• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Official Newcomer/DLC Speculation Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.

Guynamednelson

Smash Legend
Joined
Dec 17, 2014
Messages
13,148
NNID
Nelson340
3DS FC
2105-8742-2099
Switch FC
SW 4265 6024 9719
"Don't worry, the starting roster is exactly the same as Super Smash Bros. Ultimate. We've just removed all the unlockable characters."
Minus Samus, because Link already has multiple projectiles.
 

Icedragonadam

Smash Master
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
4,093
Switch FC
SW-5227-6397-6112
January 6th-10th is probably the most likely week to have a direct if amiibo theory follows, plus a major Smash patch coming on average every 2 months.
 

Nemuresu

Smash Lord
Joined
Sep 1, 2018
Messages
1,240
Location
Mexico City
3DS FC
3325-3200-4137
I still lean on Corrin not really selling all that well as a DLC simply because he was the only controversial inclusion at the time. Everyone else had a good reception, and when you have the likes of Mewtwo and Cloud, why would the blatant promotional character come out on top?
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
I wouldn’t remove Corrin, tbh.

Fire Emblem fans seem to agree that Smash Corrin is better than Fates Corrin, so I wouldn’t drop out the apparently best version of the character.
 

PSIGuy

Smash Lord
Joined
Jun 27, 2014
Messages
1,967
Location
Australia
People were bringing up the selection process and ‘lists’- I thought that was a misinterpretation based on the fact Sakurai said Nintendo made the selection and then ran it by him? That doesn’t sound like it means they picked 10~ characters and let him pick, more like they picked all 5 and made sure he could work with them before they started development. That’s a selection too.

I can only assume there was a lot of boring market analysis and meetings with company representatives before they even wrote a single character name down. Makes me wonder if the dev team get a say in even a single DLC character, but maybe Nintendo revoked their right to do that after they picked bloody Corrin last time.
 

Verde Coeden Scalesworth

Flap and Swish~
Premium
Joined
Aug 13, 2001
Messages
34,385
Location
Cull Hazard
NNID
Irene4
3DS FC
1203-9265-8784
Switch FC
SW-7567-8572-3791
People were bringing up the selection process and ‘lists’- I thought that was a misinterpretation based on the fact Sakurai said Nintendo made the selection and then ran it by him? That doesn’t sound like it means they picked 10~ characters and let him pick, more like they picked all 5 and made sure he could work with them before they started development. That’s a selection too.

I can only assume there was a lot of boring market analysis and meetings with company representatives before they even wrote a single character name down. Makes me wonder if the dev team get a say in even a single DLC character, but maybe Nintendo revoked their right to do that after they picked bloody Corrin last time.
Put simply, what you said in the first paragraph could also be the case. It's possible they had to dump a character or two they wanted to try cause Sakurai couldn't make them work. One possibility is they made a list, but only told Sakurai a character first. Or, to put it more clearly, say they said Fulgore. Sakurai said no, so they said Banjo next(hypothetical, I do believe Banjo was chosen before Fulgore was. Maybe Master Chief and/or Steve could've been first, but eh).

It's possible Sakurai is not giving much information to keep it as vague as possible to surprise us all. There's also stuff he can't say anyway. Making Nintendo look bad is not a good idea. His answer seems to make it clear that both have a major say in it, which is a lot of information for us.
 

Cosmic77

Smash Hero
Joined
Dec 17, 2017
Messages
9,547
Location
On a planet far far away...
Switch FC
2166-0541-5238
I wouldn’t remove Corrin, tbh.

Fire Emblem fans seem to agree that Smash Corrin is better than Fates Corrin, so I wouldn’t drop out the apparently best version of the character.
Even though I think FE would definitely lose a character or two in the next Smash if cuts extend farther than just third-parties, I have no idea who would get cut. I would've said Roy, but now Chrom exists.

Seems like Corrin is the only character most people would be fine losing, as much as disagree. Then again, I hardly have a connection with any of the FE characters, so I wouldn't lose sleep over Corrin.

People were bringing up the selection process and ‘lists’- I thought that was a misinterpretation based on the fact Sakurai said Nintendo made the selection and then ran it by him? That doesn’t sound like it means they picked 10~ characters and let him pick, more like they picked all 5 and made sure he could work with them before they started development. That’s a selection too.

I can only assume there was a lot of boring market analysis and meetings with company representatives before they even wrote a single character name down. Makes me wonder if the dev team get a say in even a single DLC character, but maybe Nintendo revoked their right to do that after they picked bloody Corrin last time.
Even in Smash 4, I think Nintendo had a small influence. To this day, I still believe they were the ones largely responsible for Bayonetta. Learning that she was decided on as early as the first week after the ballot only strengthened my belief in that theory.

I'm also sure Hero wasn't something Sakurai chose, given how involved SE was and how this was all orginally going to be in the base game. I'm sure Sakurai would've tried adding DQ content sooner or later, but the hard push for people to play DQXIS made this feel like Nintendo and SE teaming up to promote a Switch game.

Nothing more than theories for now, but I feel like both could easily be true.
 
Last edited:

SKX31

Smash Master
Joined
Feb 22, 2019
Messages
3,462
Location
Sweden
People were bringing up the selection process and ‘lists’- I thought that was a misinterpretation based on the fact Sakurai said Nintendo made the selection and then ran it by him? That doesn’t sound like it means they picked 10~ characters and let him pick, more like they picked all 5 and made sure he could work with them before they started development. That’s a selection too.

I can only assume there was a lot of boring market analysis and meetings with company representatives before they even wrote a single character name down. Makes me wonder if the dev team get a say in even a single DLC character, but maybe Nintendo revoked their right to do that after they picked bloody Corrin last time.
There's a major reason why I've been bringing up Furukawa - Nintendo's President and Ultimate's Executive Director - like a broken record. He's very much a major force in the negotiations. Not least since he's a marketing guy. Market analysis were not the only thing discussed though - building / reaffirming bridges between companies is another major factor. (SEGA, S-E, Microsoft and the three Chinese joint venture owners of SNK, those being Hong Kong-based LeYou Technologies, and the Chinese companies 37 Games and Orient Securities. Wouldn't be surprised if Tencent were also involved in the SNK talks, since Nintendo were very likely talking to them at the time about releasing the Switch in China and Tencent has supported SNK quite a lot).

Burning any sort of bridges with Sakurai is also no bueno: he's a bonafide VIP within Nintendo, and he's gotten there since Smash has sold 5+ million each and every time. Yes, even Wii U did that on its own. And Ultimate's not just the second biggest title on the Switch - it has the title of biggest fighting game of all time. It's not just about the market numbers though - Smash doesn't just have its own fanbase here and other places, but news on it is treated as major events. That gives Sakurai a lot of influence - and Nintendo recognizes that. Furukawa and the other execs did adjust after the reactions to Corrin were mixed to say the least.
 
Last edited:

BZL8

Smash Ace
Joined
Feb 9, 2019
Messages
918
Location
Somewhere
Switch FC
208233413838
New Sakurai pic. I love that PotD is back.
There was a problem fetching the tweet
 

toonito

Smash Ace
Joined
Jul 10, 2017
Messages
827
January 6th-10th is probably the most likely week to have a direct if amiibo theory follows, plus a major Smash patch coming on average every 2 months.
the original amiibo theory which was a DLC Fighter comes out the Tue/Wed after an amiibo wave comes out on the previous Friday has since been disproven since IIRC both Banjo and Terry released before the amiibo waves in September and November.

However, the updated amiibo theory would be DLC fighter is to come out the same month as an amiibo wave which has been true of every character in the Fighter Pass so far. For this updated theory to hold up FP5 has to be released by January 31st since the Dark Samus and Richter amiibo hit stores January 17th.
 

wynn728

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
1,380
People were bringing up the selection process and ‘lists’- I thought that was a misinterpretation based on the fact Sakurai said Nintendo made the selection and then ran it by him? That doesn’t sound like it means they picked 10~ characters and let him pick, more like they picked all 5 and made sure he could work with them before they started development. That’s a selection too.

I can only assume there was a lot of boring market analysis and meetings with company representatives before they even wrote a single character name down. Makes me wonder if the dev team get a say in even a single DLC character, but maybe Nintendo revoked their right to do that after they picked bloody Corrin last time.
Again, seems too coincidental that if Nintendo picked all the DLC they just happen to include Terry & Joker. I feel people following Sakurai words way too much and just wants to think that Sakurai had zero involvement in the DLC.

I mean, Sakurai also said that they won't do another story mode in Smash 4 because people upload the cutscenes to YouTube when clearly they were working on two separate games during the time.
 

Verde Coeden Scalesworth

Flap and Swish~
Premium
Joined
Aug 13, 2001
Messages
34,385
Location
Cull Hazard
NNID
Irene4
3DS FC
1203-9265-8784
Switch FC
SW-7567-8572-3791
Again, seems too coincidental that if Nintendo picked all the DLC they just happen to include Terry & Joker. I feel people following Sakurai words way too much and just wants to think that Sakurai had zero involvement in the DLC.

I mean, Sakurai also said that they won't do another story mode in Smash 4 because people upload the cutscenes to YouTube when clearly they were working on two separate games during the time.
It's not remotely coincidental. Terry is from a heavily exclaimed series and Persona 5 is one of the best selling games in the series. At worst it was a list of characters that Sakurai chose due to his own personal like of it. But we have a specific statement that Nintendo did indeed pick the characters first.

Also, lol, zero involvement? We know he was always involved. We don't know how much it was involved. We know that Nintendo directly picked the DLC, and Sakurai decided how a character works. We know none of the details between those two points. It's too vague on how everything works.
 

Ben Holt

Smash Master
Joined
Mar 30, 2013
Messages
3,588
Location
The Moon
NNID
BenHolt
3DS FC
5455-9637-6959
Switch FC
5283 2130 1160
Keep Corrin when it comes to FE cuts.

I wouldn't mind Roy going tbh.
I had to pay for him in 4.
Don't make me do that again.
NO CUTS!!!! EVER!
Everyone is here should be the default from here on out.
3 out of the 7 Smash 4 DLC characters were literally cut characters that should have been included from the get-go.
 

osby

Smash Obsessed
Joined
Apr 25, 2018
Messages
24,016
I had to pay for him in 4.
Don't make me do that again.
NO CUTS!!!! EVER!
Everyone is here should be the default from here on out.
3 out of the 7 Smash 4 DLC characters were literally cut characters that should have been included from the get-go.
That's not a feasible expectation from a development team unless they literally mod the next game on top of Ultimate.

I don't see why people want cuts so much and why they keep bringing it up in a newcomer speculation thread but that doesn't mean Sakurai can make a Smash game with like 80 veterans and still add meaningful content.
 
Last edited:

Ben Holt

Smash Master
Joined
Mar 30, 2013
Messages
3,588
Location
The Moon
NNID
BenHolt
3DS FC
5455-9637-6959
Switch FC
5283 2130 1160
That's not a feasible expectation from a development team unless they literally mod the next game on top of Ultimate.

I don't see why people want cuts so much and why they keep bringing it up in a newcomer speculation thread but that doesn't mean Sakurai can make a Smash game with like 80 veterans and still add meaningful content.
I mean, if Smash Ultimate just becomes a platform like RuneScape, World of Warcraft, or Team Fortress 2, and we just keep getting extra content from now til the end of time....
I'm totally cool with that.
 

Ben Holt

Smash Master
Joined
Mar 30, 2013
Messages
3,588
Location
The Moon
NNID
BenHolt
3DS FC
5455-9637-6959
Switch FC
5283 2130 1160
I don't think we'd go the full DLC cycle without a female character given how much Sakurai praised himself for adding so many female characters into Smash 4.
 

Polan

Smash Lord
Joined
Jun 23, 2015
Messages
1,089
Location
the deepest darkest part of my heart
I still lean on Corrin not really selling all that well as a DLC simply because he was the only controversial inclusion at the time. Everyone else had a good reception, and when you have the likes of Mewtwo and Cloud, why would the blatant promotional character come out on top?
fates sold pretty well so i wouldn't be shocked if corrin was one of the higher selling characters. not gangbusters but turned some profit for nintendo.
 

CyberHyperPhoenix

"Download Complete."
Joined
Sep 11, 2014
Messages
13,424
Location
Down on the corner, out in the street.
I had to pay for him in 4.
Don't make me do that again.
NO CUTS!!!! EVER!
Everyone is here should be the default from here on out.
3 out of the 7 Smash 4 DLC characters were literally cut characters that should have been included from the get-go.

I'm certainly not advocating for cuts fwiw, because I certainly agree that there shouldn't be any.
 

Wunderwaft

Smash Master
Joined
Mar 21, 2019
Messages
3,500
Yeah I don't think this community is gonna look pretty during the speculation of the next game when it comes to roster cuts, especially since cuts are guaranteed according to Sakurai.
 
Last edited:

Koopaul

Smash Champion
Joined
Oct 29, 2013
Messages
2,336
Sakurai is aware of the pandora's box he opened with Ultimate. No one will be happy with cuts in a normal sequel. So really the only thing you can do is something different.

Then do that.

*I* don't need a complete engine revamp ever again.
I don't think Nintendo or Sakurai want to sell the same game forever. Especially on a next Gen console. I have a strong feeling the next game is going to have to really change things up.
 
Last edited:

PSIGuy

Smash Lord
Joined
Jun 27, 2014
Messages
1,967
Location
Australia
I do think the next game is certainly going to be more interesting for not being able to include every character. They'll have to take a different approach, whether it be focusing on the core gameplay, content or making every newcomer on a limited roster count.

Or they come out with Melee 2. I'd be happy with Melee 2. Better than Ultimate 0.5, anyday.
 

Koopaul

Smash Champion
Joined
Oct 29, 2013
Messages
2,336
I do think the next game is certainly going to be more interesting for not being able to include every character. They'll have to take a different approach, whether it be focusing on the core gameplay, content or making every newcomer on a limited roster count.

Or they come out with Melee 2. I'd be happy with Melee 2. Better than Ultimate 0.5, anyday.
I definitely think their going to reconstruct the core gameplay. I wouldn't be surprised if every fighter had a completely new moveset.
 

SMAASH! Puppy

Smash Legend
Joined
Feb 13, 2015
Messages
13,372
Location
Snake Man's stage from Metal Blade Solid
Nah, see ya later Lucina.
What? She's a major character from the best game in the series. She, Chrom, and Robin should become mainstays. Fire Emblem deserves all of it's characters, and it would be an awful idea to cut even one, but if they did, Marth would be the only acceptable cut. Dude's gimmick just isn't viable anymore.

Yeah I don't think this community is gonna look pretty during the speculation of the next game when it comes to roster cuts, especially since cuts are guaranteed according to Sakurai.
Remind me to skip that game's speculation cycle. I don't really want to listen to things like this all day once again.

"Corrin/Incineroar/Young Link/Dark Pit/Lucas/Squirtle/Roy/Piranha Plant/You get the point is stupid and should never return ever again!"

"Hot Take: King K. Rool won't return and that's a good thing."

*Cries because favorite DLC character is widely considered to be on the chopping block.*

*Long, angry rant on why Pichu should return.* (I may or may not be guilty of that one. lol)

"Why the bleep is Jigglypuff still here? They could have used all those resources to put literally anyone else in and they chose Jigglypuff?!? Dislike. Unsubscribing."
 
Last edited:

Wunderwaft

Smash Master
Joined
Mar 21, 2019
Messages
3,500
I definitely think their going to reconstruct the core gameplay. I wouldn't be surprised if every fighter had a completely new moveset.
I wouldn't say they'd go as far as making new movesets for every character. Sure some characters might get a new move or two (I'm looking at you Ganondorf), but I think most of the movesets would remain the same. What I think might change in the core gameplay is the engine. We might get some changes to hitstun and whatnot, we also might get new mechanics like air dashing or something as cool. A sequel to Ultimate may not surprass it's predecessor in terms of roster, but it can improve on different things like gameplay mechanics, single player content (I still want a proper adventure mode), and an actual good online system.
 

PSIGuy

Smash Lord
Joined
Jun 27, 2014
Messages
1,967
Location
Australia
Remind me to skip that game's speculation cycle. I don't realy want to listen to things like this all day once again.

"Corrin/Incineroar/Young Link/Dark Pit/Lucas/Squirtle/Roy/Piranha Plant/You get the point is stupid and should never return ever again!"

"Hot Take: King K. Rool won't return and that's a good thing."

*Cries because favorite DLC character is widely considered to be on the chopping block.*

*Long, angry rant on why Pichu should return.* (I may or may not be guilty of that one. lol)

"Why the bleep is Jigglypuff still here? They could have used all those resources to put literally anyone else in and they chose Jigglypuff?!? Dislike. Unsubscribing."
Hey, we didn't have to go through all that for Ultimate thanks to Everybody is Here. Maybe they'll pull a Nobody is Here and reveal the entire roster is never-before playable characters. Between assist trophies, promoted costumes and alternate protagonists for long running series there's a lot to work with.

...I want to live in a world where Mario and Pikachu get cut from a game for once.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom