DarthEnderX
Smash Hero
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2014
- Messages
- 8,498
No? Wtf still calls Steve an indie character?Oh but Steve is?
checks Warning pointsI don’t know what that is either
I'll tell you in a couple weeks.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
No? Wtf still calls Steve an indie character?Oh but Steve is?
checks Warning pointsI don’t know what that is either
Wow. I cannot believe that Deez and then a slang term for an inappropriate part of the body is censored.Sukon *********!!!
It didn’t used to be. But over in the social thread we got a little too into making deez and Candace jokes so they made them illegal.Wow. I cannot believe that Deez and then a slang term for an inappropriate part of the body is censored.
The joke was right there. It was perfect.
Don’t worry it only made you look like a psychoWow. I cannot believe that Deez and then a slang term for an inappropriate part of the body is censored.
The joke was right there. It was perfect.
I think adding Vault Boy would be weird, because he's fictional in his own universe. I know they did that with Reptar in NASB, but I assumed that was because they didn't want to have you beat up babies. He's iconic enough to maybe get away with it, but I don't know.Idk why you guys are using the JP/EU name for the series when it's clearly called Vault Boy.
Jokes aside, Fallout is underrated as a pick, as the fanbase seems to focus solely on Doom to the exclusion of two other very popular Bethesda IP. Fallout, like Skyrim, is also a lot bigger in Japan than Doom is.
Though Skyrim/ES is bigger, and Doom Slayer is more requested, (and for whatever it may or may not be worth, both have more/bigger Nintendo attendance), so I'm not sure exactly what Fallout's hook would be. Nonetheless, it's still overlooked given its size and prevalence.
My assumption is that Fallout is one series the mascot may trump the protagonist in likeliness. It's not like some power armor-clad protag couldn't happen, but Vault Boy overarchs across titles, is the face of the series, and is overall more recognizable. I think he'd represent the series as a whole better. Fwiw, that's also who got the costume, not the protag.
Obviously for Fortnite, a normal-proportioned human works better. Personally I think Vault Boy meshes better with the Smash cast.
The biggest obstacle, getting any recognition at all, has been cleared. Not saying it'll happen for sure, but it's not impossibleOkay you ignored something. Wow I wonder if the game about nukes would fly getting anything more than a costume in the Japanese children’s party game? I get we’ve gotten M Rated characters before, and a couple of my most wanted are from said mature rated games, but being the only country to ever get nuked is probably going to damage the chance of a character from a series about nukes from ever getting into the game.
Ah. I'm moving up in the world.Don’t worry it only made you look like a psycho
If we're going to start imposing canon you're going to find many holes in the roster, not the least of which being two Marios and two Samuses.I think adding Vault Boy would be weird, because he's fictional in his own universe. I know they did that with Reptar in NASB, but I assumed that was because they didn't want to have you beat up babies. He's iconic enough to maybe get away with it, but I don't know.
And Isabelle better be in his reveal trailer[Insider Gaming] DOOM: The Dark Ages to be Revealed at Xbox Games Showcase
https://insider-gaming.com/41814-2doom-the-dark-ages/www.resetera.comNateDrake: DOOM - The Dark Ages is a Multiplatform (PC/Xbox/PS5) release, and will be revealed as such
https://x.com/NateTheHate2/status/1794109253856161986 Another one from the Discord leak!www.resetera.com
A new Doom seems to be getting announced next month, and it looks like it's gonna be multiplatform. This will definitely ensure Doomguy being a popular candidate the next time around.
I'm not sure, I feel like the same applies to Slime vs Hero for the most part, and Hero was still favoured there. I would say part of Fallout's appeal is its unique aesthetic, and that's best captured by someone who wears the armour and iconography you see associated with the series. Plus, a Vault Boy moveset would basically just be riffing on what the protagonist does based on all the illustrations anyways.Idk why you guys are using the JP/EU name for the series when it's clearly called Vault Boy.
Jokes aside, Fallout is underrated as a pick, as the fanbase seems to focus solely on Doom to the exclusion of two other very popular Bethesda IP. Fallout, like Skyrim, is also a lot bigger in Japan than Doom is.
Though Skyrim/ES is bigger, and Doom Slayer is more requested, (and for whatever it may or may not be worth, both have more/bigger Nintendo attendance), so I'm not sure exactly what Fallout's hook would be. Nonetheless, it's still overlooked given its size and prevalence.
My assumption is that Fallout is one series the mascot may trump the protagonist in likeliness. It's not like some power armor-clad protag couldn't happen, but Vault Boy overarchs across titles, is the face of the series, and is overall more recognizable. I think he'd represent the series as a whole better. Fwiw, that's also who got the costume, not the protag.
Obviously for Fortnite, a normal-proportioned human works better. Personally I think Vault Boy meshes better with the Smash cast.
Yeah, but beyond the basic recognition, what content, particularly music, that wouldn’t run into either copyright issues or something else? How do you include Fallout in a major capacity, one requiring a fighter, while also keeping your CERO A rating? That’s why I think Vault Boy is still incredibly unlikely even after the TV Show.The biggest obstacle, getting any recognition at all, has been cleared. Not saying it'll happen for sure, but it's not impossible
Okay, for starters, don't call it "Fallout": call it "Vault Boy Adventures". Then, avoid using ANY game footage. Instead, only use the animated vids used in the games. Basically, pretend this is something completely different.Yeah, but beyond the basic recognition, what content, particularly music, that wouldn’t run into either copyright issues or something else? How do you include Fallout in a major capacity, one requiring a fighter, while also keeping your CERO A rating? That’s why I think Vault Boy is still incredibly unlikely even after the TV Show.
Yeah, they chose Hero over Slime. They chose Pikachu over trainer. They chose Terry over the MC of KoF. They chose Min Min over Spring-Man. I think when you take all the options they went with, you see that no one role automatically overrules the other so much as every situation is its own paradigm.I'm not sure, I feel like the same applies to Slime vs Hero for the most part, and Hero was still favoured there.
Are you saying the mascot isn't part of a series' aesthetic? Including them isn't betraying the game's aesthetic... it's utilizing what the series itself volunteers as its face. I mean, currently the sole piece of content Fallout is represented by in Smash isn't the armor.I would say part of Fallout's appeal is its unique aesthetic, and that's best captured by someone who wears the armour and iconography you see associated with the series.
Ok... but we don't have the protagonist. Whoever gets in will still be original.Plus, a Vault Boy moveset would basically just be riffing on what the protagonist does based on all the illustrations anyways.
Yeah but let's be real.Terry is still a protagonist.
Fatal Fury existed before KoF.
Is "FF" Final Fantasy, Final Fight or Fatal Frame?Yeah but let's be real.
FF exists but KoF doesn't, what were the chances of getting an SNK character?
Terry got in because he's their mascot, not because he's FF's protagonist.
Literally doesn't matter.Yeah but let's be real.
FF exists but KoF doesn't, what were the chances of getting an SNK character?
Terry got in because he's their mascot, not because he's FF's protagonist.
Or the point is they got picked because they were the protagonist, and then it does matter, because I dispute that being why Terry was picked.Literally doesn't matter.
The point is that "someone got picked over the protagonist".
Terry is still a protagonist and thus does not fit the point. Especially when he's listed as a Fatal Fury character, not a KoF character.
Which means....the protagonist got picked for the series.
It literally doesn't ****ing matter.Or the point is they got picked because they were the protagonist, and then it does matter, because I dispute that being why Terry was picked.
Well I'm really not sure those three are comparable examples. Terry isn't the cartoon mascot you don't play as compared to Kyo, he's the main protagonist of Fatal Fury and is an important character in KoF, which itself has an ensemble cast and rotates main character. Terry represents both Fatal Fury specifically, that's the series he's highlighted as being from in his trailer, and KoF as a whole. It's not picking a mascot over a protagonist, it's picking a more popular and ubiquitous protagonist over a different protagonist. The same applies to Min Min, ARMS is an ensemble cast with no single main character, so the dev team picked the one who was the most popular. Sakurai goes out of his way to specify everybody is the protagonist in ARMS to explain why they didn't go with the obvious pick of Spring Man and that Min Min had the advantage of being the developer request.Yeah, they chose Hero over Slime. They chose Pikachu over trainer. They chose Terry over the MC of KoF. They chose Min Min over Spring-Man. I think when you take all the options they went with, you see that no one role automatically overrules the other so much as every situation is its own paradigm.
Nope lol. I was just saying I think a protagonist would capture the aesthetic better inherently. In-game Vault Boy is used as marketing and a logo in juxtaposition to the setting, like you mentioned, the idea of it being a retro-futurist apocalypse is part of the appeal. In that sense, I think picking a protagonist works better because you see the game from that perspective and through the largely worn-down apocalyptic setting and armor and weaponry, in contrast to the highlights of corporate marketing and cartoony mascots. I feel like picking that, and the character who appears on the cover of every game, would better reflect the series than making the playable representation fully the cartoony mascot you don't experience the role of. Ofc there's other forms of representation and I'm sure a stage would be a direct translation, but the playable rep is a big part and definitely the most highlight role.Are you saying the mascot isn't part of a series' aesthetic?
None: it's Fur Fighters.Is "FF" Final Fantasy, Final Fight or Fatal Frame?
Nintendo’s already putting those porting boys to work the day after buying them, I see.[Insider Gaming] DOOM: The Dark Ages to be Revealed at Xbox Games Showcase
https://insider-gaming.com/41814-2doom-the-dark-ages/www.resetera.comNateDrake: DOOM - The Dark Ages is a Multiplatform (PC/Xbox/PS5) release, and will be revealed as such
https://x.com/NateTheHate2/status/1794109253856161986 Another one from the Discord leak!www.resetera.com
A new Doom seems to be getting announced next month, and it looks like it's gonna be multiplatform. This will definitely ensure Doomguy being a popular candidate the next time around.
The Doom ports for Switch were done by Panic Button, who work pretty closely with Id, so I don't think it'd be Shiver, though Nintendo having a first party porting studio might help. I imagine if this game gets ported it will be a while later, cause it's PS5/Series X tier and that's still well above the Switch 2's paygrade based on reported specs.Nintendo’s already putting those porting boys to work the day after buying them, I see.
Yeah, it matters, because your argument is Terry = protagonist Terry = picked, so I am wrong. I know he's a protagonist.It literally doesn't ****ing matter.
The series in question that is being represented is not KoF. It's Fatal Fury.
Terry is the protagonist of Fatal Fury. He didn't get in "over the protagonist of KoF" because KOF IS NOT WHAT HE'S BILLED TO REPRESENT.
Literally no one is saying Terry isn't the mascot.If Terry isn't SNK's mascot, by that logic, the Simpson family (Homer, Marge, Bart, Lisa and Maggie) weren't (at one point) the mascots of 20th Century Fox
Actually, they just might do that somehow. I can picture them giving Doom Slayer facial expressions similar to the earlier games that you can only see if you look close enough through his helmet. Smash does tend to have sneaky little references like that, so that just might be the same case here.If Doomguy gets in and has a voice, they should make him sound like he does in Doom 1&2 (even though his voice clips are just edited stock vocal sound effects).
Maybe they could even add in his facial expressions, which they're probably not gonna do.
He did get in over KoF's protagonist. KoF is a much bigger series, and one that, unlike with most characters, is part of what Terry came representing, and had other options which, I believe, could have been eligible for the spot.Yes, Terry is a mascot.
Yes, that's likely a contributing factor because he transcends his franchise as a face of the company.
But the logic of "he got in over a protagonist" is completely invalid regardless because he IS one.
Well I think he does fit the narrative of a character getting in because they're a mascot. I think that's a bigger contributing factor than being the protagonist of FF. Because I don't think Terry gets in without those other series contributing to what I believe actually got SNK the character, being the sum of its parts.Trying to spin it as "Oh, but he got in over X protagonist of X series" is asinine and reeks of desperation to prove he fits the narrative.
With Vault Boy as a Mii Costume I don't think the subject matter is an issue. Yeah a Mii Costume is not a character, but that would be a strange and arbitrary line to draw.Okay you ignored something. Wow I wonder if the game about nukes would fly getting anything more than a costume in the Japanese children’s party game? I get we’ve gotten M Rated characters before, and a couple of my most wanted are from said mature rated games, but being the only country to ever get nuked is probably going to damage the chance of a character from a series about nukes from ever getting into the game.
HA! *******!Sukon *********!!!
It would crack the game balance like an egg but the funniest possible option is to have an entire-ass monster as our Monster Hunter rep. We'll most likely get a Hunter, but it would be absolutely hilarious to watch something like a Valstrax doing combo strings and edgeguarding on a platform that it almost entirely covers with it's sheer size aloneI don't really know what this argument is about. Terry is a protagonist, and a mascot. That combination of things made him an ideal candidate. He represents the Fatal Fury series, of which he is the protagonist. The King of Fighters tournament originates from these games.
Whether you want to read it as an excuse or otherwise, Sakurai gave us a valuable sentiment about another character previously mentioned. When Yabuki suggested Min Min to be playable, he and Sakurai came to the consensus that everyone is technically the protagonist of ARMS. Even if Terry were chosen as a "King of Fighters" representative and not a "Fatal Fury" representative, this sentiment would be an easy justification for that game as well. So it feels like, if anything, fighting games are just the genre where this criteria becomes more lenient.
I think there are other scenarios where this could be flexible - after all, Slime was on the table if Hero was denied. I suspect Nintendo may have a backup plan if Monster Hunter were to be rejected as well (Palico, maybe?). Or a special case like Undertale where Sans is by far the more popular request. But as is, the precedent hasn't really been broken. The fact that Sakurai needed to give that protagonist excuse in the first place conveys where his mind is typically at with this. Which granted, I don't even personally agree with that decision sometimes, but he's laid it on pretty thick by now.
I'm just saying, there is an entire Spinoff series of Monster Hunter that could justify the monsters being a smaller sizeIt would crack the game balance like an egg but the funniest possible option is to have an entire-ass monster as our Monster Hunter rep. We'll most likely get a Hunter, but it would be absolutely hilarious to watch something like a Valstrax doing combo strings and edgeguarding on a platform that it almost entirely covers with it's sheer size alone
I doubt we'd get a Rider before a Hunter, but I do suppose they could use that as an excuse to downsize the monsters if need be. Sakurai was bullish on adding Ridley for fear of having to downsize him, but it seems that he was downscaled based on his original Metroid appearance. So if Hunters won't work for some odd reason, somewhat-smaller-than-average Rathalos isn't a complete impossibilityI'm just saying, there is an entire Spinoff series of Monster Hunter that could justify the monsters being a smaller size