigi might not even be the most popular Mario character in some circles, Geno (an even more polarizing character) has a reasonable claim to that in the hardcore speculation fandom. I am not denying that Waluigi is popular, he is certainly a popular character. But saying outright that he is far and away the most popular character is putting your head in the sand, ignoring any evidence that suggests that Waluigi might not be the most popular character outright.

-------------------

Now with that done, let me take down your criticism of my poll. I am going to highlight your smug line about "how polling works" for this because I can tell you do not have a great idea about polling in general. I have a political science degree and have written papers on the subject in college. Several polls struggle for actual serious topics to get above 200 respondents. Reliable polling is hard, it is why we do not have great polling for most House of Representative races despite the election being days away. You also are assuming that every poll has to be a ballot, when that is just not the case either.

If you even bothered to read my article on the poll instead of skimming it for results, the goal was to see how the community broadly felt about characters. As a result, I went with this model instead. This model might negatively impact a polarizing character, but a traditional model has positive impacts on polarizing picks. The goal is not just to see who is a popular pick with a vocal fanbase: it is to see how the community at large feels about a character. Turns out, Waluigi is a polarizng character that many people also feel lukewarm on. Some characters, like King Boo, Captain Toad, or Pauline, were more consensus picks that did better. Having your two highest mean scores be 7-8 is better than your three highest mean scores be 10, 5, and 1. My poll, for what purposes I had in mind, is working as intended. It is showing how the community feels about characters broadly rather than just who their most wanted is. I know you whined about how Pauline scores slightly higher than Waluigi. Does Pauline have as many ride or die fans? Obviously not. Her most common score by far was a 7: a supportive choice but not an invested ride or die one. Her next most common one was an 8. Waluigi's most common scores were 10, 5, and 1. People either loved him, hated him, or felt nothing towards him.

Now, let me remind you again of what the stated goals of the poll were, in the first paragraph of the article.
With the dry spell in-between Smash games, it gets hard to gauge how excited people are for a character and how likely people think a character is. It's not unheard of for a character’s fanbase and hype for a character to fizzle out or grow out between Smash games. I’ve created the Smash Community Character Corral to help remedy this.
At no point do I say this is a popularity contest. This is broadly to see how excited people are. Will a character being immensely popular help? Absolutely, that is obvious. But the goal is not to just run a poll and see if people want Waluigi, Geno, and Dixie Kong. The goal is to see broadly how excited people are about the idea of a character being in Smash and see what people's realistic expectations are. In terms of expectations, Waluigi did great, he had the highest score for part 1. But broadly, he does seem to be polarizing with a vocal fanbase, which I also mentioned in the article. You have the freedom to dislike the data. It is not a perfect data set: the first one for this series was always going to have less responses just due to being harder to promote. It is not a perfect representative sample either: Smashboards was one of the main sites used to advertise it. Smashboards is not and has never been a perfect representation of even the hardcore Smash community. But despite its faults, it is data from one poll. Some polarizing characters, like Geno and Waluigi, did not perform as well as I expected sure. It is still useful data at the end of the day that we can look to later during Smash 6 to see

But if a fun little meme and a short post is enough to get you all up in arms, I do not know what to say. I even highlighted within that own post that it is "just one poll" and that it did not speak to everything. But apparently a meme is enough to make it say everything and nothing according to you for some reason. Let's take a read of my post, that you clearly are making huge conclusions from.



Ooh boy. I know it is just one poll, but given the current results, Waluigi might not even be making top ten on the Smash Community Character Corral for want after Part 2 finishes. He got a good score, but you would be surprised. I do think he has one of the most vocal support bases, but I would not say automatically he is the most popular first party or that he is a lock by any means.
I clarify it is only one poll and he might not crack top 10 despite getting a good score. I then interject that he has a very vocal fanbase, and then personally suggest that he is not automatically the most popular first party and is absolutely not a lock for Smash 6.

But according to you, the presence of this picture does suggest that it means everything. That my one poll means that Waluigi is somehow not a popular character despite me saying that he is popular and got a respectable score. Instead of reading what I actually said, which is pretty clearly not saying much at the end of the day, you choose to let one meme dictate that it says so much more than that. I do not know what to say to that. If you clearly read what I posted, that would absolutely not be the case. If you read the post I replied to, specifically the part I highlighted like this, you would know that all I was saying is that maybe you should throw some cold water on the idea Waluigi is this inevitable popular behemoth who towers over every other first party.

Instead of reading that at all, you decided to take the meaning that my meme automatically meant that I was some prophet, someone who knew everything and that Waluigi was secretly not the popular character he is. Despite, you know, me clearly exactly not that in my post. If you can somehow come to such radical conclusions from a picture and three sentences, but fail to take anything away from my previous response that gave you very reasonable counterarguments and say that I provided no counterpoints, I do not know what to reasonably say to you.
 
Last edited:

Gengar84

Smash Hero
Joined
Dec 9, 2009
Messages
6,532
It seems like the most likely options for another potential Microsoft rep are probably between Doom Slayer, Master Chief, and Crash but I wouldn’t write off other possibilities. While perhaps not as likely and not nearly as speculated on, I think characters like the Battletoads, Fulgore, Joanna Dark, Arthas, Sarah Kerrigan, or Diablo are not out of the realm of possibility. Sure, some may not be as huge as Chief but WarCraft and StarCraft were both hugely influential to gaming history and RARE played a huge part in Nintendo’s own history. WarCraft’s biggest hurdle (other than Blizzard’s actions) is the lack of Nintendo presence, which is their only major IP not to appear on Nintendo’s consoles. I could potentially see Overwatch as another potential option if Nintendo presence ends up being mandatory for consideration.
 
Last edited:

Sucumbio

Smash Giant
Moderator
Writing Team
Joined
Oct 7, 2008
Messages
8,438
Location
Icerim Mountains
This bit about polls reminds me of my first poly sci professor "intro to political science" at 900 dollars a credit (9 lectures) and 4 credits worth to achieve an "accredited" grade.

Anyway I only remember five things from that class.

"The word Authority is best defined as having the right to decide.".

"Subscribe to the New York Times."

"Statistics are dead information, and can not tell you anything useful."

An argument over whether adidas "are the best on earth" or Nike is, between two highly selected high schoolers from the inner city being able to get advanced credits but for free (technically I also went for free lol) and were engaged by this professor and turned it into a real world illustration and were kicked out because the "outburst" was an "outrage" (they never raised their voices) and thus I learned he was a racist. Got the whole class removed from the program so he wouldn't have to deal with "those."

I got an A. No one complained about his behavior because everyone was afraid an altercation was forthcoming even though I was never even thinking about that just listening to their points about shoe economics.

So anyway the point is while this project is going to be very interesting to many people the actual data will reveal what it reveals and given it's been implemented correctly by a proper statistician, I trust the numbers to be accurate.
 
Last edited:

DanganZilla5

Smash Champion
Writing Team
Joined
Mar 5, 2019
Messages
2,433
It seems like the most likely options for another potential Microsoft rep are probably between Doom Slayer, Master Chief, and Crash but I wouldn’t write off other possibilities. While perhaps not as likely and not nearly as speculated on, I think characters like the Battletoads, Fulgore, Arthas, or Sarah Kerrigan are not out of the realm of possibility. Sure, some may not be as huge as Chief but WarCraft and StarCraft were both hugely influential to gaming history and RARE played a huge part in Nintendo’s own history. WarCraft’s biggest hurdle (other than Blizzard’s actions) is the lack of Nintendo presence, which is their only major IP not to appear on Nintendo’s consoles. I could potentially see Overwatch or Diablo as another potential option if Nintendo presence ends up being mandatory for consideration.
Don't forget Dragonborn. Skyrim is pretty popular in Japan. It's the first western game to get a 10/10 on Famitsu and it partially influenced Breath of the Wild. Skyrim in general is also a huge game that is still popular to this day despite being over a decade old. Plus Dragonborn was in that group of costumes alongside Dante, Lloyd and Shantae, which Sakurai specifically stated were popular requests.

If you ask me, I think Dragonborn beats Doom Slayer in terms of likeliness. While Doomguy has more demand and did get a costume as well, his series is way less popular in Japan due to them not being big fans of FPS games, compared to Skyrim which is a fantasy action-RPG which is more appealing to them.

Master Chief and Crash on the other hand, yeah I admit that's pretty stiff competition. Halo did get a series of anime films and Master Chief was on the front cover of Famitsu a few years ago. Crash has done decently well in Japan historically, and both of them have a good amount of demand. So I can see why people think they are likely and I agree. I just think Dragonborn is very underrated in speculation and I'd argue he is at least third in terms of most likely Microsoft reps.
 

Gengar84

Smash Hero
Joined
Dec 9, 2009
Messages
6,532
Don't forget Dragonborn. Skyrim is pretty popular in Japan. It's the first western game to get a 10/10 on Famitsu and it partially influenced Breath of the Wild. Skyrim in general is also a huge game that is still popular to this day despite being over a decade old. Plus Dragonborn was in that group of costumes alongside Dante, Lloyd and Shantae, which Sakurai specifically stated were popular requests.

If you ask me, I think Dragonborn beats Doom Slayer in terms of likeliness. While Doomguy has more demand and did get a costume as well, his series is way less popular in Japan due to them not being big fans of FPS games, compared to Skyrim which is a fantasy action-RPG which is more appealing to them.

Master Chief and Crash on the other hand, yeah I admit that's pretty stiff competition. Halo did get a series of anime films and Master Chief was on the front cover of Famitsu a few years ago. Crash has done decently well in Japan historically, and both of them have a good amount of demand. So I can see why people think they are likely and I agree. I just think Dragonborn is very underrated in speculation and I'd argue he is at least third in terms of most likely Microsoft reps.
For some reason, I just completely forgot that Dragonborn was owned by Microsoft, but yeah, he also has a good chance of making it in. The Mii costume certainly helps his chances too.
 

TCT~Phantom

Smash Master
Writing Team
Joined
Dec 10, 2013
Messages
3,965
NNID
TCT~Phantom
This bit about polls reminds me of my first poly sci professor "intro to political science" at 900 dollars a credit (3 lectures) and 4 credits worth to achieve an "accredited" grade.

Anyway I only remember five things from that class.

"The word Authority is best defined as having the right to decide.".

"Subscribe to the New York Times."

"Statistics are dead information, and can not tell you anything useful."

An argument over whether adidas "are the best on earth" or Nike is, between two highly selected high schoolers from the inner city being able to get advanced credits but for free (technically I also went for free lol) and were engaged by this professor and turned it into a real world illustration and were kicked out because the "outburst" was an "outrage" (they never raised their voices) and thus I learned he was a racist. Got the whole class removed from the program so he wouldn't have to deal with "those."

I got an A. No one complained about his behavior because everyone was afraid an altercation was forthcoming even though I was never even thinking about that just listening to their points about shoe economics.

So anyway the point is while this project is going to be very interesting to many people the actual data will reveal what it reveals and given it's been implemented correctly by a proper statistician, I trust the numbers to be accurate.
Can confirm that the Times was certainly pushed in my politics 101 level course. Alongside the Post and the Chicago Tribune, they were seen as the gold standards for print journalism.

The biggest thing that I took away from my political statistics class is correlation =\= causation. Ice cream consumption correlated with yellow fever rates, that does not mean X and y cause each other.
 

MBRedboy31

Smash Lord
Joined
May 5, 2018
Messages
1,564
I wonder how the popular picks would fare if we put them in a poll where they have to compete with all the veterans.
 

Gengar84

Smash Hero
Joined
Dec 9, 2009
Messages
6,532
I kind of feel bad that I wasn’t too active while the polling was taken. Not that one person’s opinions would have really changed much but I still feel like I may have missed an opportunity to show some support for my favorite characters. Sometimes I feel like I’m the only person who’s rooting for some of the characters I talk about on here. It gets a bit lonely at times lol.
 
Last edited:

TCT~Phantom

Smash Master
Writing Team
Joined
Dec 10, 2013
Messages
3,965
NNID
TCT~Phantom
I wonder how the popular picks would fare if we put them in a poll where they have to compete with all the veterans.
Originally I was going to have a section talking about veterans and cuts for the article in depth, but I decided to cut it. I think speculation on cuts tends to devolve into philosophical beliefs or a hard stance one way or another. People have made very nuanced arguments we should expect ~10 or so cuts in the next game. People such as myself have argued perhaps we are over estimating the real danger of cuts. Either way, I find often times when people discuss the topic, it becomes less an attempt to predict the future and more what people want to say.

The bigger reason it was cut was that I wanted to focus primarily on new characters rather than concepts or other content. There are a variety of things that I think would be interesting to see people think about, such as a Tetris stage, a Ganondorf rework, or stuff like that. But with the goals of the project as is, it would feel hard to really fit them in imo. Maybe if I do an extra poll section on concepts, I might slip some of those in. But I feel it is harder to quantify a Ganon rework in the same poll as Skull Kid or Midna getting in the game. I would rather just have a Ganon rework in the same poll section as a Sonic or Samus rework. Same goes for veterans. If I did any poll on this, I would keep the vets together. If you do want some interesting veteran data, Source Gaming has been doing their mega poll and that might satiate your curiosity.

I kind of feel bad that I wasn’t too active while the polling was taken. Not that one person’s opinions would have really changed much but I still feel like I may have missed an opportunity to show some support for my favorite characters.
I can concur with this, support often does catch fire if at the right place and right time. Geno support for instance could only have really entrenched itself in Smash Speculation when it did for instance. For Ultimate, several characters went through blips of being hot topic issues in the community. Dante, Doomguy, Lloyd, heck even Tracer had their moments where they were the hot topic discussion button. This isn't saying they faded, but discussion on them peaked at certain points.

Conversely, some characters did manage to keep some traction even until the end. Crash and Ryu Hayabusa are probably the two biggest examples of where they got momentum and did not let it go. I am excited to see how they fare in the SCCC when we inevitably get to Microsoft.
 

CannonStreak

Supersonic Warrior
Premium
Joined
Nov 4, 2013
Messages
18,354
Location
Running from the cops in Stardust Speedway.
For one, there was the ballot. With big fan faves such as Ridley, K Rool, and Banjo getting in, it stood to reason that Geno also had a strong chance of getting in. Both K Rool and Geno got costumes in Smash 4 as a gift to their fans once the dev team realized they were popular among the Smash fanbase. K Rool later became playable, which raised hopes for Geno. There were some small things as well, such as a reference to Megasmilax in Viridi's dialogue when you do Piranha Plant's Palutena's Guidance. Nintendo would have had to negotiate with Square-Enix for that one, because that's a species of Piranha Plant only found in SMRPG. The mention of Megasmilax could have very easily not been there. See, Viridi gets really excited about Piranha Plant and starts listing the many, many species of them that have existed across the Mario franchise (there are a ton). Megasmilax could have been omitted and nothing would have been lost. Yet, it was there. If nothing else, this showed that the dev team was keeping SMRPG in mind. And then, there was Geno's Mii costume being absent for so long. Which, in hindsight, really sucked. At least rip off that bandaid early instead of keeping everyone in the dark for so long, y'know?

Is this the strongest evidence ever? No, far from it. But it's more than most characters get. With the benefit of hindsight, what I think happened was: S-E simply prioritized other characters. Hero and Sephiroth are far bigger icons than Geno. But of course, we had no way of knowing that at the time.
Well, I also said this a few pages ago.

Anyway, one more thing about Geno, I would not say his fan demand is the only thing working for him. The other reasons are few in number, though.

He does have good moveset potential (though I am not sure on what his Up B would be), and he is retro character from a third party game, so that would be fun to include in my opinion.

However, I don't even know how far the first reason goes, and the second one?...He is still a supporting character. A main character, but not the main main character if you know what I mean. He had an important role, but was not the star. I'd say that could most definitely cancel the second reason out.

He was still playable, if in battles only, but that goes only so far, if far at all.
Still, those are minor things you said, especially Megasmilax. For one, K. Rool is an Nintendo character with a bigger role, while Geno, well, is a supporting character who is third party in a game that is more obscure possibly than K. Rool is. K. Rool has appeared in more games. The circumstances are different.

Plus, despite the Mii Costume in Smash 4, to me, it did not mean he would necessarily get in the next game. I mean, I had a strong feeling they would make the Mii costume for Geno come back. It was surprising how long it took, but I knew it had a chance of happening. Also, counting their Nuts and Bolts game, even Banjo and Kazooie were more recent than anything Geno has been in, not counting his cameo in the original Mario and Luigi game of course.

It was just said that the Geno fans did not see that correlations do not always mean things will go their way. They were sure overconfident that things will go their way, but I knew better that there was a chance that it would not happen, despite that list of "evidence" (Not what you said above) the Geno fans had for Geno getting in. I mean, I know Geno could have been added despite being a supporting character in a third party game that was obscure, but that would go with the term, anything is possible, which not only applies to every other video game character out there, but it technically is a bad argument to begin with.

I may be pessimistic, but I just don't see Sakurai desiring Geno to be in anymore, especially since there are still big Square-Enix characters getting in before him.
 

Gengar84

Smash Hero
Joined
Dec 9, 2009
Messages
6,532
Originally I was going to have a section talking about veterans and cuts for the article in depth, but I decided to cut it. I think speculation on cuts tends to devolve into philosophical beliefs or a hard stance one way or another. People have made very nuanced arguments we should expect ~10 or so cuts in the next game. People such as myself have argued perhaps we are over estimating the real danger of cuts. Either way, I find often times when people discuss the topic, it becomes less an attempt to predict the future and more what people want to say.

The bigger reason it was cut was that I wanted to focus primarily on new characters rather than concepts or other content. There are a variety of things that I think would be interesting to see people think about, such as a Tetris stage, a Ganondorf rework, or stuff like that. But with the goals of the project as is, it would feel hard to really fit them in imo. Maybe if I do an extra poll section on concepts, I might slip some of those in. But I feel it is harder to quantify a Ganon rework in the same poll as Skull Kid or Midna getting in the game. I would rather just have a Ganon rework in the same poll section as a Sonic or Samus rework. Same goes for veterans. If I did any poll on this, I would keep the vets together. If you do want some interesting veteran data, Source Gaming has been doing their mega poll and that might satiate your curiosity.


I can concur with this, support often does catch fire if at the right place and right time. Geno support for instance could only have really entrenched itself in Smash Speculation when it did for instance. For Ultimate, several characters went through blips of being hot topic issues in the community. Dante, Doomguy, Lloyd, heck even Tracer had their moments where they were the hot topic discussion button. This isn't saying they faded, but discussion on them peaked at certain points.

Conversely, some characters did manage to keep some traction even until the end. Crash and Ryu Hayabusa are probably the two biggest examples of where they got momentum and did not let it go. I am excited to see how they fare in the SCCC when we inevitably get to Microsoft.
If nothing else, I’ll keep popping in here every now and then to share my thoughts on my favorite characters. They’re fun to talk about even if they aren’t the most likely choices. Maybe if I get lucky, I can at least convince a few people why some of these characters could be a lot of fun in Smash and maybe build a tiny bit of support for them.

My only real claim to fame is being a somewhat popular Brawl modder back in the day (under the name Aafyre) so I doubt I’m anywhere influential enough to actually bring attention to these characters.
 
Last edited:

TCT~Phantom

Smash Master
Writing Team
Joined
Dec 10, 2013
Messages
3,965
NNID
TCT~Phantom
If nothing else, I’ll keep popping in here every now and then to share my thoughts on my favorite characters. They’re fun to talk about even if they aren’t the most likely choices. Maybe if I get lucky, I can at least convince a few people why some of these characters could be a lot of fun in Smash and maybe build a tiny bit of support for them.
Personally, I would wait for the fever pitch moment where a character would be a huge push. Like maybe push Arthas next week if they announce Death Knights for Hearthstone. Or pushing Crash after TGAs if they announce a new Crash game. Just something new gives a nice spark to add fuel to the fire.
 

Gengar84

Smash Hero
Joined
Dec 9, 2009
Messages
6,532
Personally, I would wait for the fever pitch moment where a character would be a huge push. Like maybe push Arthas next week if they announce Death Knights for Hearthstone. Or pushing Crash after TGAs if they announce a new Crash game. Just something new gives a nice spark to add fuel to the fire.
That’s a great idea. It’s a bit harder to do for some of my favorite retro characters like Magus or the Toads that don’t often have anything new coming out but I’ll try to keep that in mind for characters that are still active. I did push Magus a bit when the Chrono Cross port was announced for the Switch so that’s something.

Other characters I completely acknowledge have absolutely no chance whatsoever to make it in (like Zegram Ghart from Rogue Galaxy) but I love the character and game so much that he’s still fun to talk about and share the move set I made for him on occasion. He’s from a dead, Sony owned game so he’s probably never appearing in anything again.
 
Last edited:

DanganZilla5

Smash Champion
Writing Team
Joined
Mar 5, 2019
Messages
2,433
If nothing else, I’ll keep popping in here every now and then to share my thoughts on my favorite characters. They’re fun to talk about even if they aren’t the most likely choices. Maybe if I get lucky, I can at least convince a few people why some of these characters could be a lot of fun in Smash and maybe build a tiny bit of support for them.

My only real claim to fame is being a somewhat popular Brawl modder back in the day (under the name Aafyre) so I doubt I’m anywhere influential enough to actually bring attention to these characters.
That's the spirit! I managed to get a few people to try Destroy All Humans thanks to my gushing of Crypto and he ended up being brought up a few times in the past in speculation. That's a magical feeling that I hope as many people as possible can experience.
 

chocolatejr9

Smash Hero
Joined
Sep 30, 2018
Messages
8,378
That’s a great idea. It’s a bit harder to do for some of my favorite retro characters like Magus or the Toads that don’t often have anything new coming out but I’ll try to keep that in mind for characters that are still active. I did push Magus a bit when the Chrono Cross port was announced for the Switch so that’s something.

Other characters I completely acknowledge have absolutely no chance whatsoever to make it in (like Zegram Ghart from Rogue Galaxy) but I love the character and game so much that he’s still fun to talk about and share the move set I made for him on occasion. He’s from a dead, Sony owned game so he’s probably never appearing in anything again.
Hey, I managed to win a few people over on Euden, so anything's possible I feel.

Although if you're willing to get SUPER hopeful, maybe see if Sony would be willing to sell Rogue Galaxy to Level-5. I know the chances of that happening are non-existant, but they WERE willing to sell The Tomorrow Children to that game's original developers, so I guess it's not IMPOSSIBLE. Granted, The Tomorrow Children was a VERY unique situation, but still...
 

dream1ng

Smash Champion
Joined
Jul 24, 2016
Messages
2,169
For one, there was the ballot. With big fan faves such as Ridley, K Rool, and Banjo getting in, it stood to reason that Geno also had a strong chance of getting in. Both K Rool and Geno got costumes in Smash 4 as a gift to their fans once the dev team realized they were popular among the Smash fanbase. K Rool later became playable, which raised hopes for Geno. There were some small things as well, such as a reference to Megasmilax in Viridi's dialogue when you do Piranha Plant's Palutena's Guidance. Nintendo would have had to negotiate with Square-Enix for that one, because that's a species of Piranha Plant only found in SMRPG. The mention of Megasmilax could have very easily not been there. See, Viridi gets really excited about Piranha Plant and starts listing the many, many species of them that have existed across the Mario franchise (there are a ton). Megasmilax could have been omitted and nothing would have been lost. Yet, it was there. If nothing else, this showed that the dev team was keeping SMRPG in mind. And then, there was Geno's Mii costume being absent for so long. Which, in hindsight, really sucked. At least rip off that bandaid early instead of keeping everyone in the dark for so long, y'know?

Is this the strongest evidence ever? No, far from it. But it's more than most characters get. With the benefit of hindsight, what I think happened was: S-E simply prioritized other characters. Hero and Sephiroth are far bigger icons than Geno. But of course, we had no way of knowing that at the time.
Geno probably didn't perform spectacularly in the ballot because what rejuvenated his popularity was the costume, which was revealed basically when the ballot was over. Before that he was on a downward trajectory, and wasn't among the most popular characters during most of 4.

Though I guess it would've been somewhat superfluous anyway given the Smash team was already aware of his previous popularity.
 

Opossum

Thread Title Changer
BRoomer
Joined
Aug 10, 2011
Messages
33,992
Location
This Thread
NNID
OpossumGuy
3DS FC
4742-4911-3431
Switch FC
SW 2859 6322 5208
This is my last post dealing with you.

If you bothered to click any of the polls I generously provided you, you would see that there are alternative options for a most demanded character. Bandana Dee for instance out performed Waluigi on all three of those polls. Plenty of other first parties have performed will in the polls as well, such as Isaac, Dixie Kong, Skull Kid, or even Porky on one. You also are just assuming that naturally, Waluigi's fan demand is going to rise. You can't predict the future like that. Waluigi could easily be a Brawl Geno or Krystal, or a Smash 4 Professor Layton where their demand peaks at a certain time and does not explore further. Already, if you even bothered to read any of the polls or any post I made, you would have seen that yes, there is evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that Waluigi is not the most popular first party. But it must be so much easier to make blanket statements like Waluigi is the most popular first party character right? He trended on twitter, even though I explained to you with a helpful link that trending on twitter does not mean as much at the end of the day. He got a caged PR response from Reggie. He even does... decently well but not overwhelmingly well on multiple fan polls. Surely, he must be the most popular first party?

Or instead of just making blanket statements that have no binding, you could actually make a coherent argument that yes, he might indeed not be the most popular first party. But it is so much easier to say I did not offer you reasonable alternatives, when I did so with multiple fan polls.

Even putting aside the ample evidence I provided you that does cast a reasonable doubt that Waluigi is outright the most popular first party, that does not remove the fact that he is a polarizing character. Yes, some people like Waluigi. Some people detest him. Compared to previous fan favorite picks like Ridley, K Rool, Palutena, or Little Mac, Waluigi is far more polarizing. He would more likely compare to Geno than any of them.

I originally was going to make a reply to someone else when they brought up the casual nintendo fanbase silent majority like you did, but this is a good time to stake that right through the heart. Using the ballot and polls from that era (ballot to Smash Ultimate E3) before the twitter fiasco, we can say that Waluigi was not an S tier request prior to the twitter fiasco. But even moreso, let's put to bed that there is this silent majority that would be ecstatic if Waluigi was somehow added to the game. You can just as easily claim any character from a popular Nintendo series would make the casual audience happy. What is stopping me from saying the silent majority demands Octolings, Tom Nook, and King Boo? What is stopping me from saying that Pauline would please this silent majority just as much as Waluigi? You can't claim to speak for a silent majority because they are silent. Maybe the silent majority loves Wii Fit Trainer. Maybe their favorite character is King K Rool. It is easy to just assume that this widespread, casual nintendo monolith that you claim is 100% behind Waluigi is firmly in his corner. Would they be happy with Waluigi? Sure. You know who else they would be happy with? Most other reasonably popular Nintendo characters that they know.

It's funny you say Waluigi's popularity crosses hemispheres, when its also clear he is more of a Western request. Compared to the US, demand for Waluigi is notably lower in Japan. But it is easy to just assume that Waluigi is this popular monolith. Just because he is a Mario character does not mean his popularity will automatically be what it was on NA twitter June 2018 everywhere else. What is stopping me from using your own backwards logic to claim that Tom Nook is the true pick of the silent majority, globally popular since Animal Crossing New Horizons was huge?

And yes, there is logic that perhaps, god forbid, the character you have latched onto, might not be the pick that speaks for everyone. Bandana Dee and Isaac both are competitive with Waluigi already, but both are far less polarizing than he is. Dee in particular outperformed Waluigi in each of the polls I spoonfed as an example, but I am going to take a shot in the dark that you did not read them. After all, why read them instead of saying I offered you no reasonable alternative take? Dixie Kong is another reasonable take, espeically now that she does not have a big green crocodilian obstacle in her way. If you want to go outside of the hardcore speculation scene, you can easily claim other characters could be a more desired first party. Spaltoon and Animal Crossing have had huge rises. Contrary to what you have suggested, I do think that support and demand has started to unify for both of those series. Octolings are the easy consensus pick for Splatoon, and they seem to be the most popular Splatoon pick by far. Tom Nook meanwhile is easily the Animal Crossing pick. But you want to have your cake and eat it to, so Tom Nook clearly can not ride the support of casual fans like Waluigi does by your own logic.

You also ignore the issue that, much like the issues you claim with Zelda and Splatoon, there are alternative Mario options that people would not be opposed to. Is Waluigi the most popular and polarizing of them? Sure. But there is fan demand out there for Geno, Pauline, King Boo, Paper Mario, and Captain Toad. All of those have at least somewhat of a fanbase, Geno's of which is actually comparable in size to Waluigi's (he even out performed him on some of the polls I generously provided you). Competition exists for a lot of franchises in Smash, even for the Mario fanbase. You could claim that the fandom could coalesce around Waluigi. Sure, that could happen. Or it could not. Maybe it only splinters further. There was a large growing wave of support for King Boo for instance at the end of Smash Ultimate's DLC lifespan, maybe that grows. Or maybe Pauline becomes a stronger fan request now that she is basically a mainstay addition to the Mario Spin Off crowd. There right now is no real evidence that the Mario fanbase is going to just band together and overwhelmingly support Waluigi the way for example Metroid fans did with Ridley. Maybe that will happen, but you can not just assume that it will like you conveniently do.

Unlike you, I think there is evidence that at least to a reasonable doubt, Waluigi is not the most popular first party character? Is he popular? Sure. But you can't just assume he is far and away the most popular first party on a whim. You can't casually dismiss any other option just because Waluigi trended on Twitter one time in 2018. There is evidence that the hardcore speculation audience does not have him as their first party of choice. The casual monolith you claim is behind evergreen Waluigi also is not an airtight piece of evidence: the silent majority could just as easily be behind something like a Tom Nook or an Octoling. It is easy to just latch onto a popular character, like Chrom in Smash 4. But it is important to critically think instead of just making a blanket statement about a character. The easy route is to use a leak like Gematsu like a cudgel and smash out any other speculation that threatens your "objective" choice. Needless to say, the "objective" choice did not win out in Smash 4. Despite Chrom being reasonably popular (albeit polarizing), he did not make it into Smash 4's roster as a unique character. Just because you hitch your bandwagon to a popular and/or likely character does not automatically mean they are the objective choice. There is plenty of evidence that Waluigi might not even be the most popular Mario character in some circles, Geno (an even more polarizing character) has a reasonable claim to that in the hardcore speculation fandom. I am not denying that Waluigi is popular, he is certainly a popular character. But saying outright that he is far and away the most popular character is putting your head in the sand, ignoring any evidence that suggests that Waluigi might not be the most popular character outright.

-------------------

Now with that done, let me take down your criticism of my poll. I am going to highlight your smug line about "how polling works" for this because I can tell you do not have a great idea about polling in general. I have a political science degree and have written papers on the subject in college. Several polls struggle for actual serious topics to get above 200 respondents. Reliable polling is hard, it is why we do not have great polling for most House of Representative races despite the election being days away. You also are assuming that every poll has to be a ballot, when that is just not the case either.

If you even bothered to read my article on the poll instead of skimming it for results, the goal was to see how the community broadly felt about characters. As a result, I went with this model instead. This model might negatively impact a polarizing character, but a traditional model has positive impacts on polarizing picks. The goal is not just to see who is a popular pick with a vocal fanbase: it is to see how the community at large feels about a character. Turns out, Waluigi is a polarizng character that many people also feel lukewarm on. Some characters, like King Boo, Captain Toad, or Pauline, were more consensus picks that did better. Having your two highest mean scores be 7-8 is better than your three highest mean scores be 10, 5, and 1. My poll, for what purposes I had in mind, is working as intended. It is showing how the community feels about characters broadly rather than just who their most wanted is. I know you whined about how Pauline scores slightly higher than Waluigi. Does Pauline have as many ride or die fans? Obviously not. Her most common score by far was a 7: a supportive choice but not an invested ride or die one. Her next most common one was an 8. Waluigi's most common scores were 10, 5, and 1. People either loved him, hated him, or felt nothing towards him.

Now, let me remind you again of what the stated goals of the poll were, in the first paragraph of the article.

At no point do I say this is a popularity contest. This is broadly to see how excited people are. Will a character being immensely popular help? Absolutely, that is obvious. But the goal is not to just run a poll and see if people want Waluigi, Geno, and Dixie Kong. The goal is to see broadly how excited people are about the idea of a character being in Smash and see what people's realistic expectations are. In terms of expectations, Waluigi did great, he had the highest score for part 1. But broadly, he does seem to be polarizing with a vocal fanbase, which I also mentioned in the article. You have the freedom to dislike the data. It is not a perfect data set: the first one for this series was always going to have less responses just due to being harder to promote. It is not a perfect representative sample either: Smashboards was one of the main sites used to advertise it. Smashboards is not and has never been a perfect representation of even the hardcore Smash community. But despite its faults, it is data from one poll. Some polarizing characters, like Geno and Waluigi, did not perform as well as I expected sure. It is still useful data at the end of the day that we can look to later during Smash 6 to see

But if a fun little meme and a short post is enough to get you all up in arms, I do not know what to say. I even highlighted within that own post that it is "just one poll" and that it did not speak to everything. But apparently a meme is enough to make it say everything and nothing according to you for some reason. Let's take a read of my post, that you clearly are making huge conclusions from.

I clarify it is only one poll and he might not crack top 10 despite getting a good score. I then interject that he has a very vocal fanbase, and then personally suggest that he is not automatically the most popular first party and is absolutely not a lock for Smash 6.

But according to you, the presence of this picture does suggest that it means everything. That my one poll means that Waluigi is somehow not a popular character despite me saying that he is popular and got a respectable score. Instead of reading what I actually said, which is pretty clearly not saying much at the end of the day, you choose to let one meme dictate that it says so much more than that. I do not know what to say to that. If you clearly read what I posted, that would absolutely not be the case. If you read the post I replied to, specifically the part I highlighted like this, you would know that all I was saying is that maybe you should throw some cold water on the idea Waluigi is this inevitable popular behemoth who towers over every other first party.

Instead of reading that at all, you decided to take the meaning that my meme automatically meant that I was some prophet, someone who knew everything and that Waluigi was secretly not the popular character he is. Despite, you know, me clearly exactly not that in my post. If you can somehow come to such radical conclusions from a picture and three sentences, but fail to take anything away from my previous response that gave you very reasonable counterarguments and say that I provided no counterpoints, I do not know what to reasonably say to you.
Wow, you really don't take people disagreeing with you well.

Like simmer down, man, I just thought your post was off base. You don't need to act like you're "dealing" with me by posting a lengthy manifesto defending your poll. If you want to read smugness and "getting up in arms" from my post, that's fine I guess. It's entirely off base, but it's...fine.

But at the end of the day, I wasn't the one who tried to flaunt a political degree on a party game forum at the first sign of criticism. :^) We're done here bye-bye.
 

Verde Coeden Scalesworth

Flap and Swish~
Premium
Joined
Aug 13, 2001
Messages
34,367
Location
Cull Hazard
NNID
Irene4
3DS FC
1203-9265-8784
Switch FC
SW-7567-8572-3791
The Halo Pack in Minecraft is significantly less than anything represented in Smash so far. It's not even part of its own series. It's just skins. I honestly don't think don't think Sakurai would just straight up pass up an opportunity add another significantly popular series like Halo to Smash Bros just because he's not interested. There's definitely other reasons why.
...It's not "less". It's a fully represented world in every way at most but music(which isn't saying much, due to Minecraft being a different kind of game). It has over 20 skins, multiple texture packs, full world packs, etc. It's pretty much the equivalent to what we have as a proper Fighter's Pack. It's not nearly as small as a single Costume either. It only didn't get Sounds, but most notably, has the highest amount of skins of any such mash-up pack(albeit, not all of them are low either). Even more than Super Mario, with the sole thing it got of note was also sounds, so only at best the second largest pack in Minecraft to begin with. Which makes sense, as they're both huge franchises from their respective company.

To be exact, it has a UI Texture, a World Template, Item Textures, Block Textures, Mob Textures, and Skin packs. I admit it's kind of hard to find the information, but no, it's not just skin packs like you claim.

That honor goes to Banjo & Kazooie, who got simple a few skins, not actually incorporating the entire world into it. But more to the point, while there may be other reasons, it's pretty unreasonable to think Microsoft or Nintendo could be against it when they pretty much already did so beforehand. For the record, these mash-up packs have variable larger or smaller versions, but they are also the big DLC packs you can get, actually the equivalent to the Fighter's Passes. Some won't always have sounds, and the skins are quite a huge amount to begin with, with the lowest barely being 21, and the highest at 48. This isn't "minor" like you put it, it's the game's biggest crossover DLC design.

Meanwhile "just skins" is far more closer to either Spirits or Mii Costumes, which are actual minor updates(and often times comes in around 5 skins per pack. This doesn't mean other reasons couldn't exist, but you did get your data wrong and are blatantly downplaying the big DLC stuff Minecraft gets to make your point seem better. Evidence pretty much shows its clearly that Nintendo and Microsoft don't have an issue with having Halo be a big DLC thing on the Nintendo system. Sakurai's the sole wild card. It's not that other reasons couldn't exist(for instance, licensing was denied, or the fact it's more than just likeness. As a 3D Model, they could want him to be more accurate to his proportions. Other possible reasons exist. Halo having a minor appearance isn't actually one of them, since it's an actual rather big appearance, especially for what is normally a system exclusive option. Sony couldn't get this(either they're too pigheaded to accept or Microsoft isn't willing to fully work with them), which shows it's not some "yeah, we'll give it out easily" either way. Clearly extra thought is put into how they handle one of Microsoft's top franchises.

To be fair, I'm guessing you legitimately didn't know it was a full pack and just a minor set of costumes, so it's understandable what your premise was. You were under the impression it was way smaller than what happened. It's actually rather difficult to easily find the data, even on the wikis, so I get where you're coming from on that end. You can't just search Halo Mash-Up Pack and immediately get a useful page. You have to sort through all the links to get clear information.

As for the other thing, yes, if you bring up some kind of hypothetical, some people will ask if you know more of the details, since it was your idea. Nobody's finding it odd you simply didn't know cause it wasn't released, but you shouldn't be surprised that people ask for more details on any premise you come up with. That's just normal conversation. I don't know why you're being weird about it or defensive about it anyway. It wasn't some big deal to begin with. I thought you knew because you brought it up, but you didn't. It happens. In the end, sometimes you don't know things, and nobody's trying to chastise you for it. But we do have a right to ask for more details. My suggestion, in similar cases, is just to explain clearly you weren't basing it upon specific information and just were trying to open up a very fun concept, For the record, the game was atleast active by 2020, so there was easily enough time for it to get some Spirits, since it was in development early enough by design, as they showed off a teaser. Incidentally, the information that you required was somewhat there on Wikipedia, though not an exact development start, but when it went public. You can infer from that alone that there was a year or more time spent on the game, pretty easily in time. Another way to put this is that... you should try to do a bit of research instead of brushing off questions as "I don't know." Try and look for any details that help first before replying. Replying shouldn't be some fast thing, it should be trying to say what you want while respectively trying to properly take into account as much said as possible, and if that means doing some research before sending "Post reply", then so be it. For the record, I spent over 30 minutes on this post to find purely accurate details so you understand what I said better, and not simply just cause you got some details wrong(which as I spoke of, clearly were hard to find, so it's understandable). I hope you understand this point better, but if you're debating, take your time to post, as you're not on a timelimit. Accuracy is more important to explaining one's points than "just saying stuff fast enough", which, well, means one can make errors.
 

Gengar84

Smash Hero
Joined
Dec 9, 2009
Messages
6,532
I think we can all agree that Waluigi is a popular character within the Smash community. Getting into a huge argument about whether he’s literally THE most popular seems a bit silly. He’s definitely up there if he isn’t at the very top. I’m not a huge Waluigi fan either way so I don’t really have a horse in this race but arguing over a technicality like that just seems like a bit of a waste of energy.
 
Last edited:

Verde Coeden Scalesworth

Flap and Swish~
Premium
Joined
Aug 13, 2001
Messages
34,367
Location
Cull Hazard
NNID
Irene4
3DS FC
1203-9265-8784
Switch FC
SW-7567-8572-3791
Waluigi is hardly a shoo-in, but he's certainly a contender. The character is factually proven to be polarizing, even among a smaller set of fans, but also proven to be highly popular likewise. He's a mixed character. Pretty much akin to Tingle(Tingle just has more haters than lovers, whereas Waluigi has more lovers than haters).

But then again, we rarely had shoo-ins besides most of the original 12 and Inklings among base game characters. The rest were actually pretty polarizing as is, whereas DLC-wise, the only guarantee was Steve(with or without Alex as a skin. Though I thought it was a given, but she takes more importance than that anyway), who was already in discussion before 2017, when Nintendo went out of their way to tell Sakurai DLC is going to be in the plan(according to the original information. I'm sure it's flubbed up and it's more meant they insisted, but they had a pretty hard control of all the DLC bar Piranha Plant, so who knows. At least for the playable character choices. We don't know exactly how the costumes or spirits were gotten, but we do know Sakurai at least asks for the music from the companies, but that's been the case for a while now. I think it was Brawl or 4 that acknowledge that?)

(You could make the argument that Diddy Kong was also super obvious, but I never felt like we had enough reason to believe he was coming. I just predicted him right a long time ago. Just like I predicted Hero not using Erdrick as the default, but either Eight or Eleven, who had worldwide appeal. Of which neither was for any of the same reasons. Eleven was the default simply because he was newest and according to Sakurai, more "pretty". Which is accurate since he has a bishie design compared to Erdrick, whose design is meant to be a more gruff warrior. I never took that as referring to who he likes more bias-wise, cause we know that's Erdrick anyway).
 
Last edited:

Aligo

Smash Ace
Joined
Jun 12, 2021
Messages
535
Unfortunately, I don't think circumstances have changed all that much for the purple plumber. He is still in the same spinoff camp as daisy, but without echo potential due to his body shape. May waluigi get a main appearance... Someday.
 

Verde Coeden Scalesworth

Flap and Swish~
Premium
Joined
Aug 13, 2001
Messages
34,367
Location
Cull Hazard
NNID
Irene4
3DS FC
1203-9265-8784
Switch FC
SW-7567-8572-3791
Unfortunately, I don't think circumstances have changed all that much for the purple plumber. He is still in the same spinoff camp as daisy, but without echo potential due to his body shape. May waluigi get a main appearance... Someday.
The big irony is that Daisy's spin-off status is the only reason she played exactly like Peach and made it possibly for her to be an Echo. She had nothing in common besides a minor end of game role. It wasn't till Super Mario Run where they would both uses their own models and/or sprites and play the same. Super Mario Maker doesn't really count since they play like Mario instead(albeit, most do in some spin-offs, but many others actually do separate the characters, and Daisy is meant to be identical to Peach). ...Which is mostly the case in Ultimate(yep, hurtbox differences. That's so notable. Sure, it's actual different gameplay data, but functionally, nobody can tell the difference).

Waluigi is actually unique but can't use any clear base. Luigi is too different of a bodyshape. The odd thing is, Bayonetta these days has the closest to animation style to Waluigi to be remotely useful, and obviously that isn't going to work well either way. XD
 
Last edited:

Gengar84

Smash Hero
Joined
Dec 9, 2009
Messages
6,532
Unfortunately, I don't think circumstances have changed all that much for the purple plumber. He is still in the same spinoff camp as daisy, but without echo potential due to his body shape. May waluigi get a main appearance... Someday.
The biggest change, in my opinion, is that we now have many of the most requested first party characters already in Smash. Before Ultimate, he was a bit overshadowed by K. Rool and Ridley. Now that they’re in, Waluigi’s chances go up by process of elimination. Personally, I don’t really like talking about likelihood or the concept of “shoo-ins” since I feel that kind of discouraged discussion on some of the less speculated characters. It’s much more fun to me to share ideas about how some characters could play or what they might bring with them rather than get hung up on their chances.
 

SPEN18

Smash Champion
Joined
Nov 1, 2018
Messages
2,277
Location
MI, USA
I wonder how the popular picks would fare if we put them in a poll where they have to compete with all the veterans.
Indeed, it is an interesting question. Lots of Smash fans love vet retention, but lots of them I think still have a character where they'd cut one or more characters they don't like as much if it meant that said favorite could get in.

But such a poll might also simply ask "who do you like the most" rather than making any explicit mention of cuts or adds to the Smash roster at all. If people are just viewing it as a general popularity poll rather than anything to do with Smash, then they will just vote for their favorites, in which case I could see lots of unrepped characters doing well but also lots of vets doing well.

Sometimes "obvious" choices like Mario or Pikachu don't do as well in these types of polls because, even though they are generally beloved by fans, main characters aren't always a particular person's absolute favorite if they are allowed to pick any reasonably notable character within that franchise. Like, I could see Skull Kid beating Link in a Zelda character popularity poll, for example, depending on how the poll is structured and what the demographics are. But also some (but not all) vets are slam-dunk popular picks who would probably do well in any poll they are included in, like for example Ike within the FE fandom or Lucario within the PKMN fandom.
It would be an interesting exercise but it's hard to know without doing it if it'd actually be useful for the purposes of Smash rostering.
 
Top Bottom