Solbliminal
Smash Champion
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2013
- Messages
- 2,275
- NNID
- Solbliminal
Pretty much what I've reduced myself to doing at this point.That gif looks subjectively painful though.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Pretty much what I've reduced myself to doing at this point.That gif looks subjectively painful though.
I originally just came in here to vote and now you and some other forum apes ganged up on me for just having a different opinion. Good job making a**holes out of yourselves, though.Oy, you trying and failing at being a troll to this thread, m8?
Actually most people where trying to just tell u the rules but I am just gonna not say anything and let u be a troll from what I see.I originally just came in here to vote and now you and some other forum apes ganged up on me for just having a different opinion. Good job making a**holes out of yourselves, though.
I originally just came in here to vote and now you and some other forum apes ganged up on me for just having a different opinion. Good job making a**holes out of yourselves, though.
Where would anyone even draw the line for what reasons are and aren't legit? This is quite a slippery slope you've just walked onto. Maybe Lyn's voice just bugs the crap out of me. Is that not reason enough to not want her around? Who are you to decide what is and isn't "legit"? That's a double-standard you've got there and it all just boils down to "I like this character and I don't like this character". It's just opinions and you're just trying to invalidate my opinions. You're being a jerk, basically.
You say that as though he caresEven if that's being an a**hole, guess what: you're being an even bigger one.
"Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."Even if that's being an a**hole, guess what: you're being an even bigger one.
Interesting definition of a**hole.Even if that's being an a**hole, guess what: you're being an even bigger one.
For having a different opinion? No. The results would've been the same if you'd downvoted any character with **** reasons, not just popular ones.I originally just came in here to vote and now you and some other forum apes ganged up on me for just having a different opinion. Good job making a**holes out of yourselves, though.
For being a newbie? Nah. One of my current friends was a newbie to this thread not too long ago.You're just a bunch of a**holes that like ganging up on a newbie.
Sorry, but i seriously think thats not a good enough reason.For having a different opinion? No. The results would've been the same if you'd downvoted any character with **** reasons, not just popular ones.
No one is trying to invalidate your opinion - requiring a reason for downvotes is necessary so that people don't attempt to take advantage of them in order to artificially inflate the popularity of their own favorites by down-voting characters they're not actually against. Yeah, they could just post a valid reason they saw someone else post and at this point there's no way we can tell. That's no reason to stop trying to keep things reasonable. But it does stop people from downvoting characters en-masse without regard for whether they're actually against them as they might otherwise do, since they have to type out or find reasons for each of them.
So, the others informed you (politely, I might add) that we have a rule which says downvotes require a legitimate reason, and your response is... to give reasons which are jokes rather than a legitimate reason. And then, when those reasons aren't considered valid because they're not actual reasons (one being based on a false basis and the other being more neutral than negative), you rail that your opinion is being invalidated.
You then proceed to prove us correct in not accepting these reasons when you claim them later on to be jokes. At this point, we don't even know if you're actually against these characters or if you just want to boost your own choices' popularity. And then you went on to give real reasons - those being that you feel FE is overrepped and that Isaac is just another RPG swordsman. And guess what? Those are good enough reasons and were counted. I personally disagree with the latter, but I don't count it as invalid.
You then went on and argued that your opinions were being invalidated, which is untrue since the only reasons we didn't accept were the ones that you later told us were jokes, which means those weren't actually your opinion.
And then you go on and say things like we're only accepting reasons we agree with - well, I can certainly tell you that's not true. Every single one of us have counted downvotes for characters we want and support completely even when we don't agree with the reason. It just has to be genuine and not based on a false or misinformed fact.
Edit:
For being a newbie? Nah. One of my current friends was a newbie to this thread not too long ago.
We've allowed this kind of reasoning in the past, so it wouldn't be right to not accept it now. When the votes are reset later, we can look into being more specific about what kinds of reasons we allow. Having said that, I do agree with you that the reasons aren't great. I'm pretty sure they're still valid, though, since we've allowed these kinds of reasons before.Sorry, but i seriously think thats not a good enough reason.
I could say.... Ninten is just another Psykid, and pokemon is overrepped if i downvote pichu.
if he cant knock on her playstyle or isaac's playstyle or another reason i dont think that should be counted. Imo thats still not a vaild enough reason. There is no such thing as "muh reps" to the PMBR, they want hype builders, fresh move sets, things like that.
But y'know, my opinion.
God way to make me feel expendable.Ninten is just another Psykid
We allow most things, even if they're not the best (in other words, we have a pretty high tolerance for reasoning). They often tend to be gray-zone or debatable, as you've pointed out. If other people feel like it's incorrect, they can convince the voter to change their mind, but we will count the final outcome no matter what. The main point is really just to weed out the extremes.Sorry, but i seriously think thats not a good enough reason.
I could say.... Ninten is just another Psykid, and pokemon is overrepped if i downvote pichu.
if he cant knock on her playstyle or isaac's playstyle or another reason i dont think that should be counted. Imo thats still not a vaild enough reason. There is no such thing as "muh reps" to the PMBR, they want hype builders, fresh move sets, things like that.
But y'know, my opinion.
Can confirm.For being a newbie? Nah. One of my current friends was a newbie to this thread not too long ago.
Geez, you just joined in April and almost have as many posts as me O_OCan confirm.
#BasedShinIsBasedFor having a different opinion? No. The results would've been the same if you'd downvoted any character with **** reasons, not just popular ones.
No one is trying to invalidate your opinion - requiring a reason for downvotes is necessary so that people don't attempt to take advantage of them in order to artificially inflate the popularity of their own favorites by down-voting characters they're not actually against. Yeah, they could just post a valid reason they saw someone else post and at this point there's no way we can tell. That's no reason to stop trying to keep things reasonable. But it does stop people from downvoting characters en-masse without regard for whether they're actually against them as they might otherwise do, since they have to type out or find reasons for each of them.
So, the others informed you (politely, I might add) that we have a rule which says downvotes require a legitimate reason, and your response is... to give reasons which are jokes rather than a legitimate reason. And then, when those reasons aren't considered valid because they're not actual reasons (one being based on a false basis and the other being more neutral than negative), you rail that your opinion is being invalidated.
You then proceed to prove us correct in not accepting these reasons when you claim them later on to be jokes. At this point, we don't even know if you're actually against these characters or if you just want to boost your own choices' popularity. And then you went on to give real reasons - those being that you feel FE is overrepped and that Isaac is just another RPG swordsman. And guess what? Those are valid reasons and were counted. I personally disagree with the latter, but I don't count it as invalid.
You then went on and continued to argue that your opinions were being invalidated, which is untrue since the only reasons we didn't accept were the ones that you later told us were jokes, which means those weren't actually your opinion.
And then you go on and say things like we're only accepting reasons we agree with - well, I can certainly tell you that's not true. Every single one of us have counted downvotes for characters we want and support completely even when we don't agree with the reason. It just has to be genuine and not based on a false or misinformed fact.
Edit:For being a newbie? Nah. One of my current friends was a newbie to this thread not too long ago.
I'm livin' life in the fast lane.Geez, you just joined in April and almost have as many posts as me O_O
G2GFSTI'm livin' life in the fast lane.
Opinions are opinions, but this is just nonsense. How can someone be expected to knock on a playstyle of a character like Isaac that has yet to even reveal said playstyle? What gives?Sorry, but i seriously think thats not a good enough reason.
I could say.... Ninten is just another Psykid, and pokemon is overrepped if i downvote pichu.
if he cant knock on her playstyle or isaac's playstyle or another reason i dont think that should be counted. Imo thats still not a vaild enough reason. There is no such thing as "muh reps" to the PMBR, they want hype builders, fresh move sets, things like that.
But y'know, my opinion.
Because they arent Space DandyGuys, ignore useless arguments with children.
Now Ill be back to thinking of excuses for downvoting all other characters that I havent upvoted for.
Pretty much.did i miss an whole argument about a**holes?
-1 to Psykid cus he's another NintenGod way to make me feel expendable.
Cries in the corner.
Oh, we're children now? And what are you, an autistic weeb ****** with a little anime girl avatar? Fine, I'll *ignore* you. I already was once I saw that avatard of yours. *user ignored*Guys, ignore useless arguments with children.
Now Ill be back to thinking of excuses for downvoting all other characters that I havent upvoted for.
From what I've seen, you are the only one that warrants an ignore here. GoodbyeOh, we're children now? And what are you, an autistic weeb ****** with a little anime girl avatar? Fine, I'll *ignore* you. I already was once I saw that avatard of yours. *user ignored*
Oh yes, thats me.Oh, we're children now? And what are you, an autistic weeb ****** with a little anime girl avatar? Fine, I'll *ignore* you. I already was once I saw that avatard of yours. *user ignored*
Oh, we're children now? And what are you, an autistic weeb ****** with a little anime girl avatar? Fine, I'll *ignore* you. I already was once I saw that avatard of yours. *user ignored*
I blame Condor NationThese arguments keep getting more ridiculous
Condor Nation blames youI blame Condor Nation
I am condor nationCondor Nation blames you
aka you lost
you vs a whole nation
GG
Be quiet you ungrateful scrub. To think someone of such doughy physique has even sought to challenge the Condor Nation? Sickening.I am condor nation
That means condor nation brought about it's own downfall
I blame.......PichuI blame Condor Nation
I blame users that have unpronounceable names.I blame.......Pichu
Bit my tongue trying to say thatI blame users that have unpronounceable names.
Zpxociv I'm looking at you