SomewhatMystia
Smash Lord
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2013
- Messages
- 1,194
- Location
- Columbus, Ohio
- NNID
- SomewhatMystia
- 3DS FC
- 2750-1555-1721
He looks unexpectedly handsome for a giant, bulgy-eyed lizard.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I believe DK64 can't be rerealeased because of the Rare game "Jetpack" appearing in it.DKC, DKC2, DKC3, the GBA versions, DKL, DKL2, DKL3 and DK64.
They should just release them all on the eShop after K. Rool's reveal.
I think the Corocoro website clarified today that only announced characters would be in the new issue.So! Today I send my build of my K. Rool mod to my video guy. Tomorrow a demo gets released on Kitty Corp.
If CoroCoro reveals the WHOLE roster (maybe not though), I expect some green and vicious teeth.
...I believe DK64 can't be rerealeased because of the Rare game "Jetpack" appearing in it.
I think DK64 may very likely get a remake for handhelds....
...
...
I just hated that buyout because of stuff like this. DK64 is my most wanted n64 game but getting the system and games on ebay is very expensive. It's my most wanted because it's the first video game I've played and I just want to live nostalgia.
That and the fact I can't get all first 3 dkc games. CAN I JUST GET WHAT I'M MISSING?
Not even a demo or anything like seriously.
Do you have a source for this?I think the Corocoro website clarified today that only announced characters would be in the new issue.
You do realize that's EXACTLY what they did for Brawl, right? The whole thing was a misinterpretation/mistranslation. They are talking about what's already announced, they're an official magazine, not a leak magazine. The only time stuff gets "leaked" through CoroCoro is when the magazine itself gets leaked early. Basically, they're explaining how things work, not leaking the entire roster.Do you have a source for this?
Clearly, our King has a great sense of fashion. He was first dressed as royalty, a pirate, a scientist, and was almost even dressed as a pilot that one time.He looks unexpectedly handsome for a giant, bulgy-eyed lizard.
So K. Rool can't just use his other costumes abilities in his normal form? Seriously? Who the hell spews **** like this?Heh, this costume talk reminds me of a thread from GameFAQs this morning. The guy was basically arguing that, because transformations are gone, K. Rool couldn't possibly use anything from his costumes, and thus was no different from Bowser in his King form.
Looks like what you'd get if K. Rool was in Melee.Quick update, finished my King K. Rool character render!
Minor touchups, little darker, a more refined head, and better shadows
I...What? That's like saying Mega Man can't use any Robot Master weapons.Heh, this costume talk reminds me of a thread from GameFAQs this morning. The guy was basically arguing that, because transformations are gone, K. Rool couldn't possibly use anything from his costumes, and thus was no different from Bowser in his King form.
Zelda uses magic that she never used, Link used them. Robin is one of the closest portrayals to actual skills characters can use without delving into doing things that can be done through reclassing, and even then, Robin can still use Dark Magic.I...What? That's like saying Mega Man can't use any Robot Master weapons.
As far as I'm concerned, I think K. Rool should be the "good" heavyweight, the heavyweight who is a truly heavyweight character but is incredibly competent in his own right. He's heavy, but still decently fast. He also has plenty of super armor, so he can't get knocked around easily. His attacks would be a bit slow, but he can use a large variety of weapons and items from his past to trap foes. DK and Bowser have only been getting "less" heavy as time goes on, K. Rool can help to fix the notion that a heavyweight character can't be good.It's anti-heavyweight bias at its finest.
People would never, ever suggest that a newcomer candidate would be boring or shouldn't get in for "just being another middleweight like Mario."
Exactly. I definitely agree with this.As far as I'm concerned, I think K. Rool should be the "good" heavyweight, the heavyweight who is a truly heavyweight character but is incredibly competent in his own right. He's heavy, but still decently fast. He also has plenty of super armor, so he can't get knocked around easily. His attacks would be a bit slow, but he can use a large variety of weapons and items from his past to trap foes. DK and Bowser have only been getting "less" heavy as time goes on, K. Rool can help to fix the notion that a heavyweight character can't be good.
Well, again, though, Bowser and DK have been getting reductions in their heavy weight status TO make them good. Heavyweights are supposed to usually be "slow and powerful." Bowser and DK both have been much more faster as a whole, and not as heavy as in past games, at least from what I'm seeing.Exactly. I definitely agree with this.
Although I think Bowser and DK are currently working on that "heavyweight characters are never good" stereotype.
Well, that's one of the things I'd like to see K. Rool subvert then. If everyone's going to be the same there's not going to be much in the variety. True variety.Well, again, though, Bowser and DK have been getting reductions in their heavy weight status TO make them good. Heavyweights are supposed to usually be "slow and powerful." Bowser and DK both have been much more faster as a whole, and not as heavy as in past games, at least from what I'm seeing.
From the demo I played, Bowser and DK are just as heavy now as they were in the previous games. And while Bowser is definitely faster, it isn't like he's Sonic or Fox. I personally welcome the changes.Well, again, though, Bowser and DK have been getting reductions in their heavy weight status TO make them good. Heavyweights are supposed to usually be "slow and powerful." Bowser and DK both have been much more faster as a whole, and not as heavy as in past games, at least from what I'm seeing.
Eh, maybe I was wrong...From the demo I played, Bowser and DK are just as heavy now as they were in the previous games. And while Bowser is definitely faster, it isn't like he's Sonic or Fox. I personally welcome the changes.
Do you think it would look out of place for him to use his blunderbuss in his classic "king" costume?
Well, yeah, he would be. If Ridley is in, Ridley would be lighter because he's a flying character. He'd probably be a lot more floaty than heavy.K. Rool better be the heaviest character in the game..
I still think Bowser will be heavier than him. We'll see.K. Rool better be the heaviest character in the game..
Here's the thing, K. Rool's attacks would probably be quite slow. One idea someone else had is that K. Rool likes to show off. He could do flashier moves that are a bit slower in general, but he MOVES fast. So, he's heavy and a hard hitter, but he can run quite quickly. I think he'd probably be about half as fast as he was in DKC, with great jumping and recovery, despite being a heavyweight character. His attacks themselves are what will be slow, so you've got to time them right.One thing I'm wondering is whether he'll be fast or not because fast(he's surprisingly fast for someone with a massive gut)+heavy(lots of power) just doesn't work. I wonder how Sakurai would handle him though he'd undoubtedly be able to come up with something. It's K Rool
No, because his last appearance was 2008. That's hardly "retro." Saying K. Rool is irrelevant is stupid for the same reason, because the last time he appeared was around the same time Brawl came out anyway.Anyone think that K. Rool could technically qualify as a retro rep?
First, define "retro". What qualifies as someone being a "retro"?Anyone think that K. Rool could technically qualify as a retro rep?
I think generally when people refer to "Retro" Nintendo reps, they refer to characters that haven't appeared in a game for a long time. I'd say at LEAST 15 years, or perhaps 20. Lip hasn't been in a game for 19 years except for cameos. Another example, if a character appeared in Captain Rainbow and hasn't had their own game since, they're a retro rep (except perhaps Birdo, as Birdo has appeared quite often in Mario spinoffs...).First, define "retro". What qualifies as someone being a "retro"?
A character not used in their own series for good long while.First, define "retro". What qualifies as someone being a "retro"?
K. Rool has been absent for 6 years. That's hardly Retro. I'd say a character needs to be absent at least 15.A character not used in their own series for good long while.
Obviously Ice Climbers are still retro, despite being in Brawl.
I think generally when people refer to "Retro" Nintendo reps, they refer to characters that haven't appeared in a game for a long time. I'd say at LEAST 15 years, or perhaps 20. Lip hasn't been in a game for 19 years except for cameos. Another example, if a character appeared in Captain Rainbow and hasn't had their own game since, they're a retro rep (except perhaps Birdo, as Birdo has appeared quite often in Mario spinoffs...).
The reason why I asked is because what usually defined as "retro" seems to be nothing more than an arbitrary fanmade term that's hardly defined or agreed upon.A character not used in their own series for good long while.
Obviously Ice Climbers are still retro, despite being in Brawl.