#HBC | ѕoup
The world is not beautiful, therefore it is.
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2010
- Messages
- 6,865
Taco Bell Mafia.
Damn it Soup.
![](http://i.imgur.com/3aLHS1x.jpg)
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Taco Bell Mafia.
Damn it Soup.
The ****? I'm discussing mechanics a lot because people are posting [size="7]left and right[/size] things that show they don't understand the mechanics of the game. Like, the mechanics are pretty important in this setup, you understand that right? People are literally going about playing the game wrong, based entirely on their misunderstanding of the setup, and I'm trying to get town on the right path.Okay PJB I'll concede the 'weak soup read change' point. I still find you suspicious, I feel mafia would try to take advantage of looking townie by posting alot about mechanics and less about scumhunting. Unless you have done more recently that I have missed? Otherwise my read stands. The feeling has been there from the start.
Why am I supposed to react to a case joey makes about soup? The ****?I'm saying you are doing more of that, but less of scumhunting. You didn't even react Joey's case on Soup. (Even though you were scumreading him) Things like that. I had to poke you to talk about reads.
You're putting too much damn concern on being right. It's almost the same ****ing thing that we called soup out on early, or at least the same mentality. I don't understand why--you gain nothing from continually sitting in the shadows and I don't know why you aren't pressuring your reads. ****ty gambits seem ultimately worthless here.So i'm scummy for taking my time and wanting to be right ?
I actually am doing something, if you like, I will quote every single one of my posts, and lay out my exact intention with each and every one of them and tell you what I was hoping to achieve, in such excruciating detail, it would make a EE wall cringe. Why do you think yelling will help ? Have you tried understanding my perspective and trying to work with me yet ? I'll even help you: Name anything you want a strong opinion or my idea on from me and I'll give it to you, but in exchange I'm going to ask the same of you. I have a vested interest in being right, that's why. Not only do I take immense pleasure in being right, but this time, I just want to hit all the scum, win all the ladies and ride into the sunset. Is that so wrong ?
Disregarded, just as quickly as Super Fab's PJB read. I don't see the improvement myself.What do you think of Watt's opinion that my content earlier today was / is an improvement ?
Did you miss the rant?What about Gheb's content makes you cringe ?
Cool.I'll even give you a little tidbit of info of info on Soup as my hand of friendship: I see you and soup arguing and being hardheaded with each other, and for soup it echoes of Mass Effect Mafia, for you I'm feeling better, because i think in the setting we are , given what's happening in thread right now(especially the explosion of posts), that mafia would eitehr be shadow playing ( letting the clutter mess up town), or trying to make it worse, and I don't see your and soup's battle of wills as such, and I'm labeling it as a TvT interaction in my own reads.
Soup, do you have a scumread right now? Is it still Kantrip?
I thought I got to that? Hold up.yeah and uhhh as far as a second one goes now that i townread you i have to replace it i also posted about my rake read if you could get to that too
That's a pretty dumb assumption considering I had no doubt or hesitance in my post at all, and my reads have stayed consistent regardless of their reception.Hmmm.
Did joker actually assert that he read Kantrip's reads as confident ? Because I didn't get that feel, if anything i thought Kantrip was floating out feeler reads to see how people reacted , and then backing them to try and solidify his opinion of their reaction to it.
Maybe I'll go look at joker's kantrip assertion later, for now; Musac and gaming.
/2 cents
Rake I kind of wanted you in my hotel room so you would try to read me. I'd appreciate if you did, it helps me read you too.
I wouldn't rule out the former. I don't like Rake so far, in thread or in our hotel room.
/quote]
What of the former of that argument made it see more appealing to you ? I.E : What malicious intent were you gleaning from me defending Soup sidelong ?
I like WATT. I don't think you have the right reasons for townreading them. You're certainly not making any analogies based on me multiposting despite the fact that this is way more clogging the thread than anything that slot has done.
FWIW, I read the quote right but I wanted to call you out anyway.
I don't think he's trying to appeal to towniness for malicious reasons, what I don't trust is his mechanical play in regards to the game having other features that go above and beyond mafia and the fact that his reaction to the first person to actually call someone scum was to get defensive. If Kantrip had no basis, I think he would've reacted differently.
Potassium said:I wouldn't rule out the former. I don't like Rake so far, in thread or in our hotel room.
And then Soup's two most recent posts sound 100% like a frustrated townie who put himself into a bad spot early. Gogdammit Soup.
I laughed at this.
Doubting read because of it, though. Blowing his scum play out of proportions like this doesn't make sense in his position as scum. Lashing out, yes. The ego? Not as much.
Literally nothing happened in ours. Koops and our slot were both really inactive so all we had was Ruy saying we were all sleeping in the same bed. Productivity, ho!
As for Rake, I've never fully experienced this slot in full. I tend to see it in hydras more than the actual player so if you're looking for a meta read I don't really have one. I don't like how he's dragging his heels on doing anything because he's said his part on soup, but outside of that, I need to see more from that slot before I can really make a definite stance on him.
Not anymore solid than what I said. I would like for you to elaborate on his posturing and selectiveness. His snarkyness of request (or lazyness to me) is null because he has done that before as either alignment. In the previous newbie he did it but did come in and do some work. He has done it in BIM due to low motivation and just not being able to answer questions legitimately. It's also possible that Kantrip has been 'disliking' Rake due to Rake's strong reaction to Kantrip's push towards you. At first glance it seems odd because of the blegh blegh but once I understood it and understood that Kanty's stance didn't really hold any water, I could see where Rake was coming from and can see it as possible for Kantry being opportunistic. Yet it remains to be seen until he explains his stance.
All I can really say until he comes in and does more stuff.
His posturing feeling I get is that Kantrip is trying to play for himself. I understand that Meta is not something I can fully rely on but when I think of TownTrip I think of someone who is more concerned with finding scum then wasting their time playing armchair. He either got a shot of Ego somewhere or he doesn't really have anything else to say. The thing that bothers me most about Kantrip is that he's far too certain of himself. I read him like he doesn't feel pressured to be correct, and he's throwing out goddamn reads like it's candy. How he town-reads Picture Perfect because Washed posted a couple of pretty pictures and got upset at a few things is beyond me. How he scum-reads Rake on the basis of how he reads me, is well, beyond me. I really don't ****ing get the whole Rake scum thing because I can certainly tell you that the least he has done is try to decipher an alignment. Kantrip isn't deciphering things.
I went and looked back at what Kantrip said wrt me, because it initially got me going. There is an inconsistent mindset.
I feel like he just goes on about his original point here but he doesn't really decipher as to why my play is somehow scummy. It's suddenly a scum-tell because I'm trying to fake towniness by being pro-town? That's the message I got from this, and it doesn't make a damn near lick of sense because he's snowballing like two or three statements I made earlygame into one big argument. It's like Kantrip hasn't even ****ing read the game nor does he give a **** because do you remember when Kantrip couldn't even define his read on Rake? And he had to say he needed to do some digging for it? That's a load of **** because I can certainly tell you this game isn't long enough to forget what your ****ing scum-read is for. This is the second initial thing I dislike. As far as selective goes it's obvious if you just look at his posts.
Here's my problem. You are parroting J's stance on me, after I have explained to him why it was a bad stance. Yet you still say it's partially tied to what he said. You really aren't trying to read me. Your reasoning for Rake isn't going to fly. You are half-assing your stances even now, and I don't see how me defending Soup is a problem when your original stance is weak, which you won't even back up.
Yeah you're scum. This post is terrible, I said you were scum before J, I said I will expand more tomorrow, and you are jumping at my throat.
I am half-assing because I HAVEN'T LAID THEM OUT YET
at this post
I like Soup and Rake.
Unbye
Wasting the tourney cop's time / making him or her focus on other player's beyond you maliciously. Scum still needs to stretch on scum-reads, avoiding being caught directly helps them win.Rake, what motivation in this setup would I have for "trying to make something stick" as scum? There's no daily lynch, I don't think scum's going to be too focused on reaching for scumreads.
Question, am I allowed to say what my optional goals are?
You're putting too much damn concern on being right. It's almost the same ****ing thing that we called soup out on early, or at least the same mentality. I don't understand why--you gain nothing from continually sitting in the shadows and I don't know why you aren't pressuring your reads. ****ty gambits seem ultimately worthless here.
I want you to actually play this game. I want you to participate in conversations rather than being here just to say you're doing nothing without me yanking every tooth out of your jaw first. If you want me to be your dentist, you pay for that ****.
Disregarded, just as quickly as Super Fab's PJB read. I don't see the improvement myself.
Did you miss the rant?
Cool.
I'm pretty sure that character moves/colors aren't gonna be public knowledge post match, and I', not entirely sure aspectatiing person will get all the information that a participant will.I would argue that getting the bye might actually net you more information. We don't know what information is gonna end up being public when the matches are said and done, so it might turn out that being a spectator who gets to see whatever they want could be a huge bonus.