OmegaXXII
Fire Emblem Lord/ Trophy Hunter
Yea well it will only get worse once more traffic come in, I'm especially looking for more trolls BK supporters though.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
In the IGN SSB4 Ideas thread, it was filled with mostly roster topic and not really in-depth discussion. Ever since I've came to this forum, I've learned a lot about other characters and got better at SSB4 debates.Agreed, unlike most SSB4 treads on the web, we seem to have nice healthy debates with genuine ideas and support. Although we do often get off topic, not that that's bad. lol
Trust me when I say that being a Mew-like Pokemon is not enough to keep Victini out. It's pretty much the only thing hurting it anyway as Victini has a lot more going for it then against it.Skater Trainer said:Pokemon wise, I think depending if it gets released in the time span, I see Victini being something like mew, while pokemon like genosect or zoroark will fill in the mewtwo/lucario spot, if they choose to replace instead of add on. Maybe even melodia. Victini wouldn't be playable imo.
I agree with you there, seeing as Victini has pretty much gotten exposure due to his movie, I believe it will impact Sakurai on his decision to include Victini based on how well received and popular he gets, not to mention he would most likely replace Zoroark as a possible candidate thus the possibility of Lucario and/or Mewtwo would increase their chances considerably.Trust me when I say that being a Mew-like Pokemon is not enough to keep Victini out. It's pretty much the only thing hurting it anyway as he has a lot more going for it then against it.
"Characters" is way too ambiguous. Is it pertaining to Pokémon exclusively? Or are you reffering to any character? If the latter it really conflicts with the theme of that paragraph. Not to mention the point would be highly debatable. If, granted, that is what you were inferring?
...Whenever Deoxys and Blaziken fans like to admit it or not, Lucario got in because he was among the most popular 4th gen Pokemon at the time. Not only that, he was relevant before Diamond & Pearl got released, with his movie Lucario and the Mystery of Mew coming out on July 16, 2005, meaning that he had enough time to gain popularity to become playable in SSBB. More relevant then Deoxys and more relevant then Blaziken. This is a clear indication that relevancy is important to a character's inclusion.
Although we obviously haven't seen much of his fighting ability yet since Skyward Sword isn't out, his E3 fight showed an interesting concept.Ghirahim has my support.
It might get really chaotic in the site.Just read the essay, great work SSBF.
At this point the only thing I need to see is some more Victini support and popularity in the Pokemon community, otherwise I'm still pretty neutral on his inclusion. That and, I want both Mewtwo and Lucario back. lol
Maybe try posting the essay Pokemon sites like Serebii? You've convinced most everyone here on Smashboards, why not go after support on other sites.
I'm going to make one more revision on him before I go. This time I won't show it off here, as like you said, most everyone here has been convinced.Just read the essay, great work SSBF.
At this point the only thing I need to see is some more Victini support and popularity in the Pokemon community, otherwise I'm still pretty neutral on his inclusion. That and, I want both Mewtwo and Lucario back. lol
Maybe try posting the essay Pokemon sites like Serebii? You've convinced most everyone here on Smashboards, why not go after support on other sites.
I am specifically mentioning Pokemon characters in this case. This applies to all characters but I am stressing that relevancy plays an important role in Pokemon as well, disregarding that is silly.Nice essay, only have one issue with the essay and that is this paragraph:
"Characters" is way too ambiguous. Is it pertaining to Pokémon exclusively? Or are you reffering to any character? If the latter it really conflicts with the theme of that paragraph. Not to mention the point would be highly debatable. If, granted, that is what you were inferring?
I think re-sizing him will be easy to do. Just put him as slightly taller then Kirby. Done.SSBCandidates said:Victini looks good, but legendaries like him and Mew might be hard to make playable, unless perhaps if we re-size them.
Zoroark may have some kind of gimmick revolving around his Illusion ability (Like the Shang Tsung of Smash or something), but otherwise I don't think he would set himself apart from Wolf all that much. Normals are what make up the moveset, after all.That is what needs to be addressed regarding chance. Its important to address the 'criteria' in its minute distinctions and as a whole.
Spam moreInb4itsover9000!
It might.How So? In Serebii?
Perhaps...
First where is the link again? I think I may sign.I got this, man I hope we get some signature petions soon, I'll be happy to support ANY character that helps me support Zelgius, no matter how ridiculous it is lol..
"WHERE IZ MEGA MAN?"Off - topic: How are the character discussions in MvC like?
In that case, better be ready to join all the (low, possibly one-person) demands and hype for...I got this, man I hope we get some signature petions soon, I'll be happy to support ANY character that helps me support Zelgius, no matter how ridiculous it is lol..