Vinyl was trolling because he didn't know how to emulate town scumhunting. When he is town he would naturally be asking people questions and being obvtown. I don't see how your point of how he'd play RVS along with a scummate would make sense. Loli (your predecessor) never posted so there would be no cohesion there anyways. Also keep in mind after his 'troll' votes he also voted your slot.
I'm stating that Vinyl. and Monstr. are likely not scum mates together and was forming reads along with a base town read on Tyr. to try to work out who the remaining mafia were before you and your chuckle buddy Ragnarok decided to push for an end to the day when we had an extra twenty four hours for me to entertain a q&a with you two. An instance that seems to have negligible value to both of you.
Your justification that Vinyl. trolling is indicative of a scum tell is an incredible reach. I don't really follow see any justification for why someone would act like an idiot during RVS as either alignment. However that also holds true that I don't see why trolling would be interpreted intrinsically as being town or scum without looking at context, something that your response is missing in every sense of the word.
This is not to say that it is interesting that you ignore me bringing up Monstr. as also taking on some form of trolling as he self-admits during RVS. An instance that is glossed over since what, Vinyl.'s trolling led to someone being held at L-1? Boo hoo, hoo. Not to mention I fail to see the point in you bringing up my slot being voted by a troll vote. How does this bear any significance, at all. Unless this is some pathetic attempt for you to lead a Vinyl. scum flip connection case against me which would be incredibly bunk.
There is a huge distinction between pro-town play which you mentioned which consists of asking incredibly mundane and trivial questions and actually town telling or given indications of town, tells which come about through non-intentional play.
I don't care how many questions or cases are asked or made in a given game. What is far more important is relative importance that these actions have for the player in question. For instance, I ignored most of the garbage you threw at me when I replaced in and you didn't care about following up since the questions I presume had relatively zero value to you. Something incredibly indicative in J's play in FF IX mafia and Kantrip's play in Link mafia.
I still need to go over both your justification for lynching either STEM or Vinyl. However if my conjecture is not incorrect, they are being targeted because their current reads don't match up with their old reads. Something that seems indicative of insincere argument analysis or rather the presumption that mafia are less dedicated to the process of scumhunting and therefore fabricate their reads, therefore not having actual rationale behind these reads resulting in them slipping.
This criteria combined with your use of questioning unsettles me, primarily because spray questioning is used as a tactic by mafia to give off a false sense of appearance that they are actually interested in the game through filler, but to people who are semi-decent they have the dual purpose of being "sprayed" to trap less than careful townies into generating discrepancies in their q&a giving them false justification to lynch someone based on discrepancy in and of itself without bothering to see whether the person's intent could have either town or scum motivations.
Vote: Ranmaru