Sakurai is worth like 10 million dollars. I think he's probably doing better than the overwhelming majority at HAL if not all of them.
...because Iwata brought him back to make blockbuster after blockbuster. When he left HAL, potentially to never work on or profit from Kirby or Smash Bros again, do you think that was a more stable future than remaining an executive at the company under which he created its two most profitable series?
Saying on one hand he feels an obligation (ownership) over Smash and then characterizing it as him being dragged back for Brawl is inconsistent and very loaded language. I get that you want to highlight the fact that he could technically go somewhere else but if we're being logical it's overwhelmingly likely that he won't and it's a fact that his freelance status has thus far not been a factor in keeping him away from Nintendo.
All you have to do is go through his own admissions to be able to reconcile these statements. Recently he's talked about Smash not being able to be done without him. Despite that, he left at one point, and they even tried to make the series without him, and it didn't work.
He didn't give a timeframe for when this failed attempt happened, but I suspect it was with Brawl, given that is the only time they announced a new Smash that he wasn't involved with from the very beginning. And then Iwata courted him back for the title.
I'm sure he would but since his next project was Smash 4 and it's pretty much guaranteed it's always one of his upcoming games if not the subsequent next one as was the case with 4-Ultimate then what comparative value would the Uprising team bring to the table that seasoned Bamco developers wouldn't also bring but to a much greater degree?
That's a fair question but not one that serves to demonstrate his exclusivity under Nintendo. More that he resists laying down roots, which is my point.
Where am I making the argument that he's not a freelancer and can't technically go work on other platforms? I'm saying it's not likely based on past precedent and overall familiarity with the hardware and the organization that he won't. I don't even understand where the point of contention is. That I called his freelance status a technicality in the context of being under the assumption he'll stick with Nintendo? I'm saying that because it literally hasn't contributed to him going elsewhere yet and I doubt it will. I think with Nintendo Sakurai has more creative freedom than he would somewhere else. They'll probably let him create almost anything using any IP of theirs that he wants. They literally let him play their games and show him their hardware early.
We disagree on how much of a technicality his freelance status is. I think, going forward, it's much likelier he chooses to work apart from Nintendo periodically than you do, which makes his freelance status much more substantial than some 'technicality'. Wherein you've posed his independence more as a formality. So I'm highlighting all the signs of how freelance his approach really is.
Sure but as I said other people that personally knew and got along with Iwata would be there. I'm sure other people at Nintendo have a working relationship with Sakurai with Ultimate and the DLC cycle, as you've pointed out, being a testament to that. Again he's also familiar with the organization itself. Sticking with what he knows is easier and his seniority status with the institution has its perks.
That last sentence is literally a reason he could've stayed at HAL, or looked for more permanent employment under Project Sora. This guy works on a new system with a new team almost every game. He left HAL over being tired of the monotonous output. Stability doesn't seem like his thing.
On one hand you handwave his familiarity with Nintendo systems to his non-existent team and then on the other presume that he's where he is in regards to the ability to navigate third party companies negotiations due to his deftness and skill as if Nintendo isn't providing the legal team for him to even do that. Last time I checked Sakurai didn't have a degree in copyright law. All he literally does is represent Nintendo's ability to faithfully implement their intellectual property into Nintendo's exclusive game.
This is quite the dichotomy you've presented. Sakurai is the one that has to be intimately familiar with how to best navigate the system architecture as if the team is meaningless, and yet the copyright lawyers, despite being interchangeable, are the ones crucial to acquiring the third-parties and Sakurai is more just some symbolic figurehead.
Of course Sakurai doesn't have a degree in copyright law, and no **** Nintendo's legal team has to be involved. But just send a copyright lawyer over to Disney and see if they give you Sora.
You've really flipped the script on importance here. Sakurai doesn't need to be a hardware engineer to realize the game, in part because the team will help lighten that load with their own expertise. Every game Sakurai makes is basically on hardware different from the last. He's adaptable. And yet, in this framing, Sakurai has been given a major backseat on brokering these deals, as if there aren't actual statements from the likes of Kojima, Nomura, Mayles, Harada, Horii, even Reggie, which illustrate Sakurai's leading role in negotiation.
This legitimately sounds just like the arguments against Banjo but of course now that it's happened it suddenly doesn't count or matter anymore.
This more speaks to peoples' unfamiliarity with Banjo's success in Japan. Scroll a couple posts up. The games were successful in Japan. It's a character whose demand might have skewed west, but whose success
was global. He's not an exception. Hero, frankly, is the biggest exception.
If Crash gets in the support will IMMEDIATELY shift to Spyro. That's literally guaranteed to happen. Might be a decent proposition getting to kill 2 birds with 1 reveal owned by the same friendly third party especially if it's bundled.
Some of the demand will trickle down to Spyro, but Spyro isn't going to be able to catch on the same way as Crash. One of the main reasons that people have gotten so behind Crash is because he was a rare example of a western character that found success in Japan. Spyro doesn't have that. In fact, it's rather the opposite.
But also, just because one character gets in doesn't mean another of some relation will adopt all that popularity. Some will disseminate downwards, but it's also looking past that the characters that become popular usually become popular
because of being that character. Crash is just a bigger character than Spyro is.
There's more to assessing the value of an inclusion than invoking Japan.
True. But Japan is nevertheless a crucial part of it, just as the west is a crucial part too, and makes characters like Arle and Goemon unlikely for similar but inverted reasons. Characters of lopsided appeal have a greater task to overcome those deficits.
A big reason to include Crash would be to include the definitive Playstation All-Star into the game. Spyro has that factor going for him too. They'd compliment each other's reveal extremely well. Crash getting in would get fans to go crazy in excitement and Spyro showing up would blow their collective minds in unison for how unexpected but completely justified (complimentary) the inclusion would be. It'd be in the top-tier of Smash reveals up there with the greats. There will be one extremely friendly third party to work with to make this happen. It can happen.
Well, Crash is perceived as a Playstation All-Star, but it's not actually new ground, considering Snake and Cloud were too. And yeah, Spyro would compliment Crash's reveal, but... that's not really a factor in inclusion.
Again it's literally online speculation. I guess I should just not say anything because somebody will say it's unlikely? There's a myriad of speculation that's discussed with fewer prospects for inclusion than Spyro. It doesn't matter and never will though because those characters have their dedicated fans that deserve to promote their character.
If they have worse prospects than Spyro it's probably not a huge amount of people advocating for them.
Banjo was once the underdog and now he's in. Crash, even though he's still not in has reached a status of borderline-inevitable thanks to the push made by fans. Geno and Isaac would literally be nowhere without the fans' unwavering support.
Banjo may have been an underdog, but one that did have success in Japan and a huge amount of fanbase support, and at that point you do have a decent shot to get in. So he's not a good example for any given western character, because most lack one or both of those qualities.