Oki Stuff. Also, I agree X1. Oki should go toDAY.
Vote: Oki
"I'm going to put out the (possibly devastatingly wrong) idea that X1 and Nabe are cleared town because they are IC's, meant to help us out. However, I don't know, it could be that one is there to help town and one is there to help scum."
Wifom. You knew it was wrong but you posted it anyways. You want them to seem half town/half scum.
"TGD: You have been really sketchy with your playing, especially in the beginning. You made Ran L-1 (please, pleeease if I got this wrong, let me know, I am still trying to sort out what the ongoing votecount was) without even thinking about it. That isn't putting the hammer on him, but it's pretty close. It put someone in danger of death that day when we still had a week left to decide on his fate. That makes you suspicious. It could also be that it was just dumb and reckless, or that you weren't sure of what the votecount was and rushed in, but I still don't like it."
You were accusing TGD of being sketchy yet you were trying to play off his play by saying he was just being silly. Also you try to play it off even further with wifom as well, as if defending him. You knew he was town.
I think you were trying to make him seem town, and hoping he seemed town while I would go for the first DAY. Since X1 said I was going to go over TGD, you followed suit and ignored me and said that if I flipped town, that TGD might be suspected. You knew I was town too.
italics is wifom.
"Dourin: in a game where there are a TON of players (I've played admittedly silly, informal games, but with more than 15 people), and during those we lynched an inactive first day, knowing that there was often just two wolves and that the amount of vts would not matter as much until later. However, with just 5 vts, 7 town roles all together, I think taking away a possible vt with an inactive lynch is not worth it. Doesn't benefit town at all."
How were you so sure an inactive could have been vt? An inactive can go both ways. It is very bad to let an inactive coast to lylo as scum. If you really thought I was scummy, it would have been better to lynch the inactive (or replace, which happened) and just lynch me D2 if I still was suspicious. The replacement was then seeked out when I claimed, not before. It was seeked so that person could claim not-cop.
"Joey: Since Ran insists on your opinion on why #50 isn't a town tell, go. Tell us why it isn't.
I guess what I said could be considered defending Nabe. I was just responding to your post in which you said that Nabe had not posted content and /hadn't even voted/ which was a lie."
She tells Joey to tell why #50 isn't a town tell, because she doesn't want to hear it. Like "Yeah whatever HE wants you to say it not me"
She also admits to defending nabe. If she plays EM she should know that there isn't time to be silly mid-end game. (Meaning you shouldn't be buddying everyone you see, you know what bussing is, so you should know what buddying is)
"Supposing there is nothing scummy about putting the hammer on TGD, as it needed to be done, there is nothing to be suspicious about you for, I guess."
You guess? So you still suspect her for the hammer, but want to agree with everyone else that it wasn't scummy. (Remember, you were there to hammer too, so just because you didn't hammer, doesn't mean the intention wasn't there). Saying you guess is weak, you are weakening your stance. Admit your faults.
And yes, I believe the intention to hammer was there.
"My suspicions of Dourin had to do with his doubting Ran's cop claim and his not wanting to claim as cop or not. He was not cooperative and he was still questioning a cleared town, and that didn't settle well with me. Seemed scummy. Obviously wasn't, but seemed that way to me."
That shouldn't be the basis of a suspicion. You can't suspect someone for suspecting someone else. Or rather, it would be dumb to. I wouldn't expect everyone to believe me after my apparent scumminess. It was logical, and seeing as he turned out town from his death, he wasn't trying anything sketchy. It was pure doubt.
@Question to Oki:
Oki, who do you believe killed Dourin?
@Nabe:
I believe that even though you only said one statement, that Scum had no other choices that would net a better reward. Hoping that people would think that you might have killed Dourin, it would have been an easy choice because the doc would be protecting either me,x1, or you randomly.
It wouldn't be a bad choice because any kill would probably give just as much info, but Dourin's would have given a little more due to what you said. You are being reserved, but why would you post your intent on voting him for saying a silly thing? The bold is what seems scum would want us to think. Yes, wifom, whatevs. Useless, but that seems to me the only possible thing I can get from the Dourin kill.
So in a sense, the Dourin kill was wifom due to what you said.
If you feel otherwise, then why do you think Dourin was killed? Who do you think killed him?
Also, why did you say you would vote him for being silly? That statement might have sparked a wagon, but scum beat you to it.
Disclaimer: Don't think the colours I use mean anything. Sometimes when I have an attack or accusation, it might be in red because I would want that person to see it. Sometimes I just use different colours pertaining to different people.
I just like using Yellowgreen, DeepSkyBlue, and red the most.