Oasis_S
Smash Legend
*kicks dust* Why wasn't Etemon in Mario Kart GP instead. He could throw poo instead of bombs.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I read what you said. It didn't say anything about previous installments. So I gave you an example.Read what I said again. It doesn't apply because he was not in a previous game. I only refer to character that would've been in Smash 64, but scrapped for Melee, but would have been put into Brawl instead. It would have to be like that.
Your examples only fit the four characters I mentioned. Roy, Mewtwo, and Dr. Mario do not fit this, as they were still in Melee. They aren't new scrapped characters. Those I expect in SSB4, not scrapped returners.
I believe beyond a reasonable doubt both will return. Eliminating them eliminates fanbases, which is bad for Nintendo (and either Konami or SEGA), especially given the international recession. Smash is free money for everyone with these characters; so adding them makes economical sense for everyone. EVERYONE WINS!Technically MvC could fall into that catagory, but anyway, good points, you've given some more hope about Snake and Sonic returning. Although, like anybody I still have my doubts.
Those examples were not what I meant, so it doesn't matter.I read what you said. It didn't say anything about previous installments. So I gave you an example.
There's no difference. Both were planned, both were scrapped. The only difference is that Mewtwo and Roy were in Melee. Mewtwo was also nearly finished, as I recall. It's called TIME RESTRAINTS AND DEADLINES. Not replacing a near-finished character with something else.
![]()
Actually, I think everyone missed the easter egg on PKMN MD 1. Alakazam mentions Lucario as the greatest explorer ever, and Lucario is a rank, I believe, on there. Therefore, his creation was in that time period (Which might of been in 2005, but all I'm saying is the mention of him started on MD1).Lucario had his movie in July 2005.
That was released November, 2005 in Japan, after Lucario's movie.asage94 said:Actually, I think everyone missed the easter egg on PKMN MD 1. Alakazam mentions Lucario as the greatest explorer ever, and Lucario is a rank, I believe, on there. Therefore, his creation was in that time period (Which might of been in 2005, but all I'm saying is the mention of him started on MD1).
Really? Huh, I thought it was b4 that... no, I'm sure Lucario was mentioned before that. I know because no one knew who Lucario was at the time of his name announcement. He was an easter egg on some game... I'll go find out here.That was released November, 2005 in Japan, after Lucario's movie.
Yes pleaseBut in all seriousness, who feels that characters should get themes like in Marvel vs. Capcom?
I'm not gonna stop using words just because you forum dwellers get all pissy when a word isn't used the right wayAs for being "iconic", KumaOso is right in that it should be rarely used when it comes to video game characters. Also, being well-known won't matter much if he has more people against them then supporters (which is the case for every third-party character not named Mega Man and I don't see it changing for Tails).
Diddy Kong is the bigggest supporter of Chrome in this thread. Despite Chrome having nothing that distinguishes him from other lords, He likes him merely on the grounds of being "most recent". There is also the matter how many Smash Bros. and Fire Emblem fans have already sounded off that the idea of Fire Emblem having three blue-haired swordmen (two of which are muscle heads) is redundant.Well, who'd be the 3rd slot then since you don't think it'll be Roy? Please don't say Chrome...
Now wait just a minute.So replacing Ike with Chrome, and have the most recent (by then) hero be the Roy-like promotion we'd still have 3 characters.
I mean, even putting aside the fact being new doesn't guarantee a spot on the roster for Chrome by any means, we barely know anything about him aside from a few things. I mean, couldn't we at least wait until we know his background and what his special moves might be before deciding that he's even a serious contender at this point? Hell, we don't even know if we want this guy just showing up in Smash without an invite or if he's even the slightest bit interesting.Diddy Kong is the bigggest supporter of Chrome in this thread. Despite Chrome having nothing that distinguishes him from other lords, He likes him merely on the grounds of being "most recent". There is also the matter how many Smash Bros. and Fire Emblem fans have already sounded off that the idea of Fire Emblem having three blue-haired swordmen (two of which are muscle heads) is redundant.
Yep. I keep saying that we should wait until his game before make an assessment regarding Chrome.I mean, even putting aside the fact being new doesn't guarantee a spot on the roster Chrome by any means, we barely know anything about him aside from a few things. I mean, couldn't we at least wait until we know his background and what his special moves might be before deciding that he's even a serious contender at this point?
Lawl, readed it, and guess what? I found it heartwarming!KIND OF QUIET.
SO.
HORSETAIL.
How about some pairings talk. Did you see my response to your Falcon x Samus suggestion.