RodNutTakin
Smash Lord
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2014
- Messages
- 1,019
I think it will be Cloud and Hero in base, and Sephiroth dangled as tasty looking DLC per Square Enix's request.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I think it's a "the series is still active, but it's a lot less ubiquitous" kind of deal, and that does matter, but in this context it's mainly insofar as it doesn't really make for a long discussion on its own, and speaking as if she was still at the height of her iconic status is a bit unhelpful, because she isn't. It's not denying that she was ever there or that the fact that she was there doesn't matter, it's just that she isn't there anymore, and that also matters.First, why does it matter if it's "not the 90s anymore"? No matter what decade it is, if there's a major time period during the series run, it's relevant to the series and character's iconic status and it's something worth looking into. Plus, with the series having three major hit games, thinking she's still something of the past is crazy. You might as well apply this to Crash too.
I'm not making excuses for anyone. It's just that for better or worse, I try to point out when people don't seem to be understanding each other, and when I don't have a horse in the race, my reading of these kinds of things are extremely neutral. I do have a feeling that I've overstepped this time, and this is quickly becoming off topic, so I'll try not to say too much more.Second, this isn't feuding with Speed Weed. I really didn't want to talk to him anymore. I even left his Battle of AGES thread after following it for a while. And if anything, I'd rather you not make anymore excuses for him. I don't know why you keep doing that. Sure, misunderstandings happen a lot but people do admit to it in the same conversation. He still to this day never said that his outrageous accusation was a misunderstanding. Instead, he just keeps posting here like nothing happened and ignores it even whenever I bring it up. He clearly doesn't care.
(As a matter of fact, who does? I mean, nobody else called him out on it but they want to call out certain other people that I'm not going to name.)
Moving on would be better if he takes back what he said. Until then, I'm sticking to how I feel and how I handle it. To think that I'm the kind of person that would use somebody's death to push for a character inclusion? That is absolutely insane and I'm not going along with other people making excuses for him, unless he says these things himself. This goes for Verde too, by the way.
A series is not going to always be as big as it was before. Double Dragon, one of my favorite series, is one example of that. But if a series is so big that it still gets brought up and it's still active with some solid games, it really shouldn't matter. It makes no sense to only go by the status of the character or their series now. Everything is important about the character, including back decades before, counts,I think it's a "the series is still active, but it's a lot less ubiquitous" kind of deal, and that does matter, but in this context it's mainly insofar as it doesn't really make for a long discussion on its own, and speaking as if she was still at the height of her iconic status is a bit unhelpful, because she isn't. It's not denying that she was ever there or that the fact that she was there doesn't matter, it's just that she isn't there anymore, and that also matters.
It's kind of like how Star Fox was super revolutionary in its time, but now is most known for dying a very slow and painful death because it failed to capitalize on what makes it so great. When people discuss Fox's return as a veteran fighter, it's often on the basis of him being iconic to Super Smash Bros. specifically, rather than any enthusiasm for the series itself. If he were never added, he'd definitely have fans, but I'm not sure he'd be considered all that likely a pick, especially given the source material. Heh, it'd be kind of amusing looking at the alternate timeline where people are arguing against Fox because they'd rather have a character that "lends themself to Smash better". That was kind of a tangent there, and Lara clearly isn't in that dire a straight, but I do think it's a decent parallel. Admittedly, Samus might be a stronger one; A character once held in high esteem as one of the first major female characters in gaming, but is now just one character among many.
It's all cool. I got no beef with you. It's just that if he really didn't mean any harm and it was all a misunderstanding (and a very strange one at that), he would have already cleared this up himself. For him to not do that or even say anything at all, it shows a different side to his character and it's just frustrating when people try speak for him, turn a blind eye, or tell me to move on, as that's basically giving him a pass for his bad behavior that he'll eventually keep showing again.I'm not making excuses for anyone. It's just that for better or worse, I try to point out when people don't seem to be understanding each other, and when I don't have a horse in the race, my reading of these kinds of things are extremely neutral. I do have a feeling that I've overstepped this time, and this is quickly becoming off topic, so I'll try not to say too much more.
I also have a fairly aggressive tendency to rationalize things in order to shrug off things that otherwise annoy me, so I apologize if it felt like I was just trying to force my placid behavior onto you, and I double apologize if that's actually what happened, because that's very not OK.
Don't really think so. Considering the FF content in Smash 4 and Ultimate prior to Sephiroth making it in was weirdly low, I think Cloud and Sephiroth are prime DLC candidates. And they will be cause their removal will make their support all the more loud. I also remember Everyone Is Here almost didn't happen, but Sakurai never specified which company was the obstacle. It probably was Square.I'm still of the opinion that Hero and Sora will be base game. I also still think Cloud and Sephiroth will be DLC as a little dual pack, partially for money, but I also can't deny it's really funny to imagine a pack where it's basically Cloud and his memory demon that won't leave him alone for an instant.
Like if we get one, we have to get the other now that we have both, so why not package them together as like an FF7 pack so you can't just have one or the other? lol
I mean we're on the same page there, Hero base game, Cloud/Seph as DLC, so the "Don't really think so" is confusing me a little, but yeah I agree lolDon't really think so. Considering the FF content in Smash 4 and Ultimate prior to Sephiroth making it in was weirdly low, I think Cloud and Sephiroth are prime DLC candidates. And they will be cause their removal will make their support all the more loud. I also remember Everyone Is Here almost didn't happen, but Sakurai never specified which company was the obstacle. It probably was Square.
But I do think Hero will be there. Possibly with a second Dragon Quest character. Am thinking either Slime or even Erik.
Oh I read you thought of Cloud as base game contender too. In which I'm a little unsure tbh. I could see either happen.I mean we're on the same page there, Hero base game, Cloud/Seph as DLC, so the "Don't really think so" is confusing me a little, but yeah I agree lol
Not so sure on a second Dragon Quest character, but it's definitely possible since it's such a household name in Japan. I feel like Square will just throw another franchise in with the DLC, whether that's something more classic like Chrono Trigger or something like 2B for Nier (cuz I mean if she can be in Granblue Fantasy Versus Rising and Soul Calibur 6, she could definitely end up here lol).
I'm kinda partially hoping Hero is base game just so he can pull a Mega Man/Castlevania and get a **** ton of remixes since the old composer is dead and his replacement understands that "hey maybe the video game music shouldn't be made into bad midis on purpose to sell the real version as a concert album and the real version should just be in the video game to begin with".
I don’t think cloud counts as a twinkOn one hand, Nintendo willingly paid for the rights to Sephiroth, and it’s probably in their best interests to get him and his twink friend back in the game.
On the other hand, I can’t really argue against corporate greed and letting FF7 print DLC money. Sounds like something Nintendo would do.
That right there was the point. You can't just go by how popular Tomb Raider was a long time ago, but during SSBU's DLC, it was all that was being brought up. And so, discussion of her died just as quickly as it was brought up; nobody had anything else to say about her, so there really wasn't anything else to discuss.It makes no sense to only go by the status of the character or their series now.
I agree, though I think just due to how things work, older characters are more of base game fare, with older DLC characters being entirely relegated to popular 3rd party picks.Okay, I guess I’m in the minority with this take as well. I don’t think a franchise has to be currently relevant to be deserving of a character in Smash. I think Smash is best as a celebration of the history of gaming. If a game or series was huge during the 80’s, 90’s, or any other era but has fallen off since, it should still be in the discussion for a Smash inclusion due to its historical significance. If we’re lucky, Smash could even serve as a launching point for a new game in an otherwise dormant series kind of like what it did for Kid Icarus.
I just feel like always defaulting to what’s currently relevant causes Smash to feel less like a celebration and more like an advertisement. That said, newer games are important too but I don’t think they should be a guarantee at the exclusion of everything else. I believe people focus a bit too much on the advertisement side of Smash and often dismiss older characters for that reason. Another downside of always going with what’s big right now is it could cause those characters to feel more dated in later entries. If I were making the game, I’d try to put an equal focus on representing characters from every console generation.
I am pro Excite Biker as well. A character that fights while riding a motorcycle it silly enough to appeal to me, and if you stick to his 8bit sprite proportions you could probably make grabbing onto ledges and stuff look fine. Plus the overheat meter from Excitebike would easily work as a character gimmick like other newer smash characters.As far as who we'll get, I think if we're getting another NES rep, it's going to be Excite Biker, and they'll bring music from ExciteTruck and ExciteBots with them. I also think Mach Rider is possible as an Echo Fighter, but that I'm much less confident in. Other than that, I think Isaac has the best shot.
Sometimes I wonder if SE only agreed to let Cloud into base Ult on the condition that they also got atleast one DLC character. I'm personally not that sure about cloud coming back, at least in base.I don't think Sora's more likely to be base than Cloud lol. Or likely to be base at all. I don't trust Disney not to bleed Nintendo's pockets dry for that. I imagine Sora more as permanent DLC bait tho lol, Nintendo ain't finna want him to go forever.
If only one Squeenix character is base, I'm sure it'll be Cloud. Sure ppl say he was hard to get for Ultimate... but they still got him lol. And I'm sure that DLC fed Square's pockets like a turkey dinner so I can't see them suddenly going more hardball. Especially if Nintendo promises more DLC from them in return. Fully ready for this to blow in my face but I think Cloud has a good future ahead of him.
He'd be pretty cool.What do you think the chances of Nahobino are? I think SMT5 did well. Didn't play it but I think he looks cool.
What I think would be cool is basing their moveset off of tricks that you can do on motorcycles.I am pro Excite Biker as well. A character that fights while riding a motorcycle it silly enough to appeal to me, and if you stick to his 8bit sprite proportions you could probably make grabbing onto ledges and stuff look fine. Plus the overheat meter from Excitebike would easily work as a character gimmick like other newer smash characters.
Though, back when they first announced echo fighters and we thought we were getting a lot more of them than we ended up with, I suggested that the Ice Climbers could get an echo with the Hockey Players from NES Ice Hockey. And tbh I still think they'd be a cool NES rep.
I don’t think this is so much a hot take as it is the community playing it safe with expectations. I think a lot of older series and characters would make great additions to Smash, my most wanted is coming up on a decade of no games (Rhythm Heaven). But I feel like I also ought to be honest with myself about their chances and the precedent set by Smash thus far, where currently active series tend to get the nod and those that break this mold fall into a select couple categories.Okay, I guess I’m in the minority with this take as well. I don’t think a franchise has to be currently relevant to be deserving of a character in Smash.
I think most likely Steve will be DLC again due to how much work he is to implement, and I think Pokémon Trainer will be the same.I definitely think Steve will be in the base game. The only way I can see him not making it is if programming his building and mining mechanics on all the new stages is too much work. He has a ton of pull with younger audiences in a roster mostly filled with older characters. Just imagine Steve on the box art of the next smash, it would sell billions .
Square Enix's characters seem to be the most at risk of licensing weirdness. Dragon Quest shouldn't be too difficult though. It's main hurdle was the old composer charging a fortune for the music, and he's dead now so that's out of the way. FF7's tracks are still very expensive, but I could see Nintendo being more willing to shell out the cash to get Cloud and Sephiroth in the base game with how huge of a reception Seph's reveal got.
you think PT will be dlc?I think most likely Steve will be DLC again due to how much work he is to implement, and I think Pokémon Trainer will be the same.
I think most people who are nostalgic for the 90s and 00s are in their 30sSo I was watching someone play Spyro and the chat was all (including me) man this was my jam back in the day and then came a bunch of nostalgia and it got me thinking about nostalgia picks...
If Spyro is a good example of today's young adult gamers idea of a nostalgia character who else? Would they necessarily have to be from late 90s early 2000s? See for me that era is peak gaming for me lol and nostalgia would be more Prince of Persia, Sim City, or essentially a decade earlier late 80s early 90s...
I do unless they're using Ultimate as a base like how Ultimate used Smash 4 as a base.you think PT will be dlc?
Half of my top 10 most wanted are essentially nostalgia picks from the 80’s and 90’s. Most have at least had some kind of game in the last 15 years but they were at their peak popularity back on the NES and SNES. Her’s just a few I’d qualify as nostalgia picks:So I was watching someone play Spyro and the chat was all (including me) man this was my jam back in the day and then came a bunch of nostalgia and it got me thinking about nostalgia picks...
If Spyro is a good example of today's young adult gamers idea of a nostalgia character who else? Would they necessarily have to be from late 90s early 2000s? See for me that era is peak gaming for me lol and nostalgia would be more Prince of Persia, Sim City, or essentially a decade earlier late 80s early 90s...
You have this COMPLETELY backwards.I think most likely Steve will be DLC again due to how much work he is to implement, and I think Pokémon Trainer will be the same.
I'm pretty much as old as console gaming itself. Had an Atari 2600 as a wee one and progressed from there.If Spyro is a good example of today's young adult gamers idea of a nostalgia character who else? Would they necessarily have to be from late 90s early 2000s? See for me that era is peak gaming for me lol and nostalgia would be more Prince of Persia, Sim City, or essentially a decade earlier late 80s early 90s...
He's still the most complex fighter in the game that took five years to add. I believe there's no way he will ever be in the base game unless he's a buggy mess at launch.You have this COMPLETELY backwards.
The reason Steve was difficult to implement was because he was added later. The stages weren't designed with him in mind. Having him be base game would necessitate less work, because the stages would be built with him in mind.
I think there's playing it safe with expectations, and then there's acting like if something rarely happens, it never happens, even though some things that rarely happen still take up...more than 0 newcomer slots in each Smash game.I don’t think this is so much a hot take as it is the community playing it safe with expectations
He took five years because of negotiations, not because of his mechanic that the stages didn’t take into account because Steve was added later.He's still the most complex fighter in the game that took five years to add. I believe there's no way he will ever be in the base game unless he's a buggy mess at launch.
As was stated, this was the legal team being held up, not the development team. And now that the connection has already been established, it wouldn't take five years to get approval anymore.He's still the most complex fighter in the game that took five years to add. I believe there's no way he will ever be in the base game unless he's a buggy mess at launch.
and is there a reason behind it?I do unless they're using Ultimate as a base like how Ultimate used Smash 4 as a base.
The opposite of what he claims tends to happen anyway so let him double down.So are there any further hold ups, or will you ignore this and just post this opinion again uncritically in a week or two?
The trailer of shulk is one my favorite trailer from smash 4 to this day(before DLC) specifically for the surprise effect , his accent and his play style.Shulk
The opposite of what he claims tends to happen anyway so let him double down.
I think Sora is more likely to be base than Cloud just because he's literally the single most requested character of all time according to the Ballot, and cutting a character like that is a ROUGH call to make, especially when Sakurai knows every character has their fans. And even if Disney "bleeds them dry", they did it once and Ultimate's success as the highest selling fighting game ever made would presumably allow a pretty substantial budget, likely HIGHER than before. Plus if I recall correctly, wasn't Disney pretty open to the idea? I mean they hashed out the deal after Sakurai met a Disney exec at an awards show, with FP2 being for sale in early 2020, so I don't think negotiations could've possibly taken that long.I don't think Sora's more likely to be base than Cloud lol. Or likely to be base at all. I don't trust Disney not to bleed Nintendo's pockets dry for that. I imagine Sora more as permanent DLC bait tho, Nintendo ain't finna want him to go forever.
If only one Squeenix character is base, I'm sure it'll be Cloud. Sure ppl say he was hard to get for Ultimate... but they still got him lol. And I'm sure that DLC fed Square's pockets like a turkey dinner so I can't see them suddenly going more hardball. Especially if Nintendo promises more DLC from them in return. Fully ready for this to blow in my face but I think Cloud got a good future ahead of him.
I'm not sure we'll ever see any SE reps in the base game apart from them doing "Everyone is Here" again. SE really likes having their characters be DLC only in crossovers, and it's not just in Smash, as this was also the case for Noctis's appearance in Tekken 7 and 2B's appearance in Soul Calibur 6.I think Sora is more likely to be base than Cloud just because he's literally the single most requested character of all time according to the Ballot, and cutting a character like that is a ROUGH call to make, especially when Sakurai knows every character has their fans. And even if Disney "bleeds them dry", they did it once and Ultimate's success as the highest selling fighting game ever made would presumably allow a pretty substantial budget, likely HIGHER than before. Plus if I recall correctly, wasn't Disney pretty open to the idea? I mean they hashed out the deal after Sakurai met a Disney exec at an awards show, with FP2 being for sale in early 2020, so I don't think negotiations could've possibly taken that long.
At the same time, I could see Cloud and Sephiroth being DLC because FF7 Remake is Square's giant multi-part currently spanning four years and counting.
I'm of the opinion that if Square wants in from the start we'll see Hero in base at least, and I feel like Sora will be there too from his sheer popularity.
Look, I do believe that Square Enix will be difficult to negotiate everyone back for, but why is Everyone is Here such a special scenario where Cloud or another SE character can't happen again? Will the budget for the Ultimate be that much higher than the budget for this new game... 35 million units later? Will negotiations look that much different, is there new leadership at Nintendo or Square Enix that would complicate this?I'm not sure we'll ever see any SE reps in the base game apart from them doing "Everyone is Here" again. SE really likes having their characters be DLC only in crossovers, and it's not just in Smash, as this was also the case for Noctis's appearance in Tekken 7 and 2B's appearance in Soul Calibur 6.