GOofyGV
Smash Lord
IC's are just bad in doules which is why not many people use them.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
For doubles he would never play IC's, but he still plays IC's, MK, Marth for singles. He's definitely not as good as he was in 2010. In fact he's not even active right now. =/Well, Kakera essentially quit ICs because they are unviable in doubles and he doesn't want to focus on two tourney characters. I wouldn't be surprised if that's the way lain made the transition from IC to MK either. In fact, there's probably a whole bunch of people who made a switch to MK because of doubles.
Well if you think about it. And it's a factor imothere is no way that's the reason.
Yes it's a factor, but I believe doubles can't be the only reason why there aren't a lot of IC players.Well if you think about it. And it's a factor imo
Brood has always been an impressive/smart player. The match he had vs Kakera showed that he is extremely skilled. Maybe he was hurt so bad from losing to Vinnie that he studied the matchup more?how the hell did brood get 1st over 2 ICs? vinnie and 9b made nietoni/brood look so free at SRT in that matchup
TrueYes it's a factor, but I believe doubles can't be the only reason why there aren't a lot of IC players.
^^^^This, it's most likely the main reason, they do take a lot of practice to use at a high level even though they have the most potential. CGs are hard, been trying to learn them for months now. Can't say I practiced it everyday though, but the main reason why there are no ICs is the barrier of entry.IC's takes too much practice to use effectively at high levels of play.
But it IS a reason why theres a TON of Mk players.Yes it's a factor, but I believe doubles can't be the only reason why there aren't a lot of IC players.
Ironically, the counter ICs metagame has not advanced anywhere near as much as it could in comparison to the IC metagameI honestly think the IC metagame just hasn't advanced quite enough yet.
This is 100% incorrect.Yes they are. They are the only character that can go from A tier to E tier just by making a single mistake
Olimar is actually rather draining to be consistently good with. I didn't include Pikachu because he is still a wildcard and rather unexplored in the current metagame and ZSS isn't really good in general. I don't think Falco is particularly difficult to be good with - not more than the other characters are imo.i would take olimar off. falco, pikachu, and zss are all more "difficult to play consistently" imo
Your trolling isn't appreciated. If you have nothing better to do than to put down your [former] main then at least have the decency to do so without making fun of those 50% top level players who you think you know better than. Or, even better, take it to the tier list thread instead of derailing a good discussion with your constant complaining.Ironically, the counter ICs metagame has not advanced anywhere near as much as it could in comparison to the IC metagame
Watching a video, I can honestly chalk up about 99% of losses at mid level to ignorance of the character. At high level that's closer to 80%. At the top level, closer to 50%. The other 50% of losses coming from fear or greed at the top.
Yeah, Vex and some other brave souls play him too, but that's it.Even with the chain grab, he doesn't have much going for him.