GuiltyGyarados
Banned via Administration
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2020
- Messages
- 110
Will do.Hate them all you want
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Will do.Hate them all you want
Everyone is obviously entitled to their opinion, but trying to pass your opinion off as the "correct" one when you really have no arguments to back it up is pretty lame.Will do.
Joker: Admittedly, I was quite upset with this choice. Still doesn't really feel right, but guess he's part of the SEGA family? 4/10Rank the DLC
Joker = 10/10. I adore Joker and played P3-P5 and will be playing P5R and P5S when they come out so when he came out, I was super hype seeing Him with that envelope. He plays fun.
Hero = 10/10. DQ 8 was my first Dragon quest and while i havent played 11 yet at the time, i loved DQ 8 so seeing them appear as a new hero was sweet and it's so cool to see RNG in smash.
Banjo = 5/10 initially to 7/10. Never liked Banjo or his game. Was bigger into LoZ 64 (and Majoras mask) DK64, mario 64 and Megaman 64 and even then, I didn't like it. I was stoked for people who loved him and he does play great.
Terry Bogard = 10/10. I played Fatal Fury 2 when I was a kid, along with Mortal Kombat, Samurai Shodown and street fighter. Those games shaped my love of fighting games but out of my favorites of Ken/Chun-Li, Galford and Poppy/Ukyo/Charlotte, johnny cage/Kitana/Kung Lao/Scorpion, Terry and Joe reigned as my favorite fighters of all time. Especially after the Fatal Fury 2 OVA. Seeing Terry in Smash was my Banjo wish.
Byleth = 9/10. When I first played Fire Emblem Three Houses, I knew the game had beaten P5 was my favorite JRPG. Having all these complex stories on 4 (soon to be 5) storylines were beautiful to me. I also knew that either Byleth or Edelgard would be in smash and while I wanted 2B in this spot, still getting my second pick with all the weapons made me happy.
I didn't buy the pass but I will be buying the second pass because this one was ****ing solid for me.
Pass grade = A rank
Well, regardless, he still has a chance as DLC, even if it is a slim one.Waluigi is a side character who exclusively appears in Mario spin-offs.
I don't consider him a necessity by any means, I didn't consider Daisy one either but she got in because she could easily fit over Peach.
First off, no they are not the same playstyle as most of the crew (or are you calling yourself more knowledgeable about the game then the likes of ESAM and MVD?), and no Fire Emblem is not a niche tittle anymore no matter if you like it or not. Not as big as pokemon granted, but its certainly not a niche tittle anymoreGonna go ahead and bet that I know more about it than you do. The stuff that matters, anyway.
I don't care. Whether it's an axe or a spear, it's the same **** from a gameplay standpoint.
Just another big disjointed hitbox for my Puff to struggle with avoiding. Big whoop. So hype.
Yes.
is literally based off a Wii U title though.So...is Inkling only in the game solely for promotion bait for Splatoon?
I never tried to pass mine off as the "correct" one, but I can start doing that if you want me to. Despite what you just said, I've presented countless arguments. More than anyone else I've seen on the other end of the debate, and nobody's been able to adequately refute them.Everyone is obviously entitled to their opinion, but trying to pass your opinion off as the "correct" one when you really have no arguments to back it up is pretty lame.
They pretty much are. Disjointed hitboxes. That's your entire gameplan made for you right there.First off, no they are not the same playstyle as most of the crew,
Then it's not big enough to deserve having eight characters.Not as big as pokemon granted
If you think Marth, Lucina, Chrom and Ike are blank state avatar characters AND you've played Fire Emblem, then no. You don't. I play Fire Emblem. This shouldn't even be an argument. If you claim to know more about a video game franchise that I've been playing since the moment it came to the west, you are probably obsessive about a thing you hate. Great way of wasting your precious time. But who am I to tell you that anyway.Gonna go ahead and bet that I know more about it than you do. The stuff that matters, anyway.
Something about a rotating cast of characters and a mobile gacha that is a blip in the radar compared to the actually big gacha games.What is it with people thinking that a series that started off a literally what in the West that nobody knew until Melee and still became a niche series until Awakening absolutely believes they should be on par with the literal Flagship of Nintendo and the highest grossing media franchise of all time with about 900+ characters to choose from?
You don't need to play Fire Emblem to understand these characters. They're nothing.If you think Marth, Lucina, Chrom and Ike are blank state avatar characters AND you've played Fire Emblem, then no. You don't. I play Fire Emblem.
And I'm allowed to hate what I hate.Also people are allowed to like what they like.
I wouldn’t call Dead Rising a horror series but I love it & Frank, so I’d be down lolI can think of another option.
View attachment 258323
Yesh dude... it's just a game. No big deal. You act like its life or death. But whateverI never tried to pass mine off as the "correct" one, but I can start doing that if you want me to. Despite what you just said, I've presented countless arguments. More than anyone else I've seen on the other end of the debate, and nobody's been able to adequately refute them.
They pretty much are. Disjointed hitboxes. That's your entire gameplan made for you right there.
Then it's not big enough to deserve having eight characters.
Exactly and agreed.If you think Marth, Lucina, Chrom and Ike are blank state avatar characters AND you've played Fire Emblem, then no. You don't. I play Fire Emblem. This shouldn't even be an argument. If you claim to know more about a video game franchise that I've been playing since the moment it came to the west, you are probably obsessive about a thing you hate. Great way of wasting your precious time. But who am I to tell you that anyway.
Great way to make yourself look stupid.
Also people are allowed to like what they like. Three Houses is one of the best games on the Switch too.
No arguments, then?Yesh dude... it's just a game. No big deal. You act like its life or death. But whatever
'Byleth is a fine choice, just not alongside the others on this Fighter Pass, because I think it doesn't make sense.'- the post.Before any of you put words in my mouth thinking I should condemn attacking Sakurai, I don’t understand why the man doesn’t just develop a FE game if he’s such a big fan.
Byleth itself is a fine inclusion, there was nothing wrong with them getting in as DLC since Three Houses is a well-received and popular game.
But WHY on earth would anyone defend such a stupid idea of introducing four brand new third party worlds Persona, Dragon Quest, Banjo-Kazooie and Fatal Fury that people never expected to be Smash and then end it off with ONE Nintendo franchise that people absolutely WOULD expect getting to Smash based off it’s representation in the past?
I’m aware Smash cycle end on low-notes but this may be the most baffling one yet, and before anyone points out “HOW COME NOBODY COMPLAINS ABOUT MARIO OR POKÉMON THEN?”
What is it with people thinking that a series that started off a literally what in the West that nobody knew until Melee and still became a niche series until Awakening absolutely believes they should be on par with the literal Flagship of Nintendo and the highest grossing media franchise of all time with about 900+ characters to choose from?
Call this a “Fire Emblem bad” post all you want, Byleth should’ve either been base roster, bonus like PP, or in Fighter Pass Vol 2. Not this one.
That said, I still look forward to them and hope they’re a great character to play.
I don't think they're trolling. Some of them genuinely do seem to like Byleth.why are we still feeding the troll
Except Byleth did away with a couple of cliches regarding FE reps. Rillaboom/Cinderace/Inteleon would not.how? Pokemon actually have the possibility to have incredibly unique movesets, even if Sakurai would probably just add another boring starter again. FE is much more restrictive when it comes to design and moveset potential.
.............Like what?xcept Byleth did away with a couple of cliches regarding FE reps
See, I disagree about the "saturation" debate when out of the whole 82 character roster, these are the characters that use swords:
16 out of 82. That really isn't a whole lot when compared to the rest of the roster, especially when four of them are semiclones that require less work, and 2 Echoes that require minimal work.
After that, our roster of swordies that are 100% unique and not based on anything from another character is this:
Heck, Byleth doesn't even use their sword like a sword, (it's basically a whip) and they use other weapons as well. I just can't get behind this "too many swords" argument when these are the same people asking for other characters who use swords, or more punch and kick characters in a game where there's a lot of punch and kick.
However, they aren't FE, which makes them immune to these supposed criticisms.
I need to be sure if he's actually trolling. Once he starts saying "hoes mad" and ****, I'll know for sure.Guys just report him and move on, lol.
I mean it’s my opinion, so because I’m fine with an inclusion, I should absolutely be ok with how they’re included? That’s incredible black & white mentality right there.'Byleth is a fine choice, just not alongside the others on this Fighter Pass, because I think it doesn't make sense.'- the post.
If you're fine with Byleth, you're fine with Byleth being on the Fighter Pass. Whoever else you think SHOULD'VE been on it can be the next DLC fighter.
There's literally no problem here, except your expectations and what you feel is right and wrong.
The SALT IS REAL.
Echo fighters count.It's currently 75 characters at the moment, not 82)
My advice: Don't post here if you dislike Byleth. You'll be labeled a toxic troll, just for that opinion. This place is a cesspit of fanboys.I mean it’s my opinion
75 leaves out the echoes.Fair enough (It's currently 75 characters at the moment, not 82).
Or maybe just don't say it with empty arrogance, points that have been discussed to death, absolute ignorance regarding the subject (Byleth) and dissing everyone as people that don't know nothing?Echo fighters count.
Even when you account for those, that brings the number of swordfighters to just over 20%, which is such an obnoxiously large number.
My advice: Don't post here if you dislike Byleth. You'll be labeled a toxic troll, just for that opinion. This place is a cesspit of fanboys.
Your argument is literally nothing. Fire Emblem characters have a lot of persona that's absent in a lot of the other franchises in Smash. They are young Lords or in Ike and Byleth's cases mercenaries who are thrown in the midst of war against their will. Thar sort of **** is character building. You HAVE TO HAVE a personality showcased in the characters to make this **** work. And the characters show drastic different personalities, literally all of the FE cast.You don't need to play Fire Emblem to understand these characters. They're nothing.
Couldn't care less. You just make yourself look stupid. It's more amusing to me than for your believe me.And I'm allowed to hate what I hate.
-From a very well received game that even made it to the Video Game Awards.You still haven't shown me how Byleth isn't a bad choice "at all."
If it weren¨t for people still pushing for the likes of Dante, Monster Hunter, Sora (who is technically a sword user), I would have agreed with you. Now, its more in line with "hurdurr fire emblem" because its popular to hate on it. To qoute Aaronitmar.Fair enough (It's currently 75 characters at the moment, not 82). But here's some possible perspective on why people are sick of sword characters:
Smash 64: 1/12 Characters was a sword user. (8%)
Melee: 4/25 Characters were sword users. (16%)
Brawl: 5/35 Characters were sword users. (14%)
Sm4sh: 9/58 Characters were sword users. (15%)
Ultimate: 17/75 Characters were sword users. (22%)
It is a lot to be fair. Don't have time to keep posting here (at work). Have fun with the numbers at least lol.
What difference does it even make if the next batch of fighters are probably gonna be first and 3rd party owned anyway?I mean it’s my opinion, so because I’m fine with an inclusion, I should absolutely be ok with how they’re included? That’s incredible black & white mentality right there.
You don’t find it ridiculous that there’s a row of 3rd parties and they end it off with a 1st party that’s infamous in the fandom when they could’ve just developed it another time?
Guess I should’ve toned down the cap letters in that post otherwise it would’ve been misworded as “lol salt” instead of criticizing something while acknowledging they’ll be an interesting character to play.
That depends on who you ask.So, I'm confused here. No one is supposed to like Blythe?
I argue that Terry did not have any surprise factor either concidering Terry is a no-brainer for an SNK rep. But yeah, even as someone that is hyped about Byleth, his was easily the worst oneRewatched nearly every trailer, and Byleth's is easily one of, if not the worst one. It didn't have any surprise factor, the dialogue was corny, and overall it isn't hype inducing at all. It's disappointing, Robin/Lucina's trailer was awesome and Corrin's was at least a bit funny for the absurdity of Corrin keaving their families to fight in Smash instead. Byleth's just wasn't fun.
No ****? Imagine if this was a monster hunter instead or something."People would have been hyped about this moveset if it weren¨t for the fact that Byleth is a Fire Emblem character"