It was a terrible sequel to a good game. Even fans of the original hated it and how it ruined the character development and relationships of the original
among of course other issues
the guilt trips over killing an enemy’s dog don’t help either
Ok, I don’t HATE it. I just think a lot of the games story falls flat because of the hypocrisy in the gameplay inside the story itself. It’s not either sides fault it’s just that the messages of each don’t work with the other.
Like, Joel marching into a heavily armed hospital and murdering like 50+ heavily armed, expertly trained, gunmen is canonical but so is the scene with Abby so it doesn’t make sense in context. The revenge tale with Ellie is good but the context with the gameplay, the preceding story, and the ending doesn’t make any sense.
Funny thing is. The story from the side of Abby is near flawless because you really don’t get to see a lot of the stuff you see in Ellie’s story. But since you played as Ellie and did the things you did, the ending kinda falls face first and makes the context of the game pointless. If we were given a choice for the ending, or for the major points in the story, it’d be different but Neil set out to develop a very linear story and, since it’s a video game, it falls on itself. I actually think the story is “good” but the gameplay and the story feel VERY disconnected.
I was able to finally narrow down why I didn’t really like the game as much as the first, even though the first did fumble the ending, and the reason is that the game is made up of two very good parts, gameplay and story, that don’t quite come together to make up a very good whole. It’s just ok. If you take one side outside the context of the other then it is easily a 9 or a 10 but as an interconnected whole game it’s more of an 8 or 9. Still, very good but just not perfect like others have been saying.