Thank you for proving my point about legacy, you dingus.
Holy ****, the sheer amount of irony in this single sentence is palpable. This just proves that you didn't listen to a single word I said. I'm not trying to argue that Piranha Plant has a super deep legacy or anything, whether it does or not is entirely besides the point. The point I was getting at is that, when it comes to characters people want, legacy doesn't really matter, and is only used by people as a way to build up characters they want and denegrate characters they don't want, as well as argue a character's value post-hoc.
If Mr. Game & Watch wasn't introduced in Melee, but rather introduced in Ultimate a la Piranha Plant, people would not like him. They would be complaining that Sakurai put in a character no one wanted from an old series of calculators. Instead of spending about a year and a half's time seething about a Plant getting in over any other characters you wanted, you'd be seething about some flat piece of garbage with a random, OP Side-Special who speaks in annoying beeps.
I didn't forget that context. In fact, that's the entire basis of my argument. If characters like Mr. Game & Watch, Ice Climbers, Roy, Pichu, or R.O.B. were introduced today (ie. Ultimate) as newcomers, you wouldn't have people sitting there singing their praises and welcoming their addition. Rather, you'd have people just like you bemoaning them as wastes of character slots, as you're currently doing with Piranha Plant and Byleth.
But putting all of that aside, since we've already gone over a good bit of that already, nothing you've said invalidates my initial argument whatsoever.
As a quick recap...
- You said that Waluigi is never getting in Smash because Sakurai and company put Piranha Plant in the game.
- I respond by explaining to you that it doesn't matter, because there are other characters who nobody particularly asked for who got in before other, more requested characters, and yet those same characters who didn't get in then still got in later.
- You then proceeded to say that the examples I listed weren't comparable because A) Mr. Game & Watch had a legacy, B) R.O.B. isn't third party like Mega Man is and third parties were less likely overall during the Brawl days, C) Dark Pit was put in due to Sakurai Bias, and D) those characters were released in a different time, and thus aren't as bad as Piranha Plant or Byleth.
How do any of your arguments here actually prove that Piranha Plant getting in before Waluigi makes the latter impossible? Short answer, it doesn't. You've done little-to-nothing to attack the argument I made. What you've done here instead is a classic argumentative style called a 'Bait-and-Switch Argument'. Basically, if you can't win an argument you're having with someone, shift the focus away to a different argument and try to win that. In this instance, you shifted the argument away from "Waluigi isn't getting in Smash because they already chose Piranha Plant." to "The examples you've given are inaccurate because of X, Y and Z reasons.".
You do this kind of **** a lot and I'm honestly getting tired of seeing you go that route time and time again. Why can't you just attack a person's argument head-on rather than shifting the entire topic to something else? And if you can't argue your terrible points well at all, why not stop making them? Like I get you feel that we won't get anyone good for this Fighter Pass, but sitting here seeing you trying to once again argue your feelings as fact is just tiresome and annoying for everyone to have to deal with.
And what if you're wrong?
Either him or Geno, really. They're the only two left who I think would be as hype as Ridley and Banjo.