PacificFun
Smash Ace
I'm gonna say it again: Nintendo as a creative company is awesome! Nintendo as a business company, however; is horrible and always has been (that goes for SEGA too).
Last edited:
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Son of a ***** I thought you posted a video and that it just wouldn't load considering all the space between sentences.Which is of course an utterly ridiculous claim to believe.
After all given his decision making with the franchise, its clearly Miyamoto who hates Star Fox.
Art of Fighting's always been well, Art of Fighting. It's not branded as Fatal Fury in any way, I even double checked the JP name in case it was branded as Garou. Maybe I should have used KoF as a better example but that's on me.Marketing is really good, not gonna lie.
That's fair, especially with the sheer scope of the movies. With that said...
Art of Fighting is a direct prequel to Fatal Fury. It's not really a "crossover" at this point more than it is a proof that the two franchises are indeed connected as part of a single story.
What's next? Tiki in Awakening means the game is actually a crossover too?
Then there's also the overload of Generation 1 Pokémon in Smash, with Lucario, Incineroar and Greninja as sole exceptions.
This is kinda out of nowhere but I doubt most people would disagree that Nintendo can be absolute scum. Can't say I know what you're talking about with SEGA unless you mean Atlus being absolute garbageI'm gonna say it again: Nintendo as a creative company is awesome! Nintendo as a business company is horrible and always has been (that goes for SEGA too).
Nah, you see, like everyone else who isn't an edgelord or competitive player, Diddy pretends Pichu's not in the game so that Pichu could never possibly get hurt in any way shape or form
You just made Pichu sad. Apologize.
It's not a lack of understanding. The reason why things are the way they are doesn't remove the complaint. The fact remains that they made a big show about how they couldn't have added the characters to the base roster because they hadn't existed yet (which is completely understandable), and then instead of adding one for DLC, they added arguably the least popular character like this. It's not illogical to be a little miffed by this.I genuinely don't get what's so hard to understand here, Byleth lucked out on timing for the DLC project plan, Rex and Spring Man didn't.
Pichu is hurt because he feels like he's invisible, but people ignore him because they don't want him to get hurt...Nah, you see, like everyone else who isn't an edgelord or competitive player, Diddy pretends Pichu's not in the game so that Pichu could never possibly get hurt in any way shape or form
who cares about Brewster when we finally have black ethnic hair in the gameI return to say, how dare Nintendo still not add Brewster to Animal Crossing.
Back to lurking...
I'm talking about Byleth.This is kinda out of nowhere but I doubt most people would disagree that Nintendo can be absolute scum. Can't say I know what you're talking about with SEGA unless you mean Atlus being absolute garbage
Work shifts at the Roost were pretty fun tho.who cares about Brewster when we finally have black ethnic hair in the game
And also baldness because I needed that cursed image.who cares about Brewster when we finally have black ethnic hair in the game
he will probably come in an update somewhere down the line after all the seasonal stuff is done.Work shifts at the Roost were pretty fun tho.
Honestly that kinda bugs me too. If I had the option to swap out a good chunk of the Gen 1 reps in exchange for Pokemon from the unrepresented generations, I'd choose the latter no contest.That... Simply just happens. Look at Zelda for example. Even with Smash Ultimate, Ocarina of Time has the most characters by far; Young Link, Sheik and Ganondorf. In Brawl and Smash 4 it was the Twilight Princess cast, and Melee had literally everyone from Ocarina of Time. Then there's also the overload of Generation 1 Pokémon in Smash, with Lucario, Incineroar and Greninja as sole exceptions.
I guess that's why he names all the games of every series. Next time, maybe we can get Flag Semamore that you can defendNaming all of the games in a series is infinitely more relevant to its history than naming every character. There was indeed reason for him to do it.
But... Sakurai pretty much did thatIt's not a lack of understanding. The reason why things are the way they are doesn't remove the complaint. The fact remains that they made a big show about how they couldn't have added the characters to the base roster because they hadn't existed yet (which is completely understandable), and then instead of adding one for DLC, they added arguably the least popular character like this. It's not illogical to be a little miffed by this.
Pichu is hurt because he feels like he's invisible, but people ignore him because they don't want him to get hurt...
This is so sad. Alexa, play Oracion.
Byleth isn't a bad business decision at all though, I thought you meant them profiting off of genocide or the timed release stuff but if you want to say "This disappointed me so it's scummy" go aheadI'm talking about Byleth.
**** outta here Charizard we getting mother****ing AGGRONHonestly that kinda bugs me too. If I had the option to swap out a good chunk of the Gen 1 reps in exchange for Pokemon from the unrepresented generations, I'd choose the latter no contest.
...Pokemon that are born in Gen 1 are the ones that are relevant in every generation.That... Simply just happens. Look at Zelda for example. Even with Smash Ultimate, Ocarina of Time has the most characters by far; Young Link, Sheik and Ganondorf. In Brawl and Smash 4 it was the Twilight Princess cast, and Melee had literally everyone from Ocarina of Time. Then there's also the overload of Generation 1 Pokémon in Smash, with Lucario, Incineroar and Greninja as sole exceptions.
**** outta here Charizard we getting mother****ing AGGRON
I think the Gen 1 reps should stay:Honestly that kinda bugs me too. If I had the option to swap out a good chunk of the Gen 1 reps in exchange for Pokemon from the unrepresented generations, I'd choose the latter no contest.
Just because he doesn't do it the same way each time doesn't make any of the methods irrelevant. I'm not defending an offensive gester, I'm saying there wasn't one made to begin with. He was counting in binary. That's it. He wasn't conspiring to flip everyone off. That'd be like saying that someone is being rude every time they gave someone else a thumbs up because it is a rude gesture in some parts of the world. Context matters.I guess that's why he names all the games of every series. Next time, maybe we can get Flag Semamore that you can defend
They may not always make the best decisions, but clearly they do something accurately toNintendo as a business company, however; is horrible and always has been (that goes for SEGA too).
So...just get rid of Jigglypuff?
In my idea timeline, we'd have Scizor for a full (Non-clone) Gen 2 rep, Aggron for Gen 3, Golurk for Gen 5, and Appletun for Gen 8. Keep Pikachu, Mewtwo, Lucario, Greninja, and Incineroar for the rest of the generations, plus a Legendary Pokemon. Maybe bring back Pichu and/or Pokemon Trainer, perhaps with a revamp for the latter to a more hands-on fighter that represents every generation and/or the items.
Sorry I don't have a female/gender-neutral version of the meme this is the only version they had in store
We aren't going to convince each other, so there's no point in us continuing this conversation.Just because he doesn't do it the same way each time doesn't make any of the methods irrelevant. I'm not defending an offensive gester, I'm saying there wasn't one made to begin with. He was counting in binary. That's it. He wasn't conspiring to flip everyone off. That'd be like saying that someone is being rude every time they gave someone else a thumbs up because it is a rude gesture in some parts of the world. Context matters.
****ing Golurk? My dude you've earned yourself a goddamn sticker, Golurk is so goddamn badass that seeing it in Detective Pikachu was a genuine highlight. I ****in love Gen V, hate how Pokemon's issue of refusing to acknowledge non gen 1 Pokemon can be traced back to morons whining that they had to use the new Pokemon in the main game instead of their old favourites.
In my idea timeline, we'd have Scizor for a full (Non-clone) Gen 2 rep, Aggron for Gen 3, Golurk for Gen 5, and Appletun for Gen 8. Keep Pikachu, Mewtwo, Lucario, Greninja, and Incineroar for the rest of the generations, plus a Legendary Pokemon. Maybe bring back Pichu and/or Pokemon Trainer, perhaps with a revamp for the latter to a more hands-on fighter that represents every generation and/or the items.
Sorry I don't have a female/gender-neutral version of the meme this is the only version they had in store
Not necessarily, it's just that Jigglypuff doesn't have anything to convince me otherwise. Pichu and Pokemon Trainer have some thing going for them, but from the mindset of "One Pokemon per generation + one freebie," I feel that Mewtwo being a Legendary gives them more of an edge over the other candidates, in my opinion.So...just get rid of Jigglypuff?
Why should each generation born Pokemon get a character?Not necessarily, it's just that Jigglypuff doesn't have anything to convince me otherwise. Pichu and Pokemon Trainer have some thing going for them, but from the mindset of "One Pokemon per generation + one freebie," I feel that Mewtwo being a Legendary gives them more of an edge over the other candidates, in my opinion.
Funny you mention 2B, Amazon recently added a Switch version of NieR Replicant slated for April 2021. We DO know the Automata protags are going to be in Replicant in some way so people won't be able to shoot down 2B's Phantasy Star 2 appearance not counting as a Nintendo appearance despite Sakurai counting Cloud's cameos in KH and stuffI still wonder that, if we're getting one last Square character, if Nintendo would want to promote the likes of Bravely Defualt or TWEWY or add another heavy hitter such as Lara Croft and (less so but still) 2B.
I dunno, it just feels nice having it all equal. Also, there's the fact that I can give one rep for each generation without it coming off as overboard.Why should each generation born Pokemon get a character?
I see people say this all the time, and it never seems to get defended.
The original games, which are relevant to the entire media franchise, were a cultural phenomenon unlike any other video game in history. Pokemon, up until 2001, was used as a sociological, psychological, and economic study.
Every character from Pokemon could be from the first 151 and it would still make sense. (Though, I'm glad it doesnt).
But even about 'equality,' theyI dunno, it just feels nice having it all equal. Also, there's the fact that I can give one rep for each generation without it coming off as overboard.
It should also be noted that these picks are for a personal roster I'm making, so there's a bunch of other variables that I have to take into account that are admittedly arbitrary and slanted towards my personal tastes.
Unless Nintendo and Sakurai are super mad because of the poor representation for Final Fantasy, I don't see any scenario where they would add another FF character. I mean I'd love to get Terra or another FF protagonist. To be fair I feel another FFVII character would be more likely even if it's because of the remake. Which sucks because Final Fantasy isn't just VII and I'd rather a more balanced representation instead of going with only VII.If the choice is to some degree Nintendo's control, they may have a different set of priorities. 2B is from a franchise that lacks even the tenuous connection to Nintendo that Persona did (and that's not even getting into the changes necessary for her costume), while Tomb Raider's notable but not as immediately relevant as to contemporary Switch releases as Bravely Default or TWEWY.
Heck if Square Enix announced a collection/releases of the first six FF games for Switch next year, one could argue that a Terra or Cecil would be the character they'd go for.
Brb making the Clive support thread so we can try and claim FFXVI's getting reppedUnless Nintendo and Sakurai are super mad because of the poor representation for Final Fantasy, I don't see any scenario where they would add another FF character. I mean I'd love to get Terra or another FF protagonist. To be fair I feel another FFVII character would be more likely even if it's because of the remake. Which sucks because Final Fantasy isn't just VII and I'd rather a more balanced representation instead of going with only VII.
Anyway I doubt they would even think to add a character just to promote a bunch of old games. It doesn't feel very right, if you're going to promote something I feel adding a character from a recent new game or upcoming game makes more sense.
TERRABrb making the Clive support thread so we can try and claim FFXVI's getting repped
Also yes the XVI protag's named Clive, I'm surprised too
You mean now or ever?Unless Nintendo and Sakurai are super mad because of the poor representation for Final Fantasy, I don't see any scenario where they would add another FF character.
Whelp...he gets to join the weird name squad with Corrin, Byleth, Eleven, Eight, and Solo.Also yes the XVI protag's named Clive, I'm surprised too
I think the next one after that is Pinocchio.So Neku vs Lara vs 2B vs Bravely Defualt vs Gex vs...wait, hold up.
Because Smash is a crossover game. And with Cloud opening the flood gates for speculation (for better or worse), the whole "reps" thing was going to become more apparent no matter what.I have a question: what's the deal with "reps"? Why do people care about "reps" so much? I'm not talking about SJW stuff like gender and ethnic groups (which seem to have faded into the abyss), but rather about company, franchise and genre representation.
I have a question: what's the deal with "reps"? Why do people care about "reps" so much? I'm not talking about SJW stuff like gender and ethnic groups (which seem to have faded into the abyss), but rather about company, franchise and genre representation.
Excuse me, this is Snake erasureBecause Smash is a crossover game. And with Cloud opening the flood gates for speculation (for better or worse), the whole "reps" thing was going to become more apparent no matter what.
Company: Because there generally can only be one character added from them at a time, so there's competition.I have a question: what's the deal with "reps"? Why do people care about "reps" so much? I'm not talking about SJW stuff like gender and ethnic groups (which seem to have faded into the abyss), but rather about company, franchise and genre representation.
No it's StromboliI think the next one after that is Pinocchio.
Is this the part where I mention Balan Wonderworld?So Neku vs Lara vs 2B vs Bravely Defualt vs Gex vs...wait, hold up.