AceAttorney9000
Smash Lord
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2019
- Messages
- 1,881
Superman, from the critically acclaimed Nintendo 64 masterpiece, The New Superman Aventures.Sooooooooooooooooooooo, who do you think has a 100% chance of getting in
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Superman, from the critically acclaimed Nintendo 64 masterpiece, The New Superman Aventures.Sooooooooooooooooooooo, who do you think has a 100% chance of getting in
No.If it werent for Piranha Plant, FE would be tied with Mario
So praise the
That would honestly be the biggest Smash gamble in like.,..ever. Imagine that we live in a parallel world wherein 3H wasn't as well-received as it is in our curretn timeline...dear God the salt will be tons and tons larger compared to the salt we have right now.Here's the thing, DLC was finalized before Three Houses released. There was no telling that Three Houses would've been received well, Sakurai had to play an early copy just to get an idea of what to do with that character. Byleth's inclusion had nothing to do with the quality of Three Houses, all that matter was it was a Fire Emblem game.
Plus Sakurai said relevancy doesn't matter, only if the character is fun. But it's not like that matters anymore, Byleth ain't paving the way for any other character.
I mean it was only a debate previously to begin with due to Pokemon's popularity.Please don't. We don't need another debate.
They can treat the DLC Expansion as separate event from the base game and just call it the...Gen 8 Pokemon are deconfirmed. Same reason as Resident Evil and Astral Chain.
Given the financial success of Awakening, Fates, and Heroes, Three Houses doing well was not hard to speculate.Here's the thing, DLC was finalized before Three Houses released. There was no telling that Three Houses would've been received well, Sakurai had to play an early copy just to get an idea of what to do with that character. Byleth's inclusion had nothing to do with the quality of Three Houses, all that matter was it was a Fire Emblem game.
Again you guys assume all this due to Pokemon's popularity. If it was the opposite the same would be said for Astral Chain and Resident Evil.They can treat the DLC Expansion as separate event from the base game and just call it the...
"Pokemon Sword & Shield (Isle of Armor and Crown Tundra) Event".
Could we stop misquoting him? He said this:Plus Sakurai said relevancy doesn't matter, only if the character is fun. But it's not like that matters anymore, Byleth ain't paving the way for any other character.
Brb while you guys settle this among yourselves.Please don't. We don't need another debate.
Not really. Aside from Astral Chain, what other first-party games that were recently released could get a character? Anything that had a realistic chance of getting a character has already been included because of Spirits.I mean it was only a debate previously to begin with due to Pokemon's popularity.
They might as well just take content from the base game too. Limiting content to just DLC seems like a really dumb way to conform to the "Spirits deconfirm" rule.They can treat the DLC Expansion as separate event from the base game and just call it the...
"Pokemon Sword & Shield (Isle of Armor and Crown Tundra) Event".
During Byleth presentation Sakurai was explaining how to play Fire Emblem, say what Three Houses was all about, and had the Three Houses DLC play right after Byleth's announcement. It was an advertisement. Just because the game already sold well doesn't mean you can't still advertise it. They put Byleth in before the game was even out, even with the pattern of FE games selling well doesn't mean they can't continue advertising in Smash Bros.I don’t agree that that’s the motive.
I believe that, like Pokémon, they’re in a position where they can’t possibly add every “main character” that makes sense for Smash Bros.
Other series are easy. Yes, there’s great potential extras to add, but...if a kid picks up a Mario game, you’ll play as Mario, and then you can play as that character in Smash. Same goes for Link, DK, Kirby, Samus, etc.
Fire Emblem doesn’t work that way. Marth isn’t an interesting or recognizable character for someone who has just gotten into Fire Emblem: Three Houses, because he’s not there and isn’t related in any fashion.
I think they accounted for that from the get-go, and had a “reserved spot” for a Fire Emblem newcomer, like Incineroar was for Pokémon. But instead of “using” it right away, they saved it for when the “soon to be” game was happening.
It’s not really an “advertisement” when the game has already sold well. It was just easy to predict it would do well given Awakening, Fates, and Heroes success.
Do you not remember Corrin getting in before Fates released in the west and how that game is the biggest mix bag in the FE series where most people disliked it?That would honestly be the biggest Smash gamble in like.,..ever. Imagine that we live in a parallel world wherein 3H wasn't as well-received as it is in our curretn timeline...dear God the salt will be tons and tons larger compared to the salt we have right now.
I mean if you were Nintendo/Pokemon Company, Why wouldn't you take advantage of the situation ? It would be stupid not to from a business perspective.Again you guys assume all this due to Pokemon's popularity. If it was the opposite the same would be said for Astral Chain and Resident Evil.
Funny you say for those two its a deconfirmation but Pokemon it isn't just because under the assumption of its popularity.
All things where looking great for Three Houses. First 3D Fire Emblem in a long time since the early Wii days, exploration mechanic, choosing between 3(4) sides of the story..? There was no way Three Houses wasn't gonna be amazing. Don't lie.Here's the thing, DLC was finalized before Three Houses released. There was no telling that Three Houses would've been received well, Sakurai had to play an early copy just to get an idea of what to do with that character. Byleth's inclusion had nothing to do with the quality of Three Houses, all that matter was it was a Fire Emblem game.
Plus Sakurai said relevancy doesn't matter, only if the character is fun. But it's not like that matters anymore, Byleth ain't paving the way for any other character.
It really is circumstantial.The issue with Byleth is a smash bros problem. It really has nothing to do with fire emblem per say .
Most FE characters don’t deviate from eachother that much in terms of appearance and gameplay so it’s understandable why people would be upset.
the outcome would be different if we had been given more characters that varied more from the series from the beginning : Marth, Corrin, Robin, Byleth.
An arrangement like this would keep fans expectations of new FE characters higher.
You don’t have this issue with most Pokemon/Mario characters because they are fundamentally different which is why people don’t complain about them in large masses.
Overall No one doubts that FE is a great series with great characters to explore, but unfortunately poor decisions in the past were made to best represent it in smash bros.
Listen, I don't care how much you give a **** about your gameplay gimmicks, but cutting Ike, the BAR NONE most popular character in the entire franchise, one of the few that is universally beloved by both Smash fans and Fire Emblem fans for CORRIN, ROBIN, AND BYLETH, the 3 most divisive main characters in the franchise, is a mistake I'm pretty sure no one will agree with.Marth, Corrin, Robin, Byleth.
All I can think is that they both have Counters. That’s literally it, right?Listen, I don't care how much you give a **** about your gameplay gimmicks, but cutting Ike, the BAR NONE most popular character in the entire franchise, one of the few that is universally beloved by both Smash fans and Fire Emblem fans for CORRIN, ROBIN, AND BYLETH, the 3 most divisive main characters in the franchise, is a mistake I'm pretty sure no one will agree with.
Also Ike fights nothing like Marth or Roy, what is with people misconstruing him with them. That's like saying Bowser plays too much like Mario because they both got punches.
Who's that suppose to be? Lyn or Mai?Oh my God, what's that in the distance? Oh no, oh God, it can't be! NOT HER!
View attachment 260837
S͈͉̥͖͔͚̃͂̊͑͌͒͊̑͠͡Ḩ̯̫̩͕̠̭̥͆̑̃̓ͭ̋̆̀E̡̨͈͍̮͚̱͈̲ͪ̌ͤͥ̓̓̎ ̺̜̯̖͙̈́̅͌̕C͆ͧͮ̽̂͏̞̞͓̻̝̜́͟O̢̥͈̹̾͒̈́̃ͨ̀M̭̞̺ͦ̾ͩ̇͑͌͘͢E͇̞̰̙̹̥̲̺̖ͮ̃̎̿͂͟S̤̠̞̬ͥͩͥ͌̀͢͡
Fates came before Three Houses and was not received well by fans because of the characters and story. There's always a chance that things can go sideways.All things where looking great for Three Houses. First 3D Fire Emblem in a long time since the early Wii days, exploration mechanic, choosing between 3(4) sides of the story..? There was no way Three Houses wasn't gonna be amazing. Don't lie.
I guess they have a similar-ish fair? an arcing overhead swing, but... lot of characters have that. Roy also stole Ike's dair in Smash 4. Most swordwielders also have that dsmash where they cut forward and then backwards, but that move sucks and no one uses it (outside of memers like Byleth).All I can think is that they both have Counters. That’s literally it, right?
it's Lai, obviouslyWho's that suppose to be? Lyn or Mai?
Except that Fates did very well.Fates came before Three Houses and was not received well by fans because of the characters and story. There's always a chance that things can go sideways.
No. Why? People where rallying behind Azura as well just because she has a Lance. In the end Corrin ended up quite unique, and still is. And how you want to incorporate a wyvern riding unit in Smash anyway?Would anybody here have preferred Camilla instead of Corrin as Sm4sh DLC? Asking for a friend
Nooooooooo.Would anybody here have preferred Camilla instead of Corrin as Sm4sh DLC? Asking for a friend
Lol I use Ike,Listen, I don't care how much you give a **** about your gameplay gimmicks, but cutting Ike, the BAR NONE most popular character in the entire franchise, one of the few that is universally beloved by both Smash fans and Fire Emblem fans for CORRIN, ROBIN, AND BYLETH, the 3 most divisive main characters in the franchise, is a mistake I'm pretty sure no one will agree with.
Also Ike fights nothing like Marth or Roy, what is with people misconstruing him with them. That's like saying Bowser plays too much like Mario because they both got punches.
I was asking because I had heard people talking about it before, and I have no idea. Maybe it could be like Wario’s Bike.No. Why? People where rallying behind Azura as well just because she has a Lance. In the end Corrin ended up quite unique, and still is. And how you want to incorporate a wyvern riding unit in Smash anyway?
Just because something sells well doesn't mean the product was good.Except that Fates did very well.
It doesn't.Just because something sells well doesn't mean the product was good.