RosalinaSGS
Smash Ace
why?
His reply to my comments then was the main game-changer. Everyone's negative reaction to my rant caused me to check myself, and review my position. After all, it was quite excessive. So, I had another look at my read on Zalak. Below are my original points against him:All this pushing and questionare at Zalak, yet you read him as town.
Many of this questionnaire, and the posts you made when the day started. Seem hostile, but you seem extremely reluctant to make any sort of push in that direction.
1. His NK analysis. It just... sucked. It still sucks, and if this were D1 I would still lynch him for it. But in mylo, in a game I would quite like to win, lynching him on this relatively minor point is overkill.
2. His seemingly excessive 'humour'. It didn't contribute much and crammed the thread. Originally, it'd been funny, so I tolerated it. Back then, I still saw him as the ideal player, able to seem town no matter the situation. But then someone said it could be regarded as fake, and seemed too excessive to be Zalak just being Zalak. So I had a look, and kept that in mind. And yes, I agree, Zalak's funny posts were just too much. That didn't colour my view of him well, especially when any of his townie actions from earlier Days I just attributed to his skill at the game. So that was another point, but once again, in retrospect, it's insufficient to be evidence of scumminess.
3. So, the main point is Zalak's contention with J. This is basically the deciding point. After all, it pretty much embodies Zalak in this game. At first, didn't like this, as he seemed to be way too focussed on J without actually asking him anything. Sure, he says J isn't answering, but nor was he asking. Then he puts forward 3 points, which I like. Then I skim the points, and I don't like what he wrote. So basically it's up to my opinion after I properly look at his accusations and J's response, which is why I said my read on him was actually pending.... *cough cough* *nudge nudge* *read the thread*