hjihjihjihji
Smash Cadet
I saw this on the news today and thought it was 'interesting' to say the least!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7182817.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7182817.stm
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
They wouldn't look like each other if they were ferturnal. Anyways, I'm not surprised that two people who once lived nine months inside the same womb would take a liking to each other.Oh.. Wow.. thats... odd... So wouldn't it be weird that.. "Oh we look like each other"?
-Onyx
Eh?Wouldnt they realize they both have a ******?
0.o
Yeah...that'd be awful. Talking to each other would be so awkward.The worst thing is that they probably still love each other, but at the same time are repulsed by each other as well.
Yes. I'd say it fits under the incest law.Isnt it illegal in some countries to marry your Twin/Sister/Brother/Relative?
Reminds me a bit of Shallow Hal. "I saw a knockout, I didn't care what anyone else saw"You know, I wouldn't mind your second one, Eric. It'd be bad, but whose to say that it was really false? I'd be of the opinion that she was in existence, but only to me, which wouldn't tarnish any relationship I would of had with this person.
Is our incest taboo the result of genetics or is it sociological?Well, people are biologically attracted to people who are genetically similar to them. Part of what keeps us from having any kind of romantic relationships with those people is that we have an powerful, natural disinclination from having any sort of attraction to people we knew well when we were children. Another part of it is the incest taboo, which probably also stems from our genetic makeup.
I would definitely tell them in case they ever had a child.So say you were the person that discovered that they were related, and imagine that you were the only way that they would ever find out that they were siblings. That is, if you lied to them and told them they weren't related they would never ever find out (by magic or whatever).
Would you have told them?
Well, I've actually looked into this to some degree, and as far as I'm aware it's some of both. There's definitely a genetic element to it, but there's quite obviously a social stigma against it too. As with many things, it's hard to make a clear cut distinction about where the genetic influence ends and the social influence begins.Is our incest taboo the result of genetics or is it sociological?
Just to play devil's advocate, is that really a good reason? We don't ban people with other genetic disorders from having children, though they are advised of the implicated risks. If a couple love each other, why isn't that enough? And they don't have to have children.I'm not aware of any countries that allow a person to marry within their immediate family, and for very good reason. The risk of birth defects from such a union increases astronomically compared to a relationship between two people who are unrelated.
Co-Signedwow what a cockblock
That's the whole point; wouldn't you feel disgusted after you found out about that? Of course they didn't know, that's what is so bad about it.If you try to see it from their point of view, it was an absolutely normal relationship until suddenly the secret is unveiled, and then all of their relations are suddenly "disgusting", even though nothing has physically changed.