Steam
Smash Hero
super smash bros again.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Yeah, Plusle and Minun is definitely my biggest reach.I'd really hope they'd put in K.rool if there's any DK rep... but that's just me.
@gamingboy- Lucario is more than just a fad but I can definitely see him being left out for zoroark. plusle and minun though is a bit iffy. however they are very very unique characters. and would be interesting.
I don't think Nintendo's ever stated why. They just said that they wouldn't be appearing.wait.. can someone remind me already why K.Rool and the Kremlings were not on DKCR? Licensing problems?
I agree... as unique as they'd be lucario or even mewtwo would be more likely to see a return. as GREAT of an idea as plusle and minun are. but if they pay enough homage to pokemon it's possible... maybe as a pokeball pokemon even.Yeah, Plusle and Minun is definitely my biggest reach.
I think it was because they wanted to try something different, although there are the conspiracy theories that the folks over in Japan are still pissed off by how much attention the original DKCs got during the later days of the SNES.wait.. can someone remind me already why K.Rool and the Kremlings were not on DKCR? Licensing problems?
If it's Unlimited, I demand a BlazBlue cameo. (kidding)Unleashed and Unlimited come to mind.
lukaka :33If it's Unlimited, I demand a BlazBlue cameo. (kidding)
When Nintendo and Retro sat down during DKCR's planning, Miyamoto gave Retro his recommendations for character inclusions. He never said to cut any characters, but he said to be sure to include Cranky, if I remember correctly. Retro made the call to cut everything else from the series, sans the three Kongs, Rambi and Squawks. Nintendo owns K. Rool and the Kremlings, hence their appearance in that one Mario Baseball title.wait.. can someone remind me already why K.Rool and the Kremlings were not on DKCR? Licensing problems?
Yes, but since he has never appeared on any other consoles, I consider him more likely than, say, Rayman or Bomberman. And obviously his connection to Nintendo is enough where Nintendo has held release parties for him at Nintendo World stores, so I figured he is a pretty good bet to at least be considered.Layton is in fact a 3rd party character. http://iwataasks.nintendo.com/creators.html
Kaka clan kitten assist trophy. Do it, Nintendo, you know you want to.lukaka :33
I hope you don't mean as a pair with Diddy. That'd be far from unique at this point.I dunno why but it would seem unique/interesting if they added Dixie Kong in there.
Oh wow. I was just about to suggest Plusle and Minun but then I saw this. It just sort of dawned on me that Plusle and Minun can have some sort of Ice Climbers-esque play style. I think it'd be really cool.I'd really hope they'd put in K.rool if there's any DK rep... but that's just me.
@gamingboy- Lucario is more than just a fad but I can definitely see him being left out for zoroark. plusle and minun though is a bit iffy. however they are very very unique characters. and would be interesting.
True. He is a Nintendo exclusive 3rd party character but still one none the less which means negotiations and such. I myself think he is likely though due to the reason you stated.Yes, but since he has never appeared on any other consoles, I consider him more likely than, say, Rayman or Bomberman. And obviously his connection to Nintendo is enough where Nintendo has held release parties for him at Nintendo World stores, so I figured he is a pretty good bet.
Professor Layton is nowhere near as likely as Mega Man. Not nearly as popular, wanted, and his best chance is a 3DS exclusive. He is one of the more likely fourth third-party characters, but I would put Ryu Hayabusa. Travis Touchdown, and Slime above him.True. He is a Nintendo exclusive 3rd party character but still one none the less which means negotiations and such. I myself think he is likely though due to the reason you stated.
As a character of her own and not together like Minus and Plusle.I hope you don't mean as a pair with Diddy. That'd be far from unique at this point.
Yeah I was going to note that. If there are exclusive characters to each version it would increase his chances for the 3DS one if it had to do with handheld appearances.Professor Layton is nowhere near as likely as Mega Man. Not nearly as popular, wanted, and his best chance is a 3DS exclusive.
I think Retro Studios wanted to respect the work that Rare did for Nintendo. Therefore, the company wanted to be original with its work, despite the fact that Nintendo has the rights to ALL the Donkey Kong characters.wait.. can someone remind me already why K.Rool and the Kremlings were not on DKCR? Licensing problems?
Not as likely as Mega Man, but likelier then, say, my "want but know we probably won't have" suggestions of Pac-Man, Bomberman, etc.Professor Layton is nowhere near as likely as Mega Man. Not nearly as popular, wanted, and his best chance is a 3DS exclusive.
AND Samus and Zamus.As a character of her own and not together like Minus and Plusle.
Problem being is that I very much doubt that we'll be seeing third-party characters on the 3DS version. Granted, it makes him more possible, but I can't really imagine third-party characters on the 3DS version.Yeah I was going to note that. If there are exclusive characters to each version it would increase his chances for the 3DS one if it had to do with handheld appearances.
Nope. The only reason they were not included is because Nintendo didn't want them to be in the game. Some people will contest me, but I guarantee they are bitter because the Kremlings were designed by an English company. Although Retro is American, Nintendo thought up the idea for Tikis.wait.. can someone remind me already why K.Rool and the Kremlings were not on DKCR? Licensing problems?
I think we might see one on the 3DS. Maybe. :3 You never know.Problem being is that I very much doubt that we'll be seeing third-party characters on the 3DS version. Granted, it makes him more possible, but I can't really imagine third-party characters on the 3DS version.
Yes, this is a must have. Lankey Kong will be overpowered and have screwed up hitboxes :DSomebody from the DK series that I think would be really fun is this guy:
*lankey*
lanky kong would possibly be the most humiliating character to lose to other than yoshi
Losing to Samus in a 3+ player stamina match was ALSO really humiliating.I dunno, losing to Pichu was pretty humiliating back in the day.
Losing to Mewtwo would also be humiliating. In Brawl's cases, Ganondorf.I dunno, losing to Pichu was pretty humiliating back in the day.
God help us when they actually release real hard details, or even a trailer! (Earliest chance for a trailer is probably next year's E3, I'd imagine, although it would probably be more of a teaser than an actual trailer)Losing to Mewtwo would also be humiliating. In Brawl's cases, Ganondorf.
I feel as this is an glorified chat thread with the incredible speed this thread is pacing at. Never really expected it to go this fast so quick and the fact being is that the speed will only get higher and higher.
I'm sure this thread'll die down a bit as time goes by. After all, we only have so much to talk about when development hasn't even started. New boards and new threads will eventually be designated once actual content and info are available.I feel as this is an glorified chat thread with the incredible speed this thread is pacing at. Never really expected it to go this fast so quick and the fact being is that the speed will only get higher and higher.
^^^^^SWF will crash again after the trailer most likely due to so many people joining the server at once LOL
Then when it comes back up will we have 10 year olds throwing around ideas, and just posting stuff like "DUDE THAT WAS SO AWESOME" and like.