So you question, ask, poke, prod (only in the non-mod sense) and generally cause a little ruckus. I mean look at me! I may not be the best scumhunter, but I'm sure trying
Alright, I guess it's more of my defensive nature during strategy/analysis games.
I don't mean it personal. I was fishing for a reaction.
I guess you got one then. lol
I'm hoping that you'll be convinced to elaborate on your thoughts more!
Ok, but like I said, I tend to be more about defensive gameplay
when not playing Smash Bros..
In that case, it was caution. If the vote put you at L-1, then yes. You could have accidentally gotten hammered. But it only put you at L-2, which makes the accidental factor much less likely to occur.
That doesn't mean that it was safer than L-3.
This is where your argument falls to pieces though. We had a nice (most likely) 2+ page discussion about how Terywj has been confirmed to be innocent. Even I have been convinced, and I was on his case hardcore alongside with Glyph.
You seem to have missed the previous portion of the sentence:
Terywj WAS giving me a similar vibe of scumminess, but I haven't seen anything nearly as problematic as his first posts, so I'm not sure whether I'd consider him a threat right now or not
I'm more ready to believe that he's innocent now than I was before, but that still doesn't mean that his first posts didn't exist.
Do you happen to have any additional reasons for suspecting Vandie?
(Gosh, I love that name... Vandie Vandie Vandie)
Well, out of all of us, he's by far the most aggressive of any of the players here in this particular mafia game, I don't really see anyone else making threats on a similar caliber.
Ubermario the following points that you listed against Vand are as follows:
1. Attempts to mass lynch
2. Prospective playing
Points listed again Ranmaru:
1. Odd deductions
From the tone of your post, your alibi behind not posting is simply because you didn't have anything to contribute or had no suspicions. However you do realize that mafia is a game where you are supposed to have suspicions in order to weed out mafia members and apply pressure to hear the responses that other players have to offer. Take for instance your impression of Vand. These points are formed from the pressure that Vand has applied to you in the game so that you participate and for you to have impressions. More or less this is what IC players typically do in a given game. They apply pressure in order to create reactions out of players who normally would not want to get involved such as you. Therefore your case against Vand is bland as bandwagoning is common, note that this is your second time at L-2. This means that you didn't get it the first time when you were at L-2. Also prospective playing is necessary given the fact that we can't all be on at the same time when it comes to lynch. Thinking about what comes next is necessary so that in the small amount of time we are active in this thread, we can get the things done that need to be done as a collective unit. It is similar to leaving a note to your roommates before you go out for the day about food that needs to be bought or tasks that need to be done.
*I have to leave right now, but I'll respond to this portion tonight*
As for Ranmaru, odd deductions is a vague connotation and doesn't give us much to go on.
What do you find is vague about Ranmaru's comments? How are they strange?
The basis for some of his arguments contradict the results:
I also agree that Uber should be the play toDay. I just don't want to lynch him by accident. Thank you. (Want him to claim first)
(Why agree for me to be the guy to go after if you don't want me to be accidentally lynched?)
I unvoted Meta because I don't know where he is. I can't pressure someone who can't see my posts currently.
Right now, I'm going to try to get Uber to say something, no heat is being on him.
Glyph did give some to Tery, now I, will heat up Uber.
Vote: Uber
So Ran unvotes Meta because he hasn't posted that much, but votes for me for virtually the same reason? That doesn't make much sense.
Simply generalizing it doesn't help us to understand your point at all nor does it make it a convincing case for us to not lynch you. You need to work at it a bit harder before you are lynched.
Before you leave, what is your character? If you are planning on telling us then you shouldn't take so long otherwise I may think that you are trying to make one up.
I'm not sure what to say about that which hasn't already been said in the previous two pages by me.
1. Character information. Not like, "Hey I'm Wario!" Distant yet close enough character that could seem like a valid character choice but really isn't so there you go and you're still stuck in a pot. Some dialogue if allowed so on and so forth when you find it necessary.
Well, you did ask for character
claiming before, not character information, you can't really beat around
that bush without coming off as suspicious, and like I said directly above, I'm not sure what else there is to really bring up in terms of character information.
where I am not logged in and thus won't be seem :D. It's very sneaky, and a good way for people to hide if they don't want to be seen viewing the thread without posting.
![Terywj [태리]](/data/avatars/l/71/71007.jpg?1555906021){kind=avatar}