I wouldn’t remove Corrin, tbh.
Fire Emblem fans seem to agree that Smash Corrin is better than Fates Corrin, so I wouldn’t drop out the apparently best version of the character.
Even though I think FE would definitely lose a character or two in the next Smash if cuts extend farther than just third-parties, I have no idea who would get cut. I would've said Roy, but now Chrom exists.
Seems like Corrin is the only character most people would be fine losing, as much as disagree. Then again, I hardly have a connection with any of the FE characters, so I wouldn't lose sleep over Corrin.
People were bringing up the selection process and ‘lists’- I thought that was a misinterpretation based on the fact Sakurai said Nintendo made the selection and then ran it by him? That doesn’t sound like it means they picked 10~ characters and let him pick, more like they picked all 5 and made sure he could work with them before they started development. That’s a selection too.
I can only assume there was a lot of boring market analysis and meetings with company representatives before they even wrote a single character name down. Makes me wonder if the dev team get a say in even a single DLC character, but maybe Nintendo revoked their right to do that after they picked bloody Corrin last time.
Even in Smash 4, I think Nintendo had a small influence. To this day, I still believe they were the ones largely responsible for Bayonetta. Learning that she was decided on as early as the first week after the ballot only strengthened my belief in that theory.
I'm also sure Hero wasn't something Sakurai chose, given how involved SE was and how this was all orginally going to be in the base game. I'm sure Sakurai would've tried adding DQ content sooner or later, but the hard push for people to play DQXIS made this feel like Nintendo and SE teaming up to promote a Switch game.
Nothing more than theories for now, but I feel like both could easily be true.