• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Official Next Smash - Speculation & Discussion Thread

DarthEnderX

Smash Hero
Joined
Nov 10, 2014
Messages
8,429
Hmm… I would have thought the recency of Forgotten Land would have given Elfilis an edge when compared to other Kirby bosses from the past.
If all other things were equal and you were choosing between a bunch of one-shot bosses, then yes. But some of those other bosses have had expended roles across the series. And that's not even taking into account Bandana Dee.
 

Gengar84

Smash Hero
Joined
Dec 9, 2009
Messages
6,706
If all other things were equal and you were choosing between a bunch of one-shot bosses, then yes. But some of those other bosses have had expended roles across the series. And that's not even taking into account Bandana Dee.
Well, yeah I agree that Bandana Dee is the most likely next Kirby character. I was mostly talking about the possibility of a second newcomer if we got one. I’m curious if Elfilis will also make appearances in future Kirby games like the others have. The only Kirby games I’ve played were Superstar, Superstar Ultra, Star Allies, Forgotten Land, and Air Ride off the top of my head. I think I played a little bit of Epic Yarn but I don’t know if I ever finished that one.
 

Among Waddle Dees

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Mar 23, 2017
Messages
454
Hmm… I would have thought the recency of Forgotten Land would have given Elfilis an edge when compared to other Kirby bosses from the past. I guess I didn’t realize that it wasn’t a particularly popular character. Popularity does matter and if no one really cared about Elfilis as a character, it makes sense they’d prioritize others over it. Kind of a shame because I personally thought it was really cool but the other bosses could be fun too. I guess Marx is my second pick.
Forgotten Land unfortunately fails to introduce any sound Smash candidates to the mix. The closest is Bandana Dee, but in addition to already having a big following beforehand, he's not all that different from his Star Allies adaptation, which had way more options than Forgotten Land had. I might've counted Elfilin if he had more direct connections to his other half, but they made a bit of a misstep by disassociating their identities.
 

BuckleyTim

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Jun 11, 2019
Messages
210
It would suck if Dante got in next game and he couldn't fight Bayonetta. That's like part of the fun right there.

It also sucks that Kirby will most likely only get a single slot next game. There's too many cool supporting characters to represent multiple eras of the series to just leave it at just BWD imo.
 

SMAASH! Puppy

Smash Legend
Joined
Feb 13, 2015
Messages
13,406
Location
Snake Man's stage from Metal Blade Solid
Hmm… I would have thought the recency of Forgotten Land would have given Elfilis an edge when compared to other Kirby bosses from the past. I guess I didn’t realize that it wasn’t a particularly popular character. Popularity does matter and if no one really cared about Elfilis as a character, it makes sense they’d prioritize others over it. Kind of a shame because I personally thought it was really cool but the other bosses could be fun too. I guess Marx is my second pick.
There's a couple reasons for this:
  1. Elfilis is a flavor of the week villain, and characters like Bandana Waddle Dee and Magolor have received a ton more attention than that.
  2. Elfilis isn't in most of Kirby and the Forgotten Land. The character most people who played that game are going to care about is Elfilin, not Elfilis.
They are a cool creature design though.
 

Gengar84

Smash Hero
Joined
Dec 9, 2009
Messages
6,706
Yeah, I guess my priorities are different for different genres. For platforming games and others that are light on story, I tend to just go for who I think looks the coolest or who just look like they’d be fun to play more so than whether they have a ton of depth as a character. For other genres like JRPGs and games with deeper lore, the backstory and development of the character matters a lot more to me, though I still have a preference for characters that I think look cool and fun within that. Kirby does seem to have more lore than other platformers but I never got beyond the aesthetics and moveset regarding it in Smash. That might explain why Bugzzy is my most wanted Kirby character and Goomba is my most wanted Mario character despite it neither having any role in the story whatsoever.
 
Last edited:

Gengar84

Smash Hero
Joined
Dec 9, 2009
Messages
6,706
If nothing else, Elfilis would make for a really cool model import mod over Mewtwo. I think I could be content with that.
 

NintenRob

Rising YouTuber
Writing Team
Joined
Feb 8, 2014
Messages
5,544
Location
Australia
NNID
trpdm.wilton
I do think Kirby is in a position to get multiple newcomers next game depending on roster size. Though I think specifically those characters will Bandana Dee and Magolor. Like I can easily envision bandana Dee as an early reveal while Magolor is kept secret til the end
 

PersonAngelo53

Smash Cadet
Joined
Jun 5, 2020
Messages
60
That’s sad to hear. I never really got into any Ubisoft games myself but it sucks for fans that really liked their games. I have no real attachment to Rayman but he seems like he would have been a fun a smash character.

On the subject of potential third party newcomers, would you all rather see Nintendo expand on Smash’s current direction as a “celebration of gaming” and include more popular game characters from around the world and branch out from being mostly Japan focused? Would you rather see Smash return to its roots as a big Nintendo crossover with a few guests sprinkled in here and there? Are you generally happy with how Smash is currently handling things in regards to newcomers and prefer it stay Japan focused but include guests mostly from Japanese developers?
Yeah I prefer the way smash is going now since most of my most wanted characters just so happened to be either third party or niche. So going back to mostly just Nintendo characters wouldn’t really do that much for me in the long run.
 

SMAASH! Puppy

Smash Legend
Joined
Feb 13, 2015
Messages
13,406
Location
Snake Man's stage from Metal Blade Solid
Yeah, I guess my priorities are different for different genres. For platforming games and others that are light on story, I tend to just go for who I think looks the coolest or who just look like they’d be fun to play more so than whether they have a ton of depth as a character. For other genres like JRPGs and games with deeper lore, the backstory and development of the character matters a lot more to me, though I still have a preference for characters that I think look cool and fun within that. Kirby does seem to have more lore than other platformers but I never got beyond the aesthetics and moveset regarding it in Smash. That might explain why Bugzzy is my most wanted Kirby character and Goomba is my most wanted Mario character despite it neither having any role in the story whatsoever.
If you're curious:
From what I've gleaned from the story, Elfilis is some kind of evil eldritch being that was captured by the lost civilization, and experimented on. The lost civilization was actually so comfortable around it that they turned it into a tourist attraction. The whole ordeal was pretty traumatic, or at least extremely grating for Elfilis, which is why in later fights with him you hear "And here we are, Subject F-86!" repeat over and over. So when the lost civilization left and the king of the animal people that rose in their place showed up, Elfilis psychically controlled him so that he could get him enough power to get out.

Oh and Elfilin is like Elfilis' conscience or something.
 

Gengar84

Smash Hero
Joined
Dec 9, 2009
Messages
6,706
If you're curious:
From what I've gleaned from the story, Elfilis is some kind of evil eldritch being that was captured by the lost civilization, and experimented on. The lost civilization was actually so comfortable around it that they turned it into a tourist attraction. The whole ordeal was pretty traumatic, or at least extremely grating for Elfilis, which is why in later fights with him you hear "And here we are, Subject F-86!" repeat over and over. So when the lost civilization left and the king of the animal people that rose in their place showed up, Elfilis psychically controlled him so that he could get him enough power to get out.

Oh and Elfilin is like Elfilis' conscience or something.
Yeah, I thought that whole story was pretty fascinating for a Kirby game.
Even though Elfilis doesn’t really appear until the end of the game, it just has a really cool aura around it that reminds me of both JENOVA and Mewtwo in a lot of ways.
For me personally, the little story it has combined with its general cool factor is enough that I’d be excited to see it in Smash.
 
Last edited:

Gengar84

Smash Hero
Joined
Dec 9, 2009
Messages
6,706
Man, I do think it’s great that we all have our own different opinions on what we’d like to see in Smash but it does sometimes get a little discouraging that mine seem to be so out there all the time. It would be nice once in a while to have someone that shares some of my interests lol. Still a lot of fun chatting about what we’d like to see but it’s not giving me a ton of confidence the roster will particularly appeal to me in the next game. I can’t complain too much since I did get Sephiroth, K. Rool, Ridley, and Joker in the last game.
 
Last edited:

Guynamednelson

Smash Legend
Joined
Dec 17, 2014
Messages
13,180
NNID
Nelson340
3DS FC
2105-8742-2099
Switch FC
SW 4265 6024 9719
I wouldn’t mind if we only got a few base game newcomers in the next game if we kept everything we have now
You really would...not mind a lot of things.

But that's the thing that people who don't want Ultimate DX are trying to avoid. And given that marketing Smash is heavily focused on newcomers to the point where DLC-era Ultimate marketing was less "everyone is here" and more "the recent DLC newcomer is here", Nintendo would want to avoid it too.
 

Gengar84

Smash Hero
Joined
Dec 9, 2009
Messages
6,706
You really would...not mind a lot of things.

But that's the thing that people who don't want Ultimate DX are trying to avoid. And given that marketing Smash is heavily focused on newcomers to the point where DLC-era Ultimate marketing was less "everyone is here" and more "the recent DLC newcomer is here", Nintendo would want to avoid it too.
What is that supposed to mean? I’m not sure whether to take that as an insult or a compliment. I’m generally okay with whatever we get but I’d like to at least keep my favorite characters around even if we do have to scale back a bit. I’d personally rather see them prioritize the single player and co-op experience before adding a ton of other characters at launch. A huge roster is great but it still wears a bit thin when there’s not much to do with them outside of vs matches. Still, cutting the roster by too much would make me lose hope of seeing many of my most wanted characters ever make it since they’re pretty niche within Smash speculation.
 
Last edited:

Gengar84

Smash Hero
Joined
Dec 9, 2009
Messages
6,706
It's just a comment.
Fair enough. I’m just curious what brought up that comment. It sounded like I might have said something that bothered you. It’s cool that you’d rather see a bunch of new characters instead of focusing on keeping what we have. Depending on who’s cut and who’s added, I think I actually agree with you. My biggest concern is that my favorite veterans are likely cuts and the most popular newcomers people talk about don’t appeal to me as much as who I’d likely lose. It’s not so much about the raw roster number for me.
 
Last edited:

Guynamednelson

Smash Legend
Joined
Dec 17, 2014
Messages
13,180
NNID
Nelson340
3DS FC
2105-8742-2099
Switch FC
SW 4265 6024 9719
It’s cool that you’d rather see a bunch of new characters instead of focusing on keeping what we have. Depending on who’s cut and who’s added, I think I actually agree with you. My biggest concern is that my favorite veterans are likely cuts and the most popular newcomers people talk about don’t appeal to me as much as who I’d likely lose. It’s not so much about the raw roster number for me.
To me my concern is that if we get a small number of base game newcomers, that'll mean a small number of first-party newcomers overall given DLC's focus on third-parties.
 

Gengar84

Smash Hero
Joined
Dec 9, 2009
Messages
6,706
To me my concern is that if we get a small number of base game newcomers, that'll mean a small number of first-party newcomers overall given DLC's focus on third-parties.
Yeah, that’s a reasonable concern too. Ideally, we’d keep all the characters we have and add a ton of newcomers but sacrifices likely have to made somewhere. The large majority of my most wanted characters at this point are third party so the DLC route works for me. If most of yours are first party then it makes sense you’d want more base game newcomers.

As long as we don’t end up with a drastically lower roster total than Ultimate’s base game and it adds at least as many characters through DLC, I’m fine with cuts. I’m just hoping I can at least keep Sephiroth, Ganondorf, and K. Rool. Ganondorf’s pretty safe but I’m less confident in the other two.
 
Last edited:

Diddy Kong

Smash Obsessed
Joined
Dec 8, 2004
Messages
26,345
Switch FC
SW-1597-979602774
Fair enough. I’m just curious what brought up that comment. It sounded like I might have said something that bothered you. It’s cool that you’d rather see a bunch of new characters instead of focusing on keeping what we have. Depending on who’s cut and who’s added, I think I actually agree with you. My biggest concern is that my favorite veterans are likely cuts and the most popular newcomers people talk about don’t appeal to me as much as who I’d likely lose. It’s not so much about the raw roster number for me.
Er yeah that's always the risk of liking the less popular picks. I mean, I hardly got anything to complain about here. I know for a big fact Diddy is likely gonna return, but not everyone's favorite is the more well known character.

I do think eventually most first party owned characters might return through DLC however. I cannot imagine a situation where the most popular cut veterans aren't returning. It was the first DLC campaign of Smash 4, and the main unique selling point of Ultimate.

This is why I don't stress cuts too much. Even if we say, lose Roy, Wolf, Lucas you name it again, I cannot picture them NOT being DLC.

Third party characters tho? Yeah I dunno. And the odd ones who are technically difficult, I also dunno. But anything relatively popular and with relatively low development costs? A sure bet.
 

Gengar84

Smash Hero
Joined
Dec 9, 2009
Messages
6,706
When I say that most of my most wanted characters are third party, I don’t mean to imply that there aren’t still a ton of first party characters I really like. It’s just that very few of them actually have a realistic chance to make it into Smash. Here’s some of my favorite first party characters not yet playable in Smash for context. I’ll limit it to one per franchise:

Gengar (Pokémon)
Impa (Legend of Zelda - HW version)
Nia (Xenoblade)
Jenna Anderson (Astral Chain)
Medusa (Kid Icarus)
Tharja (Fire Emblem)
Goomba (Super Mario)
Dixie Kong (Donkey Kong - unique)
Bugzzy (Kirby)
EMMI (Metroid)

Needless to say, there’s a pretty decent chance I don’t get a single one of these. Dixie probably has the best shot of any of them but she’d likely be a semiclone of Diddy at most. My third party favorites aren’t exactly likely either for the most part but I feel like some of them have a better chance.
 

The Prankster 16

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Apr 4, 2018
Messages
279
Location
Green Dolphin Street Prison
Switch FC
SW-5261-0723-0145
On the subject of potential third party newcomers, would you all rather see Nintendo expand on Smash’s current direction as a “celebration of gaming” and include more popular game characters from around the world and branch out from being mostly Japan focused? Would you rather see Smash return to its roots as a big Nintendo crossover with a few guests sprinkled in here and there? Are you generally happy with how Smash is currently handling things in regards to newcomers and prefer it stay Japan focused but include guests mostly from Japanese developers?
I definitley think the draw of the 3rd party characters is something that has been ingrained into Smash's DNA atp after Ultimate, but if we do get a paired down roster size I think a lot of the "less iconic" 3rd party characters are at risk of being cut. I also don't think there's anything stopping the Smash team from getting western characters in, it's just that: 1. It's easier to work with developers who speak your language and aren't on the other side of the world, and 2. Most of the "iconic" gaming characters are from Japanese developers, i.e Capcom, Sega, Konami. I also think when Smash fans in particular talk about adding "western characters", they mostly mean popular Indie Game characters who (except for a select few) are definitley some of those "less iconic" characters I mentioned before. I think you'd be doing a disservice to the "celebration of gaming" idea by cutting someone like Snake and adding Freddy Fazbear.
 

Gengar84

Smash Hero
Joined
Dec 9, 2009
Messages
6,706
I definitley think the draw of the 3rd party characters is something that has been ingrained into Smash's DNA atp after Ultimate, but if we do get a paired down roster size I think a lot of the "less iconic" 3rd party characters are at risk of being cut. I also don't think there's anything stopping the Smash team from getting western characters in, it's just that: 1. It's easier to work with developers who speak your language and aren't on the other side of the world, and 2. Most of the "iconic" gaming characters are from Japanese developers, i.e Capcom, Sega, Konami. I also think when Smash fans in particular talk about adding "western characters", they mostly mean popular Indie Game characters who (except for a select few) are definitley some of those "less iconic" characters I mentioned before. I think you'd be doing a disservice to the "celebration of gaming" idea by cutting someone like Snake and adding Freddy Fazbear.
There’s actually quite a few Western characters I feel are either iconic enough in general or important enough to Nintendo’s history. Here’s a few cool ones I think could make for great additions to Smash:

Rash/Pimple/Zitz (Battletoads)
Fulgore (Killer Instinct)
Joanna Dark (Perfect Dark)
Jinx (League of Legends)
Illidan Stormrage (WarCraft)
Sarah Kerrigan (StarCraft)
Diablo (Diablo)
Tracer (Overwatch)
Scorpion (Mortal Kombat)
Doomslayer (DOOM)
Master Chief (Halo)
Crash Bandicoot (Crash)
Lara Croft (Tomb Raider)
Aloy (Horizon)
Kratos (God of War)
Lilith (Borderlands)
Rayman (Rayman)
Ezio (Assassin’s Creed)
The Prince (Prince of Persia)
Marcus Fenix (Gears of War)

There’s a ton more too but I think that’s more than enough to choose from for starters.
 
Last edited:

The Prankster 16

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Apr 4, 2018
Messages
279
Location
Green Dolphin Street Prison
Switch FC
SW-5261-0723-0145
There’s actually quite a few Western characters I feel are either iconic enough in general or important enough to Nintendo’s history. Here’s a few cool ones I think could make for great additions to Smash:

Rash/Pimple/Zitz (Battletoads)
Fulgore (Killer Instinct)
Joanna Dark (Perfect Dark)
Jinx (League of Legends)
Illidan Stormrage (WarCraft)
Sarah Kerrigan (StarCraft)
Diablo (Diablo)
Tracer (Overwatch)
Scorpion (Mortal Kombat)
Doomslayer (DOOM)
Master Chief (Halo)
Crash Bandicoot (Crash)
Lara Croft (Tomb Raider)
Aloy (Horizon)
Kratos (God of War)
Lilith (Borderlands)
Rayman (Rayman)
Ezio (Assassin’s Creed)
The Prince (Prince of Persia)

There’s a ton more too but I think that’s more than enough to choose from for starters.
Oh I totally agree that more western character would be great, I was just speaking more on fan rosters that fill the third part slots with literal whos.
Although, looking at this list makes me wonder what the cutoff for "iconic" is, should a character be added because the game/series they are from is popular, or because the character themselves is popular?
 

Gengar84

Smash Hero
Joined
Dec 9, 2009
Messages
6,706
Oh I totally agree that more western character would be great, I was just speaking more on fan rosters that fill the third part slots with literal whos.
Although, looking at this list makes me wonder what the cutoff for "iconic" is, should a character be added because the game/series they are from is popular, or because the character themselves is popular?
I think a combination of both. If a character is a perfect fit for Smash and would have a really fun and creative moveset, I think it’s cool to include smaller series. In RARE’s case, they have a historical connection to Nintendo, which helps. Banjo-Kazooie isn’t as big as other potential third parties could have been but that shared history made them resonate with Nintendo fans more than they otherwise would have. I think this could extend to other RARE characters like the Battletoads, Fulgore, Joanna Dark, and Conker.
 

Louie G.

Smash Hero
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
9,821
Location
Rhythm Heaven
I also think when Smash fans in particular talk about adding "western characters", they mostly mean popular Indie Game characters who (except for a select few) are definitley some of those "less iconic" characters I mentioned before. I think you'd be doing a disservice to the "celebration of gaming" idea by cutting someone like Snake and adding Freddy Fazbear.
I think this is a flawed perspective - first off, because when people say western characters they're usually talking about Crash, Doom Guy, Master Chief and/or Rayman. Maybe Jonesy, and occasionally it does refer to indie characters. I think most of these guys hold their own, maybe not 1:1 with a character like Snake but they have clout in the greater conversation of "all-star" legacy one way or the other. Even indie characters like Sans and, I guess if they really wanted, Freddy Fazbear. It's hard to deny the contemporary influence, for better or worse.

But the big issue I have with this perspective is related. I don't think it's healthy to continue to view Smash in terms of "x over y". If we lose someone like Snake, is every third party character necessarily going to be on that level? No, but was that ever promised to us? Smash as a celebration of gaming is true however we cut it, but just as a museum can be a celebration of art all across the world rarely is it going to be a 100% comprehensive collection. If you've ever been to a big art museum, not every single artist's gallery will be as historically influential or critically renowned as the last. Sometimes exhibits come and go within a limited time. Smash celebrates video games in a general sense, it does not swear to be a perfect encapsulation of only the most important video games.

I believe people internalize these roles in Smash a bit too much. Guest characters are still guest characters - some will likely stick around for the foreseeable future, but it's reasonable to believe even some of the most popular and iconic faces may come and go. It's not a slight then if Snake needs to cycle out for someone who has been around for less time than him, or has had less general impact. Because for one thing, they probably aren't adding characters with this sort of either or mentality, and furthermore Smash's role to play as this gaming museum is greatly misrepresented by the community into something it's not. This is kind of the mindset that leads to roster stagnation, a fear of cycling out the old in favor of new opportunities and experiences. It has to happen eventually.

We got Bayonetta, Joker and Banjo & Kazooie before Jill Valentine, Master Chief, Lara Croft... is this inherently a disservice to gaming history? I don't think it is.
 
Last edited:

The Prankster 16

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Apr 4, 2018
Messages
279
Location
Green Dolphin Street Prison
Switch FC
SW-5261-0723-0145
We got Bayonetta, Joker and Banjo & Kazooie before Jill Valentine, Master Chief, Lara Croft... is this inherently a disservice to gaming history? I don't think it is.
I'm not saying that every character that was added is iconic, but like half of them are. I see no problem with cutting Joker or Banjo or even Bayo, but even then those characters have history and popularity. Persona 5 was one of the most well loved JRPGs of all time in recent years and Persona/SMT is not an underground series either. Banjo is from a beloved 3d platformer on the N64, and he has that "smash legacy" of being requested similar to Ridley or K. Rool. And Bayo is a popular character who's series is Nintendo exclusive, and aparently did fairly well in the Smash Ballot (Even though we know she wasn't the winner). I'm also not saying that all Indie characters aren't Iconic. For example, I think Undertale/Deltarune deserves to be represented in Smash (Maybe not with a character, but a Sans assist trophy and music would be enough) because of it's popularity and critical acclaim, plus Toby Fox has a working relationship with Nintendo due to him composing for Pokemon.
 
Last edited:

Gengar84

Smash Hero
Joined
Dec 9, 2009
Messages
6,706
Since this place tends to focus on a few commonly speculated characters, I wonder if we’re missing someone that will seem obvious once they make it in Smash. I didn’t see a whole lot of people talk about Joker, Terry, Sephiroth, or Kazuya prior to them actually making it in. In Kazuya’s case, that’s because people were more focused on Heihachi. It’s always fun to get characters not many people really saw coming.
 

Louie G.

Smash Hero
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
9,821
Location
Rhythm Heaven
I'm not saying that every character that was added is iconic, but like half of them are. I see no problem with cutting Joker or Banjo or even Bayo, but even then those characters have history and popularity.
Yeah, every guest character in the game has something going on that justifies them being there. My point wasn't to downplay these characters, rather address that cutting Snake and adding a less popular character isn't undermining Smash's ability to be a celebration of video games. Because if we wanted to nitpick every character that way, then we'd already find holes in this roster. Fortunately that's not really what Smash's goal is, I like it much better that way.

Since this place tends to focus on a few commonly speculated characters, I wonder if we’re missing someone that will seem obvious once they make it in Smash.
The classic folly of Smash speculation is when we try to find the answer to this, they become the norm. I was doing this with Off the Hook some months back and lately it seems people have really took toward Marina / OTH as a strong contender, and now similarly believe in the prospect of two new Splatoon characters. And I remember how quickly people hopped onto the Adol Christin train because of Terry... I think it's generally a good thing when new characters are pushing everyone to rethink their biases outside of their comfort zones, but it's funny how this effect sometimes becomes a once drastically overlooked character becoming maybe an overstated one.

Which is to say I think when we try to hard to find an overlooked surprise, we just end up missing the mark all over again. The answers IMO lie somewhere in the middle. But I think DLC also broke down many barriers that we didn't know would be broken - Joker, Terry, Sephiroth all to varying degrees - so I wonder if we have a better perspective now about what is possible. A character like Joker is no longer gonna be that surprising because we got Joker, so it propelled us to look beyond the immediate Nintendo umbrella and so forth. Stuff like Dark Souls, Nier, etc. have become common points of interest in their own right.
 
Last edited:

The Prankster 16

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Apr 4, 2018
Messages
279
Location
Green Dolphin Street Prison
Switch FC
SW-5261-0723-0145
Since this place tends to focus on a few commonly speculated characters, I wonder if we’re missing someone that will seem obvious once they make it in Smash. I didn’t see a whole lot of people talk about Joker, Terry, Sephiroth, or Kazuya prior to them actually making it in. In Kazuya’s case, that’s because people were more focused on Heihachi. It’s always fun to get characters not many people really saw coming.
I think if Persona 3 Reload comes to Switch 2 within the first year as one of those big third party ports, I think Aigis might have a shot at making it in if Sega pushes for it. Though we might have a naming problem if she goes against :ultpyra::ultmythra: in tournament.
 

fogbadge

Smash Obsessed
Joined
Jun 29, 2012
Messages
22,741
Location
Scotland
Since this place tends to focus on a few commonly speculated characters, I wonder if we’re missing someone that will seem obvious once they make it in Smash. I didn’t see a whole lot of people talk about Joker, Terry, Sephiroth, or Kazuya prior to them actually making it in. In Kazuya’s case, that’s because people were more focused on Heihachi. It’s always fun to get characters not many people really saw coming.
well I think most of that is cause the smash fandom have these strange ideas on who is and isn't possible. or that things have to happen a certain way or in a certain order. which is weird cause they keep asking for things even after they've been told no. so they have a warped view of what's possible.
 

BuckleyTim

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Jun 11, 2019
Messages
210
As far as things people don't speculate about that might have a chance...

Genshin
GTA
Call of Duty
Someone from Apex Legends
Rainbow Six Siege?
Assassin's Creed
Mobile game stuff (think candy crush, Bloons, clash of clans, etc)
PUBG
Arknights? FGO?

Almost forgot anime fighters that aren't GG. Y'all aren't ready for the Melty Blood rep.
 
Last edited:

Gengar84

Smash Hero
Joined
Dec 9, 2009
Messages
6,706
I think if Persona 3 Reload comes to Switch 2 within the first year as one of those big third party ports, I think Aigis might have a shot at making it in if Sega pushes for it. Though we might have a naming problem if she goes against :ultpyra::ultmythra: in tournament.
Lol that’s true. Are the two pronounced differently? I think Pyra and Mythra are spelled Aegis but they are really similar. We have two Roy’s so I guess that’s not a problem. Aigis would actually make for a pretty cool character. My favorite Persona 3 character is Mitsuru but I don’t think her moveset would be as interesting, plus she’s not as relevant to the overall plot. Aigis really got the chance to shine in Persona 4 Arena ironically.
 

The Prankster 16

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Apr 4, 2018
Messages
279
Location
Green Dolphin Street Prison
Switch FC
SW-5261-0723-0145
Lol that’s true. Are the two pronounced differently? I think Pyra and Mythra are spelled Aegis but they are really similar. We have two Roy’s so I guess that’s not a problem. Aigis would actually make for a pretty cool character. My favorite Persona 3 character is Mitsuru but I don’t think her moveset would be as interesting, plus she’s not as relevant to the overall plot. Aigis really got the chance to shine in Persona 4 Arena ironically.
P3 Aigis: Eye-Giss
Pythra Aegis: Ayy-Jiss
 

Gengar84

Smash Hero
Joined
Dec 9, 2009
Messages
6,706
P3 Aigis: Eye-Giss
Pythra Aegis: Ayy-Jiss
That’s what I thought I remembered. It’s been a while since I’ve played Persona 3 or Persona 4 Arena so I wasn’t certain on Aigis’ pronunciation. Thanks.

I learned a while ago that I’d been mispronouncing one of my favorite game character’s name for years. I always pronounced Magus from Chrono Trigger as Mag (like magma)-Gus (like the name) but it’s actually May-Gus. I still say Mag-Gus all the time out of habit. I think Dhoulmagus from Dragon Quest 8 was what gave me the first hint I may have been pronouncing Magus’ name wrong.
 
Last edited:

The Prankster 16

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Apr 4, 2018
Messages
279
Location
Green Dolphin Street Prison
Switch FC
SW-5261-0723-0145
Since this place tends to focus on a few commonly speculated characters, I wonder if we’re missing someone that will seem obvious once they make it in Smash. I didn’t see a whole lot of people talk about Joker, Terry, Sephiroth, or Kazuya prior to them actually making it in. In Kazuya’s case, that’s because people were more focused on Heihachi. It’s always fun to get characters not many people really saw coming.
Also I know that they were speculated a lot in the Ultimate DLC era, but I still think a Dark Souls/Elden Ring character has a good shot.
 

Louie G.

Smash Hero
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
9,821
Location
Rhythm Heaven
I'd be slightly miffed if we got two Persona characters before a crumb of SMT - just on principle - but I can't even lie I really want Aigis in Smash.

Her character archetype appeals to me a lot, for the same reason I used to like when KOS-MOS was brought up. Robot girl who can spawn an artillery and big ass gatling guns - it's just a lot of fun. I've played her in P4Arena as well and she was quickly my favorite character in that game.
 

The Prankster 16

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Apr 4, 2018
Messages
279
Location
Green Dolphin Street Prison
Switch FC
SW-5261-0723-0145
I'd be slightly miffed if we got two Persona characters before a crumb of SMT - just on principle - but I can't even lie I really want Aigis in Smash.
Yeah but it does seem like something they would do, lest we forget the TWO FF7 characters and no spirits or music from any other FF game. I am still holding out hope Joker can return with more Persona content, even though he's probably one of the first 3rd parties on the chopping block. Getting It's Going Down Now, I Believe, or even Lone Prayer as music tracks would be awesome.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom