Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Show me evidence. I have in no way disregarded his mistakes as newbie ones, merely suggested the possibility, and if I did so, I wouldn't have written anything off.
Here you go.
--
Honestly, out of the two other games I've played so far, I've been following this one a lot better/more closely.
missed this post somehowAA i believe leaving crumbs was a decent attempt. Maybe not the best move, but it was something i wanted to get out there slightly.
I like your case on MM because he is playing way to passive and that is something i don't like.
And I can agree about not trusting the ICs. To me Gheb and S2 are the most borderline people in this game imo.
If Ori flips town, what would happen? I was never necessarily wrong for trying to make sure he was gone, but I was rather playing the hand I was dealt. And in this case, my hand played against his.
I was never nervous about voting Ori, nor was I trying to write Ori off for his wording. Rather, it was something that caught my attention.
People to look out for? Hrm thats interesting.
![Terywj [태리]](/data/avatars/l/71/71007.jpg?1555906021){kind=avatar}
I was referring to people you would look into.
I implore you to reconsider those words.
The first quote was made 11/11 @ 2AM. The second quote was made 11/12 @ 3PM. We were well past RVS a whole two days ago.
Whoa. Major contradiction. That, or I'm just confused by your actions, Sokr.
I really thought you were talking about when you first asked me if I had any reads on Ori or something, my apologies.
Didn't even know/remmber that he had voted for Serin as RVS, and therefore does an unvote and vote on Ori. From here, his votes are...weird...
I'd like to know what you mean by borderline and why we're the most borderline.
Nah it's not noteworthy. Scum is either already Betty Crocker products that seem town, or they have confirmed Betty Crocker products not in the game already for them to safely claim.
My bad. I'm alright with Ori being the play toDay. His lynch brings up a ton of information, and removes a huge question mark. I do think he's scum. I admittedly don't want to think he's scum but I can't deny the logic. So for all purposes, yes I do think he's scum.
How quickly and willing he was to step out of comfort zone and seperate himself from the crowd. Scum likes to blend in. But you also can say he did this because it's part of his playstyle/personality. I think he'd do that regardless of alignment.
Like for a split second when he said this I was like "damn maybe I'm entirely wrong here." It's kind of important to not listen to emotion during mafia.
I'd like Gheb to chime in before we lynch. Other than that the only real conversations to pursue are AA vs. Marathon and Ori responding more.
and its definitely something I'm going to work on in future games.) I haven't liked how you've played the game thus far and your inconsistency is really a nail in the coffin.
Do you plan on using that in here too?
So right after I make a comprehensive, rather thorough case you vaguely collect some points that have either been directly brought up already or were redundant at that time because a better case already existed - yeah, if you think that's how you play mafia I feel the need to "do nothing but throw advice at you".
You just answered your own question - you make cases but conclude that they aren't worth pushing. Instead you add weak points to an already existing case for unclear reasons. Are we to assume that you're trying to achieve more than jjust to have an excuse as to why you joined the Ori wagon so conveniently? The ironic part about all this is that your points against Marathonman probably have enough merit to be worth going deeper into, which also would've gone along much better with what I've mentioned in my opening post: pursuing one's own ideas and not playing on somebody else's code. I maintain that you're doing the opposite of what you should be doing.
How is this all attributed to me though? I can't choose for myself how much influence I have over the other players, I just do what I can do that I believe to be best for the town to win this game - if newbie players are easily impressed by this [going against the advice I myself posted right at the beginning of this game] why do you feel that I am still the one that needs to be scrutinized the most out of the people that are suspicious of you? I have been the clearest about why I want you lynched, I have put my thoughts out there on the line the most out of all the people who vote you and therefore I am risking the most by pushing for your lynch. You migh find it biased or even self-righteous of me to say this but shouldn't you be much more concerned with the people that remain shady and vague about why you should be lynched and just follow along than with the guy who's been so outspoken and open about it? It's not easy for me to influence people without taking chances but it's very easy for a newbie mafioso to pretend to be influenced by my words.
This is terrible. We still have 2 days left and the way you set it up you literally remove all of town's chances to lynch somebody else if deemed necessary. What purpose is this supposed to serve? Especially aussie's "I'll get him back to L-1 anyway" is really stupid and shows that getting somebody's [anybody's?] lynch through means more to him than finding the most beneficial solution for town toDay [which, after all I read, should be lynching Marathonman to him].
