TheCJBrine
Smash Legend
Drummer Maui and Mr. Rabbit from Trix got nothing on James Pond.
Last edited:
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Decidueye was generally the most popular starter last time (Japan notwithstanding), but who's the one before it? Sceptile?Not all of Rillaboom's supporters are in it just for getting a grass type in Smash, but I think we need to stop pretending like that's not where a majority of its support stems from.
This is the third time in a row where the Smash fanbase has chosen to back the grass type starter, and unlike the previous two instances, it's abundantly clear that Rillaboom is not the most popular starter. Yes, Rillaboom could be a unique Pokemon, but I question if that's why a lot of its supporters want it. Feels like we've gotten to a point where any grass type would be the favorite, regardless of what gimmick the fire or water types would have.
I feel like I have some doubts that event deconfirms all Sword and Shield Pokemon given how much content there are in Pokemon Sword & Shield and Pokemon in general.I think that the Sword & Shield Spirit event deconfirms all Sword & Shield Pokemon. If one was to be added then they would not have even had that Spirit event.
There's a reason why they never had an FE 3 Houses Spirit event.I feel like I have some doubts that event deconfirms all Sword and Shield Pokemon given how much content there are in Pokemon Sword & Shield and Pokemon in general.
The content in the new Pokemon game vastly outnumbers what 3H has though. There's still a lot of good and popular Pokemon unrepped by spiritsThere's a reason why they never had an FE 3 Houses Spirit event.
Even then Pokemon has higher amount of content than 3H. Also I don't think having a spirit event with very few Gen 8 stuff that lasted for a few days would stop Nintendo/Sakurai putting a Pokemon in a DLC.There's a reason why they never had an FE 3 Houses Spirit event.
Pokemon also doesn't get that kind of attention for DLC. Only Fire Emblem does.Even then Pokemon has higher content than 3H. Also I don't think having a spirit event with very few Gen 8 stuff that lasted for a few days would stop Nintendo/Sakurai putting a Pokemon in a DLC.
But ignoring Rillaboom, Cinderace, Inteleon, Wooloo, Yamper, Toxtricity, Dragapult, Grimmsnarl, Hatterene, Cramorant, Obstagoon, Falinks, Sirfetch'd, Drednaw, the fossils, Eternatus,and G-Max forms, they have all the important and fan-favorite Sword and Shield Pokemon.The content in the new Pokemon game vastly outnumbers what 3H has though. There's still a lot of good and popular Pokemon unrepped by spirits
Given Ultimate is the 2nd Smash game with DLC, I think there's chance it may change about that especially with the 2nd Fighter Pass. Since there's a low chance a Fire Emblem character is in the 2nd Fighter Pass.Pokemon also doesn't get that kind of attention for DLC. Only Fire Emblem does.
Gen 9 isn't even out yet so I don't think that there will be any new Pokemon characters.Given Ultimate is the 2nd Smash game with DLC, I think there's chance it may change about that especially with the 2nd Fighter Pass. Since there's a low chance a Fire Emblem character is in the 2nd Fighter Pass.
Yeah, Lara Croft's up there too. If her trailer had her fighting Samus like how Cloud got to fight Link in his character poster, it'd be a real pop-off moment.You can tell how much of the Smash community haven't touched a non-Nintendo console in their lives when you hear that Crash Bandicoot isn't iconic. Next I'll be hearing that Lara Croft is a literal who.
*nervously looks at Mario*
Yeah no it's not up for debate.
When ORAS came out in 2014, people wanted Sceptile to be DLC. Blaziken should've been more popular than Sceptile even back then, but some people disagreed.Decidueye was generally the most popular starter last time (Japan notwithstanding), but who's the one before it? Sceptile?
Blaziken is more popular than Sceptile generally, Sceptile only got the boost due to typing.
Tbh that’s impossible to say. Pokemon only ever favours the most recent generation and as Smash 4 never had a new gen release while the game was still being supported they didn’t add a new Pokemon. That’s all we have to judge Pokemon and dlc. Mewtwo doesn’t really count because it was a veteran. Really judging by how Sakurai implements Pokemon into smash and making exceptions to the Pokemon series all the time and how big the series is, I doubt a few spirits (which were probably planned around E3 due to all the spirits being Pokemon shown in the June 5th direct) would stop Sakurai from adding one. The 2nd dlc pass was probably not decided upon around June so it doesn’t really affect a new Pokemon’s chancesPokemon also doesn't get that kind of attention for DLC. Only Fire Emblem does.
No memorable locations?The only problem with a Sword and shield Pokemon is that there aren't any memorable locations in Galaar to base a stage out of. So we'd be stuck with something like "Pokemon stadium 3)
Except it probably was decided on by the time the Sword and Shield spirit event happened.The 2nd dlc pass was probably not decided upon around June so it doesn’t really affect a new Pokemon’s chances
exactlyI think that the Sword & Shield Spirit event deconfirms all Sword & Shield Pokemon. If one was to be added then they would not have even had that Spirit event.
better idea...Smash should add bothIf we're talking Crash, I'm sure he'd make for an at least decent character. Not sure why people are saying he's not iconic enough though. As big as Mario or Sonic? Hell no. But he was pretty important during the early 3D days. And managed to stick around for a bit longer after that. I'd argue he's more iconic than Banjo-Kazooie. Granted of the three 3D era platformer franchises, I think he interests me the least, but I ain't about to act like he wasn't the PS1's posterboy.
Hell, Crash was one of those characters that was requested since Brawl, even during his worst days, while not nearly to the magnitude of Sonic and Mega Man, I think still says something.
Obviously, people give way more of a **** about him now because his remakes and racing games came out. Not to mention, with all the other types of characters that show up, more and more people are gonna get comfortable asking for seemingly "out-there" choices. With those two things in mind Of course people are going ask for Crash more than they did last game. I wouldn't consider him a bandwagon character.
Spyro's still the best choice though.
Croft vs Zamus...now that’s something the world isn't ready forMake Frog the Mii costume for Chrono Trigger. We need his theme.
Yeah, Lara Croft's up there too. If her trailer had her fighting Samus like how Cloud got to fight Link in his character poster, it'd be a real pop-off moment.
Dear God, this'll be where feminists cry tears of joy, like me.Yeah, Lara Croft's up there too. If her trailer had her fighting Samus like how Cloud got to fight Link in his character poster, it'd be a real pop-off moment.
I suppose I should throw my hat into the ring on this, and try to give an argument for Spirit upgrades (for spirits that were in the base game, at least). No calling out "Fan Rules!" or "We don't know what could happen" either, just my best defence.I firmly believe folks misunderstand where the skepticism of spirit upgrades stems from.
It is the not the fact that pngs exist and that Sakurai is somehow not able to go past a png.
It’s the concept of what Spirits are, and the fact that some have been withheld for particular times and others have not, added onto the fact that they function as if they were actually the character themselves as a concept.
The argument is that for two straight scenarios of Smash DLC (as in, this is based on evidence and precedent) the only DLC newcomers to Smash have been 3rd party characters that bring a stage, music, and spirits (Ultimate), or relevant first party newcomers that just so happen to both be from recent Fire Emblem games. On top of that, every DLC choice has been a main protagonist from said game or franchise.
There’s also the fact that Sakurai has seemingly suggested in the past that non-playable roles count just as much as playable ones in the crossover. He also said he would like to continue the crossover, and “improve on the record”.
Now, it’s not a rule that this will “absolutely, positively” play out this way. But this idea? The fact that previous evidence suggests another potential outcome? There’s stuff out there, like the things I mentioned, that lead to one potential inclusion.
I would absolutely entertain the idea that spirits aren’t disconfirmations if someone proposed an argument, with evidence, that suggests it’s going to happen. I have seen nothing but hypothetical situations. But when I propose stuff based on actual precedent, actual evidence, I get hit with the invalid response of, “Lalalalalala fan rule fan rule fan rule”. Just because you don’t agree with it doesn’t mean it’s a fan rule, and never have I passed it off as such.
It should also be noted that the function of spirits is quite different from trophies, and based on the way they are added to the game, I don’t know that trophies are a proper equivalent argument. That could be up for discussion.
It’s not impossible for spirit upgrades. I never said it was. I have said in the past that it seems unlikely to happen based on what I’ve read. It’s one thing to want something to happen, but wanting it or saying, “X character is popular!” Is not a strong piece of evidence in this case, at least for me.
Alas, I can continue this later. Some folks have made decent points, but again, hypothetical outcomes aren’t evidence of likelihood. Responding to a question, when the question is based on precedent, with a hypothetical such as, “Well Sakurai could” is not evidence and does not have the same gravitas. At least, as an English teacher, I feel that way, lol.
PS- I DO want to point out that the whole time Season 1 was a thing, I explicitly said that while I thought Pick 5 would be 3rd party, Astral Chain or Three Houses could be added as an exception to what I believed would be a lack of first parties.
I wasn’t wrong.
That's not how speculation works. You're not supposed to wait until something gets confirmed before talking about it.Good morning.
*sees people talking about Spirits for the umpteenth time*
Look, can't we just settle down for a minute and just wait for an actual Spirit promotion before we decide on a definite answer? This is going nowhere.
They didn't do that in Smash 4 when Mewtwo and Lucas were added, so their fighter and non-fighter trophies shared the same name.Likewise, if naming really is an issue, they could just label the new spirit as "Character Name (Fighter)" to differentiate them from their base game spirit.
Though every Spirit has their own name, so they'd probably have a rename like Character(Fighter Spirit) instead of just the character name.They didn't do that in Smash 4 when Mewtwo and Lucas were added, so their fighter and non-fighter trophies shared the same name.
They probably didn't exist at the time they are making spirits of them.Also helps that the Gen 8 Pokemon didn't use the same type of artwork as the other Pokemon. For example, Zacian and Zamazenta's artwork should've been this.
Exactly why an Gen 8 Pokemon shouldn't be ruled out so quickly.Pokemon's a pretty huge franchise, so getting a DLC character, with Spirits of Pokemon that haven't been used yet isn't a wild idea. Given what Pokemon is, I wouldn't be too surprised if they got DLC, much like Fire Emblem. If I'm wrong about that, I wouldn't complain because there's no new Pokemon I'm super attached to this time around.