The problem you have Diddy Kong is you have no argument. You have no ground to stand on. You have yet to bring an argument for Impa and your only justification for her is Sheik's spot. Let me say this, as far as people asking for characters, no one is asking for Impa. Yet you want to have her take the spot of a very well liked character. Post Brawl should show you that most people want the old guys in as well.
The only character he had no intention of adding was Pichu. Any argument you make about the Brawl cuts is irrelevant becuase of this.
So far, no character has replaced another one. Lucas never replaced Ness. Mewtwo and Roy were to be side by side by Ike and Lucario and it will likely happen in the next game. On that note, people were in outcry when these characters were cut. You'd think they'd like Impa replacing Sheik.
Your argument is based on a thing that never happened.
Why does Impa have to replace Sheik. If Impa is so important, why not have Sheik AND Impa. Was does one have to replace the other. I mean, Impa is important enough to warrant her own character right.
The rest of the post does nothing for your argument. You don't even know what your point is anymore.
Most of what you said was background story about Impa, not what she did. You were even wrong as
I say Ghirahim is far more impotaint because he is an antagonist. He is the main villian until towards the end and you fight him three times in the course of the game. He is what is moving the story. The struggle between you and him. Impa offers nothing besides
Now, I'm not saying Ghirahim should be in. I'm making the point that she is not that important. She is very much a side character and not the main one. Zelda, Link and Ghirahim are, which is why they have appeared more in trailers and promotional material. We didn't know Impa existed until near launch.
....and Sheik was just in OoT 3D
She's a Smash Brothers veteran. That's all you need. Your arguments are "She hasn't been in a game for a while," and neither has half the cast (Pit ring a bell).
Difference is you either have no point, or it's just bad.
Are you Psychic or something. Sakurai hasn't said anything about this doubt of Sheik nor could you infer it. Your making stuff up now.
So he's lazy now because he brought back an older character (one people liked) Your arguments get worse and worse.
Except he obviously caes about "Smash importance" because HE BROUGHT NESS BACK.
Young Link was planned and added as seen here. He brought Jigglypuff back, a character who's inclusion was always questionable. I do think he cares about old characters. So again, you have no argument.
OK, let's go back to your argument because you don't even get it any more. Your saying that Impa will replace Sheik, as in Sheik bye bye Impa in. If Dr. Mario was in the data, that means he was planned to come back. In other words, Dr. Mario was no bye bye. He was in. But time made him not be in. Someone is replaced when someone else takes their spot. If the plan was to have both, that means they ae not replaced.
The only character he had no intention of adding was Pichu. Any argument you make about the Brawl cuts is irrelevant becuase of this.
So far, no character has replaced another one. Lucas never replaced Ness. Mewtwo and Roy were to be side by side by Ike and Lucario and it will likely happen in the next game. On that note, people were in outcry when these characters were cut. You'd think they'd like Impa replacing Sheik.
Your argument is based on a thing that never happened.
Let me say it again because you don't get it.
Why does Impa have to replace Sheik. If Impa is so important, why not have Sheik AND Impa. Was does one have to replace the other. I mean, Impa is important enough to warrant her own character right.
No one said Wario. That never happened. You are making stuff up.
The rest of the post does nothing for your argument. You don't even know what your point is anymore.
The bold is why your argument stinks. if your a background character, you are unimportant. This is like saying the stage hand in the play is the lead character.
Most of what you said was background story about Impa, not what she did. You were even wrong as
Impa only helps Zelda in the second and third temple. Even when protecting Zelda, she fails and you come in and save both of them. You are saving them from a chaaracter who has appeared three times before and fought you once. You do not see Impa again until 3 dungeons later.
being old. In fact, if you want Impa, you'd get the old version because that character did something though most of the game. The Impa you want sat in the past for at least a third of it. In that time, you still see Ghirahim.
Ness hasn't been important for years. Pit has been dead for over 20 years.
....and Sheik was just in OoT 3D
You cling to very piss poor arguments. I'm saying a lot of this as someone who was around during Brawl and saw everyone do the same thing and be wrong. Your argument is trying to stretch Impa's limited importance (even having wrong facts) and trying to say Sheik isn't important when she was just in a game and they are still making figurines for her (and none for Impa, funny huh). Yet, as you say she is SOOOO important, you ignore Ghirahim who was actually moving the story forward and did something. All the while, you argue about how she isn't relevant, making up stuff about Wario and pre Brawl and say Lucas replaces Ness which never happens. All the while you ignore the fact that if Impa was important and could be in the game on her own merit, she wouldn't have to replace Sheik (here's a hint. Seeing as she has to replace Sheik, it means she's not important or a good character and has to be tied to another character who already has and will keep that slot.)
