Then please tell me what magnificent contributions we have from the people you mentioned - especially the latter two. Show me 3 posts that include genuine stances, thoughts on whom's scum [without obvious parrots] and general ideas on what's point on from these two players.
you're being very dramatic.
the information i want out of inactives is simply viewpoints. stances.
Im not liking Dr. Riddler so far. His most recent post sound like forced nervous joking.
Nix you sound like you are just jumping on Chaco for the sake of jumping on him. And really unsure about what you are doing.
we've been out of the RVS/RQS for a while. do you think there's nothing to gain from any of the discussions/questions so far?
you got "forced nervous joking" from "i feels ya"? do you find the point i found on him to be valid and/or scummy?
kinda disagree with your point about Nix on Chaco. if his definition of RVS/RQS was different (which seems to be the case) then others then Chaco inappropriately continued to random vote out of that phase. its not out of the question to jump on a person who continues RVS habits when the RVS seemingly ends
I got the forced nervous joking from the two behind that. Thing about Kevin not liking how he walks and wahtnot. I meant to say posts my bad.
Im not seeing your point on him as being valid. He can still be interested in others responses even if it doesnt seem big to him. Gotta see it from everyones POV.
mentos did the same. chibo did a weak analysis of the same thing which is why i kept a vote on him a little longer. notice that Omis really hasn't contributed anything since then either. the same goes for Mentos.
obvious parrots IS information, Gheb. we've already established that Omis is an obvious parrot which means his credibility is already low. since parroting is pretty scummy in the first place it gives us a read on how useful Omis will be.
and huh @ the term "magnificent". you're making it seem like i've been pulling out amazing information out of inactives or that i've interpreted that way. take a step back.
Then at the very least you owe us a more detailed explanation on the reads you've gotten from Omis, Mentos and Dr.Riddler [I'm asking for more than just "they can die" because that's more than obvious]. After all, this was your self-proclaimed goal, right? Getting a "feel" on all players. I think now is as good a time to share it than any other.
I'm curious.
omis can die. he's a parrot. he's inactive. he has nothing new or useful to say.
mentos can die. he's inactive. he doesn't seem to want to scumhunt nor seek information from other players. his neutral stance doesn't compliment him either.
dr.riddler can die. he's inactive and only chirps when he's being pressured. doesn't say anything useful even when asked to say useful things. doesn't seem to care in the same way to scumhunt just like mentos.
i dont like how you're talking to me. it's like you're trying to potray as a liar or as if i said something that conflicts with how i play or how i've been playing. knowing who can live and who can die is a perfect amount of feel i need to keep moving forward, applying added information, and seeking connections.
Unless you can go into detail what I asked about above [show that your pressure has proven effective, detailed thoughts on Mentos, Omis and Dr.Riddler] I will not accept your playstyle as pro-town. The results appear to be pro-town [but they aren't unless you show me otherwise] but your intentions are more than questionable because scum can play it like a townie can. And I said before that the way you play can by all means be interpreted as anti-town.
so let me get this straight. you're telling me that if i can't effectively apply pressure on inactive players in order to become active... then you're going to question my intentions... because scum can do the same thing. hold on. this is confusing.
it is not anti-town to prod inactives and encourage killing of inactive players. inactivity is more suitable for scum play thus an attempt to eradicate its presence is pro-town. it doesn't clear me nor make me town but it is a pro-town approach.
you can look at my play and attempt to interpret it as scum, but that's all you're doing is interpreting what scum could also do. "hm... even tho it's pro town to discourage inactivity and put nooses near inactive's necks scum could do this to so... i wont give him that pro-town+ point". that same conception can be used for ANYTHING pro-town because it turns into wifom. the only point you need to realize is whether you think i'm scum or town my direct actions are creating direct reactions. am i getting people talk? yes, but i can't control how much they talk if they choose not to do so. am i establishing connections with myself and the rest of the cast? yes, despite the fact that we still have 4-5+ players who have failed to create a decent connection with anyone.
i dont like your view on this. i am unsure how to read it from you.
I'm not getting pro-town vibes from you.
you're taking my actions that can be seen as pro-town and suggesting that scum can do the same. are you getting scum vibes from me? is a null-tell even out of the question because you haven't mentioned this option at all which is interesting and probably the most logical deduction
I also underlined certain parts of your quotes because they are misleading - at no point did I understand you wrong nor did I fall victim to a miscommunication. And just because I don't have you on my scumlist doesn't mean your motives are questionable. For somebody who claims to do nothing but make info available you have given us remarkably little to work with.
no, i've given you (and the rest of the game) plenty.
- me vs. frozen
- me vs. kevin
- me vs. chibo
- me vs. you
- me vs. view on inactives
- me on who i like and dont like.
what you seem to be upset about, for some odd reason, is my inability to force sufficient amount of information from people who refuse to volunteer that information. obviously i'm not content with the information i have from the inactives i mentioned so far but it is outside my realm of control to extract that information when they choose not to release it because they are being INACTIVE. so the little amount of information i can work with is what i have to work with because i know that not all of the inactives are scum.
and what worries me is that you find me less useful than a player like kevin. this worries me a lot. what worries me is that given the limit of information we can extract this game that you find my work insufficient compared to most of the cast who have barely put in any.
so what am i suppose to something like that? i think you're wrong. that's pretty much the jist of it
