regarding mentos: quite null actually. find him a bit airy >_> as in difficult to grasp on to anything meaningful he's saying outside of auspher being scum and I think acrostic for rvs shenanigans. Also this
reply. struggling to find where he has elaborated on things like "gheb's connections/rajam's vote/joey's hyper-sensitive vote" outside of asking more questions and/or commenting loosely, e.g. saying gheb's case on ryu was "weaker". I want to know what's weak about it to it and why etc. Then there's he's question aimed @auspher to provide content, when Glyph has effectively come in and done little (nothing actually) only to be given golden boy treatment.
Here's a russian roulette of posts prior to that reply --> odd to me he would claim others "horsed around" and generally pick at posts when his own more serious posts lacked the content he was demanding. is he waiting for others to respond on certain issues first before responding himself?
I'm still rereading mentos/ryker and ryker's break into the game. initial impressions tell me ryker was being a little suzy and mentos was attracted to this.
^@Mentos: what do you make of my analysis? also what are you thinking of Glyph and... Chaco? Outside of Acrostic/Auspher who would you look into? considering you "saved ryker" (or something you mentioned along those lines), what do you think of his content now?