>well known to retro gamersI just wanted to add that Shantae is actually well known to retro gamers. I knew who she was because her OG game is considered a lesser known classic, because it was a late GBC release I think.
>lesser known classic
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
>well known to retro gamersI just wanted to add that Shantae is actually well known to retro gamers. I knew who she was because her OG game is considered a lesser known classic, because it was a late GBC release I think.
I find it odd you believe that everyone is going to have the same tastes as you therefor will automatically go towards the games you like. Sorry, that’s not how life works.I find it INCREDIBLY hard to believe that you are somehow simultaneously a person who evidently "plays many games from various companies" and has somehow never heard of Nier Automata despite its success until someone talked about them here on smashboards.
Out of the many many JRPGs SE has released, not many have reached the outside appeal N:A has.
That's not what he's saying..he's saying that he finds it odd that someone that plays many different games from many different companies somehow hasn't heard about one of gaming's biggest company's biggest recent successes..like it was one of only two of Square-Enix's massive successes at the time, the other being Final Fantasy XV..I find it odd you believe that everyone is going to have the same tastes as you therefor will automatically go towards the games you like. Sorry, that’s not how life works.
For example, I may enjoy medical shows, but that doesn’t mean I’ve heard of shows like House M.D or etc. I find it very interesting that people are getting so upset over not knowing a video game. Does it really matter that much?
Not well known to mainstream gamers, but then it got to a point where it was on pretty much every "Underrated" list for the console, so anyone who looked at any of those pretty much knew what it was. Like Guardian Legend on NES, where it might have been "Unknown" but it got on so many of those lists that most people who play NES games are at least aware of it.>well known to retro gamers
>lesser known classic
I mean you said you play games from many different companies, not that you had limited tastes. If you're not interested in JRPG/ARPGs, then yeah, it's not really surprising that you'd never hear of Nier Automata. But if you are and you aren't stretching yourself too thin, yeah it's kind of odd to have not at least heard the name before. It was extremely talked about in 2017.I find it odd you believe that everyone is going to have the same tastes as you therefor will automatically go towards the games you like. Sorry, that’s not how life works.
For example, I may enjoy medical shows, but that doesn’t mean I’ve heard of shows like House M.D or etc. I find it very interesting that people are getting so upset over not knowing a video game. Does it really matter that much?
No, but because your situation is atypical from a logical perspective, it certainly can't account for any sort of precedent.I find it odd you believe that everyone is going to have the same tastes as you therefor will automatically go towards the games you like. Sorry, that’s not how life works.
For example, I may enjoy medical shows, but that doesn’t mean I’ve heard of shows like House M.D or etc. I find it very interesting that people are getting so upset over not knowing a video game. Does it really matter that much?
But showing up on a bunch of underrated GBC game lists doesn't refute the point that produced your reply, remarking on the lack of the series' stature. In fact, it sort of proves it.Not well known to mainstream gamers, but then it got to a point where it was on pretty much every "Underrated" list for the console, so anyone who looked at any of those pretty much knew what it was. Like Guardian Legend on NES, where it might have been "Unknown" but it got on so many of those lists that most people who play NES games are at least aware of it.
No it doesn't. It might not have been well known back then but more people became aware of it through those lists and the internet, and you probably don't look at them, but the majority of them copy each other and parrot the same ten or so games. It had the effect of it appearing so frequently that it got to the point where it wasn't the case any more if you looked into that console at all. Everyone, at least, in the discord servers and the like I hanged around in, knew who Shantae was.But showing up on a bunch of underrated GBC game lists doesn't refute the point that produced your reply, remarking on the lack of the series' stature. In fact, it sort of proves it.
The preference doesn't annoy me, it's the faulty logic behind it that does. People are allowed to want whoever they want, but I'm just pointing out that "it's a once in a lifetime chance" is not a good justification. I attempted to explain why. Do you have a counterpoint to that?Except it's not an objective right or wrong, nor are people arguing. People are expressing an opinion and preference, and that is evidently bugging you because it differs from yours.
Considering how Geno's entire history is Nintendo I think you might be mistaken.Well I won’t sugar coat it, but personally I do think that Geno’s history with Nintendo is negligible.
Well, it's impossible to prove that, so I'm not.Yes, but you're wrong.
I agree but...so do Nier fans.I only know of Shantae because of Smash discussions. If I didn’t care about Smash or she didn’t somehow become a popular pick, I imagine I still never would’ve discovered her.
Shantae’s fanbase really oversell how significant/large that series is.
Eh, I'd call it a sequel of a spinoff.I thought half the point of the games by now has been to celebrate games with some sort of legacy, and popular one offs appearing as spirits or costumes. Isn't Automata a Spinoff of a spinoff?
Because Zero exists.He's too dope. Too clean. How can you not like him?
And to which strata of reception is that more impressive than? Overlooked games that didn't eventually get appreciated in retrospect?No it doesn't. It might not have been well known back then but more people became aware of it through those lists and the internet, and you probably don't look at them, but the majority of them copy each other and parrot the same ten or so games. It had the effect of it appearing so frequently that it got to the point where it wasn't the case any more if you looked into that console at all. Everyone, at least, in the discord servers and the like I hanged around in, knew who Shantae was.
And to which strata of reception is that more impressive than? Overlooked games that didn't eventually get appreciated in retrospect?
For arguing the size of a series, that's a pretty low bar to overcome. It's miles away from a game that proliferates to the degree of a current, successful non-indie. I mean, as per your example, it might be appreciated as a good game, but it's not like anyone is going to be calling Guardian Legend a big deal.
I'd love that, but if the KH3 ReMind DLC is anything to go by, it feels like Nomura is slowly yet surely trying to break away from using the Disney worlds.My hope is that one day kh3 will receive an update to the frozen world to be the version the developers meant it to be.
It's impossible to prove because you're going out of your way to plug your ears to numerous examples of the game being popular, far more than Shantae.Well, I'm not, because it's impossible to prove.
Frankly it's silly to argue over relevancy with most wanteds when one of the most talked about potential newcomers to the series, who's been talked about since brawl, Geno, has zero relevancy to everything. The character ONLY exists nowadays because people want him in Smash. If that's enough to make him a strong likelihood than no character is too irrelevant to be in Smash.
And look who's the only one on that list NOT playable in Smash! Mmmmmmmmm!That took less than ten seconds worth of research and it comes up.
Because few of those metrics actually measure overall mindshare of a character.Since you won't accept any metric from which the size of a game's popularity can be judged, all you're succeeding in doing is making yourself out to be willfully ignorant.
Me either. Just being recognized by the developers in the game is fine enough...at least it's better than nothing.And either way she's already in the game as a spirit, and I'm pretty sure they said that they wouldn't add a character if it was already a spirit so I don't know why people keep hoping for it.
And whats your ****ing point? I am just trying to show that it's well known enough by now to be easily found if you put literally any effort in. I don't know why that's such a difficult thing for you to understand.And look who's the only one on that list NOT playable in Smash! Mmmmmmmmm!
As much as I would agree with you, yes. We are still under the assumption that Spirits deconfirm characters, and that is the stigma until a Spirit becomes playable.And whats your ****ing point? I am just trying to show that it's well known enough by now to be easily found if you put literally any effort in. I don't know why that's such a difficult thing for you to understand.
I do not think Shantae will be added because she's already in the game as a Spirit. Same with Geno.
This is the actual Flying Spaghetti Monster logic.Well, I'm not, because it's impossible to prove.
Correct... and my point was that what she's accomplished doesn't make her a big deal.I thought the entire point was talking about how well known the characters are now.
I'm gonna miss DBZA.
If you Google RPGs one of the suggestions it comes up with is Fortnite.Ok, Fine
That took less than ten seconds worth of research and it comes up.
Ain't that the truth. Give me 9S aka Hackerman instead.And 2B is recognized by the average gamer as "that eyepatch girl with the ass".
I doubt we'll get four fighters for free when we have to pay for individual Mii costumes.Remember that data mine that suggest x amount of possible DLC characters could be added.
After the second fighters pass there would still be four slots left.
Do you think the 4 remaining slots will be another pass, left unused, or...
What if they're echo slots for the second pass...
Hear my tinfoil hat theory out.
The first fighters pass had 5 characters over the span of a year give or take..
The seconds fighters pass will average 3 a year...
What if two of those fighters also get an echo, meaning 5 a year still.
They just didn't want to charge money for echos so it's like a bonus.
It's a pipe dream, but it'd be so awesome.I doubt we'll get four fighters for free when we have to pay for individual Mii costumes.
I think there's a good chance that they'll just go unused.
Doesn't really matter if she's 'iconic' or not..beyond that term being widely based on one's own definition of the term and thus highly subjective, many characters have gotten into Smash that weren't 'iconic' such as Bayonetta, DQ11 Hero, or Joker (if 2B isn't iconic neither is Joker).2B has figurines because she's a ***** monster. Not because she's a more iconic video game character.
Oh please no..I've had enough of his whiny butt from the Ending route of NieR Automata..Ain't that the truth. Give me 9S aka Hackerman instead.
Well yes, but for both of these, I double checked on incognito and on my phone, so I would presume this is the "default" ish.Isn't Google search also tailored to your history?
Well that was the start of this particular argument. Not whether 2B or Shantae was more likely to get into Smash, but that someone was flipping out that people were even suggesting that Shantae could be considered more iconic than 2B.Doesn't really matter if she's 'iconic' or not..
Like I said, 'Iconic' is speculative and means different things to different people.Neither Shantae or 2B are iconic.
Pikachu is iconic, Mario is iconic, Pac-Man is iconic.
Iconic is well known and well established.Like I said, 'Iconic' is speculative and means different things to different people.
For example, some would say Terry Bogard is Iconic, some wouldn't.
By what definition and in who's eyes?Iconic is well known and well established.
Sony has no say over whether or not Crash gets in. If Sakurai and Nintendo want Crash, Activision is the one they'll have to talk with.5.Crash Bandicoot. Family Friendly character, cartoony, well known with a legacy, as well as most of the games being pretty good, I don't see why he can't be unless sony is being difficult