#HBC | BadWolf
Crusader of Ponies
Mod: Votecount plz
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Everyone should remember we have 5 days left until deadline.@Xiroey: I'm disappointed in you. You said you had a big post incoming, and then lost it. Ok, it's gone, try again. If at all, try at least responding to my #206 in a smaller post then. Try doing it all in Microsoft word and Ctrl + S'ing all the time so that way you back up your post instead of letting it go to waste. YOU ARE HOLDING UP THE THREAD SO PICK YOURSELF UP BUDDY. Come on.
I want the newbies to take note of Xiroey taking a bit longer than usual to get involved here. Don't let others hold up the thread guys! You can't get reads on people who don't get involved. You can respect their play-styles but don't let them sit back while others fight it out, no. I also colored this post so that people don't miss this. I want attention to be put on this. I find it hard to get a read if people aren't interacting as much as usual. If people sit back it's easy for them to get away from the sights of town early on and just become "that lurker" and others might prioritize their strong scumreads over them. Don't LET that happen. Bring them in.
Expatiate.He's still bandwagoning and is guilty to some of the same accusations leveled at me in #305.
In addition he also puts xiroey on null-town. Xiroey had one post. One.
@Ran: I was curious to see if he'd respond to the vote or not. (And how)
He's already had several people voting for him so far, and so far he still hasn't reacted to Turazroks vote for him a few posts back.
Just something to help me come up with some more substancial reads.
You haven't posted anything that would lead me to suspect you so far.
So far each of your posts have contained either helpful advice or legitimate questions, so there's not much on you that would mark you as "scum". (If anything).
That doesn't mean I'm not watching you though...
In detective movies, the culprit usually turns out to be the one person you least expect...
@Rake: I'm not sure if I can name anything specific, since actions can be judged either way based on context and their accomplishments.
I'm looking for something that doesn't add up. Maybe a post that comes off as a town post, but would better benifit mafia in the long run. I haven't found anything substantial yet, but I do have some theories.
Pawn seems pretty defensive in his posts. It's suspicious, but I believe it might also attribute to him being unsure of how to respond, due to his actions being analyzed more closely than others. His original posts were honest and nonchalant. When that started to draw suspicion he became more reactive/defensive.
He seems nervous, but whether it's a case of nervous townie not sure how to respond under pressure, or guilty mafia is unclear. I'd like to make a more solid conclusion about it myself, but right now it's too early to tell.
Gaga originally drew my suspicion because of Ranmaru's post (which I questioned above). If he turned out to be Mafia then that would mean that I'd also have a second suspect (Ranmaru). It wasn't much to go off of, since, like Ran said, private chating with other townies is against the rules. But, if I could maybe get either one of them to slip up and maybe give me some solid evidence, We'd have our second most-likely culprit already found. The chances were small, but it was just too good a chance to pass up.
I'd like to hang back more and read a more responses. Maybe something else will pop up that catches my eye. That way, maybe my first random vote won't be quite so random (A little backing is better than no backing).
That's all I have for now.
By the way, question:
@Mari777: We haven't heard much from you lately. What do you think on the bandwagon on pawn so far? Do you think he's guilty or just nervous?
(Wow, I suddenly feel like a detective)
I didn't say I trust no one, I said no one's above suspicion. There's a world of difference.Where does he get the confidence to put Xiroey at null-town considering he claims to trust no one?
Good thing you cant make unilateral decisions.We're not lynching Rake.
Vacation/Low Activity. If you call V/LA i'll be less strict about prods and I'll give you more leeway with your activity. This doesn't justify not posting at all though, so don't abuse the privilege. This doesn't exempt you from being replaced either, and if you're too inactive you will be force replaced.Definition plox?
V/LA for how long? Or just for today? Just wondering.Xiroey has called V/LA.
It's called confidence, learn to deal.Good thing you cant make unilateral decisions.
I expect a good explanation...you JUST GOT HERE, do you know how suspicious you sound yourself?
You're giving me more of an 'egotistical douchebag' read than scummy, but I'm not sure how long that will last...It's called confidence, learn to deal.
If we have two lynches and one is much better than the other, I'm not going to let the wrong one get pushed through.
Besides, I just got here and I've already generated more content than have the playerlist. Or would you like to suggest that any of this somehow makes me scum?
What exactly makes me sounds suspicious?
You're giving me more of an 'egotistical douchebag' read than scummy, but I'm not sure how long that will last...
Fairly typical, but usually more affectionate. I'm a bull-headed pain in the ass.You're giving me more of an 'egotistical douchebag' read than scummy, but I'm not sure how long that will last...
Moreso seeing if you'd back down...heh.It's called confidence, learn to deal.
If we have two lynches and one is much better than the other, I'm not going to let the wrong one get pushed through.
Besides, I just got here and I've already generated more content than have the playerlist. Or would you like to suggest that any of this somehow makes me scum?
What exactly makes me sounds suspicious?
Is my question to pawn my #192? If so:No. I need some more comments from the newbies, and I want to finish this spar with Rake first. I also want you to explain your thoughts on Pawn's explanation for the question you gave him as well.
I am completely fine with this answer. What pawn says here is completely legitimate: Turaz was just trying to diffuse Rake's points without providing any proof. It's exactly like pawn says, and it is a good point too. pawn came up with it on his own and I agree.He tries to defuse [Rake's] points without providing any proof. He just says [Rake's] faking.
Here is my stuff against Turaz:Also, maybe you could try looking at if Turok responded to your most recent reasoning. Did he do so?
In response we get this:Turazrok - sheeped Ran to justify voting pawn, but he ended up making up reasoning that didn't even apply to pawn which proved Turaz was just looking to join the wagon and his heart wasn't in it. He has been failing to respond to my points against him or the questions I have asked him recently, and his content since pressure has been on him has degraded to non-serious posts. This is an example of a poor reaction to pressure which is just making his badly justified jump onto pawn all the worse.
He says he's not sure but he thinks he answered a few of my questions. Says he'll go back to check. He never follows up on this.Rake is training me because he's either fake reading scum/ I'm bad at arguing/ he's dumb.
His appraisal of me as scum seems circumstantial at best and he's reading way too deeply into silly **** I post at 4 in the morning. I don't think he's scum, he's just going too ham on too little.
Also not a hundred percent sure but I thought I answered a few of banana man's questions :/ will go back and check
Again the only evidence against me is that I was fixated on GaGa starting the wagon instead of the people jumping onto it, and the fact that you claim I don't provide evidence for most of my points, which while perhaps a poor way to argue, not damning in and of itself. Conversely Pwn is ironically jumping on the train against me by pointing out a post it seems like he didn't even read :/
These are Turaz's responses to the pressure on him. See, what I don't like about it is that rather than explaining things to make his actions more understandable, he just tries to say that others are blowing them out of proportion. He waters down the things he has done and then says "look it's not that damning." Never do we get a good explanation for anything. I don't consider this "addressing my points" sufficiently. He's also a bit defensive towards pawn and Rake, though he doesn't specifically address me at any point. I believe this is because I lay out my points without an angle he can really see to pick them apart from. For example, he focuses on the lurking section of pawn's problems with him and then redirects the issue onto Badwolf. He doesn't own up, but he also doesn't deny anything, nor does he explain himself. Instead, he just finds another player who has been "lurking" and tries to shift our attention to them.I have said why before, generally I get reprimanded for it. And since when is lurking scummy? I mean if lurking was scummy at that point then why isn't anyone taking jabs at Badwolf? Who has said literally nothing of import.
And aren't you just agreeing with Ran and Rake?
Rake's point on me being essentially, that I'm bad at arguing and therefore scum
Not very convincing tbh.
I agree with it, yeah. While I liked Xiroey's post from the standpoint where it helped me read him, following your advice will help him read other people. No problems with what you had to say there.Btw, do you agree with my #206? Let me know what you think of it and if you have anything to add.
Mod request vote count and prod on Mari777
Not necessarily. But it does let me know he's not willing to waste a lynch, and he's confident enough to stand up for it.@GaGa: Do you think it was townie of Raz to not back down?
Mhm. Just me being curious as I've said about a dozen times now.Ok ok, let me clear up one thing then. Was you asking "Kantrip, why are you being nice to me?" NOT alignment related, then? Just a question with no reason for finding scum at all? Just wondering.
Mkay fair enough wrt purpose.I think it's possible you would as scum. I don't know for sure you would have done that, which is why I'm asking you why you asked him. I'm trying to understand your purpose.
No, now it's there mainly due to some of the issue I already questioned Badwulf about, and partially because his responses to me don't make me comfortable letting go of him just yet.Yet he has been in thread and has even given some reasoning and voted you. Is your vote still 'trying to garner' a reaction from Badwolf? In fact, what is your opinion of his recent actions? If you can form a read on him, why keep a vote on him (if you don't find anything upon a re-read) and I'm looking forward to you re-reading and finding a direction. Also, have you ever voted like this before as town and just left the vote on to pressure someone? Wondering why you are starting now. If you already have a read and enough content from Badwolf to form an opinion, why not just put your vote on someone else to pressure them as well? Just wondering.
Ah okay, see as I've said, I didn't see upon Badwulf's return any reason to remove it, my initial objective completed , I could have moved it, but I chose not to after reading Badwulf's wall. I felt and still feel pretty justified in my push against him. Also, you misunderstood the second part of that question, I wasn't asking you whether me leaving my vote on him for an extended period was telling in terms of how i acted in previous games, as you well know I can change my meta from game to game so asking such would be pointless and just why lol, I meant in the sense of : With your scum read on me, why is me leaving my vote on him telling, being that I think by that point I had already told you why it was still there(maybe I am wrong in this, you can correct me if I am). Which you just explained as fitting into your "not doing much" theory.Also saying:
Has no good purpose because I didn't say that leaving it on Badwolf for a long time = scum, it fits into your whole play of not doing much in my eyes. Maybe it would be a good question if I said "You are scum for leaving your vote on Badwolf for so long". Yet me asking you if you have done this before and why you have started this if you haven't, is to find out if you really believe what you are doing is doing something, while I think it's you trying to just argue it away.
Ah ok, i thought you meant there was a magic number or something and I'm thinking : ah nope there ain't none of that.I say 'regular' meaning whatever amount really, as there isn't a bar. I just mean enough to show that you see something questionable and just question. For example, you never really gave a list of reads until I pressured you. Why didn't you release one before? Did you contribute anything worth reading you before I attacked you?
Fair, I guess I could have done more earlier on and been more forward or vocal, but there's nothing I can really do about that at this point except get my thoughts and pushes out now and defend against a storm arguably of my own making.I think you forget something. We all have to read you. I get you don't want to be the thing that shakes up everything, doing everything for the newbies. I understand. Yet you still have to do enough so I can get a gauge on you.
Yeah sorry about that, I actually did put spaces in their, smashboards just smucked it all together for no discernable reasonDANG IT RAKE WITH THIS ALMOST UNREADABLE PARAGRAPH LOL.
Alright, I just wanted to get the point across though. Admittedly it's a lot of the same question but I feel fro mmyPOV they each hold merit as things i have a right to question about.Ok yes I know I as the prosecutor bring the burden of proof. Yet it's odd when you phrase a question like this "Is it disgusting that _____" and you ask multiple varieties of the same question it's like yo. You are giving too many 'is it possible that ____" kind of questions. Just asking "Why exactly were those questions disgusting?" would suffice, not just go into the next few questions. I feel those were really unneeded and you have given alot of unneeded questions. Sure you and I are known to give alot but this is ALOT for no reason lol.
Now let me get to the point. The quote I gave felt disgusting to me because you seemed to be trying to say I was afraid of saying you were scum as if trying to give all these 'discontent' reasons about your play without really finding you scummy. (When I did say some of the things you did were suspicious, so why would I say that and try not to call you scum in the same post??? ) Does it still seem like I'm trying to say you are scum without saying it? Also, why did you think I would just do all that and be afraid to call you scum?
Yes I say I'm not happy about your play but I'm not saying you have to play up to me but you also have to let others READ you. You say that I'm only reading your early play, so I will ask you this: What parts of your play that you think people should know about, did I miss? Which posts show something readable that I didn't notice? Did this happen after or before I started accusing you of hiding behind your IC role?
Fair enough. I think I reined meself in nicely.Ok, that's the last wall i'm going to exchange with you, Rake. I don't want to flood the game with a ton of walls giving the newbies a hard time in reading and possibly giving disinterest. I'm going to let you have the last word and I want you to explain my questions in that final posts and don't want you to ask more questions which means I would have to reply (It is me accusing you so I want you to EXPLAIN yourself, not ask me a bunch of questions trying to find out why I'm asking them lol). If you really have a question or two just ask in a concise post because I don't want this to continue because I want some opinions from the newbies and others. If we do continue we'll only just distract ourselves from reading others. After we rein in the newbies and such we'll see how it goes. I think I got to the point of my concerns with this recent wall.
Agree?
1: You mentioned that you were playing somewhat 'passive' for whatever reason. Before you were called out on it your reads were minimal.
2: Before being called out on it, your input was centralized around pressuring other players after they were already being read.
3: After being called out on certain things...your game play changed. Of course you had to post more to defend yourself (which may or may not be justified), but you also started pressuring players on your own.
V V V V
If you have nothing to fear as town, why did your game play change so substantially?
If you're innocent, why do you have to go into such great depths to explain your innocent(i.e. your wall of questions defending your position against Ran, previous responses that delve deeper than simply answering the question posed)? Shouldn't it be as simple as A, B, C?
I was meta reading you too hard early so I stepped it down , re-asserted and decided to move you to null town.Going to class.
Rake, in your next post please include how I changed from Town to null-town.