I never understood the political aspect of Smash representation. If you like a character, you like a character. You don't like a character, you don't like a character. That's all Smash advertising is about and how it's been for 20 years. Maybe that's how you feel about the current DLC, that you don't like the recent newcomers and that's fine. Just never understood why we need to tie politics in a crossover game where the entire point is the series and not the gender.
And for the record, we get it's your boycott and you can do whatever you want with your money, but you keep bringing it up like it adds value to any discussion here. It doesn't and just sounds like complaining whenever possible.
Amen. This is what I've been saying all along. What people are professing is "diversity" is a definition espoused mainly by those on a certain side of the political aisle. It's safe to assume Nintendo cares much more about
actual diversity when it chooses characters, e.g. source game genre, character popularity, moveset potential, how complex a character is, what makes the character interesting, etc. Sure, some of those variables may be race, gender, etc., but I guarantee that the Smash team and Sakurai aren't saying stuff like, "Who do we think should be the next character? But before you give your suggestions, remember it has to be a woman." And when you consider that Nintendo is, at its core, a Japanese-based company with very different values than those over here in the west and other parts of the world, it's probably best to shelf your political biases because they aren't going to pander to them with something as big as DLC character negotiations.
I think it's fine to speculate that the next character will have "x" character attribute because of "y" reasons, or say you would like the next character to have "a" because of "b". But when the majority of your posts here have nothing to do with discussion, but rather mainly consist of your ideologies and how you'll be so upset if they aren't accepted and/or fulfilled, you're setting yourself up to be ignored. We value your contributions, but not when they aren't relevant to the conversation.