@Vand:
"How is telling Tery to replace out if he isn't going to enjoy the game defending him?"
:::I was focusing more on the "we shouldn't mull over this" point, but didn't want to only partially quote information as that could be a scum tell.
"Would you of preferred another page Tery/Vand back and forth of me telling Tery how he should play mafia?"
:::Tell him him how to play, no. But making anybody a more informed and better-contributing townie is always a good thing (except for scum, of course).
"
Interestingly enough, if I were scum buddies with Tery, why would I be "coaching" him in thread as opposed to communicating with him privately? (Somewhat WIFOM, but food for thought nonetheless)."
::: Not all games let the scum talk during the day. I'm in a game on a different site where my scum partner and I can only privately talk during night.
"What do you mean by light prodding? Had UberMario even posted anything at this stage? And where do you get scum-to-scum buddying from? Use quotes please."
::: In some games I had seen, scum-partners generally did one of two things. Ignoring each other completely, or constantly attacking each other as a form of cover up. Very rarely though, there would be a game where small banter would take place instead of one of the mentioned extremes. Most people wouldn't pick up on this. It's nothing they "said", just how often they were saying things, and the fact that neither one of them attacked each other.
@Acrostic: "
@Grump: How do you feel about Sephiroth? Does he seems like scum to you? Do you believe that taking someone to L-2 is a suspicious move? Do you believe that it was purely coincidence that you voted for the sample people twice so far?"
Hmm, are we talking about before or after your thread-wide vote history? Before, I wasn't too concerned except for the fact that he didn't seem to post a lot of information . Personal style I guess? I digress- I don't want to give him the same "leniency" I'm giving Tery (because he's not used to this type of Mafia) (or WAS giving Tery), but I don't want to punish him overly hard for a particular posting style.
Now that I saw the vote list though, I'm a little suspicious. I repeated his votes to apply pressure, and I haven't yet had a chance to unvote. Why he earlier repeated my votes? I'm not sure. I'm going to be watching his voting habits throughout the game now though. If he flips scum, I don't want to be lumped along-side him simply because he rode my scum-hunting coattails.
I'm not quite sure about the L-2 predicament. It certainly does show that he's ready for a lynch, since I'm of the belief that simply 2 votes is enough to cause some pressure, but L-2 (this early into the game) is close enough to ask for a mishap.
---- Onto Vandie @post 261
Seph has been one of the few people I haven't attacked, but given the first few points made in my response to Acrostic, I think I'm going to be watching him. My vote wasn't necessarily for voting him, it was for the perceived nature of your post- flailing, lashing, panicky, etc. A read of either scum trying to redeem himself, or possibly a very bad townie.
@All: And now I get to page 19 and see that Seph's vote is locked in stone.
Anyways, I'm on vacation at the moment visiting family, so I won't be able to be as active as I was for the first few days, but I'll be heading back home on the 12th. Till then, I'll stay active, just not as much so as before
When are we scheduled for another vote count?