OmegaXXII
Fire Emblem Lord/ Trophy Hunter
Victini fellas, but Zoroark is just as likely as well, neck to neck.
![Phone :phone: :phone:](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/phone.png)
![Phone :phone: :phone:](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/phone.png)
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Yeah, IIRC, SSBF said that it was getting a limited release in theaters and his latest one is going to be about him and Zekrom.What? When did you here this
When was that? I don't remember a Victini movie that came before the Zoroark movie, considering the Zoroark movie was during 4th Gen. I also don't think it's had one yet. I know one's coming out soon, but I don't think Victini has had a movie yet...Victini had a movie before and is getting another one.
What no you don't understand, both of the movies are exactly the same they both came out on the same day in Japan the only difference is in one movie Ash bonds with Zekrom and the other Ash bonds with Reshiram.Yeah, IIRC, SSBF said that it was getting a limited release in theaters and his latest one is going to be about him and Zekrom.
"Deserving" is subjective. However, I don't think I need to argue that Ridley is a better choice over Dark Samus. He has the fanbase. He's the major villain of the series. He's one of the last big names left. He outclasses her. He is more deserving. It's subjective yes. But as long as you back it up with reasoning, it can still stand 100% true.No offense to you bro but this argument really is overrated and should stop being used...
"More deserving" is subjective. Anyone could think a character is more "deserving" than another. I could easily make up some random criteria (a.k.a BS) and use that in vain to show how some character is "more deserving" than the other. And it would still only be my opinion.
And you could argue any character is "deserving" as long as they're an actual VG character and have at least somewhat of a prominent role in their own series.
Can I just say, I'm beginign to fall off the left winged Victini and the right winged Zoroark band wagons?Zoroark and Victini, they are neck in neck also. But I do think Victini has/will have the lead soon due to the attention it'll be getting.
Ah, I see, sorry my bad...What no you don't understand, both of the movies are exactly the same they both came out on the same day in Japan the only difference is in one movie Ash bonds with Zekrom and the other Ash bonds with Reshiram.
See?
http://serebii.net/movies/victini/
IMO, I don't really think Saki is as close to the others as you say he is. He only had one game on the ol' N64. Issac, Little Mac, and Starfy have had more recent games. Unless SSBB breaks that boundary(which I don't think it will because all 4 were in Brawl), Saki is lower on the priority list than the other 3.Starfy is pretty much neck in neck with Little Mac, Issac and Saki. It's pretty close so far, but it does seem that he is in last place compared to them, although not by much (2-5% off).
Zoroark and Victini, they are neck in neck also. But I do think Victini has/will have the lead soon due to the attention it'll be getting.
Also I started my own game review blog. Feel free to check it out, my first review is FE Gaiden.
You have a point there, you definitely do."Deserving" is subjective. However, I don't think I need to argue that Ridley is a better choice over Dark Samus. He has the fanbase. He's the major villain of the series. He's one of the last big names left. He outclasses her. He is more deserving. It's subjective yes. But as long as you back it up with reasoning, it can still stand 100% true.
It's whether or not you want to accept the truth that it ultimately comes down to. I can reason all day with Lucario lovers about a strictly "What if it came down to Mewtwo or Lucario" and they will simply deny everything I say.
Although, backing Lucario has it's points. Definitely.
You too?I'm going Green party with mister Insect himself. Genesect.
IMO, I don't really think Saki is as close to the others as you say he is. He only had one game on the ol' N64. Issac, Little Mac, and Starfy have had more recent games. Unless SSBB breaks that boundary(which I don't think it will because all 4 were in Brawl), Saki is lower on the priority list than the other 3.
[/size]
Thank you. It's good to know that it's somewhat original. I was worried that it had been done before.Nice blog, interesting, I'm surprised nobody has thought of it.
![]()
Well I'm not sure if I'm the best one to go into character chances like SSBF, but this is why Saki's chances are slightly above Starfy's.IMO, I don't really think Saki is as close to the others as you say he is. He only had one game on the ol' N64. Issac, Little Mac, and Starfy have had more recent games. Unless SSBB breaks that boundary(which I don't think it will because all 4 were in Brawl), Saki is lower on the priority list than the other 3.
![]()
I'd get into more, but since I can't support my claims on those I won't.He rivals just about any main character. There were many requests from users for his inclusion, and he IS pretty cool, so I did what I could to include him. After all, this game does let you enjoy a dream cast of supporting characters!
H-he has absolutely no problem fitting in!
Oh. Really? I didn't know that. I guess that would explain G&W and ROB though. Huh... Learn something every day, I suppose. :DNo, the fact that Saki is not so popular is precisely why he has a good chance, why? Because Sakurai is looking at "lesser" series since he stated in an interview that Nintendo is lacking franchises therefore he is bound to look at lesser franchises as well.
![]()
Waluigi plays no role in the main series of Mario. Everyone added so far has plyed a major role in the series. Bowser Jr does that better than Waluigi. He runs miles around Waluigi. Waluigi isn't that popular, especially when you compare him to Toad. Toad runs circles around Walugi's popularity. TOAD RUNS CIRCLES AROUND EVERYONE'S POPULARITY. I hate it. He isn't a good pick for the spin-off series. Paper Mario's spin off series is much more interesting/better reviewed than "Mario Tennis" and "Mario Sports Mix". Paper Mario and Geno, HECK DOC even runs circles around him.You have a point there, you definitely do.
I just feel like Waluigi, a character I'm not even crazy about, gets the shaft unfairly when it comes to these type of arguments. I don't like it when someone comes up with shoddy arguments, and everyone else simply agrees with them without even looking deeper into things.
Basically, I just want to be the devil's advocate and be Waluigi's defense attorney, so to speak.
I like Victini, and I like Zoroark....but I love Genesect. The debate between those two is annoying, and really, I just have always preferred Genesect. I realized last night that I find Victini slightly annoying. He makes Pikachu and Jigglypuff look like Emo kids. He's freakin' happy as ****. I DO, like his body type, and potential moveset much more than Zoroarks. But Zoroark has swagger. He could carry himself like a sneaky Wolf. Which would translate into his moveset. BUT, I find his design... oh, so so. Genesect. He has a cool design, a UFO head, an awesome type, and a demeanor that says "Wut, want my to poke you to death?". He's wicked looking. I dunno. I'm just attracted to everything he has. Plus, UFO HEAD.You too?
Misquoted. Chrono has a much more proper quote. Sakurai said something more along the lines of "Oh, yeah Nintendo hasn't released very much new content/IP recently to choose from" It's not the same.No, the fact that Saki is not so popular is precisely why he has a good chance, why? Because Sakurai is looking at "lesser" series since he stated in an interview that Nintendo is lacking franchises therefore he is bound to look at lesser franchises as well.
FYI, relevance isn't everything, just because a said character is relevant doesn't automatically mean that he has higher chances, it's absurd to even think that.
I am in agreeance with you, you do know that, right?Waluigi plays no role in the main series of Mario. Everyone added so far has plyed a major role in the series. Bowser Jr does that better than Waluigi. He runs miles around Waluigi. Waluigi isn't that popular, especially when you compare him to Toad. Toad runs circles around Walugi's popularity. TOAD RUNS CIRCLES AROUND EVERYONE'S POPULARITY. I hate it. He isn't a good pick for the spin-off series. Paper Mario's spin off series is much more interesting/better reviewed than "Mario Tennis" and "Mario Sports Mix". Paper Mario and Geno, HECK DOC even runs circles around him.
So, let's add this up:
Waluigi has an important role.Bowser Jr. takes that cake.
Waluigi is extremely popular.He's a spec compared to Toad.
Waluigi could represent a spin-off series (Party/Sports).RPG and Puzzle are a better genre than Party/Sports crap. Doc, Geno, and PM have it over him.
SO, it can be assumed that all five of these characters are better choices than him? No?
As probably the biggest Mewtwo fantard around here, I think Genesect is cool because he's like a Gen V reincarnation of him.I like Victini, and I like Zoroark....but I love Genesect. The debate between those two is annoying, and really, I just have always preferred Genesect. I realized last night that I find Victini slightly annoying. He makes Pikachu and Jigglypuff look like Emo kids. He's freakin' happy as ****. I DO, like his body type, and potential moveset much more than Zoroarks. But Zoroark has swagger. He could carry himself like a sneaky Wolf. Which would translate into his moveset. BUT, I find his design... oh, so so. Genesect. He has a cool design, a UFO head, an awesome type, and a demeanor that says "Wut, want my to poke you to death?". He's wicked looking. I dunno. I'm just attracted to everything he has. Plus, UFO HEAD.
Yup, obscure choices are definetly going to be in Smash 4, although, Saki isn't that obscure at all, he is quite known as well in a sense like Starfy and Little Mac but to a lesser extent I suppose.Oh. Really? I didn't know that. I guess that would explain G&W and ROB though. Huh... Learn something every day, I suppose. :D
![]()
Much lesser extent. Sort of goes (Here anyways US) Little Mac, Isaac, TOM NOOK. . Starfy. . Saki.Yup, obscure choices are definetly going to be in Smash 4, although, Saki isn't that obscure at all, he is quite known as well in a sense like Starfy and Little Mac but to a lesser extent I suppose.
![]()
Right on the nail, I agree with all those points as well. :DThank you. It's good to know that it's somewhat original. I was worried that it had been done before.
Well I'm not sure if I'm the best one to go into character chances like SSBF, but this is why Saki's chances are slightly above Starfy's.
1. Saki had a good amount of requests for Brawl
2. Saki was an AT, and based on his discription, Sakurai showed some interest in him and stated he would be a good fit for Smash.
3. Saki did appear in S&P:SS, so that does raise his relevancy.
Lolwut? That's a joke right? Starfy didn't sell that well in America, a place where Golden Sun, Punch out, and Animal Crossing rule the small franchises. LOLWUT? Saki/Starfy is more like it.Tom Nook? Lolwut? :/
![]()
I don't like it as well but considering he had a stage in Brawl could possibly be an indication that Sakurai may have wanted Tom Nook.Tom Nook? Lolwut? :/
![]()
Well, by "lolwut" I meant how would Tom Nook fight? He's from a game with no enemies, fighting, or really anything that Starfy and Saki have. And I think it would even be weird for Smash to see a raccoon wearing an apron flail a pickax around. Just my little 2 cents.Lolwut? That's a joke right? Starfy didn't sell that well in America, a place where Golden Sun, Punch out, and Animal Crossing rule the small franchises. LOLWUT? Saki/Starfy is more like it.
Also, Omega, why do you cherry pick? No one adressed my point about poplarity in the west, or the major Sakurai misquote? Two things a lot of your agrument was based on.
I shall.No one adressed my point about poplarity in the west, or the major Sakurai misquote?
I think he said something along the lines of "I will think about this once Kid Icarus is completely, but it is true that there haven't been many new things from Nintendo recently."Misquoted. Chrono has a much more proper quote. Sakurai said something more along the lines of "Oh, yeah Nintendo hasn't released very much new content/IP recently to choose from" It's not the same.
Also, I wouldn't ever try to argue "He has a good chance because no one likes him!"
*looks at Captain Falcon*Well, by "lolwut" I meant how would Tom Nook fight? He's from a game with no enemies, fighting, or really anything that Starfy and Saki have. And I think it would even be weird for Smash to see a raccoon wearing an apron flail a pickax around. Just my little 2 cents.
![]()
Exactly. Which, of course he probably didn't remember about TLS or Xeno. Were they revealed even when he said this?.. Well, you know how character savvy Sakurai is. "Uh, who's Krystal?"I think he said something along the lines of "I will think about this once Kid Icarus is completely, but it is true that there haven't been many new things from Nintendo recently."
He was just recognizing the truth that Nintendo hasn't made a lot of IP's lately. I doubt it really meant anything specifically, at least not then when he said it...
Moveset potential is an invalid argument, with the likes of R.O.B and C. Falcon having adequate movesets.Well, by "lolwut" I meant how would Tom Nook fight? He's from a game with no enemies, fighting, or really anything that Starfy and Saki have. And I think it would even be weird for Smash to see a raccoon wearing an apron flail a pickax around. Just my little 2 cents.
![]()
Well, I never said Tom Nook was impossible, I'm just saying it would be weird to have him in place of a character with fighting experience. That's all.*looks at Captain Falcon*
*Looks at R.O.B*
*Looks at Pheonix Wright in UMvC3*
It should be fine. Yeah. It will be fine.
Exactly. Which, of course he probably didn't remember about TLS or Xeno. Were they revealed even when he said this?.. Well, you know how character savvy Sakurai is. "Uh, who's Krystal?"
I think you need to look at Star's essay and moveset to get a better understanding, really, he isn't as bad as people think he is.Saki has pretty much every reason to be in, but I would not be pleased if he did.
Really, there's nothing he can do that's interesting, per se. Souped up laser attacks and generic sword slashes are all I see in store for him. Granted, I haven't played S&P, but it's not hard to predict how Sakurai will go about making movesets.
Again, it's not weird. It's happened already.Well, I never said Tom Nook was impossible, I'm just saying it would be weird to have him in place of a character with fighting experience. That's all.
![]()
I bet you anything, Deoxys 2014. The games probably already in development (Maybe not far mind you). The remakes aren't an IF, but a WHEN."Thanks for your thoughts. Ruby and Sapphire are important games to me. I will consider your request."
Burning Ruby, Restless Sapphire, or something along the ideas of "Ocean and Magma".Inb4predictionnames
Rare Ruby & Shiny Sapphire.