Izanagi97
Smash Lord
I'm more a fan of Sub Zero if only because we don't have much in the way of dedicated Ice users outside of some special movesYet people clamors for Scorpion. NottooviolentamIriteorwut?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I'm more a fan of Sub Zero if only because we don't have much in the way of dedicated Ice users outside of some special movesYet people clamors for Scorpion. NottooviolentamIriteorwut?
If you really think they'd put Sub-Zero over or before Scorpion you're delusional no offense.I'm more a fan of Sub Zero if only because we don't have much in the way of dedicated Ice users outside of some special moves
Sorry, this really ain't it chief. I know nothing is going to change your mind on this subject, but the gore content in Resident Evil really isn't that much worse than what you'd find in your average Persona or Bayonetta game. The only difference is the grotesque monster designs, and even then you could easily leave those out without losing anything. If you're argument is about realistic weapons, then allow me to introduce you to my friend Ren "For his neutral special, he wields a gun" Amamiya.Doom and Resident Evil are too violent.
Pretty good choice as well.Easily anyone from Dead or Alive. The recent games may be rated M but that mostly has to do with sexual content and never gory violence.
Wait Skyrim is M-Rated?Dragonborn and Conker, all of the particularly violent elements could be removed without sacrificing their characters. Lara Croft could also be done well.
It'd be difficult to tone down Doom and Resident Evil.
Is that Joker's real name? I thought that was his friend.If you're argument is about realistic weapons, then allow me to introduce you to my friend Ren "For his neutral special, he wields a gun" Amamiya.
To add to this, Jill and Chris were easily added to MVC without any need for overly gorey content. And with the existence of Snake/Joker guns, rpgs, grenades, etc. are in no way a problemSorry, this really ain't it chief. I know nothing is going to change your mind on this subject, but the gore content in Resident Evil really isn't that much worse than what you'd find in your average Persona or Bayonetta game. The only difference is the grotesque monster designs, and even then you could easily leave those out without losing anything. If you're argument is about realistic weapons, then allow me to introduce you to my friend Ren "For his neutral special, he wields a gun" Amamiya.
That actually was the original intent of the developers [to make it T-rated]. But then the E10-rating was introduced and they cut some content as a resultGuns themselves are okay, Shadow the Hedgehog was E10+.
To my surprise, because I just learned this. I knew there was a bit of swearing, demon-like aliens, and the guns, so I always assumed it was T at the least.
Yep! It (and Oblivion as well) are M-Rated. Morrowind was T-rated.Wait Skyrim is M-Rated?
In your opinion. Metal Gear and Bayonetta are also too much for Smash, in your opinion. You've said as much.Doom and Resident Evil are too violent.
No it wouldn't. Take out the blood and dismemberment and they're no worse than Snake.It'd be difficult to tone down Doom and Resident Evil.
And then they're extremely poorly represented.No it wouldn't. Take out the blood and dismemberment and they're no worse than Snake.
You must not have looked very closely at the Fire Emblem, Zelda, Kid Icarus, Mother, Star Fox, Castlevania or Street Fighter portions.The concept of "precedent" poisons the well for all speculation.
If the Smash roster has taught me anything, it's that Sakurai likes to do things ONCE and then never do it again.
You must not have looked very closely at the meaning of my post.You must not have looked very closely at the Fire Emblem, Zelda, Kid Icarus, Mother, Star Fox, Castlevania or Street Fighter portions.
Well if Sakurai only does everything ONCE, that would apply to characters as well. Or at least the concept of a clone. But there are many, many clones. I guess he does do some things multiple times.You must not have looked very closely at the meaning of my post.
No moreso than Snake or Bayonetta.And then they're extremely poorly represented.
Doesn't make it any less likely either.Your personal willingness to accept bad and unfaithful representation doesn't make a character more likely.
The problem isn't all these things the individually problem is with Resident Evil at least is that it contains all of them. With those characters Snake and Bayonetta they were able to strip away the blood and gore and there was something left, to little johnny playing the game will just see a high tech military guy and a cool witch who fights evil monsters but with say Leon from Resident Evil, I doubt they'd allow bloody, rotting corpses to just hang out with Pikachu (I mean look at the E3 Nintendo direct, there was an ad for a Resident Evil collection and couldn't even show a Zombie) and if you take that away what's left? Just some dude in with a gun and a brown jacket, sure guns are in the game but with say Joker that's not all he has a character whose entire existence just popping Kirby full of lead and occasionally stabbing him. So the Characters design is bland, his moveset would be bland, the most recognisable aspect of the franchise (The Zombies) are too innately gorey to be included, what's even left?Sorry, this really ain't it chief. I know nothing is going to change your mind on this subject, but the gore content in Resident Evil really isn't that much worse than what you'd find in your average Persona or Bayonetta game. The only difference is the grotesque monster designs, and even then you could easily leave those out without losing anything. If you're argument is about realistic weapons, then allow me to introduce you to my friend Ren "For his neutral special, he wields a gun" Amamiya.
Just to go back to this for a second, the SMAAAASH!!! line does appear whenever you beat the Starman Assist Trophy. Though it looks more like the text from EarthBound Beginnings over EarthBound.If I remember correctly Super Smash Flash 2 gave Ness a critical hit chance on his Forward Smash. I hope the next smash game does this too because it's really satisfying to see that SMAAASH!!! Heck I even made half my namesake in reference to it (and now regret it because it sounds kinda bad if you don't get the reference).
Something like Nemesis could quite easily fit in as a boss fight. Especially since we've seen the Castlevania bosses pull from more horror-y roots (admittedly from less violent source material) and ReDeads have been in the game which are literally gore-less zombies. I don't think you need zombies to represent Resident Evil, no other franchises have needed the enemies to feel complete, and characters like Chris, Leon and Jill have transcended their franchise into genuine gaming icons.The problem isn't all these things the individually problem is with Resident Evil at least is that it contains all of them. With those characters Snake and Bayonetta they were able to strip away the blood and gore and there was something left, to little johnny playing the game will just see a high tech military guy and a cool witch who fights evil monsters but with say Leon from Resident Evil, I doubt they'd allow bloody, rotting corpses to just hang out with Pikachu (I mean look at the E3 Nintendo direct, there was an ad for a Resident Evil collection and couldn't even show a Zombie) and if you take that away what's left? Just some dude in with a gun and a brown jacket, sure guns are in the game but with say Joker that's not all he has a character whose entire existence just popping Kirby full of lead and occasionally stabbing him. So the Characters design is bland, his moveset would be bland, the most recognisable aspect of the franchise (The Zombies) are too innately gorey to be included, what's even left?
A fighting policeman from a lot of people's favorite video game franchise?The problem isn't all these things the individually problem is with Resident Evil at least is that it contains all of them. With those characters Snake and Bayonetta they were able to strip away the blood and gore and there was something left, to little johnny playing the game will just see a high tech military guy and a cool witch who fights evil monsters but with say Leon from Resident Evil, I doubt they'd allow bloody, rotting corpses to just hang out with Pikachu (I mean look at the E3 Nintendo direct, there was an ad for a Resident Evil collection and couldn't even show a Zombie) and if you take that away what's left?
Except as a whole he would be very uninteresting without a lot of the gory content, which would get the game's rating elevated to T if included.A fighting policeman from a lot of people's favorite video game franchise?
Except for the part where Chris and Jill already appeared in MvC3 without having anything that would have kept them out of Smash.Except as a whole he would be very uninteresting without a lot of the gory content, which would get the game's rating elevated to T if included.
I have to say, I don't really get that mentality. Snake might not have the M-rated elements from his series, but his playstyle reflects the nature of his game in a different way. Same with Bayo.Except as a whole he would be very uninteresting without a lot of the gory content, which would get the game's rating elevated to T if included.
Nintendo is much more strict when it comes to their content. The RE2 trailer in the E3 direct didn't even show a single zombie. Also, Capcom has many other characters that they can choose from, such as Phoenix Wright, Amaterasu, and Dante, among others.Except for the part where Chris and Jill already appeared in MvC3 without having anything that would have kept them out of Smash.
If CAPCOM doesn't think the characters don't work without gory content, then why the hell would Nintendo?
Dante was deconfirmed, but otherwise, yes. Capcom has other stuff to pull from. I just don't think we should discard RE, personally.Nintendo is much more strict when it comes to their content. The RE2 trailer in the E3 direct didn't even show a single zombie. Also, Capcom has many other characters that they can choose from, such as Phoenix Wright, Amaterasu, and Dante, among others.
But they're not more strict than Chris and Jill's appearances in MvC3. So, again, what would prevent those characters from being in Smash?Nintendo is much more strict when it comes to their content.
So? Why should Nintendo pick a less popular series when they don't have to?Also, Capcom has many other characters that they can choose from, such as Phoenix Wright, Amaterasu, and Dante, among others.
Maybe not, but Sakurai's is.And then they're extremely poorly represented.
Your personal willingness to accept bad and unfaithful representation doesn't make a character more likely.
According to you, Sakurai has already done the 'tone down M-rated characters' thing three times.The concept of "precedent" poisons the well for all speculation.
If the Smash roster has taught me anything, it's that Sakurai likes to do things ONCE and then never do it again.
I'm sorry, but Resident Evil has some of the most iconic protagonists in gaming, so I think saying the designs are bland is just wrong.The problem isn't all these things the individually problem is with Resident Evil at least is that it contains all of them. With those characters Snake and Bayonetta they were able to strip away the blood and gore and there was something left, to little johnny playing the game will just see a high tech military guy and a cool witch who fights evil monsters but with say Leon from Resident Evil, I doubt they'd allow bloody, rotting corpses to just hang out with Pikachu (I mean look at the E3 Nintendo direct, there was an ad for a Resident Evil collection and couldn't even show a Zombie) and if you take that away what's left? Just some dude in with a gun and a brown jacket, sure guns are in the game but with say Joker that's not all he has a character whose entire existence just popping Kirby full of lead and occasionally stabbing him. So the Characters design is bland, his moveset would be bland, the most recognisable aspect of the franchise (The Zombies) are too innately gorey to be included, what's even left?
I...I guess. But what the hell does that have to do with what we're talking about?We might not even get a Capcom character at all, as there are many other companies and characters that can get in.
It reeks of people trying to disqualify characters they don't want for made up reasons.Also this reeks of "DQ would be boring" all over again.
Which is clearly not an issue because the game already does it.There would also be the problem of the player being able to use real guns on kids