It is reliable, however, in the fact that it opens a window into Hitler's mind while he was in imprisoned. You are trying to exaggerate and impose a view of unreliability by comparing a small book made a page at a time to thousands of newspapers made on everyday of the week except for Sundays that come off the. Hitler was one person, not a whole herd of people.
In other words, you did a bad job at an analogy.
No, I did a good job on my research, and you did a bad job on typing and understanding anything.
"Hitler was sent to Landsberg Castle in Munich to serve his prison sentence. While there he wrote Four Years of Struggle against Lies, Stupidity, and Cowardice. Hitler's publisher reduced it to My Struggle (Mein Kampf). The book is a mixture of autobiography, political ideas and an explanation of the techniques of propaganda. The autobiographical details in Mein Kampf are often inaccurate, and the main purpose of this part of the book appears to be to provide a positive image of Hitler. For example, when Hitler was living a life of leisure in Vienna he claims he was working hard as a labourer. "
from
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/GERnazi.htm
I said he wrote lies cause he did. Now stop being a **** and accept it. I'm not trying to fool anybody, Im telling the truth, and you're being a f@g.
Point in bold is true, but to say that Hitler wasn't motivated by something other than a concept created by the human mind is ludicrous. Nobody except the truly insane have no real reason to do things. We can only call the actions of Hitler words like "insane" and "lunatic". Just because a person kills someone doesn't mean they are unsound of mind. It has been proven in courts with insanity tests, alot of killers of which had failed the insanity test.
It is possible for human beings to kill people, and still be sound of mind, because they came to conclusions molded by external and internal information (Environmental interaction with people and situations, and personal morals) which lead to the death of a person or persons. The need for money is a perfect example.
I even defended the Columbine Shooters to an extent. Here is why.
While I recognize what they did is wrong, and conflicts with my sense of morality, it is entirely possible for the shooters to have been completely sane, and enacted upon conclusions they reached through rational thought.
Also, to put an even bigger nail into the proverbial coffin for this part of your statement, I present to you the Merriam Webster definition of the word Insane, and I quote.
That is not to say however, that he could not have been insane by the time he committed suicide.
I don't even think he was insane, just really smart and pissed off.
So your whole poorly worded, badly organized, and fallacious wall of text is null and void.
So you deny the existence of Auschwitz and deny the fact he oppressed the Jewish people, as well as committed terrible things upon them? Okay.
No, you're good at really bad misreadings aren't you?
Hitler didn't kill people, he had several armies and police forces to do it for him. You can't even say that people like adolf eichmann killed people, they just organized the thing.
So you imply the anyone who does not acknowledge, or decides out of personal choice to deny the existence of evil to be insane? Need I quote Webster again?
Unfortunately for you, his post goes deeper than that. You are simply being ignorant of that fact. This is a person's objective view of Hitler as opposed to the image of him people are indoctrinated with in our history textbooks, which are terribly biased, and thusly, extremely flawed informations sources, and it is all because of the fallacy known as "political correctness". His post goes through different rationalizations in order to see Hitler in a different way from everyone else.
So he has a different opinion or view of someone you disdain because of his history. Deal with it.
Not insane, just stupid.
Gosh you're frustrating. Learn to read.
Indoctrinated... stupid kid, you can be one of those ******** deconstructionist people all you want, but you still believe in something. You trust your senses of reason, even though you have no proof that they are real: I guess you've been indoctrinated into that terrible dogma, poor soul that you are.
Everything is biased, get over it. I'm not spewing out of any textbook I read... anything that you learned was from something else, so are you calling yourself indoctrinated? No, you must be somehow free from this terrible injustice that tries to control people and enslave them.
Liberal dumb*** that you are, you are right that history is written by winners. But it doesn't matter, because when Nazi's say that the holocaust never happened, they aren't some poor group fighting against the biased history of the winners. There liars. The camps are there, there are bodies, videos, and photos, and thousands of terrible stories.
Kid, use your head: you should be smart enough to be able to read a biased source and not ***** about it, but still pull the facts out of it. I guess I'm just a lot smarter than you.
You know these things called opinions? Surprisingly they can be wrong. If it's my opinion that world peace could be achieved by killing all chinese people, it's my opinion, but it's also a wrong opinion.
Moral of the story is: you can't read or understand so go die.
That is his choice, and he is free to that choice, as well as being able to express it.
Why do people reject some of the things they have been indoctrinated by? They want to be individuals, they want to think differently than others do, they want fork away from the crowd and find their own opinion, which comes from a mash of things they gather from the varied opinions of others.
Who has more knowledge and experience in this world? I perhaps venture a guess that you fancy yourself as such a person, when in all likelihood, you are just like he is, but you are objecting to something he thinks about that you disagree with him on, and are attempting to change his view.
I'm not censoring him, I'm just calling him wrong, which I can do. If you say I can't you're doing the same thing to me. I don't have a problem with expression, that's why I should be able to say how ridiculous his and your viewpoints are.
You use this word indoctrination like I've become a slave of some school of thought. I think I've already told you that you sound like a liberal nutjob who has no sense of reason and feels his way through life, but I'll do it again. You're telling me I'm indoctrinated: you have no evidence or any indication, other than I believe the majority opinion in the West about hitler (read: he was
bad). It's not indoctrination, it's called using my head.
I don't really care if I change his view. It was actually thought provoking and interesting. But hopefully undecided people won't just read it and jump on, because they wouldn't have really thought about it as much as he did. That's another issue, I'll explain when you're older.
Your counter to his post is backed up by nothing but your personal morality, and what you have been taught in schools, plus a part of history you choose to think did not, or does not exist. You have not succeeded.
He isn't making excuses for Hitler, that is just how you wish to perceive it because you believe his post is a "evil does not exist" argument, and refuse to see it as anything other than that.
My personal morality was not taught to me by my parents or by any other things. It's a combination of many authors, many views, and my own senses of life. And its still developing every day.
If I got taught that hitler started a war cause of hid lust for power in school, how is that not desirable?
How do you learn anything? Books, internet, teachers, or you experience it. Ok.... what is your point? If I learned history in school or read it in a book, what are you strung up about? Do you hate learning or something? I wouldn't be surprised.
It's not just an evil does not exist argument. Papers can be more than one thing, young grasshopper. And I don't even think it was an evil DNE argument now that I read it again.
You didn't understand or read anything that I posted. Good job n00b, you look and sound like a complete tool who can't use his head and assumes and feels
everything he says. Try harder next time.
